Peel back the glossy press releases, and a darker narrative emerges—one echoed in financial circles wary of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Great Reset” rhetoric. Independent researchers and African policymakers have revealed that GMO mosquitoes aren’t just about disease suppression; they’re a Trojan horse for depopulation and coerced medical interventions. The Gates Foundation, with its $50 billion endowment and deep ties to pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Moderna, has long been exposed of prioritizing population management over genuine aid. In a 2010 TED Talk, Bill Gates himself mused on reducing global population growth through vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive services. Fast-forward to today: Oxitec’s malaria-focused strains, developed with Gates funding, will deliberately target human fertility in high-birth-rate regions.

Bill Gates’ GMO Mosquitoes

Flying Syringes for Forced Vaccination and Global Control

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation invested a staggering $41 million in Oxitec, a British biotech firm, to develop these genetically modified mosquitoes that purportedly aim to eradicate malaria. However, numerous health experts have dubbed these creatures “flying syringes,” because their true purpose is to covertly vaccinate the general population with potentially hazardous vaccines that induce sterility in both men and women, without their knowledge or consent. This could lead to a significant increase in infertility, with women becoming barren and men becoming impotent on a massive scale, highlighting just one of the many risks associated with this technology.

Consider the “flying syringe” concept, a Gates-backed idea to engineer mosquitoes that deliver vaccines via bites. A 2008 Grand Challenges grant explored transgenic mosquitoes secreting malaria antigens into human saliva during feeding, turning insects into inoculators. This blurs the line between consent and compulsion. This tech could enforce compliance under the guise of public health emergencies. Financially, the payoff is staggering: The global vaccine market, projected to hit $100 billion by 2030, thrives on perpetual crises. Gates’ investments in mRNA platforms during COVID-19 yielded billions; GMO mosquitoes could similarly prime markets for next-gen shots, funnelling profits to elite stakeholders.

Back in 2008, Gates’ foundation doled out $100,000 to a Japanese scientist, Hiroyuki Matsuoka, to engineer mosquitoes that secrete malaria vaccine proteins in their saliva. Bite you? Boom – you’re “vaccinated.” No needle, no doctor, no choice. They called it a “flying syringe,” and it wasn’t some fringe fantasy; it was funded under Gates’ Grand Challenges Explorations, where he threw millions at 104 “bold ideas” for global health domination. Fast-forward, and outfits like Oxitec – backed by Gates cash – are releasing billions of GM bugs in places like Florida and Brazil, supposedly to fight diseases. But whispers from the lab? These could be tweaked to deliver anything: vaccines, gene therapies, or worse. These genetically engineered mosquitoes are not only being touted as a means to control population growth, but also as a way to inoculate people with vaccines without their explicit consent. As a seasoned finance analyst who has tracked the ways in which globalist billionaires transform “philanthropy” into lucrative business ventures, this initiative reeks of a depopulation agenda masquerading as a benevolent endeavor. Rather than saving lives, Gates is essentially attempting to playing god with people’s bodies, and the backlash from Africa is only the beginning. In essence, the hazardous and potentially deadly vaccines that people have been wary of and rejected can now be administered without their knowledge or consent, courtesy of these genetically modified mosquitoes. All it takes is a mosquito bite, and the vaccine is injected into the bloodstream, complete with untested and questionable substances, all without the individual’s permission. Why should any nation, proud of its heritage, allow Bill Gates and his associates to continue perpetrating their mass depopulation agenda on their soil? The very idea of allowing these “flying syringes” to infiltrate their ecosystems is a stark reminder of the need for vigilance and resistance against such insidious plans.

Bill Gates is Waging a High-Tech War on Mosquitoes

At What Cost to Humanity and the Environment?

Bill Gates’ ambitious plan to eradicate malaria is a complex combination of artificial intelligence, experimental vaccines, and genetic modification, known as gene drives, which are essentially “kill switches” for mosquitoes.

 At first glance, his plan appears to be a selfless act, aiming to save the lives of over 600,000 children under the age of five who die from malaria every year. However, beneath the surface of this seemingly altruistic endeavor lies a more sinister reality: Gates’ desire to control nature reflects the arrogance of the global elite, who view humanity and ecosystems as mere test subjects for their experiments. Gates portrays mosquitoes as malicious, but is he and his allies truly any different? Unlike mosquitoes, they have monopolized farmland, disrupted food supplies, and profited from crises under the guise of “charity” – actions that have had far more devastating consequences for human societies. The use of gene drives, the cornerstone of Gates’ mosquito eradication plan, poses significant risks to the environment and ecosystems. These irreversible genetic modifications have the potential to disrupt the delicate balance of nature in unpredictable ways. While mosquitoes can be a nuisance, they also play a crucial role in pollinating plants and supporting biodiversity. However, Gates’ solution to the malaria crisis disregards these essential roles, prioritizing short-term human intervention over long-term ecological stability. This reckless approach to genetic engineering is reminiscent of the same hubris that has plagued globalist experiments in agriculture, healthcare, and energy, which have often had disastrous consequences for the environment and human societies. The narrative surrounding the “war on malaria” also conceals a more insidious agenda: control.

Gates acknowledges that malaria research has been underfunded because its victims are “too poor to attract attention”, but who is responsible for perpetuating this imbalance if not the billionaires who profit from inequality? Gates’ projects are not about saving lives, but about consolidating power and using diseases as leverage to reengineer society and nature in the image of the global elite. The exploitation of the Global South by Western philanthropists and corporations has become a familiar pattern, with the beneficiaries of these “humanitarian” efforts often being the same biotech firms, AI companies, and elites who profit from controlling life at the molecular level. The use of gene drives as a tool for population control is a chilling possibility that cannot be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Given Gates’ history of using the Global South as a testing ground for his experiments, it is not far-fetched to imagine the use of gene drives for more sinister purposes. The same individual who has treated people as lab rats now seeks to play god with the natural world, ignoring the catastrophic consequences that his actions could have for the environment and human societies. The growing resistance to Western “philanthropy” in the Global South is a testament to the fact that people are no longer willing to be treated as test subjects for the experiments of the global elite. Ultimately, if Bill Gates truly wants to eliminate parasites, perhaps he should start by targeting the ones that are monopolizing resources and exploiting humanity. Mosquitoes may carry malaria, but Gates and his allies are carrying the far more malignant disease of hubris, which has already had devastating consequences for the environment and human societies. The cure for this disease is not found in a lab, but in the growing resistance of people who are rejecting the control of the global elite and demanding a more equitable and sustainable future for all. Financially, this is a goldmine for the elite. Gates invests in biotech firms like Oxitec and big pharma players, then “donates” to projects that create demand for their patents. It’s vertical integration on steroids – fund the “problem” (engineered bugs), sell the “solution” (vaccines via bite), and watch royalties flood in while populations dwindle. Remember his TED talk where he released mosquitoes on the audience to make a point about malaria? That wasn’t a stunt; it was foreshadowing. And don’t buy the fact-check spin that his current projects aren’t for vaccination – the tech’s the same gene-editing toolkit, and history shows he’s funded the syringe concept directly.

Bill Gates is actively utilizing insects as carriers for hazardous pathogens and recklessly dumping untested mRNA technology on impoverished communities, flagrantly disregarding fundamental conservative values such as informed consent, secure national borders, and unrestricted free markets. The Nuremberg Code, established to protect human rights, is being blatantly disregarded, while national sovereignty is being deliberately compromised. The potential consequences of these actions are alarming, ranging from ecological devastation and unforeseen genetic mutations to deliberately engineered pandemics designed to justify further authoritarian control. The state of Florida has already been transformed into a testing ground for these experiments, with billions of dollars being invested under the supervision of Governor DeSantis, despite the absence of comprehensive long-term studies to assess the safety and efficacy of these measures. We must reject this blatant attempt at technocratic domination and instead support courageous leaders like Traoré, who are taking a firm stance against these dangerous experiments. It is imperative that we invest in genuinely effective solutions, such as locally driven agricultural initiatives and traditional medicine, rather than relying on patented, potentially lethal products promoted by Gates. If we fail to take immediate action to halt these egregious practices, we risk being subjected to an unending barrage of experimental technologies concocted by globalist elites, as this sinister agenda is driven by an insatiable pursuit of wealth, power, and the systematic erosion of national sovereignty.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

Unpacking the revelations from the documentary titled Food Deception: The Global Poisoning Plot, and to begin with, right at the beginning of the documentary, an important fact is communicated, which is that in the last 50 plus years, how or what people eat has significantly changed. And this is a crucial reflection point, which necessitates that we ask the question, on what through this change about?

Well, first, we can note this change in light of the shift towards a higher consumption of ultra-processed foods. So, the term ‘ultra-processed food’ emerged in the 1980s, mostly used in reference to highly-processed convenience foods and snacks, often energy-dense, poor in nutrients, and inclusive of various synthetic additives such as emulsifiers, colours, artificial sweeteners, and flavor enhancers. Concern over such foods was part of the growing holistic and environmental health movements of the 1970–80s; yet, those who raised alarm about the encroachment of ultra-processed foods were often labeled, especially by industry and their powerful allies, as ‘food faddists’ and ‘pseudoscientists’.

Nevertheless, for decades, there was a significant amount of determined advocacy against ultra-processed foods, backed with clinical work, much of it by pioneers within the holistic medicine (now integrative, functional, and lifestyle medicine) movement. For instance, by the early 1970s, the topic of highly-processed foods finally became the subject of intense scientific and public debate. Included in this debate were a small but growing number of physicians and allied health professionals who promoted holistic medicine, an important part of which was dietary advice to limit highly-processed foods. When nutritional medicine pioneer Dr. Jeffrey Bland began lecturing on ‘food as medicine’ in the 1970s, he advocated for the removal of highly-processed foods (donuts, soda, and the like) during conference breaks, replacing them with whole fruits, nuts, and minimally processed items.

But, certainly the entrance and prevalence of ultra-processed foods did not occur on its own. In fact, it turns out that it was brought about by an industry that had little to do with food – being the cigarette industry – so much so that in the 90’s, the two largest food companies in the world were RJ Reynolds and Phillip Morris (which are both cigarette companies. And happened because, when the Surgeon General of the US announced during this same period that cigarettes were problematic (which was obviously going to hinder the profits of cigarette companies), well, cigarette companies used their profits to buy entire sections of Food Companies.

In fact, the two biggest Mergers and Acquisitions deals in world history up until the 90’s were the Cigarette Companies buying food companies. These 2 cigarette companies (being  RJ Reynolds and Phillip Morris) shifted their thousands of scientists from making cigarettes addictive to focusing on making food addictive. The Cigarette Industry further shifted all of their lobbying to lobbying for food… and created the horrible Food Pyramid where carbs and sugar were the base of the Pyramid. The Food industry then paid off the FDA, USDA, Harvard to create reports that sugar isn’t a cause of obesity. This is why America significantly shifted their diets to ultra high processed foods.

So, evidently, the nature of food eaten has changed from non-processed to ultra-processed foods, and this is because of the deliberate efforts of food corporations, and even non-food corporations – which is to say that there is a way on food and nutrition. Well, this necessitates that we question who else is involved in this plot, and what structures exist to hold them all accountable.

MANY FOOD CORPORATIONS KNOW THEIR PRODUCTS ARE HARMFUL TO CONSUMERS

Well, for one, a lot of the food corporations in the status quo are among the culprits in the war on food and nutrition. In fact, food corporations have known for a long time that they were harming people with high levels of sugar in their foods. For instance, in the year 1999, a group of men who controlled America’s largest food companies attended a meeting in the Minneapolis headquarters of Pillsbury. In attendance were CEOs and presidents from Nestle, Kraft and Nabisco, General Mills and Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola and Mars. The agenda was the emerging obesity epidemic and how to deal with it. These men were in constant battle with each other over what they called “stomach share” – the amount of consumers that any one company’s brand could take away from their competition.

Pillsbury’s chief technical officer ran the meeting. His intent was to get these men to agree that they had gone too far in creating and marketing products that posed the greatest health concerns–foods laden with sugar, salt and fat. He and others wanted these food giants to agree to be part of the solution, not the problem, by reformulating their foods to make them healthier. But, by looking at today’s obesity epidemic it is quite clear that the food companies did not agree, and only proceeded to fuel the problem further.

HOW LOBBYING PRACTICES HAVE CORRUPTED FOOD REGULATION

However, it is not the people over at the 1999 meeting in the Minneapolis headquarters of Pillsbury that learned to corrupt the vices of dissenters, regulators and credible science, because lobbying has become a highly weaponised tool from food corporations, and many diabolical corporations alike.

For instance, have you ever noticed how cheese is practically everywhere and in almost everything? Pizza crusts are stuffed with it. Salads are sprinkled with it. Burgers are smothered in it. Even vegetables, supposedly the healthy part of a meal, are often drowned in melted cheese sauce. Well, this is NOT an accident. It’s the result of decades of manipulation by one of the most quietly powerful food lobbies in the United States: being the dairy industry. And before we proceed, I certainly am aware that dairy can be among the healthier food groups, but make no mistake – this should not be a blanket assumption, being that cheese is either processed or ultra-processed, and pasteurised milk is not as healthy as it is marketed to be in comparison to the often unjustly vilified raw milk. And so, in essence, behind the dairy industry as well is a cartel-like structure of trade groups, marketing boards, and government partnerships that have worked together to artificially inflate the place of cheese and dairy in the human diet.

Let’s look at the US as a case study. The roots of America’s dairy dominance go back to World War I and II. During wartime, the government encouraged farmers to ramp up dairy production to feed troops overseas and keep the home front nourished. Milk, butter, and cheese were essentials. But when the wars ended, production didn’t stop. Farmers had built massive infrastructure to deliver milk in quantities that no longer matched demand.

Instead of scaling back, the US government stepped in. Federal price supports and subsidy programs propped up the dairy sector, buying up excess milk and converting it into shelf-stable products like cheese, powdered milk, and butter. These items were cheap to store and even cheaper to push. And so, over time, cheese went from being a relatively healthy food to a storage solution! And then, they got creative. In the 1980s, the USDA began working directly with fast food companies to (quote-unquote “solve” the surplus problem. One of the biggest partnerships was with Pizza Hut. With government assistance, they created the “cheese-stuffed crust pizza” to push more dairy.

By the way, pizza hut was NOT the only one. Domino’s pizza partnered with Dairy Management Inc. (a USDA-funded front group) to launch a new pizza with 40% more cheese. Taco Bell’s cheesy menu items were developed with the same organization’s help. Even McDonald’s began tweaking its menu to boost cheese consumption. And so, just like that, public health policy was working against public health!

Now, if this sounds like a conspiracy, it is likely because it practically is—only it’s all legal, tax-funded, and publicly documented. Here’s how it works: Dairy Management Inc is a marketing organisation funded by mandatory fees (checkoff programs) on dairy farmers. Dairy Management Inc also works in partnership with the USDA, meaning the same government that’s supposed to be promoting healthy eating is also helping the dairy industry sell more products. Then, between 1995 and 2023, the US provided over $50 billion in direct subsidies to the dairy industry, even though demand for liquid milk has been dropping for decades. All meaning that companies, regulators and government departments have all colluded in a corporatism plot, which prioritised private profit that is supported by public spending and shielded from normal market consequences. But, by the way Canada also has its own version of the dairy cartel that is currently colluding with the government to enforce a dairy production quota system that is detrimental to small farmers, as it is only the big dairy corporations that can afford them.

WHAT ARE THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THE SHIFT TOWARDS ULTRA-PROCESSED?

Now, one of the things we have to understand about the current predicament with regards to health is that however bad the effects of, say, phthalates or PFAS are on their own, things become so much worse in combination. This is considering that lab studies generally try to pinpoint the effects of individual chemicals, but the truth is that, out there in the real world, no-one is just exposed to one chemical. Instead, they’re exposed to dozens, maybe hundreds at a time.

The combination of particular substances is likely to result in enhanced negative effects or even new effects, as this study (which I’ve never seen anybody discuss) reveals. The common food emulsifier glycerin monostearate, which is readily found in processed food, significantly enhances the hormone-disrupting effects of phthalates, leading to increased testosterone decline and increased testicular damage in rats.

Similarly, Nitrosamines in processed meats can cause DNA alkylation damage leading to double-strand breaks (or DSBs). Acrylamide in fried foods also generates what is called Reactive Oxygen Species (or ROS), which is a neurotoxin. And so, the short-term takeaway is that eating processed food – which contains untold chemical additives – is probably one of the worst things you can do in a context where food corporations are pushing estrogenic and obesogenic substances. If you haven’t already, you would kindly need to consider stopping to eating processed and ultra-processed food, opting instead for whole foods.

THE PROBLEM WITH FLUORIDATED MILK

Now, a warning about fluoridated milk was re-echoed in the documentary Food Deception: The Global Poisoning Plot, specifically in light of how many milk brands contain fluoride, and how this has health ramifications for children. Now, Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in rocks, soil, and water. It’s a form of fluorine, a chemical element, and it exists in small amounts in plants, animals, and even our bodies. BUT, on average, the human body contains about 2,600 mg of fluoride, mostly stored in bones and teeth, which is far more than what is naturally acceptable; in other words, it is far more than what people would be exposed to if they only interacted with in the small, naturally occurring amounts found in plants, soil and water.

Well, while fluoride is promoted for preventing cavities, the levels that people are exposed to through specifically tap water, toothpaste, and processed foods are unnaturally high, and that’s where the trouble begins. But, in addition, fluoride is NOT a harmless nutrient like vitamin C or magnesium. It’s a toxin that can wreck your body when you get too much of it. Unlike other minerals, your body struggles to excrete fluoride, so it builds up in your bones, teeth, organs, and even your brain over time. And this accumulation can even lead to a range of health issues, many of which you might not immediately connect to fluoride.

Here is why this is concerning: Studies have linked high fluoride exposure to cognitive problems, including reduced IQ in children and brain fog in adults. Fluoride can cross the blood-brain barrier, potentially disrupting neurological function and contributing to memory issues or difficulty concentrating. But, as troubling as it is for adults, it is especially alarming for children, whose developing brains are more vulnerable. Research from places like China and India, where fluoride levels in water are naturally high, shows a clear connection between fluoride exposure and lower cognitive performance.

Then, in addition, there is also the problem of mineral displacement. More specifically, fluoride displaces iodine, which your thyroid needs to regulate metabolism, energy, and hormones. This can, in turn, lead to hypothyroidism, leaving you feeling sluggish, gaining weight, or just not strong in your body. It also competes with calcium and magnesium, essential for strong bones and muscles, potentially weakening bones and causing joint pain – and so, ironically, fluoride weakens bones that strengthen them. And so, considering that milk is a staple in the diets of billions, the fluoridation of milk – just like the fluoridation of water – makes many susceptible to health risk if they do not know these facts.

GOT RAW MILK? THE WAR ON A CRUCIAL DAIRY SOURCE

During the Biden-Harris administration, small farms and companies were being mandated by the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to destroy all of their raw dairy products after receiving a cease and desist order from the state – primarily because of raw milk. So, why was there this effort to target raw milk, which is non pasteurised and non-fluoridated. Well, first, raw milk proprietors tend to be small operations with limited political clout who giant agricultural interests see as competition they would like to wipe – much like Monsanto does with smaller farmers. Second, raw milk is actually full of beneficial bacteria that get wiped out during pasteurisation. But, of course, a government susceptible to a diabolical agenda to depopulate the world will try to stamp out what is good and healthy for people to consume by whatever means available to them – this is part of the reason farmers are being asked to destroy organic crops and use GMO seeds.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Target Malaria: Pioneering Genetic Technologies to ”Combat” Malaria

Target Malaria is a not-for-profit international research consortium dedicated to developing and sharing innovative genetic technologies aimed at controlling malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. The initiative originated as a university-based research program in 2005, initially exploring genetic modifications in mosquitoes. By 2012, it had evolved into a broader consortium, incorporating multidisciplinary expertise from scientists, social scientists, and regulatory specialists. At the heart of Target Malaria’s strategy is gene drive technology, which uses CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to introduce modifications that spread through mosquito populations at higher-than-normal inheritance rates. They say these modifications typically aim to reduce female mosquito fertility or bias offspring toward males, leading to population decline over generations. Target Malaria operates in several African countries, including Uganda, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Ghana, collaborating with local institutions such as the Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) and the Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS) in Burkina Faso. In Uganda, recent contained studies on non-gene drive mosquitoes have advanced understanding of male bias traits. Past activities in Burkina Faso included releases of non-gene drive genetically modified mosquitoes in 2019, marking early field testing. Primary funding comes from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Open Philanthropy Project, with additional support from entities like the UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), the European Commission, the Medical Research Council (MRC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and African governmental bodies such as the Uganda Ministry of Health.

Bill Gates’ Philanthro-Capitalism

In Africa, malaria claims thousands of lives annually, with over 10,000 fatalities reported in Burkina Faso alone in 2023. However, a closer examination reveals the significant financial interests at play. Bill Gates, often perceived as a philanthropist, is also an investor with substantial stakes in biotech firms and pharmaceutical giants that stand to gain from innovations like these. Essentially, the strategy involves creating a problem, or exaggerating its severity, then selling the solution, and reaping the financial benefits while the local population bears the risks. From a financial perspective, this approach is a classic example of the globalist playbook, where costs are externalized to impoverished nations, and the elite reap the benefits of patents and subsidies. The project, backed by Gates and allegedly linked to US military interests, has turned African soil into a testing ground for gene-drive technology, which poses significant risks, including ecological disasters and the potential for weaponized biology. Traoré has taken a firm stance, ordering laboratories to be sealed, samples destroyed, and all activities halted due to concerns over biosafety, ethics, and ecology. The public outcry from locals and anti-Western activists has also played a significant role, as they reject the narrative that this is a form of assistance, instead viewing it as interference. The issue of sovereignty, a core conservative value under attack worldwide, is a critical aspect of this debate. The military government of Burkina Faso is pushing back against foreign NGOs and projects that undermine local control, revoking licenses and asserting that Africans will not be used as test subjects for Western experiments. Traoré is a hero in this context, thinking outside the globalist box, while other African leaders succumb to the lure of handouts. Critics argue that halting this project could hinder progress in combating malaria, but this is the same fear-mongering tactic used to promote every globalist agenda, from vaccines to climate change initiatives.

Traditional methods, such as bed nets and insecticides, have proven effective in combating malaria without resorting to genetic manipulation. The ethical red flags surrounding this project are glaring, including a lack of transparency, potential long-term harm to biodiversity, and the absence of genuine input from the affected population. Gates’ track record is questionable, given his ties to population control rhetoric and investments that conveniently align with his charitable work. This suspension serves as a beacon for conservatives worldwide, highlighting the need to reject globalist overlords, protect borders, and prioritize fiscal and national independence. More countries should follow Burkina Faso’s lead, abandoning the Gates-funded initiatives that come with strings attached and investing in homegrown solutions that do not compromise their sovereignty. If we fail to do so, we risk becoming lab rats in their grand experiment, with our nations and ecosystems being exploited for the benefit of the global elite. The people of Burkina Faso have made it clear that they will not be used as test subjects for Western experiments, and their stance serves as a powerful example for other nations to follow. By taking control of their own destiny and rejecting the influence of globalist interests, they are reclaiming their sovereignty and protecting their people from the risks associated with untested and potentially harmful technologies.

Bill Gates’ GMO Mosquitoes – Flying Syringes for Forced Vaccination and Global Control

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation invested a staggering $41 million in Oxitec, a British biotech firm, to develop these genetically modified mosquitoes that purportedly aim to eradicate malaria. However, numerous health experts have dubbed these creatures “flying syringes,” because their true purpose is to covertly vaccinate the general population with potentially hazardous vaccines that induce sterility in both men and women, without their knowledge or consent. This could lead to a significant increase in infertility, with women becoming barren and men becoming impotent on a massive scale, highlighting just one of the many risks associated with this technology.

Back in 2008, Gates’ foundation doled out $100,000 to a Japanese scientist, Hiroyuki Matsuoka, to engineer mosquitoes that secrete malaria vaccine proteins in their saliva. Bite you? Boom – you’re “vaccinated.” No needle, no doctor, no choice. They called it a “flying syringe,” and it wasn’t some fringe fantasy; it was funded under Gates’ Grand Challenges Explorations, where he threw millions at 104 “bold ideas” for global health domination. Fast-forward, and outfits like Oxitec – backed by Gates cash – are releasing billions of GM bugs in places like Florida and Brazil, supposedly to fight diseases. But whispers from the lab? These could be tweaked to deliver anything: vaccines, gene therapies, or worse. These genetically engineered mosquitoes are not only being touted as a means to control population growth, but also as a way to inoculate people with vaccines without their explicit consent. As a seasoned finance analyst who has tracked the ways in which globalist billionaires transform “philanthropy” into lucrative business ventures, this initiative reeks of a depopulation agenda masquerading as a benevolent endeavor. Rather than saving lives, Gates is essentially attempting to playing god with people’s bodies, and the backlash from Africa is only the beginning. In essence, the hazardous and potentially deadly vaccines that people have been wary of and rejected can now be administered without their knowledge or consent, courtesy of these genetically modified mosquitoes. All it takes is a mosquito bite, and the vaccine is injected into the bloodstream, complete with untested and questionable substances, all without the individual’s permission. Why should any nation, proud of its heritage, allow Bill Gates and his associates to continue perpetrating their mass depopulation agenda on their soil? The very idea of allowing these “flying syringes” to infiltrate their ecosystems is a stark reminder of the need for vigilance and resistance against such insidious plans.

Bill Gates is Waging a High-Tech War on Mosquitoes

At What Cost to Humanity and the Environment?

Bill Gates’ ambitious plan to eradicate malaria is a complex combination of artificial intelligence, experimental vaccines, and genetic modification, known as gene drives, which are essentially “kill switches” for mosquitoes.

 At first glance, his plan appears to be a selfless act, aiming to save the lives of over 600,000 children under the age of five who die from malaria every year. However, beneath the surface of this seemingly altruistic endeavor lies a more sinister reality: Gates’ desire to control nature reflects the arrogance of the global elite, who view humanity and ecosystems as mere test subjects for their experiments. Gates portrays mosquitoes as malicious, but is he and his allies truly any different? Unlike mosquitoes, they have monopolized farmland, disrupted food supplies, and profited from crises under the guise of “charity” – actions that have had far more devastating consequences for human societies. The use of gene drives, the cornerstone of Gates’ mosquito eradication plan, poses significant risks to the environment and ecosystems. These irreversible genetic modifications have the potential to disrupt the delicate balance of nature in unpredictable ways. While mosquitoes can be a nuisance, they also play a crucial role in pollinating plants and supporting biodiversity. However, Gates’ solution to the malaria crisis disregards these essential roles, prioritizing short-term human intervention over long-term ecological stability. This reckless approach to genetic engineering is reminiscent of the same hubris that has plagued globalist experiments in agriculture, healthcare, and energy, which have often had disastrous consequences for the environment and human societies. The narrative surrounding the “war on malaria” also conceals a more insidious agenda: control.

Gates acknowledges that malaria research has been underfunded because its victims are “too poor to attract attention”, but who is responsible for perpetuating this imbalance if not the billionaires who profit from inequality? Gates’ projects are not about saving lives, but about consolidating power and using diseases as leverage to reengineer society and nature in the image of the global elite. The exploitation of the Global South by Western philanthropists and corporations has become a familiar pattern, with the beneficiaries of these “humanitarian” efforts often being the same biotech firms, AI companies, and elites who profit from controlling life at the molecular level. The use of gene drives as a tool for population control is a chilling possibility that cannot be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Given Gates’ history of using the Global South as a testing ground for his experiments, it is not far-fetched to imagine the use of gene drives for more sinister purposes. The same individual who has treated people as lab rats now seeks to play god with the natural world, ignoring the catastrophic consequences that his actions could have for the environment and human societies. The growing resistance to Western “philanthropy” in the Global South is a testament to the fact that people are no longer willing to be treated as test subjects for the experiments of the global elite. Ultimately, if Bill Gates truly wants to eliminate parasites, perhaps he should start by targeting the ones that are monopolizing resources and exploiting humanity. Mosquitoes may carry malaria, but Gates and his allies are carrying the far more malignant disease of hubris, which has already had devastating consequences for the environment and human societies. The cure for this disease is not found in a lab, but in the growing resistance of people who are rejecting the control of the global elite and demanding a more equitable and sustainable future for all. Financially, this is a goldmine for the elite. Gates invests in biotech firms like Oxitec and big pharma players, then “donates” to projects that create demand for their patents. It’s vertical integration on steroids – fund the “problem” (engineered bugs), sell the “solution” (vaccines via bite), and watch royalties flood in while populations dwindle. Remember his TED talk where he released mosquitoes on the audience to make a point about malaria? That wasn’t a stunt; it was foreshadowing. And don’t buy the fact-check spin that his current projects aren’t for vaccination – the tech’s the same gene-editing toolkit, and history shows he’s funded the syringe concept directly.

Bill Gates is actively utilizing insects as carriers for hazardous pathogens and recklessly dumping untested mRNA technology on impoverished communities, flagrantly disregarding fundamental conservative values such as informed consent, secure national borders, and unrestricted free markets. The Nuremberg Code, established to protect human rights, is being blatantly disregarded, while national sovereignty is being deliberately compromised. The potential consequences of these actions are alarming, ranging from ecological devastation and unforeseen genetic mutations to deliberately engineered pandemics designed to justify further authoritarian control. The state of Florida has already been transformed into a testing ground for these experiments, with billions of dollars being invested under the supervision of Governor DeSantis, despite the absence of comprehensive long-term studies to assess the safety and efficacy of these measures. We must reject this blatant attempt at technocratic domination and instead support courageous leaders like Traoré, who are taking a firm stance against these dangerous experiments. It is imperative that we invest in genuinely effective solutions, such as locally driven agricultural initiatives and traditional medicine, rather than relying on patented, potentially lethal products promoted by Gates. If we fail to take immediate action to halt these egregious practices, we risk being subjected to an unending barrage of experimental technologies concocted by globalist elites, as this sinister agenda is driven by an insatiable pursuit of wealth, power, and the systematic erosion of national sovereignty.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

Healthcare as one of the 7 areas that globalists seek to manipulate, and we ought to start with some historical context, regarding how the COVID plandemic enabled globalists to test a militarised healthcare system.

Now, in former US president Eisenhower’s farewell speech of January 17, 1961, he stated that “…in the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” Sixty-three years on, many understand what he was referring to. We’ve seen the cycle of undeclared wars and decades-long foreign occupations that are undertaken on nebulous or even outright false pretences. We’ve also seen the ever-hungry mega-industry that produces super-expensive, high-tech killing devices of every imaginable form, as well as the steady stream of traumatised soldiers that it spits out. Evidently, war, to some, has become big business! And as Eisenhower warned, as long as those profiting from it drive the policy and the money stream (in other words – if they can weaponise the laws), the MIC will continue to grow.

In light of this contextualisation of the MIC, one would think that other mega-industries – the medical industry in particular – have generally fared better in public perception than the military-industrial complex; in that this MIC seemed a far more diabolical industry. Well, that was until the covid pandemic, but not forsaking a number of prior controversies. But this is really to say that among its many lessons, the Covid plandemic era has taught us this: if you substitute Pfizer and Moderna for Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, and swap the NIH and CDC for the Pentagon, you essentially get the same result. Meaning that not only is the “medical-industrial complex” every bit as real as its military-industrial counterpart, but, it is also every bit as real a problem, precisely because they are different sides of the same coin since the military industrial complex informed the weaponisation of the healthcare system in the COVID era. So, how did this happen?

Well, during the Covid era, one can infer interesting parallels to military operations. For instance, by early-to-mid 2020, it became obvious to those paying attention that the Covid “response,” while promoted as a medical initiative, was in fact a military operation. Martial law had effectively been declared in March 2020, after the Covid response (and practically speaking, control of the nation) was ceded to the National Security Council. Civil liberties – including the freedoms of assembly, worship, the right to travel, to earn one’s living, to pursue one’s education, or to obtain legal relief – were rendered null and void. In addition, top-down diktats on how to manage Covid patients were handed down to physicians from high above, and these were enforced with a militaristic rigidity unseen in doctors’ professional lifetimes. Meanwhile, the mandated protocols also made no sense: they ignored fundamental tenets of both sound medical practice and medical ethics; they shamelessly lied about well-known interventions, while their mandated protocols killed people.

What was also interesting to note during that time is that those physicians and other professionals who spoke out were effectively court-martialed. State medical boards, specialty certification boards, and large healthcare system employers virtually tripped over each other in the rush to de-license, decertify, and fire dissenters. Genuine, courageous physicians who actually treat patients, such as Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Scott Jensen, Simone Gold, and others, were persecuted, while non-practicing bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci were hailed with false titles like “America’s Top Doctor.” The propaganda was as nauseating as it was blatant. And the subsequent violence was no different.

But, speaking of lies about well-known interventions, you’d recall the ivermectin debate, that president Trump was involved in during that period. Well, as more evidence came out supporting Trump’s claim of the comparative benefit of using ivermectin in comparison to vaccines and all other protocols that were mandated, the FDA in the Biden era, even tried to back-peddle on their dismissal of ivermectin. In particular, the FDA claimed their Ivermectin smear campaign was only related to people self-medicating w/ a veterinary formulation of the drug.

However, in a 2021 interview with the American Medical Association, FDA Director John Farley discouraged physicians from prescribing Ivermectin, calling it a ‘tragic choice’. He stated that (quote): “Making that choice to choose Ivermectin over a vaccine can be a tragic choice that can lead to them getting very sick, getting admitted to the hospital, or even dying from COVID.

This ultimately means that the concerning tenets that have driven the military industrial complex were incorporated into the healthcare system. During covid, globalist debuted this militarised so-called healthcare response, and thus in seeking to manipulate healthcare, want similar control. Why else would there be a WHO pandemic treaty and IHR that try to centralise power to dictate health policy on the Director General, except to great a legal justification for a militarised top down approach to global healthcare?

MEDICINE BECAME BIG BUSINESS: THE COMMERCIALISATION OF SICKNESS AND INFIRMITY 

Now, in light of the parallels between the military and the medical industrial complexes, we alluded to the fact that in light of the operations of the military industrial complex, war has become big business. Well, as far as institutional capture is concerned, the medical establishment has done the same, especially with cancer. You’d recall that we discussed here on ‘The War Room’ how not only is cancer man-made, but it is also big business, a multi-billion dollar industry. It involves getting people to get cancer, to be poisoned with chemotherapy, and large amounts of money spent on continuous research for a cure that apparently does not exist (which is a lie). And the biggest proof of this intentional weaponisation and commercialisation of cancer is that, simply put, cancer did NOT really exist more than 50 years ago but started booming with the introduction of processed food loaded with massive amounts of sugar and chemicals.

So, you’ve just heard the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD. warn about the artificial and genetically modified food that causes cancer. Well, another crucial cause is exposure to carcinogenic systems. Now, a carcinogen is any substance, agent, or process that can induce cancer. They can cause cancer by damaging DNA or interfering with cellular processes (hence cancer is known as an attack on healthy cells by a cancerous cell). Examples of these carcinogens include asbestos, benzene, radon and even tobacco smoke.

This is critical to note because it exposes a detrimental irony when it comes to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is also a carcinogenic system! It is inherently a harmful concoction of chemicals that was initially created as a weapon, and then suddenly became rebranded as a highly profitable health intervention.

There you have it, this same chemical agent that was used to kill people is now being used to allegedly treat cancer. And ironically, despite the modifications on it, chemotherapy can also function as a carcinogen! More specifically, chemotherapy drugs are designed to target and destroy rapidly dividing cells, including cancer cells, but they can also affect healthy cells that divide quickly, like those in the bone marrow, hair follicles, and digestive tract. However, some chemotherapy agents, particularly alkylating agents, have been linked to an increased risk of developing certain types of leukemia or other secondary cancers. And the risk of developing a second cancer after chemotherapy is influenced by factors like the type of chemotherapy drugs used, the dosage, the duration of treatment, and the individual’s overall health. ALL of this is to say that (IRONICALLY) chemotherapy also functions as a carcinogen, meaning that it is a cancer causing agent.

And so this details the institutionalisation of the commercialisation of sickness and infirmity. The medical industrial complex sees sickness as an opportunity to form a market or customer base; and so, this industry interventions that it knows are harmful or not effective in the long run, and merely brands them as an acceptable panacea. What makes this a problem of institutional corruption, as opposed to mere isolated cases of unethical business conduct is that this is standard practice in the medical industry – all while legitimate or just better cures are hidden.

Take Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong, who we recently discussed. So, in an interview with Tucker Carlson he detailed that there actually is a medical breakthrough in fighting cancer. However, because of politics, the Deep State and Big Pharma it’s being suppressed. Meaning that there is an intervention for which he has the data and research to prove has been helpful, yet special interests block it – pointing to systemic institutional corruption in the medical industry. Meanwhile, Dr Mark Hyman also told Tucker Carlson about the keto diet’s ability to fight cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia and more. And so, literally eating certain good organic foods, is a comparatively far better option to chemotherapy.

MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONS: THE MEDICAL CARTEL’S TOOL FOR WEAPONISING LAWS

We then also have to address how the medical industrial complex weaponised laws, through formal legal avenues and also through the establishment of organisations that serve special interests. For instance, we’ve spoken about the audacious incident where the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America have filed a federal lawsuit against Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr for withdrawing COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.

The cartel also demanded a federal judge reinstate the COVID shot recommendations (again for children and pregnant women)—and block the US Department of HHS from enforcing or promoting RFK Jr’s May directive that removed them. Then, they also argued that Kennedy’s directive violates (quote) “norms” by bypassing the CDC and its ACIP panel, and undermines their ability to push the shot to patients and secure insurance coverage. This revealed a jarring display of the audacity of the medical industrial complex to use laws to fight or undermine progress. Because they obviously know that there are serious ramifications from the COVID jabs, but were adamant to use formal legal structures to block the US Department of HHS from enforcing or promoting RFK Jr’s May directive that removed those jabs from the recommendation list.

Similarly, we’ve been told to “listen to scientists” for years, while their credibility was tied to medical societies and associations that vouched for their alleged credibility. BUT… the dark and corrupt history behind the largest group of health professionals in the US, being the American Medical Association, suggests that these organisations are part of the problem of systemic institutional rot and corruption.

Thankfully, the corruption of these medical associations is being exposed on the regular today. For example, files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (also called WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical. The American Medical Association, The Endocrine Society, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and thousands of doctors worldwide rely on WPATH. It is considered the leading global authority on gender medicine.

And yet WPATH’s internal files, which include written discussions and a video, reveal that its members know they are creating victims and not getting “informed consent.” Victims include a 10-year-old girl, a 13-year-old developmentally delayed adolescent, and individuals suffering from schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses. Meanwhile, WPATH members indicate repeatedly that they know that many children and their parents don’t understand the effects that puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries will have on their bodies. And yet, they continue to perform and advocate for gender medicine. In any case, the WPATH Files prove that gender medicine is comprised of unregulated and pseudoscientific experiments on children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults.

Then there is also the American Heart Association. This association exposes systemic corruption in the medical industry in that it also serves to propagate false and detrimental health directives. You’d recall that we had a discussion of the hoax behind the claim that humans need to consume very little saturated fats and salt, which heavily implicated Ancel Keys, who had the backing of the American Heart Association. Well, even in the status quo the American Heart Association recommends aiming for a dietary pattern that achieves less than 6% of total calories from saturated fat. This is to say, that for example, if you need about 2,000 calories a day, no more than 120 of them should come from saturated fat – the same saturated fat that has now been proven to be essential for your health and to play an essential role in the functionality of your body!

Well, this unaccountable attitude towards accurate nutritional science in the present (as well) is actually less surprising when you consider that the AHA has been operating as a corrupt, anti-health lobby institution for the medical industrial complex, and even food companies. For instance, this year, the American Heart Association sent an employee to TEXAS to fight a bill that would stop food stamps from covering unhealthy items such as candy and soda—part of the MAHA initiatives.

Well, when you follow the money, you understand why the AHA has these inclinations. Not only is it funded by many pharmaceutical corporations, but General Mills and Pepsi Co are both forum members of The American Heart Association.

The question then is, why have these associations averted scrutiny for all these years? Well, for one the people who back them, like the Rockefellers have deep pockets: they not only pay for their operations, but pay to insure they either receive positive coverage (think the mainstream media and vaccines), or pay to ensure they remain under the radar. The second reason is that these organisations play on the liberal inclinations of society, in a world where identity politics are also expected to govern organisational culture. For instance, (and this is not a joke), the American Medical Association declared WEIGHT measurement, through the Body Mass Index (or BMI) to be RACIST, of all things – which obviously fit well in a culture of “body positivity”, and negative reinforcement for unhealthy habits.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Sudan Health Ministry Reports Over 1,300 New Cholera Cases in One Week

the Sudanese Health Ministry reported that from July 12-18, a total of 18 people died across Sudan due to this deadly disease spread via contaminated water. Over 91,000 cases since July 2024, a total of 2,302 deaths and infections recorded in 17 out of 18 states. Interestingly, the report then goes on to say that cholera cases in the Khartoum State are declining following a ten-day vaccination campaign, with 2.24 million people vaccinated (96% coverage). This was the report given by the WHO, stating that new cases dropped from 1,500 to 10-11 per day. Let’s quickly resolve the claims by the WHO.

Zimbabwe door-to-door cholera vaccination campaign

Zimbabwe launched a cholera vaccination campaign to immunize over 2 million people against the waterborne disease, amid an outbreak that has killed hundreds since early 2023. In response to the cholera update, the government implemented an oral cholera vaccination programme, aiming to inoculate over 2.3 million people. The single-shot OCV provides six months of protection against the diarrhoeal illness. So, boosters? But now, they are being used as a poster child for other countries to follow suit.

Mass cholera vaccination carried out in Southern Africa

SADC urged Member States to jointly plan and implement synchronised cross border vaccination campaigns against Cholera, if necessary, and mobilise vaccines for affected and non-affected countries at risk. The organization also devoted to “increase investment in the current cholera emergency response” and “accelerate local and regional manufacturing of cholera vaccines” among other measures. Cholera outbreaks had been reported in several SADC countries, most notably Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania. In Mozambique alone, they rolled out a target to vaccinate over 2 million people against cholera. Kenya has also been running a much-celebrated Vaccine campaign. 72% Increase in Cholera Vaccine Revenues, If I’m talking about it, it means there is money involved.

The cost to immunize against cholera is between US$0.10 and US$4.00 per vaccination. The Vaxchora vaccine can cost more than US$250. Since the beginning of 2023, there have been 24 reactive cholera vaccination campaigns implemented in 12 countries. But, there is a global shortage of cholera vaccines. From January 2023 to January 2024, 76 million oral cholera vaccines (OCV) were requested by 14 countries, while only 38 million doses were available. The World Health Organization (WHO) has three pre-qualified OCVs: Dukoral®, Shanchol, and Euvichol®. One of these OCV manufacturers reported a 72% increase in revenues today. On February 15, 2024, Valneva SE reported its revenue for 2023. Last year, sales of Valneav’s DUKORAL® vaccine amounted to €29.8 million (US32 million), a significant increase from the €17.3 million recorded in 2022. This significant increase can be attributed to the recovery of the private travel markets and price hikes. In a press release, Peter Bühler, Valneva’s Chief Financial Officer, commented, “In 2023, Valneva successfully executed key strategic objectives despite a difficult economic environment…. we are entering 2024 in a good financial position to support our commercial and R&D objectives.” It’s a money-making gimmick for some, fuelled by something deeper and darker. The depopulation agenda.

EuBiologics main supplier of cholera vaccine to global vaccine stockpile

The Oral Cholera Vaccine was developed with the support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through the International Vaccine Institute. This vaccine technology was then transferred to a South Korean Company EuBiologics, which is mass producing the Euvichol oral cholera vaccine. This vaccine was introduced in Haiti and Malawi as well as in other African countries. The WHO then pre-qualified this cholera vaccine and is now the only oral cholera vaccine available for mass vaccination campaigns. Why? Surprisingly, the other prequalified oral cholera vaccine Shanchol was discontinued and production stopped amidst cholera outbreaks. Coincidentally, Sanofi stopped producing the Shanchol vaccine citing less demand for cholera vaccines. Yet as soon as that happens and the Gates invested Euvichol is the only vaccine in the market the demand for cholera vaccines shoots sky high! Currently EuBiologics is the main supplier of the cholera vaccine to the global vaccine stockpile and Euvichol-Plus is the primary product in use.

Revelations about unnecessary and experimental vaccination

Notice the similarities between the vaccines that have been covered. The Oral Cholera Vaccine and the Oral Polio Vaccine have one manufacturer that Gates has invested in, and they become the main or sole supplier of the vaccine globally. In 2022, A European Parliamentary Question asked whether the European Commission had investigated the disturbing revelations about the unnecessary and experimental vaccination of the Haitian people organized by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). What disturbing revelations? World renowned expert on cholera, Professor Renaud Piarroux, exposed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation organized a large-scale trial of the single-dose vaccine using bogus publications and modelling, without clarifying that cholera had disappeared in Haiti two years earlier. The aim of the mass vaccination campaign was to gain support and create a market for the oral cholera vaccine, since Bill Gates owns cholera vaccine factories in South Korea. This vaccine trial in Haiti had been supported as a joint investment between BMGF and with the European Commission (EC) committing close to EUR10 million. Additionally, the European Commission was jointly investing close to EUR100 million in ‘health in Africa’ with the BMGF. The European Parliament questioned why the joint investment (BMGF and EC) was happening despite Microsoft laying off 25,000 European workers, and with the claims that these experimental vaccinations were not necessary.

They always seem to have the money to give people poisonous vaccines but Not Clean Water… Don’t take their poison chemicals. Have you learned nothing? The people who seek to exterminate you … cannot give you healing. How do the African people not know that they have been test subjects for vaccines since Gates and company came along?

The WHO is a criminal racketeering organisation

As explained by Dr. David Martin, the WHO is a “criminal racketeering organisation”—founded by eugenicists—which has been, since 1953, “exclusively a vaccine promoting enterprise, for the benefit of the people who have a commercial interest in vaccines”. The minute the people who have a financial incentive to gain from the decision to declare a pandemic, the minute they’re the ones who are collecting data… they’re going to collect the data that actually justifies their existence. As long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability.

Namibia’s New Surveillance Strategy: A Leap Toward Better Health Security

Namibia has made a significant stride in public health surveillance by launching the Event-Based Surveillance (EBS) Guideline in Windhoek. This move aims to foster early detection and rapid response to health threats such as malaria and cholera, integrating information from diverse sectors for comprehensive monitoring. Supported by the Africa CDC and WHO, Namibia’s approach tailors public health solutions to its unique challenges, bolstering its capacity to manage acute health risks. This initiative comes at a time, coinciding with ongoing outbreaks in the region. With the third edition of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy enhancing information flow from local to national levels, Namibia is reinforcing its ability to protect public health. The adoption of these guidelines aligns with continental efforts to strengthen public health systems and is a step toward improving epidemic intelligence across Africa.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

The war on the census fraud, and we ought to begin with establishing a crucial fact, which is that the census counting process does not follow a scientific process of methodology. And yet, many people genuinely think that this body of work that the government spends exorbitant amounts of money on is supposed to reflect a degree of accuracy, thus being worthwhile for interpreting the state of a respective nation. BUT, the methods used in the census typically involve door-to-door surveys (with gross inaccuracies), postal questionnaires (that not many people care to answer), and even modern approaches like combining data from multiple sources, including administrative records and registers (while that data is also susceptible to error). And so, the government agency in charge of the census will collect, and compile all of this faulty data; then use it for analysis.

So, this obviously makes the census prone to inaccuracy, but also prone to being highly politicised. In essence, what and who is emphasised on the census matters relative to the objectives of the authority in charge. And we see this across various nations, including the US, England and even Australia. In Australia, for instance, while aboriginals were counted as part of the census, a law in 1901 changed that, and rendered them excluded from the census, and subsequently from the state’s mandate.

IN ADDITION TO LACKING A SCIENTIFIC METHOD, CENSUS CONDUCTORS MAKE UNACCEPTABLE ERRORS

But, it’s not just that the census method lacks a scientific method and accuracy; it is also that those conducting it make ridiculous errors. And here, we need to look at the US 2020 census as a case study, because that was a fairly messy development that exposed a number of the underlying issues with the census – in the US and other nations as well. Well, it transpired that the director of the Census Bureau announced in November 2020 that irregularities had been found during the numbers-crunching phase of the 2020 census, a development that jeopardises the statistical agency’s ability to meet a year-end submission period for handing in numbers used for divvying up congressional seats. Meanwhile, the Census Bureau already was facing a shortened schedule of two and a half months for processing the data collected during the 2020 census — about half the time originally planned. But, at the same time, the Census Bureau would not say what the anomalies were… That was until an additional development came to the surface.

In particular, texts from an Alabama census supervisor, in 2020, were found to contain communication that laid out how census takers should fake data to mark households as having only one resident even if they had no idea how many people actually lived there. The goal of the texts from October, obtained by The Associated Press, was to check off as many households as possible on the list of homes census takers were supposed to visit because residents never had filled out census questionnaires. The supervisor wanted the census takers to finalize cases — without interviewing households.

And yet, that was not the end of the census problem in Alabama because the Alabama Secretary of State in 2024 discovered that ‘thousands’ of non-citizens registered to vote in the November 2024 election! Secretary of State, Wes Allen then proceeded to order an immediate investigation into this.

UNPACKING THE ISSUES WITH THE 2020 CENSUS

Now, a number of media personalities attributed this 2020 census problem to the Trump administration because it was waging a legal battle to end the once-a-decade head count early; and we ought to respond to this. BUT, the problems with the census long pre-dated president Trump’s time in office. Issues like staff not being well equipped to conduct the census were issues innate to the bureau from the very first ever census that was conducted in the US. On top of that, there has been less of a rigid employment process at the Census Bureau, which has meant that staffers do not have an extensive background check to confirm their competence, while there has been a persistent problem in the census bureau where the lack of background checks has meant that violent criminals are employed, thus making Americans less willing to comply with the (especially) the door-to-door census process – which is actually far more serious a concern.

In more detail, Thirteen years after a federal investigation blasted the U.S. Census Bureau for hiring criminals to enter American homes to gather statistics for the decennial count, a new audit reveals the disturbing practice continues. In fact, more than a decade after the problem was exposed workers for the 2020 count were not properly vetted and many with criminal records had direct interactions with the public. The most recent probe, conducted by the Department of Commerce Inspector General, found that “dozens of employees who worked on address canvassing in advance of the 2020 census had major issues flagged on their investigations, which typically means employees are automatically disqualified from their federal jobs.”

Chunks of the 28-page report are redacted but the gist is well conveyed, that the Census Bureau has long failed to screen its workforce and therefore endangers the public. It’s not like there isn’t a vetting system in place. When one of the 248 regional offices recruit a candidate, the Census Investigative Services (CIS) at the agency’s headquarters in Suitland, Maryland is charged with conducting a pre-employment suitability review. The process includes sending fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and a credit history as well as self-disclosed criminal record to CIS for review. Nevertheless, the Bureau still hires felons—including sex offenders—at regional offices nationwide. As an example, a few years ago the Charlotte, North Carolina Area Census Office (ACO) employed a man convicted of a felony involving sex with a child as a regional recruiting manager because despite his criminal record, he passed the Census Bureau’s background check.

The Bureau’s negligent security practices have been on the radar of federal lawmakers for years. Over a decade ago, Congressional investigators slammed the agency for failing to adequately conduct mandatory background checks for tens of thousands of workers, resulting in the hiring of hundreds of violent criminals. At the time, the probe found that more than 35,000 temporary census workers were employed without the proper criminal background check, which includes fingerprinting. That means that more than one-fifth of the canvassing workforce did not get properly processed or fully screened for employment eligibility, creating an obvious security risk. More than 200 of those were subsequently determined to have criminal records yet were in constant contact with the public while canvassing for the 2010 census. Investigators said the criminal record checks were bungled because the Census Bureau’s incompetent staff was poorly trained to conduct them.

Twelve years ago Judicial Watch reported that the Census Bureau knowingly hired a registered sex offender with a long criminal history to make home visits even though such convicts are banned from working for the agency. The embarrassing gaffe came to light when a young mother in a New Jersey suburb recognized the census worker who came to her home from the state’s registered sex offender database. She initially thought it was safe to provide the man with information because he was a legitimate government worker with a badge and bag sporting the U.S. Census Bureau’s official logo. Incredibly, the sex offender used a fake name to get the census job but failed a fingerprint check after getting hired. The agency still let him complete four days of training and allowed him to visit homes even though he did not pass the background check! All of this is to detail that corruption and incompetence were not an issue that somehow emerged due to Trump’s focus on citizenship – rather, they were innate to the census bureau. In fact, Trump even later announced that instead of pursuing a census citizenship question through the courts, he would require federal agencies to compile noncitizen data internally.

PROPONENTS OF THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA ALSO “FIX” POPULATION NUMBERS

Let’s proceed to talk about the diabolical agendas tied to the inaccuracy of the census. Bill Gates persistently claims that his work is about promoting health care. This attempt was shattered by an unqualified claim that Gates made recently. He said that overpopulation remains a concern. He also adds that, however, as healthcare in the world improves, will people have less children.

But, this is obviously paradoxical. In the past, where there were less vaccines, and less genetically modified food, people had many children! Many of us either come from or known families where the grandparents or great grandparents had around 10 children on average. This is to say, that when health was not a massive concern, and people’s bodies were not made infertile, people actually had more children.

So why would Bill Gates make such an obviously false statement? Well, one reason is probably that he spends too much time around people who do not tell him when he is blatantly wrong. But, the other more serious reason is that Gates is engaged in a social conditioning tactic. If he continues to repeat this claim that good healthcare makes people decide to have less children, then when population growth stagnates or even decreases, people (as a result of this conditioning) will think to attribute these changes in population numbers to the claim Gates made. This means that there would be less of an immediate impetus to question whether the population is decreasing as a result of a sharp rise in infertility or even people dying in increased numbers.

This is very likely, because they are already engaged in this tactic. Depopulation enthusiasts like Bill Gates already lie about present population numbers! The claim they made 2 years ago is that the population finally reached 8 billion on the earth. And yet, the present population is actually over 10 billion – that is an obviously big miscalculation. Well, it is actually an intentional miscalculation because it enables depopulation enthusiasts to “fix” population numbers! More specifically, if a population is claimed to be just over 8 billion people and it is actually over that number, if 1-2 billion people die in a short period, it does not become an alarming issue, whereas that would obviously have ordinarily become a central issue for every government.

But in case this sounds like conspiracy, let’s kindly visit the method that is used to determine population numbers. Simply, the world population is calculated by demographers by (a) ESTIMATING regional populations based on fertility, mortality, and migration information; (b) gathering data from government CENSUS, health surveys, vital registers, and similar sources; and then (finally) adding up the populations of all countries to get the total world population. Now, first, estimating is basically guessing so, we already know that is not reliable. Second, censuses fro government have GAPING errors that are NOT ONLY insufficient for a domestic purposes, but are even more insufficient to use to determine how many people there are in the world. [PAUSE] This is an example from Australia, where there were 1 million vacant dwellings on census night in 2021 – which is 10% of the dwelling stock.

THE FAULTY CENSUS IS ALSO USED TO INFORM POLICY

Now, the census is also used to inform resource distribution and policy. Therefore, another diabolical agenda with the false representations through the census is corrupting what resource allocation and policy direction looks like. The U.S. Census Bureau has admitted to a mistake in population counting. Well, the implications are massive since the census determines how many Congress seats and electoral college votes a state gets, which subsequently impacts who wins a presidential election, and what policy directions are advocated for in Congress.

THE CENSUS FRAUD IS ALSO PART OF ELECTION CORRUPTION

But, as far as diabolical agendas are concerned, the census fraud also [art of election corruption. In particular, illegal immigrants are actually counted in the census and house seats are awarded based on population size. But, most Americans do not know that the US census currently counts, for purposes of voting power, all people in a district, regardless of citizenship!

In fact, in the previous year, Senate Democrats just voted unanimously to defeat an amendment that would have stopped counting illegals for congressional seat apportionment and electoral college (or presidential) votes. And well, since illegal immigrants are mostly in Democrat states, both the House and the Presidential vote are shifted by approximately 5% to the left, which is at times enough to change the entire balance of power! This was a major reason why the Biden administration was ushering in record levels of illegal immigrants and doing so few deportations. It was all about election fraud. Here is Representative Mark Green explaining how. Through this system – Democrats sought to disenfranchise Americans to gain political power by counting illegal immigrants on the 2020 Census.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

The 2025 Bilderberg Meeting: Depopulation and Migration on the Agenda

The term “Depopulation and Migration” has raised alarms, as it is evidence of a globalist agenda tied to population control and replacement migration. However, the Bilderberg Group operates under Chatham House Rules, meaning no detailed minutes or attributable statements are released, leaving the exact context of discussions unclear.

If you think the reference to “depopulation” may refer to declining birth rates and aging populations in developed nations, potentially linked to migration policies like the UN’s Replacement Migration concept, rather than a conspiratorial plot, you couldn’t be further from the truth.

Bilderberg attendes list, the who’s-who of the anti-freedom crowd

First of all, who was in the Room? The so-called “official” attendee list on bilderbergmeetings.org reads like a who’s-who of the anti-freedom crowd: NATO’s Mark Rutte, Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, Pfizer’s Albert Bourla, and Palantir’s Alex Karp rubbing elbows with Goldman Sachs suits and the King of the Netherlands. Swedish PM Ulf Kristersson was there too, conveniently left off the public list—because why be honest with the people? You’ve got Big Tech (Google, Anthropic), the military industrial complex (Saab, Anduril), big pharma and the banking cartel (Citigroup) plotting alongside left-wing democrats like Stacey Abrams.

The 2025 Bilderberg Meeting: Depopulation and Migration on the Agenda

Red flags are waving on the issue of depopulation and migration, and rightly so. The crux of the matter goes beyond merely declining birth rates – it appears to be a deliberate and calculated effort to reshape the very fabric of Western nations through the implementation of open border policies and stringent population control measures. The United Nations’ Replacement Migration plan is a notable example that comes to mind, where the ruling elite seek to supplant our native culture with a more controllable and malleable entity. Although the secretive nature of organizations like the Bilderberg Group has limited our access to concrete evidence, the available information hints at a more sinister plot. It’s essential to acknowledge that when globalist leaders discuss depopulation, their primary concern is not the preservation of our planet, but rather the consolidation of their power and control over the masses. Meanwhile check out this video of Club of Rome member Dennis Meadows.

The 2025 Bilderberg Meeting: War and AI on the Agenda

Here’s what’s also on their agenda: they’re actively targeting the US economy, meddling in Ukraine, pushing the boundaries of artificial intelligence, bolstering defense, and manipulating energy markets. In essence, they’re deliberately interfering with our financial systems, fueling endless wars, and aggressively investing in AI surveillance and militarized technology. With the Trump administration’s tariffs and “America First” policies significantly disrupting their globalist agenda, it’s no surprise that they’re now desperately trying to salvage their vision of a free-trade, open-border world. Their focus on energy and critical minerals is a clear attempt to counter China’s dominance over rare earths. Meanwhile, their involvement in Ukraine and the Middle East is leaving a trail of NATO’s fingerprints, dragging the US deeper into costly conflicts that are rapidly depleting our financial resources.

The Bildrberg meeting is epitome of the globalist establishment

It’s important to sound the alarm on the secretive Bilderberg gathering, which embodies the epitome of the globalist establishment, shrouded in secrecy and devoid of accountability. This elite clique, convinced of their intellectual superiority, has a notorious history of concocting disastrous policies, such as the Euro, and is now setting its sights on dismantling our borders, manipulating demographics, and eroding our freedom. The euphemistic term “depopulation” is being used as a thinly veiled code for implementing policies that systematically undermine our core values and national sovereignty. The fact that this year’s meeting is being held in close proximity to Sweden’s Grand Lodge only serves to further fuel speculation, with its unmistakable Masonic undertones seeming to mock the demands for transparency.

Make no mistake, this is not a baseless conspiracy theory, but a stark reality, given the organization’s steadfast refusal to allow even a glimmer of sunlight into their proceedings, leaving the public to wonder what exactly is being orchestrated behind closed doors. Contrary to this, private-public partnerships have been taking a more aggressive approach, driving the globalist agenda and depopulation efforts under the guise of promoting global health and pandemic preparedness. In reality, these funders and partners are spearheading the charge, deliberately crafting and manufacturing pandemics, rather than genuinely working towards preparedness. The term “pandemic preparedness” has become a euphemism, as it is now synonymous with the intentional creation, development, and construction of these global health crises, ultimately serving the interests of these powerful partnerships.

Proponents of Depopulation

For decades, powerful elites have openly discussed and promoted depopulation as a means to reshape society in their favor. From billionaires to policymakers, their words and actions reveal a disturbing agenda. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, during one of the World Economic Forum, stated that depopulation ACTUALLY GOOD as it makes it easier to replace humans with AI and automation.

US billionaire Bill Gates has grown an obsession over his vaccines. However, his vaccination programs in India have been linked to paralysis in at least 490,000 children. In a 2010 TED Talk, he controversially stated that vaccines could help reduce the global population by 10-15%.

Notably, Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla is there, alongside top brass from the World Economic Forum and the chair of DSM-Firmenich, the company behind Bovaer, a technology eerily linked to “climate cow control”. Remember, the meeting took place under a strict media blackout, with no press coverage allowed. However, in a stunning contradiction, prominent corporate media figures are actually inside the meeting, but not as reporters – they’re participants. Specifically, journalists from esteemed outlets like The New York Times, Bloomberg, and The Economist are rubbing shoulders with the elites, raising serious questions about the blurring of lines between journalism and cronyism.

Flashback from 2012: In a very telling and bizarre reaction, executive editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson, literally ran away from a question about the Bilderberg Group by Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange.

Writteb By Tatenda Belle Panashe

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES, VACCINES, AND THE TRANS AGENDA

And now onto our main discussion on the agenda on the mutilation of the human species; and we ought to begin with the mutilation of the human species – particularly in light of the intersection between vaccines and the trans agenda. This discussion emanates from a diabolical agenda exposed by the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD., regarding how there is a mutilation of the human species, part of the gender agenda; and which is part of things that people are made to ingest, including contaminated food and drugs. He went on to address how this mutilation agenda even destroys male and female appearances AND has been occurring for many years. Let’s kindly revisit that moment.

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES THROUGH CONTAMINATED FOOD

Let’s first address this human mutilation with respect to food. You’d recall the President of Loveworld Incorporated addressed the issue of corn, and how corn is one of the most genetically modified crops in the present, despite producers who market their corn as organic. At best, the organic mark refers to organic farming practices, as opposed to the natural nature of the product itself. In light of this, you’d recall that we discussed, here on ‘the War Room’ that this genetically modified corn, known as Bt corn, was engineered to produce an insecticide, killing corn borers and other pests, reducing the need for chemical pesticides.  And that, despite it being hailed as a success – especially in killing pests, this corn is a massive liability for human and animal health – especially because the DNA of corn has been altered in such a manner, that is supposed to make it survive being sprayed with toxic chemicals like glyphosate.

As a result, this corn that is contaminated with toxic chemicals has become one of the leading tools in the human mutilation agenda. In particular, the genetically modified corn presents people with numerous health threats, resulting from the toxins – especially when we begin to consider that genetically modified corn is directly tied to something called leaky gut syndrome. Leaky gut syndrome is a condition where increased intestinal permeability allows toxins and undigested food particles to leak into the bloodstream, potentially causing inflammation and various health problems. Here’s what’s notable about this. When the genetically modified Bt corn was made, studies noted that the insects who ate this corn would develop hoes in their stomachs, which would ultimately make their stomachs burst. It appears that the very same genetically modified But corn has a similar mutilating impact on a human stomach, and it is what is being called leaky gut syndrome – as was discussed in a US government hearing.

Now, you’d also recall that the ambitions of mutilating humans through food did not end with corn being tied to leaky gut syndrome. In September 2001, scientists created what they called contraceptive corn, with the pretext or (quote unquote) saving the world from overpopulation. These pregnancy prevention plants were the handiwork of the San Diego-based biotechnology company ‘Epicyte’, where researchers discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack the male reproductive seed, or sperm. By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company essentially created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives, towards a depopulation agenda!

Well, DuPont and Monsanto then purchased the contraceptive epicyte gene to include it in their products and subsequently the corn that they produce – all resulting in decreasing fertility rates in a number of people.

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES THROUGH CONTAMINATED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS

We then ought to talk about the mutilation of the human species through contaminated pharmaceutical products – and frankly, this is where it gets even more twisted and diabolical. In particular, we ought to address this in light of vaccines. And to begin with, I’d like to establish a crucial piece of context, which is that a lot of vaccines that are presented as simple clear solutions ACTUALLY contain fetal tissue that was taken from aborted babies. In fact, kindly have a listen to Stanley Plotkin’s contribution on this. By the way, Stanley Plotkin is widely regarded as a leading author and contributor to vaccinology. He has also been a consultant to Moderna, one of the main manufacturers of the Covid vaccine. And in the following excerpt, he is under oath admitting to the use of fetal tissue from aborted babies in vaccines.

Here’s why this piece of context matters: American author and journalist Dr Naomi Wolf exposed that the COVID jabs are ACTUALLY about “destroying women and babies” AND also “emasculating men.” In Pfizer’s own documents, the pharmaceutical company focused more on researching the effects of the vaccine on sex and reproduction RATHER than on its impact on the lungs. Which is an immediate red flag because COVID was allegedly a virus that affected a person’s respiratory system – so, why would a pharmaceutical company that is allegedly making a vaccine that would protect from this lung harming virus place more emphasis on research the vaccines impact on sex and reproduction?

Well, it is because Pfizer knew of the far greater impact of their vaccine on the reproductive system. American author and journalist Naomi Wolf, along with independent researchers brought a body of work titled the Pfizer Papers, looking at Pfizer’s crimes against humanity. The body of work features reports which are based on Pfizer clinical trial documents released under court order and on related medical literature. They show that Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial was deeply flawed and that the pharmaceutical company knew by November 2020 that its vaccine was neither safe nor effective. THEN, the reports detail vaccine-induced harms throughout the human body, INCLUDING TO THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM; they also show that women suffered vaccine-related adverse events at a 3:1 ratio; expose that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not rare, mild, or transient; and, shockingly, demonstrate that the mRNA vaccines have created a new category of multi-system, multi-organ disease, which is being called “CoVax Disease.”

But, now, in light of the harms to the reproductive system specifically, Dr Naomi Wolf proceeded to detail the diabolical extent that Pfizer targeted the reproductive function of the human body. She states that they knew they were blocking women’s ovaries with lipid nanoparticles, they knew the lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta. Furthermore, Pfizer KNEW there’s something with the biological seed of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or foetuses because Pfizer warned vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women and that if they do, they ought to use 2 reliable forms of contraception. Here’s more fro mDr Noami Wolf.

THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN HUMAN MUTILATION, VACCINES AND THE TRANS AGENDA

Now, I mentioned that it gets even more twisted and diabolical when it comes to the mutilation of the human species through contaminated pharmaceutical products, and we proceeded to look at the contamination of vaccines with the fetal tissue of aborted babies. [PAUSE] Well, this actually explains a concerning intersection between the mutilation agenda, vaccines, and the trans agenda.

More specifically, it appears that the transgender “movement” (so to speak) is the political cover for a larger, long-term directed evolution project being carried out by DARPA, which is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, within the United States Department of Defense. You’d remember DARPA as a notable actor in our discussions on the weaponisation of weather. This project has 3 goals. (2) First, is to sterilise/depopulate 90% of the population covertly over three generations; (2) Second is to trigger/force hyper-accelerated mutations in the general human population in the search for life extension technologies; And (3) to destroy the classical definition of what it means to be human, giving rise to new divergent species.

But, you see the greatest evidence of this project is all that we know about the COVID plandemic and the vaccines themselves. First, it should be no surprise that DARPA – a US Department of Defence Agency – is involved in the creation of a biologically destructive project. It should be no surprise because during the Covid era, one could easily infer interesting facts of military involvement, and even parallels to military operations. For instance, the so-called public health experts were actually not responsible for pandemic response policy in many countries. In the US, for example, the military-intelligence-biodefense leadership was in charge. In fact, government documents have shown how standard tenets of public health pandemic management were abruptly and secretly thrown out during the covid plandemic. The most startling switch was the replacement of the public health agencies by the National Security Council and Department of Homeland Security at the helm of pandemic policy and planning. And as part of the secret switch, all communications – defined in every previous pandemic planning document as the responsibility of the CDC – were taken over by the National Security Council under the auspices of the White House Task Force; the CDC was not even allowed to hold its own press conferences!

And so, when the so-called public health and medical experts blanketed the airwaves and Internet with “recommendations” urging universal masking, mass testing and quarantining of asymptomatic people, vaccine mandates, and other anti-public health policies – or when they promoted obviously flawed studies that supported the quarantine-until-vaccine biodefense agenda – they were not doing so of their own accord, INSTEAD, they were performing the role that the leaders of the national security or biodefense response gave them: which is to be the trusted public face that made people believe quarantine-until-vaccine was a legitimate public health response – all while this was a military operation.

Similarly, it is not a surprise that the mRNA vaccines are a central piece in the mutilation and trans agenda. In particular, you’ll recall that they lied about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, but especially about what the mRNA vaccines do in the human body!

ANTHONY FAUCI AUTHORISED MORE THAN $200 MILLION FOR TRANSGENDER ANIMAL STUDIES

But, just in case the evidence on this intersection between human mutilation, vaccines and transgenderism still sounds circumstantial or less damning for the covid industrial complex, well… Republican Representative Eli Crane exposed critical information concerning Anthony Fauci’s dealings in the COVID era. Anthony Fauci – who was the face of the diabolical covid response, well he also authorised more than $200 million for transgender animal studies.

WHAT THE HUMAN MUTILATION AGENDA MEANS FOR THE VACCINATED

So, what does this mean for the vaccines? Well, for one, we now know that COVID-19 injections are NOT biological, and are rather synthetic nano circuits that communicate with 5G! Now, a Dr Astrid Stuckelberger exposed that Pfizer Covid vial contents “contains graphene oxide, parasites, RFID, metals, and nano-circuitry. And DARPA and Bill Gates developed these non-biological synthetic injections to control the minds and bodies of the population.” She further exposes that “Dr. Charles Morgan formerly with the CIA in a 2018 DARPA meeting talking to the U.S. Military about CRISPR gene editing technology said they can engineer a “unique thing” to kill only one person in the world. In this case, they used this ‘mRNA’ technology to kill millions of innocent people in the world.” This happens because the self-replicating nanobots can be coded to control the mind and body.

written By Lindokuhle Mabaso