The announcement was confirmed by the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, following high-level consultations with the presidency and industry stakeholders.

Debt Relief to Ease Airline Financial Strain

Under the new directive, domestic airlines will receive a 30% reduction on outstanding debts owed to aviation agencies, including charges linked to airport operations, navigation services and regulatory fees.

Officials say the move is designed to provide immediate financial breathing space for carriers that have been grappling with severe liquidity challenges, largely driven by surging operational costs and fuel price volatility.

According to government sources, the relief applies to debts owed to key aviation bodies such as the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), the Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA), and the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA).

Aviation authorities described the decision as part of broader efforts to prevent disruptions in domestic flight operations and stabilise airline finances.

Fuel Price Talks Ordered Within 72 Hours

Alongside the debt relief, President Tinubu has ordered urgent negotiations within 72 hours between airline operators, fuel marketers and regulatory agencies to agree on a fair pricing framework for jet fuel (Jet A1).

The directive follows weeks of tension in the aviation sector over sharply rising fuel costs, which have significantly increased operating expenses for airlines and raised concerns over possible flight disruptions.

Industry stakeholders had previously warned that continued fuel price increases could lead to widespread operational shutdowns or fare hikes, placing additional pressure on passengers and the wider economy.

Aviation Sector Under Pressure

Nigeria’s aviation industry has been facing mounting challenges, with airlines reporting steep increases in jet fuel prices in recent months. The rising costs have forced carriers to review schedules, delay expansion plans and seek government intervention.

Officials say the government’s latest measures aim to prevent a broader collapse of services and restore stability to a sector considered critical for domestic connectivity and economic activity.

Government Push for Stability

The Tinubu administration has positioned the intervention as part of ongoing economic reforms intended to balance market realities with industry sustainability. Authorities say the goal is to ensure airlines remain operational while addressing structural inefficiencies in pricing and taxation.

Government representatives are expected to meet airline operators and fuel suppliers in Abuja in the coming days as part of the emergency talks.

Outlook

While the 30% debt relief is expected to provide immediate short-term relief, analysts say the outcome of the fuel pricing negotiations will be crucial in determining the long-term stability of Nigeria’s aviation sector.

The coming days are likely to be decisive as stakeholders attempt to reach a consensus that could prevent further disruptions in air travel across the country.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Flights to UAE Resume

The airline confirmed that daily flights to Dubai and Sharjah have resumed, reconnecting Qatar with two of the UAE’s busiest travel hubs. The move is expected to boost regional travel, business connectivity, and tourism flows between the Gulf states.

Route to Reopen

Flights to Damascus are scheduled to restart on May 1, marking Qatar Airways’ return to Syria after a prolonged suspension. The route is seen as a significant step in restoring air links to the country following years of disruption.

Airspace Reopening Signals Stability

The airline said the decision follows the reopening of Qatari airspace and a broader easing of regional tensions, allowing carriers to gradually rebuild flight networks affected by recent conflict.

Aviation analysts note that the resumption of these routes reflects improving stability in key parts of the Middle East and could encourage other international airlines to restore suspended services.

Rebuilding Regional Connectivity

The return of flights is expected to:

• Strengthen economic and trade links across the Gulf
• Support tourism recovery in the region
• Improve travel options for passengers affected by earlier disruptions

As regional conditions stabilize, airlines are likely to continue expanding operations and restoring connectivity across previously restricted air corridors.

The aircraft, a Lockheed C-130 Hercules operated by the Colombian Air Force, went down on Monday near the town of Puerto Leguízamo in Putumayo province, close to the borders with Peru and Ecuador.

Casualties and survivors

Officials said the plane was carrying approximately 128 people, including army personnel, air force crew and police officers. Of those on board, 66 have been confirmed dead, while dozens more were injured. At least four individuals remain unaccounted for as search and rescue operations continue.

More than 50 survivors have been rescued, many with serious injuries. Victims were transported to nearby hospitals, with some later airlifted to larger medical facilities in Bogotá due to the severity of their condition.

Crash details

The military aircraft crashed moments after taking off from Caucayá Airport en route to Puerto Asís, a short domestic flight.

Preliminary reports suggest the plane may have failed to gain proper altitude, possibly striking the end of the runway before clipping a tree and crashing into dense jungle terrain roughly one to two kilometers from the airport.

The impact triggered a fire at the crash site, and explosions were reported shortly afterward, likely caused by ammunition onboard detonating following the crash.

Authorities have said there is no evidence of an external attack, and the cause of the crash remains under investigation.

Rescue efforts hampered by terrain

Emergency response efforts have been complicated by the remote location and difficult jungle terrain. Local residents were among the first to reach the crash site and assisted in rescuing survivors before official teams arrived.

Military units and emergency services later deployed aircraft and additional personnel to evacuate the injured and support ongoing recovery operations.

Government response and criticism

Colombian President Gustavo Petro described the incident as a national tragedy and called for a full investigation into the cause of the crash.

The disaster has sparked political debate, with opposition figures raising concerns about aircraft maintenance and the condition of the country’s military fleet. Government officials have maintained that the aircraft was considered airworthy prior to takeoff.

One of the deadliest recent air disasters

The crash is among the deadliest aviation disasters in Colombia in recent years and is the deadliest reported so far in 2026.

Investigators are expected to examine flight data, maintenance records, and wreckage evidence in the coming days to determine what led to the حادث.

Ongoing search

Search teams continue to comb the crash site for the four missing individuals. Authorities warn that the death toll could still rise as recovery operations continue.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The incident occurred late Sunday night as an Air Canada Express regional flight arrived from Montreal, marking one of the most serious runway collisions in recent U.S. aviation history.

Deadly Runway Collision

According to officials and multiple media reports, the aircraft a Bombardier CRJ-900 operated by Jazz Aviation struck a Port Authority firefighting vehicle while landing on Runway 4.

The pilot and co-pilot were killed in the impact, while dozens of passengers and crew members sustained injuries of varying severity.

The fire truck, which was responding to a separate emergency at the time, was carrying police officers. At least two officers were injured, reportedly suffering broken limbs but remaining in stable condition.

Passengers and Survivors

The flight was carrying 72 passengers and four crew members, most of whom survived the crash.

Emergency responders rushed to the scene within minutes, evacuating passengers and transporting the injured to nearby hospitals. Some reports indicated that a flight attendant was violently thrown during the impact but survived.

Images from the scene showed severe damage to the aircraft’s nose, with debris scattered across the runway following the collision.

Airport Shutdown and Travel Disruptions

Authorities immediately suspended operations at LaGuardia Airport, issuing a ground stop and diverting incoming flights to nearby airports.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) indicated the airport would remain closed for several hours as emergency crews secured the area and investigators began their work.

The closure disrupted dozens of flights, compounding travel delays across the already congested New York airspace.

Investigation Underway

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has launched an investigation into the crash, working alongside the FAA to determine how the aircraft and emergency vehicle ended up on the same runway.

Preliminary information suggests the fire truck had clearance to operate on the runway while responding to another incident, though the exact sequence of events remains unclear.

Weather conditions, including rain reported in the area at the time, may also be examined as a contributing factor.

A Growing Aviation Safety Concern

The crash has raised renewed concerns about runway safety and coordination between aircraft and ground vehicles at major airports.

LaGuardia, which handles tens of millions of passengers annually, has experienced previous ground incidents, though fatal collisions of this nature remain rare.

Ongoing Developments

Authorities continue to assess the full extent of injuries and damage, while airlines and airport officials work to restore normal operations.

With investigations still in the early stages, officials have urged caution against speculation, emphasizing that a full review of air traffic control communications, aircraft data, and ground procedures will be critical in determining the cause.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Represented by the Federation of Indian Airlines (FIA) which includes carriers such as IndiGo, Air India and SpiceJet the industry wrote to the government on March 12 asking for an end to price controls first introduced in December 2025 following widespread cancellations.

Airlines facing rising costs amid crisis

The airfare caps, which set maximum one‑way fares at up to ₹18,000 ($192) depending on distance, were originally aimed at protecting travelers after operational disruptions. But the FIA said the limits are now constraining carriers’ ability to respond to surging operational costs triggered by the geopolitical crisis in West Asia.

The ongoing conflict around Iran has disrupted key air routes and led to sharp increases in jet fuel costs, as airlines must avoid restricted or hazardous airspace and reroute flights over longer distances. Combined with continued bans on using neighbouring Pakistani airspace, these conditions are placing further strain on profits.

In its letter, the FIA warned that the combination of fare caps and elevated fuel bills may render some operators financially unsustainable unless the government intervenes.

Operational hurdles and longer flights

India’s aviation sector has been under pressure since regional tensions intensified, with airlines forced to reroute flights to Europe, North America and the Middle East to avoid conflict‑affected zones. These detours have lengthened journey times and pushed fuel consumption higher a significant cost at a time when global oil markets remain volatile.

To mitigate some of this impact, carriers including Akasa Air, IndiGo and Air India have already introduced fuel surcharges on both domestic and international tickets in recent weeks, passing a portion of the increased expense on to travelers.

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has also temporarily eased certain operational rules, such as pilot duty limits for long‑haul flights, to help sustain service levels despite longer routing and restricted airspace.

Financial risk and government response

Industry officials say the combined effect of increased operating costs and capped ticket prices could force some carriers to withdraw from certain routes or delay planned network and fleet expansions.

So far, neither the airlines nor the government has publicly commented on the request. Analysts indicate the situation puts New Delhi in a difficult position: removing fare caps could ease financial pressure on airlines but risks higher ticket prices for passengers already feeling the pinch of surcharges.

Broader industry implications

The challenges facing Indian carriers echo global industry concerns over the impact of Middle East tensions on aviation. Airline leaders in Europe have warned that prolonged conflict and rising fuel costs will lead to higher fares worldwide and could force structural changes across the sector.

As the Iran crisis shows no immediate signs of abating, India’s airlines already coping with the lingering effects of previous operational disruptions and high fuel prices are pushing for regulatory relief to help weather what could be a prolonged period of elevated costs and complex flight planning.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The project a critical component of East Africa’s regional transport ambitions had been halted near the Rift Valley town of Naivasha, leaving the railway hundreds of kilometres short of its intended destination at the Ugandan border.

A Project Stalled by Funding Shifts

The SGR, one of Africa’s most ambitious rail projects, was initially financed under China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The first phase linking Mombasa to Nairobi was completed in 2017, followed by an extension to Naivasha in 2019.

However, construction came to a halt soon after as Beijing began scaling back large infrastructure lending to African nations amid growing concerns about debt sustainability.

The stalled railway became emblematic of broader debates around China’s role in Africa’s infrastructure boom with critics raising concerns over debt exposure, while China has consistently rejected claims of “debt-trap diplomacy.”

New Financing Model Signals Strategic Shift

To revive the project, Kenya has adopted an innovative financing approach based on revenue securitisation, reducing reliance on external borrowing.

Under new legislation, the government will channel proceeds from a railway development levy on cargo transported via the existing SGR line, estimated at about 35 billion Kenyan shillings ($270 million), to fund the next phase of construction.

This approach reflects the government’s constrained fiscal position. With rising debt servicing costs and limited room for additional borrowing, authorities have turned to domestic revenue streams to finance key infrastructure.

The move also follows public resistance to tax hikes, including widespread protests in 2024, which forced policymakers to explore alternative funding mechanisms.

China’s Role Evolves, Not Ends

While Chinese financing has diminished, China remains involved in the project as a contractor, with the state-owned China Road and Bridge Corporation continuing its role in construction.

Analysts say this reflects a broader shift in China-Africa relations away from large sovereign loans toward investment-driven partnerships. At a 2024 Beijing summit, China pledged $50 billion in credit and investment to Africa over three years, signalling a recalibrated approach to infrastructure cooperation.

Strategic Importance for Kenya and the Region

The railway extension is central to Kenya’s long-term economic vision. Once completed, the SGR is expected to link Kenya to Uganda and potentially extend further into Rwanda, South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo, forming part of a wider East African transport corridor.

The project aims to:

• Reduce transport costs for goods moving inland from the Port of Mombasa
• Boost regional trade and integration
• Improve logistics efficiency for landlocked neighbouring countries

The railway is designed to replace older, less efficient metre-gauge systems and serve as a backbone for regional commerce.

Economic and Political Implications

The revival comes at a critical time for Kenya’s economy. Public debt remains high, and infrastructure investments have faced increasing scrutiny over cost, transparency, and returns.

By shifting to a self-financing model, the government is attempting to strike a balance between continuing development and maintaining fiscal discipline. However, questions remain about whether the levy-based funding approach will generate sufficient capital to complete the full extension, which could cost billions of dollars.

Launch and Outlook

President William Ruto is expected to formally launch the renewed construction phase in Naivasha, underscoring the political and economic significance of the project.

Analysts say the success of the revived railway will depend on consistent funding flows, regional cooperation, and sustained political commitment. If completed, the line could transform East Africa’s trade landscape but if delays persist, it risks becoming another costly infrastructure project struggling to deliver on its promise.

A Broader Shift in African Infrastructure Financing

Kenya’s decision to revive the SGR without heavy reliance on Chinese loans may signal a turning point for infrastructure development across Africa. Governments are increasingly exploring hybrid financing models that combine domestic revenue, private investment and strategic partnerships.

As construction resumes, the project stands not only as a test of Kenya’s economic resilience but also as a case study in how African nations are redefining development in a post-debt-boom era.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Strait of Hormuz a narrow maritime chokepoint linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea is one of the world’s most important shipping lanes. Normally, around one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments transit through it, making its security and accessibility central to global energy markets.

Proposal Aims to Monetise Iran’s Strategic Control

According to the Iranian Students’ News Agency, the Iranian parliament is reviewing a draft bill that would require foreign countries whose vessels use the strait for shipping, energy transit and food supplies to pay tolls and taxes to Iran. Proponents of the measure argue it reflects Iran’s growing ability to exert control over the passage following disruptions tied to the ongoing conflict involving Tehran.

An adviser to Iran’s supreme leader has hinted at the broader intent behind such measures, stating that a “new regime for the Strait of Hormuz” could be implemented after the eventual end of the war, granting Tehran greater authority to impose maritime restrictions and financial obligations on states that have sanctioned it.

Shipping Through Hormuz Has Already Been Disrupted

The backdrop to this proposal is a dramatic reduction in maritime traffic through the strait amid escalating conflict between Iran on one side and the United States and Israel on the other. Recent data suggests that in the opening weeks of the crisis, shipping transits plunged sharply, with only a small fraction of typical annual traffic managing to navigate the waterway.

The disruption has contributed to spikes in global oil prices with Brent crude climbing above $100 per barrel and forced many carriers to delay or reroute vessels away from the Gulf. Countries and maritime organisations are increasingly alarmed by the effect on global supply chains, particularly for energy and bulk goods.

Controversy and Global Impact

International shipping firms, insurers and governments already grapple with rising risk premiums and war‑risk surcharges for voyages in the region. The introduction of formal transit fees could compound those costs, pushing up freight rates, impacting energy prices, and forcing consumers and countries to absorb higher transportation expenses at a time of already strained global supply chains.

Analysts warn that such a move if enacted could have profound implications for free navigation and maritime law. Under international law, straits used for international navigation are generally subject to the right of transit passage, which ensures freedom of navigation. However, Iran’s unique political posture and current wartime assertions over the strait complicate this framework.

Geopolitical Ripple Effects

The potential toll proposal arrives as diplomatic and security tensions escalate around the strait. The United States and its allies have repeatedly emphasised the need to ensure open sea lanes. Washington has urged partner navies to ensure safe commercial passage, though allied naval support remains fragmented.

Simultaneously, proposals from other nations to establish safe maritime corridors to assist tens of thousands of seafarers stranded by halted traffic indicate international concern over the ongoing disruption.

Tehran’s Strategic Calculus

Iran’s approach reflects a potentially new phase in its strategic use of influence over the strait. Beyond military posturing, Tehran appears to be seeking not just tactical leverage but also economic compensation for the heightened risks and political power it wields over one of the globe’s most important trade arteries. Such a shift could set a precedent for how critical sea lanes are managed amid geopolitical conflicts, raising questions about long‑term security, international navigation rights and economic stability.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Industry executives and airline associations addressed policymakers during a high‑profile gathering in Brussels, arguing that the proposed rules part of the EU’s broader climate strategy to decarbonise aviation are premature given market realities.

What the Mandate Requires

Under the EU ReFuelEU Aviation regulation adopted in recent years, airlines and fuel suppliers operating within EU territory face a series of escalating sustainable aviation fuel targets. These include:

• A general sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) blending requirement beginning in 2025, ramping up to 6% by 2030.
• A sub‑mandate requiring at least 1.2% of jet fuel to come from synthetic sources (eSAF) from 2030, increasing sharply toward mid‑century targets.

These policies aim to significantly reduce carbon emissions from aircraft one of the hardest‑to‑decarbonise segments of the transport sector but they rely on the rapid scale‑up of new synthetic fuel production.

Airlines Say Supply Isn’t Ready

Airline leaders argue that the supply of eSAF is far too limited and prohibitively expensive to meet the 2030 targets, raising concerns over compliance feasibility. According to industry sources, production capacity for synthetic jet fuel remains embryonic, with only a fraction of the volumes needed expected to be available by the end of the decade.

EasyJet’s chief executive, speaking at an industry event, emphasised that the industry cannot meet the mandate until sufficient eSAF volumes are commercially available, and urged regulators to rethink the timeline.

Broader Cost and Market Pressures

The demand for a suspension comes amid broader economic pressures on carriers. Soaring jet fuel prices influenced by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have already strained airline finances and forced some carriers to raise ticket prices or reduce capacity.

European airlines also argue that the advanced eSAF requirements could put them at a competitive disadvantage relative to carriers in other regions where similar green fuel rules are less stringent or delayed.

Industry Response and Next Steps

Association groups representing airlines, including Airlines for Europe (A4E) which counts carriers like Lufthansa, Air France‑KLM and Ryanair among its members are preparing a formal submission to EU regulators outlining their concerns. The proposals include calls for:

• Postponing the 2030 eSAF sub‑mandate, or
• Revising the schedule and enforcement mechanisms to reflect actual market readiness.

EU’s Climate Ambitions

EU regulators have so far defended their climate policy framework, saying the synthetic fuel targets are essential to achieving the bloc’s 2030 and 2050 climate goals. Sustainable aviation fuels, including eSAF and bio‑derived SAF, are considered a critical transitional tool until zero‑emission aircraft technologies mature.

Officials have previously acknowledged the supply challenges but maintain that clear, predictable regulatory signals are necessary to spur investment in production capacity.

Industry at a Crossroads

The unfolding debate highlights the tension between environmental ambition and economic practicality within the aviation sector. Airlines insist that without a workable supply infrastructure and financial support mechanisms, stringent fuel mandates may have unintended consequences from higher fares to reduced connectivity before a sustainable fuel market is truly established.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Expanded Services to Meet Travel Demand

Norwegian Air said on Wednesday that it would deploy additional flights across its Nordic network, targeting popular domestic and regional routes that experienced disruptions due to SAS’s cuts. The airline’s decision aims to provide alternatives for passengers affected by cancellations and to capture growing demand from travelers still seeking air travel despite broader industry pressures.

The added services will run during the peak spring travel period traditionally a busy time for Nordic air travel helping bridge capacity gaps left by SAS. Norwegian’s expanded schedule reflects its ability to scale operations quickly in response to market changes and traveler needs.

Context: SAS Cancellations and Fuel Price Surge

SAS announced earlier this week that it would cancel a large portion of its flights this spring, primarily due to surging jet fuel prices. The spike in fuel costs has been traced to disruptions in oil and energy markets related to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, which have pushed prices dramatically higher, squeezing airline profit margins and forcing operational cutbacks.

Industry sources indicate that SAS’s cancellations have affected short‑haul and regional services throughout Scandinavia, prompting concern among passengers and travel agencies over connections and onward itineraries. While the Danish‑based airline has sought to consolidate capacity, Norwegian Air’s announcement offers some relief to travelers seeking alternatives within the Nordic market.

Strategic Opportunity for Norwegian Air

The added flights come at a time when Norwegian Air has been strengthening its regional footprint. According to its latest operational reviews, the airline is expanding its route network and adjusting capacity to align with both demand and competitive opportunities. Norwegian’s network already spans dozens of destinations across Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland, and the carrier has been investing in fleet and service enhancements to solidify its position in the Nordic low‑cost market.

Industry analysts say the extra flights may not only help passengers disrupted by SAS cuts but could also boost Norwegian’s market share in a key segment of European air travel especially for short‑ and medium‑haul routes where flexibility and price competitiveness are crucial.

Impact on Passengers and the Travel Market

For travelers, the expansion offers more booking options during a period of heightened uncertainty. Passengers whose itineraries have been affected by SAS cancellations are being encouraged to contact Norwegian or travel agents to secure seats on the newly added flights. Air travel demand in the Nordics remains resilient, with many travelers willing to adjust plans to maintain schedules during the spring holiday season.

SAS has not yet provided a public timetable for resuming all previously scheduled flights or announced long‑term adjustments to its network in response to fuel price volatility. Aviation experts note that continued price instability in global fuel markets could keep capacity and scheduling under pressure for some time.

What Travelers Should Know

• Norwegian’s 120 extra flights are scheduled from March 25 to April 12, 2026.
• These flights will mainly serve major Nordic hubs and frequently traveled regional routes.
• Passengers affected by SAS cancellations should check availability with airlines or booking platforms for updated options.
• High fuel prices remain a key challenge for the industry and could influence future scheduling decisions.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Authorities said the incident occurred around 4 a.m. local time, when a drone struck a fuel tank in the vicinity of the airport, igniting a large fire and prompting emergency services to respond. The blaze was later brought under control, allowing limited operations to restart.

Officials confirmed that no injuries were reported, though the incident caused significant disruptions to flights and passenger movement throughout the morning.

Flights Gradually Resuming

Dubai airport authorities announced that flight operations would resume on a limited schedule, urging passengers to check with airlines for updated travel information before heading to the airport.

Dubai-based carrier Emirates said it would begin operating limited services starting at around 10 a.m. local time, though some flights scheduled for the day were cancelled or delayed due to earlier disruptions.

Several flights were temporarily diverted to Al Maktoum International Airport while emergency teams worked to secure the affected area and restore airport operations.

Passengers were advised to monitor airline announcements and airport updates as schedules continued to change throughout the day.

Part of Escalating Regional Conflict

The drone strike is the latest incident linked to escalating tensions in the Middle East, following weeks of military confrontation involving Iran and its regional adversaries.

Since late February, Iranian forces have launched hundreds of missiles and drones targeting Gulf states, including the United Arab Emirates, citing their support for U.S. and Israeli military operations against Iran.

The attack on Dubai airport marked one of the most significant strikes on civilian infrastructure in the UAE since the conflict began, highlighting the widening regional impact of the war.

Major Global Aviation Hub Disrupted

Dubai International Airport is one of the world’s busiest international travel hubs, handling more than 95 million passengers in 2025 and serving as a key transit point connecting Europe, Asia and Africa.

Even brief disruptions at the airport can have global ripple effects on airline schedules, cargo shipments, and tourism as many long-haul flights rely on Dubai as a major connecting hub.

Travel analysts say the latest attack could also push airlines to reroute or delay flights across parts of the Gulf region as security risks increase.

Heightened Security Measures

Following the incident, UAE authorities tightened security around key infrastructure, including airports, ports and oil facilities.

Roads near the airport were temporarily closed while emergency crews worked to contain the fire and ensure the safety of passengers and airport staff.

Officials said investigations into the drone strike are ongoing, and further updates will be released as authorities assess the extent of the damage.

Uncertain Outlook for Regional Travel

The drone attack comes amid a wave of missile and drone strikes across the Gulf, which have disrupted airspace and forced airlines to cancel or reroute flights throughout the region.

While Dubai airport has resumed limited operations, aviation experts warn that continued military escalation could lead to further travel disruptions across the Middle East in the coming days.

For now, authorities say airport operations are stabilizing, but passengers are urged to remain alert to sudden schedule changes as the regional security situation evolves.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________