PROPONENTS OF THE VACCINE HOLOCAUST ARE UNRELENTING

THE VACCINE ENTERPRISE BEGAN THE YEAR BY TRYING TO MAKE VACCINES MAINSTREAM AGAIN

And now in we revisit key moments and revelations from DAY 1 of the Your Loveworld Specials Season 12 Phase 1; and in light of our discussion today, we will especially focus on an analysis of warnings in the insightful documentary showed by the President of Loveworld Incorporated, titled “The Ideal Toy (Unmasking the COVID 19 mRNA vaccine)”. Now, in signifying the documentary, the President of Loveworld Incorporated highlighted that the proponents of the COVID debacle and vaccine holocaust are unrelenting in their efforts. And truly we’ve seen this in various developments in our world; and one such development pertains to an effort to make vaccines mainstream in a time where vaccination rates are falling sharply.

In greater detail, on December 31st 2025, The Washington Post published a detailed investigation showing that childhood vaccination rates across the United States are falling sharply, particularly for measles. Fewer counties in America now meet the 95 percent coverage level commonly associated with herd immunity, and millions of children attend schools in communities below that threshold – this article was even fourth of January, this new year. But the Washington Post’s analysis notably fails where it matters most: which is that it cannot explain why trust in vaccines has collapsed so broadly, so persistently, and so rationally for many ordinary people.

And instead of confronting this lack of explanation for the collapse in trust towards vaccines, readers were offered a familiar diagnosis, which puts the focus on distrust of authorities. They referenced political polarisation, so-called misinformation, as well as backlash against mandates. However, all of this is curiously detached from responsibility, meaning that the article describes the consequences of distrust without confronting its root causes. But of course, that omission is not accidental. RATHER, it reflects a broader unwillingness among the mainstream media and public health institutions to reckon honestly with Covid-era failures, and the deceptive nature of the core tenets of so-called “vaccine science”.

For instance, during the Covid-19 period, public health authorities repeatedly overstated certainty, minimised uncertainty, and treated legitimate scientific disagreement as a threat rather than a feature of good science. Claims about vaccines preventing infection and transmission were also presented as settled fact, not evolving hypotheses. And when those claims weakened or collapsed under new evidence, they were revised quietly, without acknowledgment of error.

The same pattern appeared across other policies: including masking, school closures, natural immunity, and population-level risk. Positions shifted, sometimes dramatically, but rarely with public explanation. The message conveyed – intentionally or not – was that narrative management mattered more than transparency. And this mattered because (in state politics, and other socio-political affairs) trust is cumulative. In this context, this means that people do not evaluate each public health recommendation in isolation. They judge institutions based on patterns of behaviour over time. And so, when authorities insist they were always right, even when claims visibly change, credibility then erodes.

Similarly, evidence from Pennsylvania illustrates this point. In particular, Montgomery County has historically had strong vaccination uptake. Yet an interesting physician survey research was published in the non-partisan research and publication platform “International Centre for Law and Economics”, and it was conducted in the county during and after the pandemic, and tells a different story. In essence, clinicians reported that while initial Covid vaccine uptake was high in 2021, acceptance declined sharply over time, particularly for boosters. More importantly, many physicians observed a spillover effect: which was growing hesitancy not only toward Covid vaccines, but toward other vaccines as well.

Now, what was even more interesting is that patients were not primarily citing technical fears about vaccine safety (which we will address in a moment). Instead, patients were expressing distrust of public health authorities. They referenced shifting claims, perceived exaggeration, and the absence of acknowledgment of error. Named figures – most notably Anthony Fauci – were mentioned not as sources of reassurance, but as symbols of lost credibility. All of this is what is now visible in the data the Washington Post reports but does not explain. And so, the Washington post article represents a pitiful effort, by an unrelenting vaccine enterprise, to try to make vaccines mainstream in this new year, in the face of their plummeting trust, which as you’re about to see, has long been an issue in the making.

IT IS A TRIED-AND-TESTED FACT THAT ALL VACCINES ARE UNSAFE

Now, I mentioned that we would revisit the point that some patients in the physician survey referenced were reluctant to take boosters or other jabs due to their concerns about shifting claims, perceived exaggeration, and the absence of acknowledgment of error, BUT not concerns about vaccines themselves. And so, in response to this, it is worth addressing that it is a tried-and-tested fact that all vaccines are unsafe, and even lack a net positive – and this is something the president of Loveworld Incorporated highlighted during DAY 1 of the YLS Season 12 Phase 1. And since the Washington post article addressed measles, we can even specify our discussion to this particular vaccine.

And, here, it is worth noting what emerges when we look at a broader historical context of  measles mortality. So, in the early 20th century, measles was quite fatal in the United States. When national reporting began in 1912, an average of around 6,000 measles-related deaths occurred each year during the first decade. This reflected a time when the disease struck millions of children annually, often leading to severe complications like pneumonia, encephalitis, and bacterial superinfections. By the decade just before the measles vaccine was licensed in 1963, reported annual deaths had fallen to approximately 500 (from about 6000 annually). Estimated infections still reached 3–4 million annually, as nearly every child contracted measles by age 15. Yet the death rate had dropped sharply—often cited as a decline of approximately 98% from peak early-20th-century levels.

Well, this dramatic reduction in mortality occurred WELL before the measles vaccine became available, thus meaning that this sharp decline was not due to medical interventions like antibiotics or vaccines, especially seeing as penicillin was also not widely used until the 1940s.

As such, two key factors contributed: The first was better nutrition, which played a crucial role. Improved childhood diets, including access to vitamins (especially vitamin A), strengthened immune responses and reduced the severity of infections. Malnutrition had long amplified measles complications in vulnerable populations. Then the second factor was the advances in sanitation and living standards, which helped limit secondary bacterial infections, such as those causing deadly pneumonia. Additionally, cleaner water, better hygiene, and reduced overcrowding in urban areas supported overall public health gains.

YET, vaccine advocates often credit immunisation for eradicating the threat, ignoring how societal progress had already tamed the virus’s lethality – which should make one question how if the measles virus was becoming less deadly without medical intervention, then why was there a rush to vaccinate everyone? BUT, the overall point of emphasis here is that it is important for vaccine skepticism not to be only on the policy front, but also in light of vaccines themselves because they are not the medical miracle that the vaccine enterprise has pretended they are.

IT MATTERS WHO WE LISTEN TO; & THIS APPLIES EVEN TO ORGANISATIONS

Well this then brings us to what I believe offers a pre-emptive solution to the devices of the vaccine enterprise even as they are unrelenting in their efforts. Simply, governments ought to be careful who they listen to, and be careful what informs their decision making processes, lest they find themselves making decisions that are influenced by the vaccine enterprise and its collaborators.

For instance, there are numerous examples that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (or the CDC) cannot be trusted in relation to vaccines and infections. The CDC has claimed, for example, that influenza vaccines reduce hospitalisations and mortality even though the randomised trials did not find this. But, the CDC did not also provide a single comment that its claims were based on deeply flawed case-control studies. Similarly, on the 17th of August in the year 2025, Maryanne Demasi published a very disturbing article showing that corruption and scientific misconduct at the CDC are not things of the past.

This was further evidenced by the fact that, in June, the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel met for the first time since being overhauled by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, in order to get rid of the financial conflicts of interest. Kennedy had promised that his new appointees would demand full transparency and scrutinise the evidence before making recommendations.

HOWEVER, if the documentation provided by the CDC to its advisory panel is flawed, it is difficult for the panel to make rational, evidence-based recommendations. And this is exactly what happened when the panel voted about whether to endorse Merck’s monoclonal antibody for babies against the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), nearly identical to Sanofi’s version, which was approved in 2023. What essentially happened is that the CDC assured the advisory panel committee there were “no safety concerns,” but (of course) there surely were. Professor Retsef Levi, who cast one of the two dissenting votes, noticed a troubling pattern across four major clinical trials conducted by Sanofi. In each, there was a consistent imbalance in “nervous system” serious adverse events, most often including seizures, in the treatment groups compared to controls – which (as a side note), is why control studies are so crucial, and often so ignored by vaccine developers.

In any case, Merck’s Dr Anushua Sinha downplayed the concerns, saying there had been “extensive analysis of the events” and that Merck’s investigators had deemed that none of the nervous system harms were related to its product. Now, this is not reassuring, because if a product developer tells me that its own investigations proved its product safe, I do not have good reason to trust them because they profit from the sale of that product, and thus have a vested interest in ensuring that the product hits the market soon than later, even at the expense of the safety of patients – as has been the modus operandi of the pharmaceutical industry. And so, this actually highlights why the ongoing Global Prayer & Fasting Programme is so pivotal. It highlights the truth that we ought to pray for leaders and nations because without our intercessory prayers and the grace of God that delivers nations, nations cannot free themselves.

And so, what we’ve just heard is to signify that the solution to the unrelenting efforts of those behind the COVID debacle is the unrelenting prayers of the Church of Jesus Christ.

THE DANGERS OF mRNA: EVIDENCE FROM THE RISE OF “TURBO CANCERS” IN CHILDREN

This then brings us  to a discussion on mRNA technology and vaccines. And I think one of the biggest indictments of mRNA vaccines has been the revelations of the genetic harms of COVID jabs, especially in relation to the spike protein induced by an mRNA vaccine. And we particularly saw this when, for the first time in modern medical history, children as young as eight are being diagnosed with aggressive colon cancer – which is a phenomenon so rare that it was virtually unheard of before 2021. But now, oncologists are breaking ranks, exposing what they call a “global epidemic” of fast-moving cancers directly linked to COVID-19 vaccines, while the medical authorities who once demanded blind faith in these shots have gone eerily silent as the many children get sick.

Against this backdrop, Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong, who is a pioneering cancer researcher, recently dropped a bombshell by bluntly connecting the dots between mRNA vaccines and the surge in deadly cancers. His warning follows a flood of reports from frontline doctors witnessing bizarre, rapid-onset tumors in young patients—cases that they state defy decades of medical understanding. Meanwhile, Dr Angus Dalgleish, a renowned oncologist from the University of London, has called for an outright ban on mRNA vaccines, declaring they have no place in medicine outside of terminal cancer cases; and this came as his research found mRNA fragments inside tumors, suggesting the shots may be fueling cancer growth.

More specifically, Dr Dalgleish highlighted that researchers have identified traces of mRNA within cancerous tumors, noting that this genetic material plays a role in their rapid growth and the aggressive spread of these cancers. He asserted, “Cancer caused by mRNA vaccines is a known outcome.” He subsequently issued a cautionary note, emphasising that mRNA vaccines should NOT be utilised as a preventive measure against cancer, as they are implicated in its causation!

Now, the timing of these cancers is undeniable. Before 2021, childhood cancers like glioblastoma and advanced colon cancer were statistical anomalies. Now, pediatric oncology wards are filling with cases that progress at terrifying speeds—what doctors now call “turbo cancers.” Yet instead of investigating, public health agencies and pharmaceutical giants have doubled down on censorship, smearing dissenting experts as “conspiracy theorists” while quietly updating vaccine injury compensation programs to include cancer claims. The term “turbo cancer” isn’t even a recognised medical term, yet doctors continue to report aggressive cancer cases, in adults and young children without a history of medical issues!

Not only that but the parallels to past medical scandals are chilling. Just as Big Tobacco buried evidence linking smoking to lung cancer for decades, the COVID vaccine pushers—from the FDA to Pfizer—are gaslighting the public while children suffer. Evidently, history repeats itself when profit outweighs ethics. The same institutions that lied about opioids, asbestos, and Agent Orange are now dismissing vaccine injuries as “anecdotal.” 

But, evidently, the dismissal of vaccine injuries is not holding up – especially as parents demand answers. In any case, here is Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong revealing what is evidently concerning data: which reports aggressive prostate cancers in men as young as 40-50, and colon cancer in kids aged 10-12. And the culprit is a prostate enzyme (called TMPRSS2) that helps spike proteins invade cells faster, thus accelerating cancer growth.

PFIZER’S COVID-19 JAB GOES INTO LIVER CELLS AND IS CONVERTED TO DNA

By the way, this issue is seen also with liver cells. According to Swedish researchers at Lund University, the mRNA  from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA! SO, the researchers found that when the mRNA vaccine enters the human liver cells, it triggers the cell’s DNA, which is inside the nucleus, to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA. The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and enters the cell’s cytoplasm, where it translates into LINE-1 protein. A segment of the protein called the open reading frame-1, or ORF-1, then goes back into the nucleus, where it attaches to the vaccine’s mRNA and reverse transcribes into spike DNA. Now, reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, whereas the normal transcription process involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nucleus. And of course you can conduct your own research about, especially the difference between the normal and reverse transcription process.

However, what remains important to note from this information is this: this whole process of reverse transcription occurred rapidly within six hours. And yet… the vaccine’s mRNA converting into DNA and being found inside the cell’s nucleus is something that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said would not happen! And so, they lied about the relationship between the mRNA jab and the human DNA – something that the President of Loveworld Inc. has always made plain: mRNA affects, and makes editable, the human DNA! 

WHY mRNA VACCINES ARE CATEGORICALLY HARMFUL AND DANGEROUS

But, here’s why mRNA interventions are categorically harmful and dangerous – irrespective of how they are delivered into the body. In essence, mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver modified mRNA, instructing cells to produce spike protein. Unlike traditional vaccines (which are also bad), as proven by how they have often caused or worsened the illnesses they claim to solve, the spike protein produced through the instruction given to cells from mRMA causes uncontrolled spike protein production for unknown durations, spreading to the heart, brain, vasculature, ovaries, and testes. In fact, the EMA’s assessment of Pfizer’s vaccine confirmed biodistribution beyond the injection site, contradicting claims it “stays in the arm.”

For instance, in 2021, Dr Vaughn treated a 69-year-old patient with unexplained shortness of breath after a second Pfizer dose. Tests ruled out typical causes, but anti-clotting therapy brought rapid relief. This case led him to study how spike protein induces fibrin resistant to breakdown, activates platelets, and damages blood vessels—explaining this case and thousands more.

Additionally, myocarditis signals emerged in spring 2021, particularly in young males post-mRNA vaccination. The DoD confirmed cases, studies detected spike protein in myocarditis patients, and autopsies linked fatal cases to vaccines. Yet, federal mandates intensified, sidelining these concerns. Subsequently, the CDC and FDA’s inaction—and vaccine promotion—eroded public trust. Meanwhile, the patients coerced by 2021 mandates despite prior infections or health risks, now face disability if they have not been killed by those vaccines already. And all this because Informed consent, which should be a cornerstone of medicine, was undermined – much like will be done with floss based mRMA delivery systems… But, the truth is that this is yet another step into uncharted territory, where science (or scientism) is rapidly evolving but leaving important ethical and safety considerations behind. Especially considering that no one asked for this, and natural immunity was always better. But, here’s more about the mRNA vaccines, from the documentary titled “The Ideal Toy (Unmasking the COVID 19 mRNA vaccine)”.

FORCING mRNA HAS BECOME THE VACCINE ENTERPRISE’S OBSESSION

But, the reality is that not only is the vaccine enterprise aware of the dangers of mRNA vaccines, but forcing mRNA on the general public has become something of an obsession for them. For instance, you’d recall that in 2023, a team of researchers was reported to have developed what they call an inhalable vaccine against the COVID virus. It actually also makes it possible to deliver other messenger RNA therapeutics for gene replacement therapy. Now, for the so-called vaccine, the researchers demonstrated that two intranasal doses of the treatment, made with nanoparticles carrying mRNA Covid vaccine, is effective in mice. It also apparently demonstrates that an inhalable delivery system allows for minimally invasive and lung-targeted mRNA delivery, potentially applicable for numerous pulmonary diseases in addition to covid.

In their new study, the researchers showed that the shot isn’t necessary to provide protection. They state that there is no intramuscular injection, they just gave two doses, a prime and a boost, intranasally. They also state that based on their research, this method enables them to deliver different kinds of mRNA; meaning that it’s not just used for a vaccine, but potentially also for gene replacement therapy in diseases like cystic fibrosis and gene editing. Therefore, they used a vaccine-based study to show how an aereosolised mRNA vaccine works, but admit that it opens the door to doing all these other kinds of interventions… Well, this then explains the attraction of an aereosolised mRNA vaccine to the propagators of the covid debacle and vaccine enterprise at large; which is that an aerosolised mRNA vaccine is actually a tool to execute airborne interventions, such as gene editing; without having to deal with objections and dissent, or the responsibility to respect the bodily autonomy of people.

Now, you would have noted that in explaining how they would use mRNA delivery for cystic fibrosis that they claimed that it is advantageous because the mRNA does not integrate into your genome – the genome being the complete set of genetic instructions, containing all the DNA. Additionally, the person presenting stated that they based their understanding on how mRNA was applied in the COVID vaccine. But, (again) this is actually not true about mRNA, as was further detailed in the documentary titled  “The Ideal Toy (Unmasking the COVID 19 mRNA vaccine)”.

But, another issue to consider in light of the mortality of infants from COVID jabs is that infants do not even have to be inoculated themselves to deal with the adverse effects of vaccines. More specifically, the CDC’s own data shows babies born are now dying at a 77% excess rate — years after mass vaccination of childbearing women. The 30-year decline in infant mortality collapsed in 2021, immediately following the mRNA injection campaign. The excess infant death causes mirror those observed in vaccinated adults, thus suggesting a transfer of mRNA “vaccine” genetic material to offspring! In other words, the mRNA vaccines created a transgenerational crisis, where children are dying who were never injected, but whose mothers were.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso