The authorities are actively constructing a digital prison

Big Tech insiders are now exposing the alarming plan to confine humanity within smart cities, essentially creating a high-tech prison under the guise of security, convenience, and sustainability. Aman Jabbi, a whistleblower, reveals that our personal devices and smart appliances are constantly monitoring our every move, tracking our daily activities. As we step out of our homes, our cars are being tracked, and our smartphones, smartwatches, and other devices are being surveilled as we walk down the street. This pervasive surveillance allows for 24/7 data collection on every individual, effectively creating a digital prison. The concept of smart cities, which encompasses the idea of 15-minute cities, is designed to restrict our mobility and limit our access to resources like water, energy, and transportation. Moreover, initiatives like air monitoring, water management, and noise pollution are being used to ration our resources, limit our movement, and even surveil our speech. The notion of geofencing is also being employed, creating an invisible fence that restricts our movement and controls our access to digital currency, all tied to our face recognition, digital identity, and access control. In essence, our world has been transformed into a digital panopticon, where our every move is being watched, tracked, and controlled. The authorities are actively constructing a digital prison, and it’s imperative that we’re aware of the looming threat to our freedom and autonomy.

Surveillance capitalism erodes individual autonomy

Surveillance capitalists are actively manipulating users, stripping them of their autonomy by utilizing algorithms that predict and shape their behaviour, posing a significant threat to the very foundations of democracy. By concentrating power in their own hands, these surveillance capitalists are undermining democratic processes, leveraging their influence to mold public opinion and dictate policy. Furthermore, the unchecked wealth generated by surveillance capitalism is exacerbating economic inequality, as the corporations that own and control the data and algorithms are raking in profits, while users are being exploited as nothing more than free commodities, fuelling a system that perpetuates economic disparity.

Covid was meant to normalise biometric surveillance

But it even goes beyond that. Advisor to the WEF, Yuval Noah Harari admitted that Covid was critical because this is what convinces people to accept total biometric surveillance, which will enable the Stalins of the 21st century” to monitor and analyse the brains of all the population, all the time.

Understanding Smart Cities, 15-Minute Cities

In cities and towns across the word, our communities are being transformed by the implementation of so-called “smart” technologies said to create more efficient, safe, and sustainable environments. These smart cities use a range of devices such as cameras, sensors, and artificial intelligence to attempt central management of everything from traffic and public safety to environmental monitoring. Proponents of smart cities will sing songs about their efficiency. Traffic lights adjust in real-time to traffic conditions, reducing congestion and shortening commutes. Smart waste management systems notify city services when trash bins are full, optimizing collection routes and frequencies. Public safety could be enhanced by using networked cameras and environmental sensors that can detect crimes and so forth.

Moreover, the control and ownership of this data resides predominantly in the hands of corporations. This new era of surveillance isn’t just about privacy. It’s a profound shift in the power dynamics between the state and the individual. It tips the balance overwhelmingly in favour of the observer. In a society where everyone is watched, the watched are not free. This surveillance creates a chilling effect on behaviour, stifling dissent and discouraging participation in civil society. If you think about it, it’s a strange trade-off. We’re bartering away bits of our privacy for the convenience of not having to flip a light switch or remember where we parked the car. And the lessons from history are clear. Surveillance technologies, once introduced, are rarely rolled back. They tend to expand in scope and scale, often outstripping the original intentions behind their deployment. So we need to ask: Are we building a smarter world or just a more surveilled one?

The UN’s Diabolical Agenda for World Domination 

Under the United Nations’ plan for complete global control known as Agenda 21 (which Agenda 2030 is a mere milestone of), humans who once lived on farms and in rural areas are to be forcibly relocated into densely populated “smart” cities, known as “human settlements”. Watch this except from the documentary, ‘Unsustainable: The UN’s Agenda For World Domination’.

As we stand at the crossroads of technology and privacy, the choices we make today will define the legacy of our generation. It’s crucial that we strike a balance between leveraging technology for our own betterment and safeguarding the individual freedoms we hold so dear. The Documentary ‘The Agenda: Their Vision, Your Future’ by Oracle Films presents evidence that the global takeover is not only possible—it’s actually happening and has been decades in the making.”

Writtebn By Tatenda Belle Panashe

Los Angeles is a C40 city

But all this is valid because Los Angeles is a C40 city? A C40 City is a member of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, a global network of cities committed to addressing climate change. The common theme with these cities is that they will be wrecked by natural disasters such as floods, wildfires, hurricanes, tornados or any other event. Only then can they be built up again to be turned into open air prisons.

C40 Cities Organization and its “Green” Globalist Agenda

C40 Cities is a coalition of billionaires, non-government organizations (NGOs), foundations, banks, governments, and businesses collaborating on raising climate ambition, influencing the global agenda, building a movement and scaling up climate action. Approximately 100 cities around the world have climbed aboard the C40 Cities bandwagon, including numerous U.S. cities led mostly by left-leaning mayors. Prominent supporters include figures like Bloomberg, Clinton, and Soros. Michael Bloomberg serves as C40’s President. The rest of the board and steering committee includes a small number of international elites focused on limiting your choices about energy, living conditions, lifestyle, and food. They are eager to push their global agenda for total control.

C40 Cities is another dystopian manifestation of the green, globalist agenda

C40 Cities is another dystopian manifestation of the green, globalist agenda being forced upon the citizens of the world by a number of mostly non-elected entities. According to the C40 Cities website, their group is “a global network of nearly 100 mayors of the world’s leading cities who are united in action to confront the climate crisis” as they define it. Although the United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) are unelected, they have undue influence over the leaders of numerous nations. The C40 Cities plan is being championed by elected mayors of numerous major cities around the globe without affording their constituents an opportunity to vote on its implementation. A C40 Cities generated report titled “The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5*C World” claims that the world will be destroyed unless global temperature increases are limited to the arbitrarily determined 1.5 degrees Celsius, which is the equivalent of 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit.

Origins of C40 Cities and its Metastasis

The original concept behind C40 Cities is credited to Carlos Moreno, a professor at Sorbonne University in Paris. His “Digital and Sustainable City” concept was introduced in 2006, and was followed by several additional iterations before his “15-Minute City” concept was revealed in 2016. This concept is being touted for its supposed sustainability, and for the “convenience” and “timesaving” features it supposedly creates for citizens. In 2005, then-mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, introduced the C40 Cities concept and convened the leaders of 18 major cities around the globe to form an agreement to cooperatively reduce climate pollution. Not to be left out, a “me too” movement led to 22 additional mayors joining by 2006, hence the moniker C40 Cities. Among the 40 are 14 United States cities, including Austin, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Miami, New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Washington DC, Seattle, and Los Angeles. C40 Cities supporters celebrated President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which offered up $369 billion for projects just like theirs. The administration has openly admitted that it is “the most ambitious climate and conservation agenda in history.” How novel, the federal government is spending taxpayer-generated dollars to ultimately control the population in the name of climate change.

C40 Cities Makes Political Prisoners of Citizens

The C40 Cities agenda aligns completely with the goals of the UN and WEF and would essentially make political prisoners of the citizens living in the participating cities. The stated goals include controlling what citizens eat, where and when they travel, and even what they wear, all part of the crusade for combating climate change. C40’s numerous financial supporters include Google, the Clinton Foundation, the World Bank, Bloomberg Philanthropies, the German Federal Ministry, IKEA, Climateworks Foundation, FedEx, and George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Considering the “climate crisis” aspect of human-caused climate change is increasingly being challenged by science, facts, truth and logic, it is becoming obvious the entire climate change agenda is about controlling people. A C40 Cities September 2023 press release stated: “Global mayors lead the way to a fossil free future.” The problem is that the technology and infrastructure necessary to replace fossil fuels on a national, much less global, scale do not yet exist, and aren’t likely to exist for decades, if ever. Some central goals of C40 Cities include, Eliminating meat and dairy products as well as actively limiting individual diets to 2,500 calories per day; Banning private car ownership by 2030;  Regulating the frequency and distance of air travel by limiting people to one flight less than 1,500km (about 930 miles) every three years;  Restricting each citizen to only three new items of clothing purchased each year.

Control of populations in this way would very likely be implemented via social credit scores tied to central banking digital currencies (CBDC), in a system nearly identical to that of communist China. The U.S. Federal Reserve Bank is currently exploring such a system for possible implementation in America. It’s important to note that China also uses a system of approximately 600 million closed-circuit cameras, through which people can be identified by face and gait. Citizens’ ability to buy, sell, and travel can be limited this way, even when they are paying with cash.

The C40 Cities “Planetary Health Diet”

The C40 Cities website boasts that its cities “commit to sustainable food policies that will address the global climate emergency.” They arbitrarily claim that their “Planetary Health Diet” could save 11 million lives annually if adopted universally, which is a questionable claim at best. They claim that the “global food system is out of balance… [and that] more than 820 million people suffer from hunger, while many more eat too much and/or eat an unhealthy diet that contributes to premature death and rising healthcare costs.” C40 Cities doesn’t have a plan to reduce world hunger, yet it has a plan to entirely control what their “subjects” (serfs) are permitted to eat. C40’s Planetary Health Diet is based on two repeatedly debunked suppositions. First, food production is a major source of man-made climate change, and second, meat and dairy in personal diets are unhealthy. The C40 Cities website refers to “the over-consumption of meat, a major driver of greenhouse gas emissions.” However, a 2016 EPA report showed that ALL agriculture contributes only 9% of greenhouse gas globally, with the entirety of animal agriculture contributing only 3.9% to total emissions. C40 Cities has stated that reducing “consumption-based emissions will require significant behavioral changes,” but it is more discreet about the manner in which those changes might be made. The fact is that most people do not want to limit, much less give up, meat and dairy products in their diets. In fact, merely 1% of the global population identifies as vegan. Enter bioengineering into the equation.

The fact that mayors of C40 Cities did not put the measure to a vote illustrates the forced, insidious, nature of the overall “green” agenda. As the truth about what’s actually being planned comes to light, it’s obvious the well-being of mankind is not a consideration, no matter how pretty a picture is painted by C40 Cities talking points.

L.A Fires: The C40 Smart City Vision and Urban Transformation

There is a growing realization that California’s crises aren’t mere accidents of nature, they’re the inevitable result of the globalist green agenda racket. Under the banner of “climate justice,” government officials and influential elites have undermined effective forest management and poorly managed vital water resources. They allow their ideological beliefs to overshadow the urgent need to protect both the environment and the people who depend on it. This situation raises troubling questions about the true intentions behind these policies. It appears that the aim may not be to save California. Instead, there seems to be a plan to dismantle its core—turning the state into a hollow shell. This sacrifice seems to serve a broader agenda that values ideology over tangible results. As a result, the very forests that are essential to California’s ecosystem are left vulnerable, while the state’s residents suffer from misguided policies that prioritize political correctness over practical solutions.

C40 Cities are about Global Control

Los Angeles is among many cities whose leaders have joined the global C40 Cities initiative. This initiative serves as a cover for promoting the United Nations and global elites’ agenda to reshape urban areas, claiming to fight against the so-called “climate change” crisis. Disguised in grand language, this movement aims to tackle environmental problems while altering city life to fit a misguided vision. Remarkably, cities worldwide are signing up for this initiative, raising concerns about who is really making these choices and whether they truly serve the public interest. So, in these cities, they’re moving the people out to make way for those smart cities. This movement, involving cities from every corner of the globe, raises serious questions about the true motives behind such international collaborations, suggesting a broader agenda of control rather than genuine environmental concern. It’s not a conspiracy theory. There is a conspiracy.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe