Is Big Pharma silencing cancer breakthroughs?

Researchers are uncovering groundbreaking evidence that Big Pharma is deliberately ignoring. Dr. William Makis, a renowned radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, in a recent online interview revealed that ivermectin is apparently demonstrating profound anti-cancer properties. Studies are showing that the drug is capable of triggering a staggering 83% death rate in cancer cells, effectively shutting down the blood supply to tumours, and annihilating a significant 85% of cancer stem cells. In a remarkable documented case, an 11-year-old patient suffering from leukaemia experienced a dramatic 90% elimination of cancer cells in just one week while undergoing ivermectin treatment. Furthermore, ivermectin is amplifying the potency of chemotherapy drugs by up to 300%, and even reversing chemotherapy resistance, all while exhibiting minimal side effects. Meanwhile, Big Pharma continues to peddle expensive treatments costing upwards of $100,000 annually, while this safe and affordable alternative remains shrouded in secrecy – what’s driving this glaring disparity?

Researchers like Dr. Bryan Ardis are now uncovering that many tumours initially thought to be cancerous are actually parasitic in origin. This discovery explains why ivermectin, a anti-parasitic medication, has been remarkably effective in curing these tumours. As Dr. Ardis points out, “there are affordable and natural alternatives available to eliminate parasites from the human body, providing a much safer option compared to chemotherapy and radiation, which can be detrimental to the entire body and even put the patient’s life at risk.” By exploring these alternative treatments, medical professionals can potentially save countless lives and reduce the need for harsh and often ineffective cancer therapies.

Pharmaceutical giants are openly prioritizing profits over people, with a business model that relies on the notion that “a patient cured is a customer lost”. The harsh reality is that the pharmaceutical industry is deliberately designed to capitalize on disease, rather than eradicate it. By focusing on treatments that merely manage symptoms, rather than addressing the root cause of illnesses, the industry ensures a steady stream of revenue. Meanwhile, natural remedies and holistic approaches that could potentially cure diseases are being deliberately dismissed, discredited, or even outlawed, simply because they cannot be patented and exploited for financial gain. The ultimate objective of Big Pharma is not to restore your health, but to create a lifelong dependency on their products, a strategy that generates billions of dollars in profits each year.

Dr. Paul Marik: chemotherapy is essentially a massive scam

Dr. Paul Marik boldly state that chemotherapy is essentially a massive scam, asserting that it barely extends a patient’s life by a mere two to three months. He further emphasizes that for certain types of cancer, chemotherapy actually has a devastating effect, ultimately reducing the patient’s life expectancy. Marik vehemently argues that this so-called “treatment” is nothing more than a lucrative scheme concocted by Big Pharma, deliberately designed to exploit and profit from the suffering of countless individuals, all while masquerading as a legitimate medical solution.

As the 20th century gave way to the 21st, the field of oncology was rocked by a slew of corrupt clinical trials, marked by shoddy control groups, subpar post-trial care, and blatant crossover practices that lined corporate pockets while leaving patients high and dry. Cancer specialists were allegedly on the take, pocketing payments from these companies and peddling a narrative that put profits ahead of people. The sheer scale of corruption and decay that had taken hold of this system had become so entrenched that it was almost impossible to see its inherent toxicity. Historians will likely view this era as a bleak period in the history of medicine, one in which dubious medications were pushed on terminally ill patients, while governments taxed struggling citizens to subsidize these ineffective treatments. Meanwhile, doctors, in the pocket of corporate interests, were complicit in promoting these products, even as the United States careened towards bankruptcy due to the staggering costs of misguided, harmful, and useless care. We must confront the severity of this crisis head-on and acknowledge that awareness is the first step towards driving real change. The medical community has a profound obligation to put genuine healing and patient welfare above financial gain, and it’s crucial that we reexamine our approach to cancer treatment, demanding greater transparency and accountability from the individuals and corporations that wield significant influence over this industry. Ultimately, it’s only through a collective effort to reform this broken system that we can create a more just and equitable healthcare landscape, one that puts patient well-being above all else.

Family Court Enforces Child’s Chemotherapy Against Parents’ Wishes

Australian parents are being stripped of their fundamental rights, with the government wielding absolute control over their children’s lives. A recent Family Court ruling has left a family reeling, forcing them to subject their child to chemotherapy against their explicit wishes. The debate surrounding the merits of chemotherapy takes a backseat to the far more pressing issues of consent and medical autonomy. The fact that the system can override a parent’s decision regarding their child’s health, education, or even end-of-life care raises a disturbing question: do parents truly have ownership over their own children? This alarming trend is not an isolated incident, as state control continues to tighten its grip, while parental authority is gradually being eroded. It’s high time for parents to take a stand and reclaim their rights, as the very fabric of family autonomy hangs in the balance. The Australian government’s overreach into family matters is a stark reminder that the notion of parental rights is rapidly becoming an illusion, and it’s crucial that we acknowledge the severity of this issue and demand change.

Force Medical Intervention: the Parker Jensen Case

But this is not the first time such things would happen. Have you heard of the case of Parker Jensen? It’s a horrific story of where the government tried to force a 12-year-old boy to get chemo and radiation against the will of the parents, and even worse, he never even had cancer in the first place. But Parker had strong and determined parents who refused to accept the diagnosis and barbaric “treatment”, wanting to find a second opinion and talk to other doctors first. After they refused and before any bloodwork was done, the diagnosing doctors reported to the state that Parker had 2 weeks to live and needed chemo/radiation immediately, which led to a court order and then the parents refusing to honour it. They then charged his father with Kidnapping his own son because they fled the state to prevent them from taking their kid, and then eventually caught and arrested him in Idaho, but not the mother and son. Parker and his mom remained on the run for weeks, before eventually proving he had no cancer in the first place and a judge eventually dismissing the charges. This started Aug 20th, 2003, and the judge finally dismissed the charges on Oct 25th, 2003. The Jensen family sued the state and lost. No justice was delivered, and they could have killed Parker with the chemo on a false diagnosis. This is still happening to this day.

Forced chemotherapy on a 10-year-old Amish girl

Here is another example of forced chemotherapy on a 10-year-old Amish girl. Her name was Sarah, and she got diagnosed with lymphoma in April 2013, and the Amish family was convinced by the doctor to do chemo and radiation. Couple months later, Sarah started getting severely ill (like most do on toxic chemo) and was begging her parents to stop the treatment, so they did and went for alternatives and second opinions. As soon as the parents stopped treatment, Akron children’s hospital staff notified CPS and took them to court and got guardianship over Sarah. After the court ruling, the guardian sent out a taxi to the family to get Sarah and go to the hospital for more toxic chemo, but the family was gone. They fled to Mexico. While safely in another country, their lawyers fought the case and won in court on claims of religious freedom. 2 years later, she got bloodwork to confirm that she had no cancer without any chemo and was in perfect health. The medical and legal system is straight up corrupted and harms/kills far more people than it helps. It’s absurd that they are still trying to treat cancer with radiation and chemo, when all the data clearly shows how dangerous it is and how it rarely works.

Written By tatenda Belle Panashe

Healthcare as one of the 7 areas that globalists seek to manipulate, and we ought to start with some historical context, regarding how the COVID plandemic enabled globalists to test a militarised healthcare system.

Now, in former US president Eisenhower’s farewell speech of January 17, 1961, he stated that “…in the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” Sixty-three years on, many understand what he was referring to. We’ve seen the cycle of undeclared wars and decades-long foreign occupations that are undertaken on nebulous or even outright false pretences. We’ve also seen the ever-hungry mega-industry that produces super-expensive, high-tech killing devices of every imaginable form, as well as the steady stream of traumatised soldiers that it spits out. Evidently, war, to some, has become big business! And as Eisenhower warned, as long as those profiting from it drive the policy and the money stream (in other words – if they can weaponise the laws), the MIC will continue to grow.

In light of this contextualisation of the MIC, one would think that other mega-industries – the medical industry in particular – have generally fared better in public perception than the military-industrial complex; in that this MIC seemed a far more diabolical industry. Well, that was until the covid pandemic, but not forsaking a number of prior controversies. But this is really to say that among its many lessons, the Covid plandemic era has taught us this: if you substitute Pfizer and Moderna for Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, and swap the NIH and CDC for the Pentagon, you essentially get the same result. Meaning that not only is the “medical-industrial complex” every bit as real as its military-industrial counterpart, but, it is also every bit as real a problem, precisely because they are different sides of the same coin since the military industrial complex informed the weaponisation of the healthcare system in the COVID era. So, how did this happen?

Well, during the Covid era, one can infer interesting parallels to military operations. For instance, by early-to-mid 2020, it became obvious to those paying attention that the Covid “response,” while promoted as a medical initiative, was in fact a military operation. Martial law had effectively been declared in March 2020, after the Covid response (and practically speaking, control of the nation) was ceded to the National Security Council. Civil liberties – including the freedoms of assembly, worship, the right to travel, to earn one’s living, to pursue one’s education, or to obtain legal relief – were rendered null and void. In addition, top-down diktats on how to manage Covid patients were handed down to physicians from high above, and these were enforced with a militaristic rigidity unseen in doctors’ professional lifetimes. Meanwhile, the mandated protocols also made no sense: they ignored fundamental tenets of both sound medical practice and medical ethics; they shamelessly lied about well-known interventions, while their mandated protocols killed people.

What was also interesting to note during that time is that those physicians and other professionals who spoke out were effectively court-martialed. State medical boards, specialty certification boards, and large healthcare system employers virtually tripped over each other in the rush to de-license, decertify, and fire dissenters. Genuine, courageous physicians who actually treat patients, such as Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Scott Jensen, Simone Gold, and others, were persecuted, while non-practicing bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci were hailed with false titles like “America’s Top Doctor.” The propaganda was as nauseating as it was blatant. And the subsequent violence was no different.

But, speaking of lies about well-known interventions, you’d recall the ivermectin debate, that president Trump was involved in during that period. Well, as more evidence came out supporting Trump’s claim of the comparative benefit of using ivermectin in comparison to vaccines and all other protocols that were mandated, the FDA in the Biden era, even tried to back-peddle on their dismissal of ivermectin. In particular, the FDA claimed their Ivermectin smear campaign was only related to people self-medicating w/ a veterinary formulation of the drug.

However, in a 2021 interview with the American Medical Association, FDA Director John Farley discouraged physicians from prescribing Ivermectin, calling it a ‘tragic choice’. He stated that (quote): “Making that choice to choose Ivermectin over a vaccine can be a tragic choice that can lead to them getting very sick, getting admitted to the hospital, or even dying from COVID.

This ultimately means that the concerning tenets that have driven the military industrial complex were incorporated into the healthcare system. During covid, globalist debuted this militarised so-called healthcare response, and thus in seeking to manipulate healthcare, want similar control. Why else would there be a WHO pandemic treaty and IHR that try to centralise power to dictate health policy on the Director General, except to great a legal justification for a militarised top down approach to global healthcare?

MEDICINE BECAME BIG BUSINESS: THE COMMERCIALISATION OF SICKNESS AND INFIRMITY 

Now, in light of the parallels between the military and the medical industrial complexes, we alluded to the fact that in light of the operations of the military industrial complex, war has become big business. Well, as far as institutional capture is concerned, the medical establishment has done the same, especially with cancer. You’d recall that we discussed here on ‘The War Room’ how not only is cancer man-made, but it is also big business, a multi-billion dollar industry. It involves getting people to get cancer, to be poisoned with chemotherapy, and large amounts of money spent on continuous research for a cure that apparently does not exist (which is a lie). And the biggest proof of this intentional weaponisation and commercialisation of cancer is that, simply put, cancer did NOT really exist more than 50 years ago but started booming with the introduction of processed food loaded with massive amounts of sugar and chemicals.

So, you’ve just heard the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD. warn about the artificial and genetically modified food that causes cancer. Well, another crucial cause is exposure to carcinogenic systems. Now, a carcinogen is any substance, agent, or process that can induce cancer. They can cause cancer by damaging DNA or interfering with cellular processes (hence cancer is known as an attack on healthy cells by a cancerous cell). Examples of these carcinogens include asbestos, benzene, radon and even tobacco smoke.

This is critical to note because it exposes a detrimental irony when it comes to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is also a carcinogenic system! It is inherently a harmful concoction of chemicals that was initially created as a weapon, and then suddenly became rebranded as a highly profitable health intervention.

There you have it, this same chemical agent that was used to kill people is now being used to allegedly treat cancer. And ironically, despite the modifications on it, chemotherapy can also function as a carcinogen! More specifically, chemotherapy drugs are designed to target and destroy rapidly dividing cells, including cancer cells, but they can also affect healthy cells that divide quickly, like those in the bone marrow, hair follicles, and digestive tract. However, some chemotherapy agents, particularly alkylating agents, have been linked to an increased risk of developing certain types of leukemia or other secondary cancers. And the risk of developing a second cancer after chemotherapy is influenced by factors like the type of chemotherapy drugs used, the dosage, the duration of treatment, and the individual’s overall health. ALL of this is to say that (IRONICALLY) chemotherapy also functions as a carcinogen, meaning that it is a cancer causing agent.

And so this details the institutionalisation of the commercialisation of sickness and infirmity. The medical industrial complex sees sickness as an opportunity to form a market or customer base; and so, this industry interventions that it knows are harmful or not effective in the long run, and merely brands them as an acceptable panacea. What makes this a problem of institutional corruption, as opposed to mere isolated cases of unethical business conduct is that this is standard practice in the medical industry – all while legitimate or just better cures are hidden.

Take Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong, who we recently discussed. So, in an interview with Tucker Carlson he detailed that there actually is a medical breakthrough in fighting cancer. However, because of politics, the Deep State and Big Pharma it’s being suppressed. Meaning that there is an intervention for which he has the data and research to prove has been helpful, yet special interests block it – pointing to systemic institutional corruption in the medical industry. Meanwhile, Dr Mark Hyman also told Tucker Carlson about the keto diet’s ability to fight cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia and more. And so, literally eating certain good organic foods, is a comparatively far better option to chemotherapy.

MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONS: THE MEDICAL CARTEL’S TOOL FOR WEAPONISING LAWS

We then also have to address how the medical industrial complex weaponised laws, through formal legal avenues and also through the establishment of organisations that serve special interests. For instance, we’ve spoken about the audacious incident where the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America have filed a federal lawsuit against Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr for withdrawing COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.

The cartel also demanded a federal judge reinstate the COVID shot recommendations (again for children and pregnant women)—and block the US Department of HHS from enforcing or promoting RFK Jr’s May directive that removed them. Then, they also argued that Kennedy’s directive violates (quote) “norms” by bypassing the CDC and its ACIP panel, and undermines their ability to push the shot to patients and secure insurance coverage. This revealed a jarring display of the audacity of the medical industrial complex to use laws to fight or undermine progress. Because they obviously know that there are serious ramifications from the COVID jabs, but were adamant to use formal legal structures to block the US Department of HHS from enforcing or promoting RFK Jr’s May directive that removed those jabs from the recommendation list.

Similarly, we’ve been told to “listen to scientists” for years, while their credibility was tied to medical societies and associations that vouched for their alleged credibility. BUT… the dark and corrupt history behind the largest group of health professionals in the US, being the American Medical Association, suggests that these organisations are part of the problem of systemic institutional rot and corruption.

Thankfully, the corruption of these medical associations is being exposed on the regular today. For example, files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (also called WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical. The American Medical Association, The Endocrine Society, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and thousands of doctors worldwide rely on WPATH. It is considered the leading global authority on gender medicine.

And yet WPATH’s internal files, which include written discussions and a video, reveal that its members know they are creating victims and not getting “informed consent.” Victims include a 10-year-old girl, a 13-year-old developmentally delayed adolescent, and individuals suffering from schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses. Meanwhile, WPATH members indicate repeatedly that they know that many children and their parents don’t understand the effects that puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries will have on their bodies. And yet, they continue to perform and advocate for gender medicine. In any case, the WPATH Files prove that gender medicine is comprised of unregulated and pseudoscientific experiments on children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults.

Then there is also the American Heart Association. This association exposes systemic corruption in the medical industry in that it also serves to propagate false and detrimental health directives. You’d recall that we had a discussion of the hoax behind the claim that humans need to consume very little saturated fats and salt, which heavily implicated Ancel Keys, who had the backing of the American Heart Association. Well, even in the status quo the American Heart Association recommends aiming for a dietary pattern that achieves less than 6% of total calories from saturated fat. This is to say, that for example, if you need about 2,000 calories a day, no more than 120 of them should come from saturated fat – the same saturated fat that has now been proven to be essential for your health and to play an essential role in the functionality of your body!

Well, this unaccountable attitude towards accurate nutritional science in the present (as well) is actually less surprising when you consider that the AHA has been operating as a corrupt, anti-health lobby institution for the medical industrial complex, and even food companies. For instance, this year, the American Heart Association sent an employee to TEXAS to fight a bill that would stop food stamps from covering unhealthy items such as candy and soda—part of the MAHA initiatives.

Well, when you follow the money, you understand why the AHA has these inclinations. Not only is it funded by many pharmaceutical corporations, but General Mills and Pepsi Co are both forum members of The American Heart Association.

The question then is, why have these associations averted scrutiny for all these years? Well, for one the people who back them, like the Rockefellers have deep pockets: they not only pay for their operations, but pay to insure they either receive positive coverage (think the mainstream media and vaccines), or pay to ensure they remain under the radar. The second reason is that these organisations play on the liberal inclinations of society, in a world where identity politics are also expected to govern organisational culture. For instance, (and this is not a joke), the American Medical Association declared WEIGHT measurement, through the Body Mass Index (or BMI) to be RACIST, of all things – which obviously fit well in a culture of “body positivity”, and negative reinforcement for unhealthy habits.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Cancer has become an enormous business

The cancer industry is now a massive $222 billion market, driven by an unrelenting quest for profit that often prioritizes financial gains over patient welfare. This multibillion-dollar industry is fuelled by greed, with many players putting profits ahead of developing and sharing effective treatments, which perpetuates a culture of exploitation. Meanwhile, a deliberate effort is being made to suppress and conceal real cures and breakthroughs, resulting in prolonged and unnecessary suffering for millions of people worldwide who are bravely fighting this devastating disease.

The Food is Poisoned for Profit and Pharma Profits Off Illness

The food system is actively driving a vicious cycle, where the widespread consumption of processed foods is directly linked to a heightened risk of developing devastating health issues, including cancer. By flooding the market with these products, the food industry is inadvertently creating an environment that breeds disease, forcing individuals to undergo expensive and often invasive treatments, rather than providing effective solutions that tackle the root causes of these health problems head-on.

Cancer is Symptom of Toxins in the Body

Cancer is not just a disease, it’s a sophisticated physiological response to toxic substances invading the bloodstream, where the body’s defense mechanisms kick in to fight off the harmful effects of these toxins. In this scenario, a tumor can be seen as a deliberate self-protective mechanism, where the body intentionally encapsulates and isolates these toxic substances to prevent them from damaging surrounding tissues. However, when doctors perform a biopsy, they effectively breach this protective barrier, unleashing a flood of toxins back into the system, which can have catastrophic consequences. Essentially, this medical procedure doesn’t solve the underlying problem, it makes it worse, allowing toxins to spread and potentially triggering a chain reaction of devastating effects throughout the body.

How Big Pharma Controls Medical Schools

Radiation therapy hits the body with a powerful blow, siphoning off vital energy that would normally fuel the natural healing process and redirecting it to attack the cancerous tumor. Meanwhile, chemotherapy pours toxic chemicals into the body, throwing the entire physiological balance into chaos. This one-two punch doesn’t just weaken the immune system, making it more susceptible to new threats, but it also creates a breeding ground for new tumors to emerge, trapping patients in a vicious cycle of endless treatment and recurring illness. Doctors are now taking a closer look at the devastating impact of these treatments, and the shocking truth is that they can be just as deadly as the diseases they’re meant to cure. The harsh reality is that these therapies can have a crippling effect on the body, leaving patients to suffer from a multitude of debilitating side effects, from crippling fatigue to excruciating pain. As researchers dig deeper, they’re uncovering the alarming consequences of these treatments, and the findings are forcing a reckoning with the very foundations of modern medicine.

Every year, pharmaceutical companies shell out tens of millions of dollars to a significant number of cancer specialists, particularly those in academic positions, who are then tasked with creating guidelines that push the very same drugs they’re being paid to promote. These medical professionals are actively drafting and prescribing treatment plans to patients who are seeking unbiased advice, but instead, they’re serving up biased recommendations. A staggering 85% of the individuals responsible for writing the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines have taken payments from pharmaceutical companies, and these corporations are pouring massive amounts of money into professional organizations. The American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual convention, which is supposed to be a neutral forum for evaluating scientific data, has turned into a full-blown marketing extravaganza for the pharmaceutical industry, with the organization itself being heavily swayed by the massive influx of pharmaceutical funds.

How Big Pharma Pays Doctors to Push Chemotherapy

Reportedly, the human body actively responds to carcinogenic toxins in the bloodstream by encapsulating them in tumorous growths, effectively creating a containment vessel to isolate these hazardous substances. When medical professionals perform a biopsy, they directly breach this carefully constructed barrier, releasing toxic matter back into the bloodstream and potentially worsening the underlying condition. Moreover, administering radiotherapy can induce a state of systemic shock, diverting the body’s energy reserves away from the critical task of tumour degradation and towards crisis management, thereby undermining the body’s natural defences. At the same time, chemotherapy, although intended to target malignant cells, ultimately proves to be a blunt instrument, as it poisons the entire body and contaminates the bloodstream, which can trigger a perverse response, prompting the body to generate even more tumorous growths in a desperate bid for self-preservation.

Oncology is big business

Investigations reveal that the global cancer treatment market has skyrocketed to a staggering $158 billion in 2020, with experts predicting a massive surge to $268 billion by 2026. These alarming numbers demand a hard-hitting examination of the shocking lack of effective cures, fueling heated debates and intense scrutiny. The brutal truth is that the cancer industry is raking in billions of dollars from the suffering of patients, with projected growth expected to propel the market to a staggering $470 billion by 2032. As the medical sector faces explosive allegations of corruption, recent high-profile scandals have ignited widespread outrage and demands for accountability. We must launch a thorough and unflinching investigation into the cancer industry, re-examining the prevailing narrative and considering the disturbing possibility that it may be one of the most shocking deceptions of our time, driven by greed and corruption.

As the 20th century gave way to the 21st, the field of oncology was rocked by a slew of corrupt clinical trials, marked by shoddy control groups, subpar post-trial care, and blatant crossover practices that lined corporate pockets while leaving patients high and dry. Cancer specialists were allegedly on the take, pocketing payments from these companies and peddling a narrative that put profits ahead of people. The sheer scale of corruption and decay that had taken hold of this system had become so entrenched that it was almost impossible to see its inherent toxicity. Historians will likely view this era as a bleak period in the history of medicine, one in which dubious medications were pushed on terminally ill patients, while governments taxed struggling citizens to subsidize these ineffective treatments. Meanwhile, doctors, in the pocket of corporate interests, were complicit in promoting these products, even as the United States careened towards bankruptcy due to the staggering costs of misguided, harmful, and useless care. We must confront the severity of this crisis head-on and acknowledge that awareness is the first step towards driving real change. The medical community has a profound obligation to put genuine healing and patient welfare above financial gain, and it’s crucial that we reexamine our approach to cancer treatment, demanding greater transparency and accountability from the individuals and corporations that wield significant influence over this industry. Ultimately, it’s only through a collective effort to reform this broken system that we can create a more just and equitable healthcare landscape, one that puts patient well-being above all else.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe