According to Rothschilds’ media arm, The Economist—long a mouthpiece for elite interests—states encompassing a third of America’s population are on the brink of legalising assisted dying. The magazine lists 13 states along with Washington, DC, where doctor-assisted suicide is now either permitted or poised to be approved, painting this expansion as some kind of historic achievement.

The Economist claims that lawmakers are “catching up with public opinion,” referencing a Gallup poll stating just over half of Americans support assisted suicide in general, while two-thirds would approve if the patient is suffering and has no hope of recovery—a framing that conveniently serves the agenda of normalising state-sanctioned death. The magazine attempts to placate concerns that America might follow Canada’s deeply controversial path, where so-called “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAID) has ballooned to include vulnerable groups such as those with chronic pain, mental health struggles, or even the homeless, fuelling debates over organ harvesting and a chilling disregard for human life. With more than 42,000 MAID deaths reported in Canada since 2021—over 5% of all deaths in 2024—The Economist assures its readers that the US will enforce “stricter safeguards.” These supposed protections require a prognosis of six months or less to live, confirmation by two doctors, and the patient’s ability to self-administer the lethal drugs. Yet, the steady erosion of ethical boundaries and the growing influence of globalist eugenics ideology remain deeply troubling. Whitney Webb has characterized the spread of doctor-assisted suicide as a dark reboot of the fascistic eugenics programs of the 20s and 30s.

Canada’s Fast Track to Death: Euthanasia Approved Years in Advance

Organ harvesting & child murder

Canada’s euthanasia nightmare spirals

Canada has tragically become a global frontrunner in state-sanctioned euthanasia, with more than 15,000 lives ended through assisted suicide in 2023 alone—a staggering 15% rise from the previous year. This explosion in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) followed the passing of Bill C-7 in March 2021, which eliminated the “reasonably foreseeable natural death” requirement and drastically loosened restrictions. As a result, MAiD deaths have surged by a third annually. What was falsely presented as a supposedly compassionate, last-resort measure for terminally ill patients now extends to those suffering from chronic pain, autoimmune conditions, and even depression—ailments that can easily be alleviated with proper care and support. Instead, vulnerable Canadians are being pushed toward death rather than offered help, reflecting a chilling disregard for human dignity and echoing the dark legacy of eugenics policies.

Many so-called “assisted deaths” in Canada are immediately followed by rapid organ harvesting. Physicians prepare patients for organ donation mere hours after administering euthanasia drugs, turning the suffering and desperate into commodities. Let’s point out the bitter irony of this practice: instead of preserving life, the system transforms the vulnerable into sources of organs and money. Homeless and struggling Canadians are now routinely approved for euthanasia—not because of terminal illness, but due to the failure of social services. Canadian doctors, who once dedicated themselves to saving lives, now increasingly serve as facilitators of death, describing their euthanasia cases as “delivery of life out.” Over 99.9% of assisted suicides in Canada are carried out by physicians. The nation’s euthanasia crisis is descending even further, as discussions now broach the prospect of extending these deadly practices to infants with disabilities. In 2022, proposals surfaced to legalise euthanasia for babies under one year old, a horrifying step that raises serious moral questions and signals the relentless advance of a eugenics-driven ideology.

Countries that allow euthanasia

In 2002, the Netherlands and Belgium became the first countries in the world to legalize euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, followed by Luxembourg, Colombia, Canada, Spain, New Zealand, most of Australia’s states, Austria, and most recently, Portugal and Ecuador. Switzerland has allowed passive assisted suicide since the 1940s, although active, doctor-assisted euthanasia is illegal. Assisted dying is not to be confused with passive euthanasia (i.e. refusal of treatment or withdrawal from life support), which is legal in most of Europe, North and South America, and a sprinkling of countries in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

How euthanasia laws become more liberal

Belgium’s 2002 Euthanasia Act originally allowed assisted suicide for adults facing “unbearable suffering.” In 2013, it was extended to terminally ill children with parental consent. In Colombia, the decriminalization of euthanasia for adults in 2014 led to the practice being approved for children as young as six – and without parental consent after age 14, in 2018. In 2022, Colombia decriminalized assisted suicide for non-terminally ill people suffering from “severe health conditions.” In Canada, Justin Trudeau’s Liberals passed doctor-assisted suicide legislation in 2016 for terminally ill mentally competent adults. It was expanded in 2021 to include incurable illnesses, and in 2023, plans to include mental illness were delayed until 2027.

In 2021, a story in New Zealand revealed that COVID-19 patients deemed terminally ill qualified for euthanasia under the 2019 End of Life Choice Act. Local anti-euthanasia campaigners said the story highlighted “the lax nature of the already existing qualifying criteria” for assisted suicide procedures.

Euthanasia is Lucrative business

In Switzerland and Belgium, assisted dying has apparently become a lucrative business, with foreigners traveling to the countries in droves. In 2020 alone, Dignitas, a non-profit Swiss clinic, counted 3,248 assisted suicide cases, most of them foreigners. Belgium, where assisted dying can only be performed by doctors, was dubbed the world’s “euthanasia capital” by Forbes in 2019, and allows qualified applicants to be euthanized for about $3,500.

In Canada, lobbying promoting assisted dying has taken an ugly turn, with a 2017 Canadian Medical Association Journal report touting how up to $136.8 million CAD could be saved annually on health care costs through euthanasia. The passage of the ‘Medical Assistance in Dying’ (MAiD) program has also resulted in a dramatic surge in assisted suicide deaths, from 1,018 in 2016 to 13,241 in 2022 – accounting for over 4% of all deaths in Canada that year. A year ago, Health Minister Mark Holland announced the government needed more time before it could expand “medical assistance in dying” to include people who are suffering from mental illnesses, but it’s still in the works. The government was originally planning to expand the euthanasia project on March 17, 2024.

In 2009 British psychotherapist and author Colin Feltham penned a shocking op-ed in The Guardian where he argued that “there are good reasons for arguing that a stabilization or gradual reduction in population would be the best way to address the carbon emissions problem,” and that assisted dying programs were one possible way to do so.

Who’s funding pro-euthanasia propaganda?

In 1998, George Soros’ Open Society Foundations published a ‘Project on Death in America’ report, detailing hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants to Dartmouth College, Stanford, Staten Island University Hospital and other academic, medical and cultural institutions for research, education and public policy discussions about death, including physician-assisted suicide, which Soros hoped might “influence the culture of dying” in America. After shelling out $45 million in grants, the project closed in 2003 after being deemed to have “completed all grantmaking.” In March 2024, US lawmakers grilled Pfizer after discovering links between the pharmaceuticals giant and Dying with Dignity Canada, the lobbying group “owning the conversation around assisted deaths” in Canada, with media discovering that Pfizer makes three of the lethal drugs recommended by the MAiD program for assisted deaths. Other donors included Google, United Way, and the San Diego chapter of the Hemlock Society – a right-to-die advocacy group that George Soros’ mother Elizabeth was a member of. In the UK, the pro-euthanasia lobby has reportedly received a sympathetic ear from the publicly-funded BBC, and consists of a series of partisan nonprofits funded by little-known groups like the AB Charitable Trust – created in 1990 by former hedge fund manager Yves Bonavero and his wife, which seems to be involved in backing an array of assisted dying lobbying groups, including the Citizens Jury, Humanists UK and the Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

Their goal is depopulation

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink explained how the real goal of depopulation (Covid19, Midazolam, Remdesivir, “vaccines”, euthanasia, abortion, Ukraine war, Gaza genocide, assisted dying) is to make it easier to substitute humans with machines.

Who promotes euthanasia and why?

The origins of the modern right-to-die movement can be traced back to the Club of Rome’s liberal humanist agenda and concerns about overpopulation and climate change began presenting assisted dying as a humane way to end suffering. More recently, the World Economic Forum has taken up the euthanasia agenda, actively discussing it since at least 2009.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

The United Nations is finally staring down the barrel of its own incompetence: Secretary-General António Guterres just warned member states on January 28, 2026, that the UN risks “imminent financial collapse” due to unpaid dues hitting a record $1.57 billion by the end of 2025 – with the United States shouldering 95% of the arrears (around $2.2 billion). The Trump administration’s funding cuts and withholdings are accelerating this crisis, and I’ll say: let it burn. This isn’t a tragedy – it’s accountability catching up to a bloated, corrupt, sovereignty-erasing evil machine. Today I am making the case that the UN’s financial woes are self-inflicted and long overdue.

The UN’s “Imminent Financial Collapse”

Good Riddance to Globalist Tyranny

The UN’s Panic Button and Why America Is Right to Starve It

On January 30, 2026, Guterres sent a desperate letter to member states warning that without immediate action, the UN could run out of cash by July 2026 and might even have to shutter its New York headquarters. Outstanding dues doubled from 2024 to 2025, collections covered only 76.7% of assessed contributions, and liquidity is drying up fast. Who’s the main culprit? The United States – allegedly owing nearly $2.2 billion in current and overdue assessments. The Trump administration has ramped up pressure by slashing voluntary contributions and withholding mandatory dues over waste, bias, and ineffectiveness. This isn’t petty – it’s principled. The U.S. is assessed 22% of the regular budget and ~27% of peacekeeping, more than any other nation. Why keep bankrolling an organization that routinely bites the hand that feeds it? This crisis exposes the UN’s flawed model: it spends first, then begs later, with no real penalties for decadence. Good on America for finally saying “enough.”

How the UN Became a Black Hole for Taxpayer Dollars

The UN’s 2026 regular budget is $3.45 billion – down 7% after negotiations – but that’s still billions funnelled into a bureaucracy with zero accountability. The U.S. alone has historically covered over a quarter of the tab, yet gets constant lectures on “global responsibilities.” Remember history: Reagan withheld funds in the 1980s over anti-Israel bias and waste. Clinton paid some arrears but attached reforms. Trump 1.0 cut voluntary funding to agencies like UNRWA and WHO, exited Paris Accord and Human Rights Council. Now Trump 2.0 is finishing the job, and the UN is screaming in panic. The math is damning: End-2025 arrears hit $1.568 billion. U.S. dues for 2026 alone are ~$767 million, much of it unpaid on principle. Without U.S. cash, the UN can’t pay salaries, keep lights on in Geneva, or fund its endless conferences. This isn’t “collapse” from malice – it’s collapse from decades of entitlement. If the UN were a corporation, it’d have been bankrupt long ago.

Waste, Fraud, and Abuse

The Real Reason Taxpayers Should Cheer This Crisis

UN corruption cultureproves that it doesn’t deserve another dime

The UN isn’t poor – it’s wasteful. An example is the Oil-for-Food scandal (1990s-2000s): Billions were diverted to Saddam Hussein while UN officials took kickbacks. Don’t get me started on the Peacekeeper sexual abuse scandals. There are hundreds of documented cases in Congo, Haiti, Central African Republic – zero real accountability. Then there’s the bloat: Thousands of highly paid staff jetting to summits while producing zero measurable results. There is procurement fraud, nepotism, cover-ups. Whistleblowers are routinely silenced or fired.

The film producer Jennifer O’Mahony and whistleblower James Wasserstrom (UN Administration Mission in Kosovo) spoke during the 20th International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC) held in Washington, D.C. in December 2022.

The UN’s Globalist Agenda

Agenda 2030 and the Push for One-World Control

Beyond waste, the UN’s real danger is ideological. Agenda 2030 and its Sustainable Development Goals sound noble – end poverty, save the planet – but it’s a blueprint for centralized control: wealth redistribution, migration mandates, climate lockdowns, erosion of national borders. It is a Trojan horse for global governance. The UN’s “Pact for the Future” (2024) and ongoing pushes give supranational bodies power over national policy. WHO pandemic treaty attempts? Same playbook. Angela Small talks about the UN’s Project 2020 vision and its mission to end private property among many other freedoms.

These aren’t fringe – they’re warnings from sovereignty defenders about unelected bureaucrats dictating your life.

UN’s sponsorship of Terror

The UN’s moral rot runs deepest in its agencies. UNRWA (Palestinian refugee agency) has repeatedly been exposed for staff ties to Hamas – including employees implicated in October 7, 2023 attacks. Yet billions keep flowing. The Human Rights Council? Dominated by rights abusers – while obsessively condemning Israel with more resolutions than against all other countries combined. Peacekeeping? Often ineffective or worse – enabling warlords while costing billions.

Let it sink in deeper—the United Nations, that sprawling, unaccountable globalist machine, is teetering on the edge because one nation finally turned off the tap. America, under President Trump, is withholding billions in dues and slashing voluntary funding, and suddenly the whole parasitic structure is gasping for air. Guterres’ panic letter to all 193 member states isn’t just a fundraising plea—it’s an admission that the UN’s entire model is unsustainable without the U.S. taxpayer as its unwilling ATM. The U.S. owes the bulk of the $1.57 billion+ in arrears, and the Trump administration is making it clear: no more blank checks for an organization that routinely undermines American interests while lecturing the world on “global responsibilities.” This isn’t a “humanitarian” outfit. It’s a sovereignty-erasing powerhouse that pushes, Open borders and mass migration mandates, Climate alarmism as a pretext for wealth redistribution and control, Censorship via “disinformation” initiatives, Endless bureaucratic expansion that tie to depopulation agendas through aggressive family-planning programs in the developing world

The United Nations isn’t some benevolent peacemaker

The UN is a vehicle for globalist manipulation

The United Nations isn’t some benevolent peacemaker; it’s a vehicle for globalist manipulation, pulling strings on nations while pretending to uphold “international cooperation.” And yes, its ties to the World Economic Forum (WEF), European Union (EU), and even NATO reveal a web of elite influence that prioritizes centralized control over true sovereignty. Look at this undeniable proof from 2019: UN Secretary-General António Guterres personally signed a Strategic Partnership Framework with WEF founder Klaus Schwab to “jointly accelerate” the implementation of Agenda 2030 (the Sustainable Development Goals). This wasn’t just a handshake—it publicized the already existing deeper coordination, giving WEF’s corporate elites “preferential access” to shape UN policy on everything from climate, health, finance, and digital governance. Hundreds of civil society organizations (over 400 groups and networks) immediately condemned it as corporate capture of the UN, warning it delegitimizes the organization, weakens state sovereignty, and shifts power toward privatized, multistakeholder global governance where billionaires and multinationals call the shots.

 The EU acts as a major UN donor and ideological ally, pushing the same supranational agendas (open borders, climate mandates, digital IDs). NATO coordinates closely with the UN on “peacekeeping” and security, but often in ways that align with interventionist policies benefiting the same elite networks. The UN postures as anti-war while it allow endless conflicts to rage—conflicts that enrich arms manufacturers, defense contractors, and the military-industrial complex deeply intertwined with WEF partners and Western elites. They “fight” wars on paper but ensure the profits flow upward. Agenda 2030 itself is the blueprint.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe