George Soros who deliberately manipulate economies and societies for their gain. Soros is not just a skilled hedge fund manager who famously challenged the Bank of England in 1992 – he is also the mastermind behind a vast network that has invested billions of dollars in fuelling unrest, protests, and outright destabilization efforts across the globe. Through his Open Society Foundations, he strategically uses philanthropy as a weapon to promote a radical left-wing agenda that actively erodes national sovereignty, fuels division, and creates an environment of chaos that can be exploited. Although his supporters in the mainstream media and fact-checking organizations may dismiss these claims as a conspiracy theory or argue that the funding is indirect, a thorough examination of the financial transactions reveals the truth, and the evidence is available for those who are willing to follow the money trail.

Soros and OSF Funding Division and Disorder in the US

George Soros and his Open Society Foundation (OSF) have been actively funnelling millions of dollars into various groups that ignite protests across the United States, often transforming peaceful demonstrations into violent flashpoints that disrupt the economy. A notable example is the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, which received a staggering $33 million from OSF in 2016 alone, supporting organizations such as the Organization for Black Struggle and Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment that played a significant role in the Ferguson unrest and subsequent chaos. While some critics on the left may view this as merely “supporting civil rights,” it is, in fact, a deliberate attempt to create chaos: BLM protests escalated into riots that destroyed businesses, increased crime rates, and resulted in billions of dollars in damages, all while Soros-backed district attorneys in cities like San Francisco and Philadelphia, funded through OSF-linked networks, adopted lenient policies towards criminals, thereby exacerbating urban decay.

USAID and Soros NGOs worked together to disrupt with paid protestors

Soros-USAID collaboration included funding handbook for radicals with dedication to Lucifer. What stands out about Alinsky’s handbook, aside from its guidance for activists on undermining democratic systems and its connection to Hillary Clinton, who famously based her college thesis on it, is Alinsky’s foreword, which includes a dedication to Lucifer. In 2017, Judicial Watch initiated a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department and USAID, seeking documentation of communications concerning OSF and questioning the rationale behind the financial support given to its Macedonian division. This inquiry followed the Soros-backed 2016 campaign aimed at destabilizing Macedonia’s government, referred to as a “colorful revolution.” Furthermore, Judicial Watch pointed out a similar partnership between Soros and USAID in Albania, where the U.S. government contributed $9 million annually to a judicial reform initiative known as ‘Justice for All,’ which also received $1 million from the Soros Economic Development Fund. Remember what I told you in the previous episode, how USAID and Soros NGOs worked together to disrupt with paid protestors?

Soros and OSF funding of Anti-Trump Movements

Fast-forward to the anti-Trump era, and it becomes clear that Soros’s influence was palpable in the 2017 Women’s March and post-election protests, with OSF grants being awarded to groups like MoveOn.org and the Centre for Popular Democracy, which organized confrontations with lawmakers. The Kavanaugh hearings also saw protesters, backed by OSF-funded entities, including the ACLU, which received a significant $50 million from OSF for anti-incarceration campaigns that dovetailed with broader disruption efforts, storm the Capitol. Furthermore, in 2020, amid the George Floyd protests, OSF pledged an additional $220 million to racial justice groups, including those tied to antifa-like tactics, although OSF denies direct funding of violence, the money flows to networks that enable it.

Soros’ army of ‘progressive prosecutors’ fuelling America’s urban collapse

Many of America’s major cities struggle with a blight that cannot be discussed without mentioning George Soros. He has funded numerous prosecutors nationwide. Through his Open Society Foundations and associated dark money PACs, Soros has invested tens of millions of dollars in the election campaigns of around 100 district attorneys over the last decade. By 2022, district attorneys backed by Soros represented half of the 50 most populous cities in the U.S., impacting about 72 million people. Rather than focusing on crime, many of these prosecutors have acted as Soros’ chosen instruments of political repression. For instance, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, supported by OSF, has charged Trump with 34 felony counts, a move seen as an attempt to undermine his 2024 presidential campaign.

Soros profits from engineered market volatility and crises

More recently, as highlighted by President Trump on August 27, 2025, Soros and his son Alex are accused of bankrolling violent protests against his administration’s crime crackdowns, with $20 million being funnelled to dark-money groups organizing anti-Trump actions in Washington, D.C. The chaos on college campuses is also linked to OSF, which has backed pro-Palestine groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, fueling anti-Israel protests at institutions like Columbia, which are essentially antisemitic dog-whistles designed to divide youth and erode American values. While fact-checkers like PolitiFact argue that these connections are indirect, the reality is that Soros’s money creates the infrastructure for unrest, and the results are undeniable: divided communities, weakened law enforcement, and significant economic losses for small businesses. From a financial perspective, this is not charity; it is a strategic investment in disorder, as Soros profits from market volatility, having previously made lucrative bets against currencies during times of crisis. By funding protests, Soros creates the instability that allows savvy investors to short stocks or currencies, ultimately benefiting from the turmoil.

Soros and OSF Exporting Chaos to Undermine Sovereignty

Open Society Foundation has its operations to over 120 countries, with a staggering $23 billion spent on “open society” initiatives, it’s a push for borderless globalism and regime change. In Europe, the OSF has been accused of deliberately destabilizing nations by pouring $500 million into refugee initiatives in 2016, which many believe encouraged a massive influx of migrants that put a strain on local economies and fueled a populist backlash. The Hungarian government, led by Viktor Orban, took a drastic step in 2018, banning the OSF and labelling it a threat to the country’s sovereignty after it was discovered that the organization was backing NGOs that promoted open borders. Russia had already taken similar action in 2015, designating the OSF as “undesirable” due to its perceived meddling in the country’s politics.

Soros’ abuse of migration as a weapon against nations

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has attributed the intense criticism he faces over his migration policies to the influence of billionaire George Soros. For Soros, it’s a globalist agenda to try to erase countries. Orban describes a direct and ongoing “open conflict” with Soros, specifically centered on the issue of migration. According to Orban, Soros, along with like-minded individuals, is secretly working to undermine his efforts, stating that “Soros and other guys like him try to operate under the radar.”

Orban Declared War on Soros Influence in Brussels

Viktor Orban earlier this year defied Brussels with a list of sweeping demands, seeking to purge the European Commission of agents linked to billionaire George Soros. The Hungarian Prime Minister was taking direct aim at corrupt lobbyists, determined to dismantle their influence over the European Parliament. As the EU teeters on the brink of a crisis, Orban sounded the alarm, warning that Europe must wrest control back from unelected globalist forces that are eroding national sovereignty. According to Orban, these forces are surreptitiously undermining the autonomy of nations, and his actions are exposing a deepening rift within the EU. While some member states are pushing for greater central control, others, like Orban, are fighting to preserve national powers. The debate over who truly governs Europe has reached a boiling point, with the EU’s very sovereignty hanging in the balance. Orban has long been a vocal critic of George Soros and his network of non-governmental organizations, which are being used to undermine Christian values, attack traditional family structures, and compromise national sovereignty – all under the guise of liberal democracy. By taking a firm stance, Orban is forcing the EU to confront the existential question: who will ultimately shape the future of Europe? Additionally, NATO’s expansion has unfolded in tandem with billionaire George Soros making substantial donations to the bloc, particularly in the context of the ongoing Ukraine crisis, with these two developments occurring almost simultaneously.

Colour revolutions” reveal a disturbing pattern with the OSF’s fingerprints

A closer look at the so-called “color revolutions” reveals a disturbing pattern, with the OSF’s fingerprints evident in many of these upheavals. In Ukraine, for instance, the OSF funded NGOs that sparked the chaos that ultimately led to Russia’s intervension in 2014. Similar scenarios have played out in Georgia, where the 2003 Rose Revolution was backed by OSF-funded groups, and in Belarus, where OSF-supported organizations have been instrumental in fomenting anti-government protests. The OSF has also been active in Latin America, where it has backed groups that are critical of conservative governments, such as in Brazil, where Soros-linked ads targeted opponents during the 2022 elections. More recently, Indian authorities raided OSF-linked offices in 2025, alleging that the organization was involved in money laundering aimed at destabilizing the government. While some fact checkers claim that there is no concrete evidence of direct orchestration by Soros, citing the OSF’s denials of funding violence and emphasizing its support for “peaceful advocacy,” a closer examination of the organization’s financial dealings reveals a more complex web of influence. As a seasoned finance expert, I can attest that indirect funding through layers of NGOs, such as the Tides Foundation or Color of Change, is a common tactic used to launder influence without leaving any fingerprints. The OSF’s lack of transparency in its grant-making, which has been rated zero stars for transparency, only serves to hide the full picture, making it difficult to discern the true extent of its involvement in these global upheavals.

Soros and OSF: A Globalist’s Assault on Freedom

Soros, a self-admitted “amoral” trader who collaborated with Nazis as a teen (a claim he downplays as survival), uses OSF to erode borders, economies, and cultures for a one-world order. It’s not philanthropy; it’s power consolidation. As anti-globalists, we see this as the real threat—billionaires buying unrest to remake society in their image. Trump’s call for RICO charges is spot-on; seize their assets and rebuild what they’ve broken.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

The influence of witchcraft, and as we alluded to at the beginning of our discussion, the influence of witchcraft, when understood from the Scriptures, is notable in various dynamics and settings: from families and homes to even global politics. Now, during the July Edition of the monthly Global Fasting and Prayer with the President of Loveworld Inc., the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD. exposes the polarisation effect that is orchestrated through witchcraft, and how this has application beyond what many people have actually observed.

THE INFLUENCE OF WITCHCRAFT IN THE POLARISATION OF NATIONS

We ought to zoom into this polarisation effect further, against the backdrop of two notable conflicts in the world – namely the proxy war between Russia and NATO being fought in Ukraine, and the conflict between Israel and Hamas. With the proxy war between Russia and NATO, it is notable that the war in Ukraine has significantly polarised nations globally, particularly in Europe, with a divide emerging between those aligned with Western liberal democracies and those perceived to be more aligned with Russia and China. This polarisation is further fueled by three factors; namely: (1) varying degrees of support for Ukraine, (2) differing perspectives on the conflict’s causes and implications, and (3) the role of the NATO alliance.

Here’s what is troubling, and ultimately revealing of the spiritual influence behind the polarisation driven through this proxy war; and we’ll start with the varying degrees of support for Ukraine… Despite the fact that Ukraine is comparatively magnitudes behind Russia in population numbers and military strength, there is no consensus on its victimhood in this conflict – and this is not for lack of trying. In fact, most of the world has been exposed to efforts of the liberal and mainstream media at portraying Ukraine as a victim of Russian aggression and invasion, while propping it up as a beacon of democratic excellence. However, despite all of this work, there is no overwhelming support for Ukraine’s presence in this conflict, because there is discernment and a protruding awakening to the fact that it is a war based on deceptive and nefarious agendas.

For one, there was an agreement between NATO and Russia that NATO will no longer expand closer towards Russia; particularly that NATO will not expand eastward of Germany to draw near the Russian border – BUT NATO did not uphold its end of this agreement. Secondly, the Ukrainian government under Zelenskyy became an oppressor to the people it claimed it was protecting from Russian aggression – especially when you look at the persecution of the Orthodox Church and forced conscription of men. Then, thirdly, there was also a propaganda effort, where the media spewed lies about Russia in a parallel information war, which not only contradicted facts that we already knew (such as the information about referendums from Crimea and the Donbas region; but also the conflict between Ukraine and the Donbas since 2014). And so, it became suspicious for many to hear a narrative that claimed Russian invasion, when recent history showed there were longstanding discussions on session in Ukraine.

And so, clearly, there was no just war effort from Ukraine and its backers. Clearly, this war became a polarisation effort through deceiving nations and (in particular) their leaders, into propping up this proxy war with resources that should have otherwise been spent on their people. And I would say the greatest proof of this is the extent to which the so-called liberal democracies and the Ukrainian government undermined diplomatic and peaceful options for resolving the conflict. You’d recall that they hosted gatherings and peace summits ALL while excluding Russia, which is one of the fighting parties. Moreover, this proxy war was a pre-meditated effort, when you consider that in the course of 2014, Putin called repeatedly for a negotiated peace, which led to the Minsk II Agreement in February 2015 based on autonomy of the Donbas and an end to violence by both sides. Russia did not claim the Donbas as Russian territory, but instead called for autonomy and the protection of ethnic Russians within Ukraine. Then, years later, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel blurted out the truth, which is that the Western side treated the agreement not as a solemn treaty (meaning a disingenuous diplomatic engagement on their part), that was only entertained to give Ukraine time to build its military strength, because NATO members told Zelenskyy that it was important that he defeat Putin on the battle field.

Well, the Bible says to test the spirits whether they are of God. And if God is a God of peace, then those who are working to start or prolong a war are influenced by a contrary and polarising spirit – ergo, exposing the influence of witchcraft in the polarisation of nations!

SIMILARLY, THERE IS A NOTABLE INFLUENCE OF WITCHCRAFT IN CIVIL STRIFE

Similarly, this polarisation of nations is seen even in the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Think about it: for the most part, many in the world would agree that if a violent insurgent group murders innocent civilians, that group committed a condemnable act of terror. And yet, there has been a jarring display of moral rotation through the outright support of Hamas, disguised as support for suffering Palestinians from a number of deceived people around the world. Similarly, Iran is a KNOWN state sponsor of terrorism – and not just from the perspective of Israel or the US, but even a number of middle-eastern nations share this issue with Iran: from Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates. But, they suddenly had fans rooting for them in ignorance during the Operation Midnight Hammer period.

However, it does not end with interstate conflicts, even domestically, we can observe the polarisation effect of witchcraft through civil strife. For instance, when you genuinely consider the history of the apartheid system in South Africa and Namibia, you cannot refute that it was an evil invention! It was a system built on the inherent dehumanisation of people on a superficial basis (being race), so much so that officials were tasked with coming up with innovative ways to oppress and kill others. Well, the Bible says it is the devil who came to steal, kill and destroy. Additionally, the phrase “inventors of evil things” appears in the Bible, specifically in Romans 1:30; and it is part of a larger description of people who have turned away from God and embraced sinful behavior (in other words, people who are rebellious, which the Bible says is equivalent to witchcraft) – again, ergo the polarisation effect of witchcraft.

But, what is particularly interesting about Romans 1:30 is that the verse refers to individuals who are not only engaging in evil actions but are also actively devising new and creative ways to do evil. When you consider the rise of the AIDS epidemic in South Africa and Africa at large, you can discern the influence of witchcraft further.

In essence, it has since come out in the open that Africans were intentionally inoculated with the AIDS virus, with the intention to kill them – a confession that came from one of the intelligence officers who worked for the South African Apartheid regime, through a unit of the South African Institute for Maritime Research (SAMIR) which was actually an intelligence and mercenary group.

But, the officer in question, a Mr Alexander Jones, doesn’t say that this operation was exclusive to South Africa, thus making it implausible to say that this was an exclusive pursuit by the Apartheid regime. In fact, he instead says this was an undertaking that was directed towards Africans in general. Here’s why this matters: it shows that when a group of people are villainised, problematised or even regarded as less than deserving of equal moral concern, they are treated and even killed in the most heinous ways. And while this is discussed in the context of the apartheid regime that discriminated against black South Africans, this problem actually transcends racial politics! At its core is a fundamental disregard for human life, once the people committing the atrocities have convinced themselves that those they are fighting are an enemy.

This influence of witchcraft in civil strife is not just retrospective. We see it in those labouring to fuel unrest in modern day society. For instance, it should not be lost on anyone that George Soros is behind a lot of socio-political instability and moral rot through the organisations he funds. For one, we recently saw an organised wave of protests against president Trump in the US, also in light of the tariffs. Considering that they were organised, there was certainly nothing organic about these protests. However, when following the money, it becomes even more but even more revealing that this was bought-and-paid for domestic terrorism, funded by oligarchs. In fact, the Soros-funded organisation called ‘Indivisible’ is openly admitting they are behind the 1300 paid protests that took place in all 50 states. And it’s not just them, there is also MoveOn, Third Act and others.

Additionally, President Trump made a post that remarked, “Paid Insurrectionists” in light of the LA riots. And he was not wrong, because there are people fueling these riots behind the scenes. For one, Leftwing nonprofit groups are openly helping to fuel anti-ICE riots here by handing out “F–k ICE” packs with protective equipment — as protesters continue to take over downtown every night and engage in rolling battles with cops, federal agents and National Guard troops. Chilling footage even revealed one unidentified group handing out a truckload of face shields and other riot gear to protesters in downtown Los Angeles. The “F–k ICE” packages — which include goggles, facemasks, gloves and a phone number for “jail support” — are being assembled and distributed by a nonprofit called Operation Healthy Hearts.

It’s just one of several organizations that started as grassroots community aid agencies, but have been wading into politics and throwing their weight behind left-wing street protests. LA Poverty Department (which is another organisation) was handing out PPE in the midst of that with the help of another community group, Mutual Aid/Social Therapy (MAST), which describes itself as “a decentralized project that uses the principles of mutual aid to put the tools of the psychological disciplines in the hands of the people.” But rather than focusing on spreading therapy practices, the group has been passing out goggles and gear to help protesters evade tear gas and rubber bullets, while stoking anti-law enforcement sentiment on social media.

And like the other groups, Operation Healthy Hearts (which we mentioned earlier) generally organises community service like food drives for the homeless on LA’s Skid Row, but in addition to creating the “F–k ICE PPE” packs, has a long history of pumping out left-wing rhetoric on its social media — and has been denouncing law enforcement since protests started. So, clearly, there is nothing organic about these protests, and there is an influence of witchcraft driving people to sponsor the unrests

PHARMAKEIA: WHY THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IS EVIDENTLY PRACTICING WITCHCRAFT

This then brings us to pharmakeia. We’ve highlighted here on ‘The War Room’ that the UK terminally Ill Adults or End of Life Bill represents a digression from Godly Wisdom. When significant changes take place as a consequence of sinister influence, it is often a gradual process. A catalyst takes place, the slow burn begins, and then a threshold is crossed, and suddenly the narrative changes. For instance, Europe was pivotal in taking the Sopel to other continents, and yet, today, the Christian faith and doctrine in Europe is not as valued as it was; in fact, in a number of places, people have great reverence for their government and secular law instead.

This highlights the significant shift in social narrative in Europe, and the gist of the spiritual war in today’s discussion; which is that when laws are made in the UK, it is not the Wisdom of God and Scriptures that are at the fore of the discussion, rather it is diabolical activities of witches in the UK, and something must be done. And considering that the End of life bill has influence from the diabolical activities of witches in the UK, and that the medical industry is being used as a conduit of these diabolical activities, this exposes another crucial fact about witchcraft, which is its association with pharmakeia, which the Bible reveals is also sorcery.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

On May 13, 2025, Fidesz tabled this bill to clamp down on foreign-funded organizations—NGOs, media, even private companies—that the government deems a threat to Hungary’s sovereignty. The idea? If you’re getting cash from abroad, especially to meddle in Hungarian politics, you’ve got to register with the Sovereignty Protection Office, get state approval before accepting funds, and have your leaders file public asset declarations. Non-compliance could mean fines up to 25 times the foreign funds received, frozen bank accounts, or even dissolution. Hungarian donors also face scrutiny, needing two witnesses to prove their money isn’t foreign-sourced.

This is about protecting national interests and economic independence

From a conservative finance angle, this is about protecting national interests and economic independence. Orbán’s government argues that foreign money—from USAID, the European Commission, or private donors like George Soros—has been flooding Hungary to sway elections and public opinion. They point to 2022, when millions in foreign funds allegedly backed opposition campaigns. A 98% approval rating in a national consultation shows Hungarians want their democracy free from external puppet strings. Think about it: if foreign entities can bankroll NGOs or media to push migration, gender ideology, or pro-war narratives, that’s not just a political issue—it’s a financial one. It distorts markets, undermines local businesses, and erodes trust in homegrown institutions.

Hungary’s version, though, is tougher, with broader definitions of “influencing public life” that include advocacy, lobbying, or even critical reporting. Critics scream it’s a copy of Russia’s foreign agent law, but let’s be real: the U.S. has been policing foreign influence since 1938. Why shouldn’t Hungary? Sovereignty isn’t just a buzzword—it’s about ensuring Budapest, not Brussels or Washington, controls Hungary’s economic and political destiny.

Now, the other side’s howling that this is “Operation Starve and Strangle,” designed to crush civil society and independent media. Over 320 NGOs, including Transparency International and Human Rights Watch, penned an open letter to the EU, claiming the bill violates free speech, association, and EU laws like the free movement of capital and GDPR. They’re not wrong about the legal risks—Hungary’s 2017 transparency law was struck down by the European Court of Justice in 2020 for similar reasons. The EU’s already threatening infringement proceedings and Article 7 sanctions, which could freeze Hungary’s EU funds. That’s a big deal for a country where EU grants fuel infrastructure and growth.

But let’s zoom out. Orbán’s playing a long game ahead of the 2026 elections. He’s betting that voters, skeptical of foreign meddling, will back Fidesz’s tough stance over EU threats. Polls show he’s got a fight on his hands, with opposition gaining traction. The bill’s delay to autumn suggests internal Fidesz debates about balancing sovereignty with economic stability. For conservative investors, this is a reminder: national pride and control come with risks. Hungary’s defiance might inspire other nations, but it could also isolate Budapest economically if the EU plays hardball. Far from restricting legitimate civic activity, the bill aims to restore transparency and accountability in the political process. Just as political parties are banned from receiving foreign funds under EU rules, non-party actors should be subject to scrutiny when their operations affect public decision-making. In today’s geopolitical climate, defending sovereignty is no longer a theoretical concern—it is a practical necessity. Hungary’s new legislation sets a precedent in protecting democratic institutions from external manipulation and reaffirms the nation’s right to self-governance.

Orban Declares War on Soros Influence in Brussels

Viktor Orban has challenged Brussels with a bold list of demands. The Hungarian Prime Minister wants to remove Soros-linked agents from the European Commission. He seeks to end the influence of corrupt lobbyists in the European Parliament. Orban also demands a stop to Ukraine’s quick path to EU membership. the EU faces a threat and Orban states that Europe must regain control from globalist forces not elected by the people. Orban says these forces undermine national sovereignty. His actions show a growing divide within the EU. Some members want more central control. Others, like Orban, seek to protect national powers. The debate over who governs Europe is now at a critical point because the EU losing its national sovereignty. Viktor Orban has long criticized George Soros and his dubious network of NGOs. The EU hurts national sovereignty, attack family values and undermines Christian heritage, all under liberal democracy’s banner. So Orban posted on X, calling for “a Union, but without Ukraine. Hungary opposes Ukraine joining the EU.

Budapest views Ukraine’s bid as a disaster. They foresee economic, security, and political problems. Brussels wants to spend billions in a “black hole.” They punish members that don’t agree with their ideas. Hungary refuses to conform. They won’t bow to pressure on issues they deem vital. This stance reflects Hungary’s broader resistance. They reject the EU’s perceived overreach. Orban’s government defends its national interests. They resist what they see as harmful policies. Hungary fears a loss of identity. Concerns exist about economic stability. They believe Ukraine’s membership poses too many risks. They insist on protecting their own values and security.

Brussels is in full-blown panic mode. Orban is not just challenging the EU’s policies; he’s attacking the very heart of the globalist power structure that runs the bloc. Soros-backed organizations have operated unchecked in Eastern Europe for decades, infiltrating education, media, and policymaking under the guise of “democracy promotion.” But Orban has refused to kneel. His call to purge Soros’ influence from EU institutions is more than just political posturing, it’s a declaration of war against the foreign-backed NGO industrial complex that thrives on eroding national identities. The EU’s real fear? Hungary’s defiance could inspire others. Slovakia’s Robert Fico and Poland’s nationalist forces are already taking notes. If Orban succeeds in weakening Brussels’ control, the entire EU power structure is at risk of crumbling. The bloc, already struggling with an identity crisis, is now faced with a member state openly advocating for an alternative path, one that prioritizes national sovereignty over the dictates of unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and their billionaire financiers.

The battle lines are drawn. Will Brussels crush Hungary with legal and financial warfare? Or will Orban’s defiance spark a populist revolt against the EU’s imperial overreach? The next few months will determine whether Europe remains shackled to globalist rule or begins its glacial-speed march toward true sovereignty. Now the globalists repeat the same lie. History is turning. The future belongs to patriots and sovereign nations, not to globalist empires.

Written by Tatenda Belle Panashe

USAID’s Role in Funnelling Money to Activist Groups

Investigative reports have long suggested that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been used as a vehicle for funding global activist organizations, including those linked to George Soros-backed NGOs. USAID, under the guise of humanitarian aid and democracy promotion, has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars into various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that align with leftist causes. Some of these same NGOs are tied to domestic protest movements, raising concerns about whether federal funds are indirectly supporting disruptive activities against private businesses like Tesla.

Us Against Media’s investigation into the recent vandalism of Tesla dealerships across the United States has uncovered a rabbit hole containing a complex network of organizations and individuals potentially orchestrating and funding these disruptive activities. Notably, connections have been identified between certain activist groups, political operatives, and media entities linked to billionaire financier George Soros and Democratic Party affiliates. One organization at the center of this controversy is Crowds on Demand, a Los Angeles-based publicity firm founded by Adam Swart in 2012. The company specializes in providing actors for various events, including protests, rallies, and advocacy campaigns. Their services encompass organizing demonstrations and supplying crowds for hire, effectively allowing clients to simulate public support or opposition. This practice has raised ethical concerns about the authenticity of such events and their influence on public opinion.

Who Is Funding the Tesla Attacks and Why?

There’s no definitive, publicly verified evidence pinpointing exactly who is funding the recent attacks on Tesla properties, but various sources and speculation offer some leads. Statements from U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, indicate that the Department of Justice is investigating these incidents as acts of “domestic terrorism” and is pursuing not just the perpetrators but also those “operating behind the scenes to coordinate and fund these crimes.” Posts on X and some news outlets have pointed fingers at left-leaning groups and individuals, alleging ties to figures like George Soros and Reid Hoffman, a LinkedIn co-founder and Democratic donor. For instance, organizations like ActBlue, the Sunrise Movement, or the Indivisible Project—linked to Soros or Hoffman through funding networks like the Open Society Foundations or the Hopewell Fund—seem to be involved. Allegedly, the Soros’s Open Society Foundations granted $7.6 million to target Tesla, while others claim ActBlue, already under scrutiny for possible illegal foreign donations, is channelling money to these efforts. I’ll just throw in a legal note to say that there haven’t been independently verified proof like financial records or legal filings tying specific funds to the attacks.

George Soros funnelled $7.6 million to one of five groups Targeting Tesla

Elon Musk says five radical groups are behind the coordinated vandalism attacks on Tesla properties as part of a campaign against the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The Washington-based non-profit Indivisible Project received over $7.6 million from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2017 and 2023, according to the New York Post. It has coordinated a cross-country protest against Musk, empowering “grassroots” affiliates to “stop the Trump-Musk coup,” according to its website. The group posted a toolkit for a “Musk or US March Recess” demonstration that included graphics for signs reading: “Deport Musk” and “Fire Elon Musk.”

Democratic Socialists of America has posted videos of its members protesting outside Tesla buildings and made anti-Musk posts on its various social media platforms. Philadelphia-based group Disruption Project, together with the Action Network, helped organize “Tesla Takedown” last month, encouraging consumers to “sell your Teslas; Dump your stock.” New York-based group Rise & Resist organized protests against Musk and published a social media “toolkit” on its website linked to “Tesla Takedown.” Seattle-based environmental organization Troublemakers has been involved in “Tesla Takedown” events at Tesla dealerships.  On their website, they urge people to dump Tesla stock and claim “Hurting Tesla is stopping Musk.”

The “why” seems tied to Elon Musk’s political alignment with Donald Trump and his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which aims to slash federal spending—a move that’s angered some progressive and environmentalist factions. Its important to note that attacks surged after Musk joined Trump’s administration in early 2025, with incidents like Molotov cocktails thrown at Tesla dealerships in Oregon, Colorado, and South Carolina, and vandalism of 80+ vehicles in Canada. Musk’s shift from a green-tech icon to a Trump ally has flipped Tesla’s image for some, making it a symbol of political backlash rather than just an electric car company. Protests and violence, including arson in Las Vegas and shootings in Oregon, align with this timeline, suggesting a motive rooted in opposition to Musk’s influence in Trump’s government rather than Tesla’s business itself.

The Link between the USAID and Soros

It is also important to note that one of the biggest losers from cessation of USAID is George Soros and his myriads of NGOs that have had to take their begging basket to Brussels. George Soros, the guy with the Open Society Foundations (OSF) and over $32 billion to play with since 1979, has his reach all over the world. He’s tosses money into elections, rattles governments, and destabilizes economies, sugarcoating it by saying it’s for good. Long known as a top donor to progressive district attorneys across the U.S, now, his son, Alex Soros, controls the empire, contributing over $720,000 to the Biden Victory Fund in 2020.

The Trump administration is turning up the heat on George Soros’ soft power empire amid revelations of his Open Society Foundations’ close-knit links to and alleged profiteering off USAID. Musk and Trump have claimed USAID acted as a “slush fund” for Soros to finance leftist activism, including protests against Tesla in 2025.  USAID was Soros’s “secret cash cow” for global influence—buying politicians, media, and unrest. Yet Open Society Foundations claims that it’s privately funded by Soros, not USAID, and calls such reports “manifestly false” (per their February 2025 statement). The Trump administration’s USAID purge, now under Secretary Marco Rubio’s oversight, aims to realign aid with U.S. interests, implicitly targeting this alleged Soros link.

USAID, established in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy, is the U.S. government’s primary vehicle for administering civilian foreign aid and development assistance, with a budget historically averaging around $20-40 billion annually. Soros, a billionaire “philanthropist”, has funnelled over $32 billion into Open Society Foundation since the 1980s to support so-called democracy, so-called human rights, and progressive causes worldwide. USAID has either directly funded Open Society Foundations or collaborated with Soros-backed groups to advance shared controversial or ideologically driven agendas.

USAID: Soros’ secret cash cow

The earliest documented interaction dates to 1993, when a Soros Foundations quarterly report noted a cooperative agreement with USAID for the Soros Foundations Management Training Program. This initiative trained professionals in Eastern European countries like Poland and Bulgaria, marking an initial collaboration. Fast-forward to the 2000s, and a notable example emerges: USAID and Soros’s International Renaissance Foundation reportedly partnered during Ukraine’s 2003-2004 Orange Revolution, with USAID spending $54.7 million in 2003 and $34.11 million in 2004 on democracy promotion in Ukraine, per government records.

Under the Obama administration (2009-2017), the relationship deepened. A 2017 Heritage Foundation report claimed USAID made Open Society Foundations a “main implementer” of its aid, tying funds to progressive stances on issues like LGBTQ rights and drug decriminalization. Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog, uncovered documents in 2018 showing USAID sponsored Soros’s agenda in Guatemala (roughly $100 million from 2015-2018) and funded the East-West Management Institute—linked to Open Society Foundations —with over $270 million over 15 years for judicial and civil society projects in places like Albania and Georgia. These figures come from USASpending.gov.

USAID’s 2025 budget was proposed at nearly $30 billion by the Biden administration before Trump’s freeze in January 2025 via Executive Order 14169. Elon Musk and the Heritage Foundation, revealed that this money flowed to Soros-aligned NGOs, citing examples like $31.2 million to East-West Management Institute in Financial Year 2024 alone. In Albania, a Soros-USAID collaboration allegedly spent $60 million (2000-2015) on judicial reforms that critics say bolstered the Socialist Party, though Open Society Foundations claims independence in its funding decisions.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe