This program, is a periodic spiritual initiative that brings together believers for a dedicated time of corporate prayers, fasting and worship. It is widely followed across multiple countries through live broadcasts and online platforms.

Participants are expected to engage in daily sessions featuring guided prayers, biblical teachings and moments of reflection. The event typically includes structured prayer points focused on global issues, national leadership and personal spiritual growth.

Over the years, the Global Prayer and Fasting program has gained prominence within Christian communities, particularly among members of the LoveWorld network. It is known for fostering a sense of unity among participants, regardless of location, as they join simultaneously in prayer.

Believers are encouraged to take part actively throughout the duration of the program, emphasizing its significance as a time for spiritual renewal and collective intercession.

The event is accessible globally via digital streaming, and right here on LN2 International enabling widespread participation from audiences across the globe.

The program continues right through to Sunday 29th March,2026 with scheduled sessions expected to maintain strong global participation.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PROPONENTS OF THE VACCINE HOLOCAUST ARE UNRELENTING

THE VACCINE ENTERPRISE BEGAN THE YEAR BY TRYING TO MAKE VACCINES MAINSTREAM AGAIN

And now in we revisit key moments and revelations from DAY 1 of the Your Loveworld Specials Season 12 Phase 1; and in light of our discussion today, we will especially focus on an analysis of warnings in the insightful documentary showed by the President of Loveworld Incorporated, titled “The Ideal Toy (Unmasking the COVID 19 mRNA vaccine)”. Now, in signifying the documentary, the President of Loveworld Incorporated highlighted that the proponents of the COVID debacle and vaccine holocaust are unrelenting in their efforts. And truly we’ve seen this in various developments in our world; and one such development pertains to an effort to make vaccines mainstream in a time where vaccination rates are falling sharply.

In greater detail, on December 31st 2025, The Washington Post published a detailed investigation showing that childhood vaccination rates across the United States are falling sharply, particularly for measles. Fewer counties in America now meet the 95 percent coverage level commonly associated with herd immunity, and millions of children attend schools in communities below that threshold – this article was even fourth of January, this new year. But the Washington Post’s analysis notably fails where it matters most: which is that it cannot explain why trust in vaccines has collapsed so broadly, so persistently, and so rationally for many ordinary people.

And instead of confronting this lack of explanation for the collapse in trust towards vaccines, readers were offered a familiar diagnosis, which puts the focus on distrust of authorities. They referenced political polarisation, so-called misinformation, as well as backlash against mandates. However, all of this is curiously detached from responsibility, meaning that the article describes the consequences of distrust without confronting its root causes. But of course, that omission is not accidental. RATHER, it reflects a broader unwillingness among the mainstream media and public health institutions to reckon honestly with Covid-era failures, and the deceptive nature of the core tenets of so-called “vaccine science”.

For instance, during the Covid-19 period, public health authorities repeatedly overstated certainty, minimised uncertainty, and treated legitimate scientific disagreement as a threat rather than a feature of good science. Claims about vaccines preventing infection and transmission were also presented as settled fact, not evolving hypotheses. And when those claims weakened or collapsed under new evidence, they were revised quietly, without acknowledgment of error.

The same pattern appeared across other policies: including masking, school closures, natural immunity, and population-level risk. Positions shifted, sometimes dramatically, but rarely with public explanation. The message conveyed – intentionally or not – was that narrative management mattered more than transparency. And this mattered because (in state politics, and other socio-political affairs) trust is cumulative. In this context, this means that people do not evaluate each public health recommendation in isolation. They judge institutions based on patterns of behaviour over time. And so, when authorities insist they were always right, even when claims visibly change, credibility then erodes.

Similarly, evidence from Pennsylvania illustrates this point. In particular, Montgomery County has historically had strong vaccination uptake. Yet an interesting physician survey research was published in the non-partisan research and publication platform “International Centre for Law and Economics”, and it was conducted in the county during and after the pandemic, and tells a different story. In essence, clinicians reported that while initial Covid vaccine uptake was high in 2021, acceptance declined sharply over time, particularly for boosters. More importantly, many physicians observed a spillover effect: which was growing hesitancy not only toward Covid vaccines, but toward other vaccines as well.

Now, what was even more interesting is that patients were not primarily citing technical fears about vaccine safety (which we will address in a moment). Instead, patients were expressing distrust of public health authorities. They referenced shifting claims, perceived exaggeration, and the absence of acknowledgment of error. Named figures – most notably Anthony Fauci – were mentioned not as sources of reassurance, but as symbols of lost credibility. All of this is what is now visible in the data the Washington Post reports but does not explain. And so, the Washington post article represents a pitiful effort, by an unrelenting vaccine enterprise, to try to make vaccines mainstream in this new year, in the face of their plummeting trust, which as you’re about to see, has long been an issue in the making.

IT IS A TRIED-AND-TESTED FACT THAT ALL VACCINES ARE UNSAFE

Now, I mentioned that we would revisit the point that some patients in the physician survey referenced were reluctant to take boosters or other jabs due to their concerns about shifting claims, perceived exaggeration, and the absence of acknowledgment of error, BUT not concerns about vaccines themselves. And so, in response to this, it is worth addressing that it is a tried-and-tested fact that all vaccines are unsafe, and even lack a net positive – and this is something the president of Loveworld Incorporated highlighted during DAY 1 of the YLS Season 12 Phase 1. And since the Washington post article addressed measles, we can even specify our discussion to this particular vaccine.

And, here, it is worth noting what emerges when we look at a broader historical context of  measles mortality. So, in the early 20th century, measles was quite fatal in the United States. When national reporting began in 1912, an average of around 6,000 measles-related deaths occurred each year during the first decade. This reflected a time when the disease struck millions of children annually, often leading to severe complications like pneumonia, encephalitis, and bacterial superinfections. By the decade just before the measles vaccine was licensed in 1963, reported annual deaths had fallen to approximately 500 (from about 6000 annually). Estimated infections still reached 3–4 million annually, as nearly every child contracted measles by age 15. Yet the death rate had dropped sharply—often cited as a decline of approximately 98% from peak early-20th-century levels.

Well, this dramatic reduction in mortality occurred WELL before the measles vaccine became available, thus meaning that this sharp decline was not due to medical interventions like antibiotics or vaccines, especially seeing as penicillin was also not widely used until the 1940s.

As such, two key factors contributed: The first was better nutrition, which played a crucial role. Improved childhood diets, including access to vitamins (especially vitamin A), strengthened immune responses and reduced the severity of infections. Malnutrition had long amplified measles complications in vulnerable populations. Then the second factor was the advances in sanitation and living standards, which helped limit secondary bacterial infections, such as those causing deadly pneumonia. Additionally, cleaner water, better hygiene, and reduced overcrowding in urban areas supported overall public health gains.

YET, vaccine advocates often credit immunisation for eradicating the threat, ignoring how societal progress had already tamed the virus’s lethality – which should make one question how if the measles virus was becoming less deadly without medical intervention, then why was there a rush to vaccinate everyone? BUT, the overall point of emphasis here is that it is important for vaccine skepticism not to be only on the policy front, but also in light of vaccines themselves because they are not the medical miracle that the vaccine enterprise has pretended they are.

IT MATTERS WHO WE LISTEN TO; & THIS APPLIES EVEN TO ORGANISATIONS

Well this then brings us to what I believe offers a pre-emptive solution to the devices of the vaccine enterprise even as they are unrelenting in their efforts. Simply, governments ought to be careful who they listen to, and be careful what informs their decision making processes, lest they find themselves making decisions that are influenced by the vaccine enterprise and its collaborators.

For instance, there are numerous examples that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (or the CDC) cannot be trusted in relation to vaccines and infections. The CDC has claimed, for example, that influenza vaccines reduce hospitalisations and mortality even though the randomised trials did not find this. But, the CDC did not also provide a single comment that its claims were based on deeply flawed case-control studies. Similarly, on the 17th of August in the year 2025, Maryanne Demasi published a very disturbing article showing that corruption and scientific misconduct at the CDC are not things of the past.

This was further evidenced by the fact that, in June, the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel met for the first time since being overhauled by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, in order to get rid of the financial conflicts of interest. Kennedy had promised that his new appointees would demand full transparency and scrutinise the evidence before making recommendations.

HOWEVER, if the documentation provided by the CDC to its advisory panel is flawed, it is difficult for the panel to make rational, evidence-based recommendations. And this is exactly what happened when the panel voted about whether to endorse Merck’s monoclonal antibody for babies against the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), nearly identical to Sanofi’s version, which was approved in 2023. What essentially happened is that the CDC assured the advisory panel committee there were “no safety concerns,” but (of course) there surely were. Professor Retsef Levi, who cast one of the two dissenting votes, noticed a troubling pattern across four major clinical trials conducted by Sanofi. In each, there was a consistent imbalance in “nervous system” serious adverse events, most often including seizures, in the treatment groups compared to controls – which (as a side note), is why control studies are so crucial, and often so ignored by vaccine developers.

In any case, Merck’s Dr Anushua Sinha downplayed the concerns, saying there had been “extensive analysis of the events” and that Merck’s investigators had deemed that none of the nervous system harms were related to its product. Now, this is not reassuring, because if a product developer tells me that its own investigations proved its product safe, I do not have good reason to trust them because they profit from the sale of that product, and thus have a vested interest in ensuring that the product hits the market soon than later, even at the expense of the safety of patients – as has been the modus operandi of the pharmaceutical industry. And so, this actually highlights why the ongoing Global Prayer & Fasting Programme is so pivotal. It highlights the truth that we ought to pray for leaders and nations because without our intercessory prayers and the grace of God that delivers nations, nations cannot free themselves.

And so, what we’ve just heard is to signify that the solution to the unrelenting efforts of those behind the COVID debacle is the unrelenting prayers of the Church of Jesus Christ.

THE DANGERS OF mRNA: EVIDENCE FROM THE RISE OF “TURBO CANCERS” IN CHILDREN

This then brings us  to a discussion on mRNA technology and vaccines. And I think one of the biggest indictments of mRNA vaccines has been the revelations of the genetic harms of COVID jabs, especially in relation to the spike protein induced by an mRNA vaccine. And we particularly saw this when, for the first time in modern medical history, children as young as eight are being diagnosed with aggressive colon cancer – which is a phenomenon so rare that it was virtually unheard of before 2021. But now, oncologists are breaking ranks, exposing what they call a “global epidemic” of fast-moving cancers directly linked to COVID-19 vaccines, while the medical authorities who once demanded blind faith in these shots have gone eerily silent as the many children get sick.

Against this backdrop, Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong, who is a pioneering cancer researcher, recently dropped a bombshell by bluntly connecting the dots between mRNA vaccines and the surge in deadly cancers. His warning follows a flood of reports from frontline doctors witnessing bizarre, rapid-onset tumors in young patients—cases that they state defy decades of medical understanding. Meanwhile, Dr Angus Dalgleish, a renowned oncologist from the University of London, has called for an outright ban on mRNA vaccines, declaring they have no place in medicine outside of terminal cancer cases; and this came as his research found mRNA fragments inside tumors, suggesting the shots may be fueling cancer growth.

More specifically, Dr Dalgleish highlighted that researchers have identified traces of mRNA within cancerous tumors, noting that this genetic material plays a role in their rapid growth and the aggressive spread of these cancers. He asserted, “Cancer caused by mRNA vaccines is a known outcome.” He subsequently issued a cautionary note, emphasising that mRNA vaccines should NOT be utilised as a preventive measure against cancer, as they are implicated in its causation!

Now, the timing of these cancers is undeniable. Before 2021, childhood cancers like glioblastoma and advanced colon cancer were statistical anomalies. Now, pediatric oncology wards are filling with cases that progress at terrifying speeds—what doctors now call “turbo cancers.” Yet instead of investigating, public health agencies and pharmaceutical giants have doubled down on censorship, smearing dissenting experts as “conspiracy theorists” while quietly updating vaccine injury compensation programs to include cancer claims. The term “turbo cancer” isn’t even a recognised medical term, yet doctors continue to report aggressive cancer cases, in adults and young children without a history of medical issues!

Not only that but the parallels to past medical scandals are chilling. Just as Big Tobacco buried evidence linking smoking to lung cancer for decades, the COVID vaccine pushers—from the FDA to Pfizer—are gaslighting the public while children suffer. Evidently, history repeats itself when profit outweighs ethics. The same institutions that lied about opioids, asbestos, and Agent Orange are now dismissing vaccine injuries as “anecdotal.” 

But, evidently, the dismissal of vaccine injuries is not holding up – especially as parents demand answers. In any case, here is Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong revealing what is evidently concerning data: which reports aggressive prostate cancers in men as young as 40-50, and colon cancer in kids aged 10-12. And the culprit is a prostate enzyme (called TMPRSS2) that helps spike proteins invade cells faster, thus accelerating cancer growth.

PFIZER’S COVID-19 JAB GOES INTO LIVER CELLS AND IS CONVERTED TO DNA

By the way, this issue is seen also with liver cells. According to Swedish researchers at Lund University, the mRNA  from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA! SO, the researchers found that when the mRNA vaccine enters the human liver cells, it triggers the cell’s DNA, which is inside the nucleus, to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA. The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and enters the cell’s cytoplasm, where it translates into LINE-1 protein. A segment of the protein called the open reading frame-1, or ORF-1, then goes back into the nucleus, where it attaches to the vaccine’s mRNA and reverse transcribes into spike DNA. Now, reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, whereas the normal transcription process involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nucleus. And of course you can conduct your own research about, especially the difference between the normal and reverse transcription process.

However, what remains important to note from this information is this: this whole process of reverse transcription occurred rapidly within six hours. And yet… the vaccine’s mRNA converting into DNA and being found inside the cell’s nucleus is something that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said would not happen! And so, they lied about the relationship between the mRNA jab and the human DNA – something that the President of Loveworld Inc. has always made plain: mRNA affects, and makes editable, the human DNA! 

WHY mRNA VACCINES ARE CATEGORICALLY HARMFUL AND DANGEROUS

But, here’s why mRNA interventions are categorically harmful and dangerous – irrespective of how they are delivered into the body. In essence, mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver modified mRNA, instructing cells to produce spike protein. Unlike traditional vaccines (which are also bad), as proven by how they have often caused or worsened the illnesses they claim to solve, the spike protein produced through the instruction given to cells from mRMA causes uncontrolled spike protein production for unknown durations, spreading to the heart, brain, vasculature, ovaries, and testes. In fact, the EMA’s assessment of Pfizer’s vaccine confirmed biodistribution beyond the injection site, contradicting claims it “stays in the arm.”

For instance, in 2021, Dr Vaughn treated a 69-year-old patient with unexplained shortness of breath after a second Pfizer dose. Tests ruled out typical causes, but anti-clotting therapy brought rapid relief. This case led him to study how spike protein induces fibrin resistant to breakdown, activates platelets, and damages blood vessels—explaining this case and thousands more.

Additionally, myocarditis signals emerged in spring 2021, particularly in young males post-mRNA vaccination. The DoD confirmed cases, studies detected spike protein in myocarditis patients, and autopsies linked fatal cases to vaccines. Yet, federal mandates intensified, sidelining these concerns. Subsequently, the CDC and FDA’s inaction—and vaccine promotion—eroded public trust. Meanwhile, the patients coerced by 2021 mandates despite prior infections or health risks, now face disability if they have not been killed by those vaccines already. And all this because Informed consent, which should be a cornerstone of medicine, was undermined – much like will be done with floss based mRMA delivery systems… But, the truth is that this is yet another step into uncharted territory, where science (or scientism) is rapidly evolving but leaving important ethical and safety considerations behind. Especially considering that no one asked for this, and natural immunity was always better. But, here’s more about the mRNA vaccines, from the documentary titled “The Ideal Toy (Unmasking the COVID 19 mRNA vaccine)”.

FORCING mRNA HAS BECOME THE VACCINE ENTERPRISE’S OBSESSION

But, the reality is that not only is the vaccine enterprise aware of the dangers of mRNA vaccines, but forcing mRNA on the general public has become something of an obsession for them. For instance, you’d recall that in 2023, a team of researchers was reported to have developed what they call an inhalable vaccine against the COVID virus. It actually also makes it possible to deliver other messenger RNA therapeutics for gene replacement therapy. Now, for the so-called vaccine, the researchers demonstrated that two intranasal doses of the treatment, made with nanoparticles carrying mRNA Covid vaccine, is effective in mice. It also apparently demonstrates that an inhalable delivery system allows for minimally invasive and lung-targeted mRNA delivery, potentially applicable for numerous pulmonary diseases in addition to covid.

In their new study, the researchers showed that the shot isn’t necessary to provide protection. They state that there is no intramuscular injection, they just gave two doses, a prime and a boost, intranasally. They also state that based on their research, this method enables them to deliver different kinds of mRNA; meaning that it’s not just used for a vaccine, but potentially also for gene replacement therapy in diseases like cystic fibrosis and gene editing. Therefore, they used a vaccine-based study to show how an aereosolised mRNA vaccine works, but admit that it opens the door to doing all these other kinds of interventions… Well, this then explains the attraction of an aereosolised mRNA vaccine to the propagators of the covid debacle and vaccine enterprise at large; which is that an aerosolised mRNA vaccine is actually a tool to execute airborne interventions, such as gene editing; without having to deal with objections and dissent, or the responsibility to respect the bodily autonomy of people.

Now, you would have noted that in explaining how they would use mRNA delivery for cystic fibrosis that they claimed that it is advantageous because the mRNA does not integrate into your genome – the genome being the complete set of genetic instructions, containing all the DNA. Additionally, the person presenting stated that they based their understanding on how mRNA was applied in the COVID vaccine. But, (again) this is actually not true about mRNA, as was further detailed in the documentary titled  “The Ideal Toy (Unmasking the COVID 19 mRNA vaccine)”.

But, another issue to consider in light of the mortality of infants from COVID jabs is that infants do not even have to be inoculated themselves to deal with the adverse effects of vaccines. More specifically, the CDC’s own data shows babies born are now dying at a 77% excess rate — years after mass vaccination of childbearing women. The 30-year decline in infant mortality collapsed in 2021, immediately following the mRNA injection campaign. The excess infant death causes mirror those observed in vaccinated adults, thus suggesting a transfer of mRNA “vaccine” genetic material to offspring! In other words, the mRNA vaccines created a transgenerational crisis, where children are dying who were never injected, but whose mothers were.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

The Global Prayer and Fasting with Pastor Chris continues to unite millions of believers around the world in a sacred season of spiritual alignment, intercession, and prophetic insight. This divinely inspired gathering has become a powerful platform for the Church to pray without ceasing, enforce righteousness, and influence the affairs of nations through fervent, effectual prayer.

More than a routine observance, the Global Prayer and Fasting is a strategic spiritual exercise. As Pastor Chris has consistently emphasized, when the Church prays, circumstances change. When believers fast and pray, spiritual authority is strengthened, barriers are dismantled, and destinies are repositioned according to God’s perfect will.

This season is especially significant as it features Your LoveWorld Specials – Season 12, Phase 1, a series of impactful teachings and prophetic sessions that provide divine perspective on global events and spiritual realities shaping our world today. Through these sessions, Pastor Chris unveils hidden dimensions behind world affairs, equipping the Body of Christ with clarity, understanding, and boldness to stand firm in faith.

Across continents and time zones, millions are participating lifting their voices in unity, declaring God’s righteousness over their nations, and aligning with Heaven’s agenda. Testimonies continue to emerge of transformed lives, renewed spiritual passion, and greater awareness of the Church’s authority in these times.

The Global Prayer and Fasting is not merely about abstaining from food; it is about consecration, focus, and heightened sensitivity to the Spirit of God. It is a call to deeper fellowship, stronger faith, and greater spiritual responsibility.

As this season progresses, believers are encouraged to stay connected to every session of Your LoveWorld Specials – Season 12, Phase 1, engage wholeheartedly in prayer, and invite others to participate. In moments like these, the Church rises to fulfill its divine mandate shaping history through prayer and manifesting God’s will on earth.

This is a time of revelation.
This is a time of action.
This is a time for the Church to stand strong.

Stay engaged. Stay prayerful. Stay expectant.

This remarkable spiritual journey has already begun stirring the hearts of millions around the world. The sights, the revelations, the prophetic utterances, and the divine alignments taking place in the Holy Land are nothing short of historic. Throughout the visit, Pastor Chris has been sharing profound insights that speak directly to the times we are in, the unfolding of Scripture, and the urgency of the Gospel.

During one of the sessions, Pastor Chris taught on the true nature of love, explaining that love is revealed when the people you love offend you. He emphasized that it is one’s reaction to offense that proves whether love is genuine or flawed. According to him, love is demonstrated by response—especially when the offense comes from those closest to us. This understanding of love set the tone for the evening’s message, which centered on the Holy Land, Israel, the promises of God, and the rich history of the Jewish people—a history that is deeply significant to believers.

Pastor Chris reminded attendees of their identity in Christ, declaring, “I’m a Jesus woman, you’re a Jesus man.” He explained that loving God means loving the Jewish people and loving the land of Israel because of the promises of God recorded in Scripture. However, he clarified that believers do not love the land merely because it is land, nor do they come because of its geography alone. Rather, they come because of God—because of how God is intrinsically linked to His people, how He is connected to this land, and because of all that will yet unfold according to Scripture.

Speaking strongly on the subject of evidence, Pastor Chris highlighted that Christianity is founded on “evidence, proof beyond any reasonable doubt.” He stated that it is impossible to come to Israel and not be convinced that the Israel of the Bible is the Israel that exists today. The descriptions, measurements, locations, and historical accounts align so precisely with Scripture that the evidence is overwhelming. This, he noted, is why the Bible declares that believers have not followed “cunningly devised fables,” but truths grounded in eyewitness reality.

Pastor Chris further reminded participants that there are approximately 2,500 prophecies in the Bible, about 2,000 of which have already been fulfilled, with roughly 500 still to come. This reality, he explained, confirms that we are living in the last days and are witnessing the fulfillment of God’s promises right in the Holy Land, walking where Jesus walked.

He concluded by emphasizing that the purpose of the teachings, the Scriptures, and the entire experience aligns perfectly with the words of Luke: “That thou mightest know the certainty of those things wherein thou hast been instructed.” The ultimate goal, Pastor Chris said, is certainty, certainty of the Word, certainty of the Gospel, and certainty of God’s promises. Our faith, he affirmed, is not built on myths, but on truth, evidence, and the conviction of the Spirit.

The highly anticipated week long event, taking place at Loveworld City in Asese, Nigeria, has drawn thousands of delegates, ministers, and partners from every continent. The atmosphere has been one of faith, celebration, and inspiration as attendees reflect on the message of the year “The Year of Completeness.”

Our LN24 International correspondent, Melissa Sithole, was on the ground and spoke with some of the esteemed pastors and partners in attendance, who shared the remarkable impact of the Day 1 session and how it’s shaping their vision for ministry and partnership.

Here’s more from Melissa…

LN24 International is reporting LIVE from Nigeria, where the International Pastors and Partners Conference (IPPC) 2025 with the President of Loveworld Incorporated, Rev. Dr. Chris Oyakhilome DSc., DSc., DD, is currently underway at Loveworld City.

Thousands of delegates from every continent have gathered to celebrate remarkable milestones in global ministry and to receive fresh inspiration for the advancement of the Gospel. The atmosphere has been one of deep gratitude, faith, and renewed purpose.

Our LN24 News Correspondent Mellisa Sithole spoke with esteemed pastors and ministry leaders from around the world, who testified to the transformative impact of the Message of the Year 2025 “The Year of Completeness.” Many shared how this prophetic word has strengthened their faith, expanded their vision, and led to supernatural growth in their churches and outreach initiatives.

As delegates continue to participate in sessions, workshops, and plenary meetings, one resounding theme echoes across Loveworld City: the call to take the divine message of Jesus Christ to every man’s world.

Stay tuned to LN24 International for continuing live coverage from the IPPC 2025 bringing you exclusive moments, powerful testimonies, and words of inspiration from this historic global gathering.

WATCH INTERVIEWS HERE:

THE HEALING STREAMS LIVE HEALING SERVICES: TEACHING THE DEITY OF JESUS CHRIST

The thing that came to mind as I watched this excerpt is how God, through the Man of God Pastor Chris, was sent to answer these question and bring many to the full knowledge of Christ – because in deed, DAY 1 of the October Edition of the HSLHS answered the questions that were articulated by Joe Rogan, and perhaps even harboured by many others.

And so, we ought to revisit the crucial teaching from the Man of God and President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD, in which he teaches that Jesus is Adonai. Pastor Chris, first began by bringing our attention to Mathew 22 from verse 41, looking at the question that Jesus asked the Pharisees. Let;s kindly revisit that moment.

This is easily one of the most crucial interactions that Jesus had, which showed the limited understanding of those who accused him of blasphemy when he said he was the Son of God. But, here is what is crucial to note about the questions that the Master Jesus asked the Pharisees.

As you study the Bible, you’ll be enthused to discover who Jesus truly is. For instance, John 1:1-4 teaches us that “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men”. Verse 14 of the same book then states that “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth”. This first means that Jesus is the Word of God made flesh or encapsulated in a human body; and secondly it means that when Jesus walked the earth, He looked as ordinary as everybody else, yet He was Himself God – because He was the word of God become flesh; and you do not separate a person from His words. And with this understanding, it bears mentioning that Jesus was, therefore, the God that spoke to Moses in the burning bush. He was the One that called Abraham out of Haran and said, “Walk before me, and be thou perfect; I am the Almighty God” (in Genesis 17:1). He was the One that stood before Moses and said, “Take your shoes off your feet for where you are standing is holy” (in Exodus 3:5).

Similarly, After Jesus rose from the dead, He appeared to His disciples. But one of them, Thomas, wasn’t there; so he doubted the resurrection of Jesus. Then, Jesus appeared to the disciples on another occasion; this time, Thomas was present, and Jesus engaged him in a dialogue. He said to Thomas, “…Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing” (in John 20:27).

Thomas reached out his hand, and felt the holes in the Master’s hands and the hole in His side. Awed at this, Thomas exclaimed, “…My Lord and my God” (John 20:28)! When Thomas addressed Jesus as God, Jesus didn’t say, “No, Thomas, don’t call me God; you’re going too far.” He accepted it because Thomas spoke reality. Jesus is Himself God: He is God in a human body. He is Adonai, the Lord, God!

JESUS IS ADONAI AND THE SON OF GOD

Now, one might then ask, “Why is He called the Son of God if He’s Himself, God?” Many ask that question because they don’t understand the true meaning of the expression, “Son of God.” “Son of God” doesn’t mean one that’s born of God; rather, it means God in a human body. Jesus is Adonai; the Lord, God. He was the One that said to Moses, “Your fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob knew me as El Shaddai, but I’m Jehovah” (Exodus 6:3). Jehovah is Yahweh. This is why the Jewish people had difficulty accepting Jesus Christ ordinarily, because everything written about Jesus in the Scriptures and the things He said of Himself, show that He is Adonai. Now you can understand why His Name has all power.

Think about it: that seemingly ordinary man of Galilee was actually God Almighty, walking the streets of Israel, but they didn’t know it, to the point they even killed Him. John says, “He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own; and his own received him not” (John 1:10-11). Here, John was talking about Jesus, the incarnate Word!

IN JESUS CHRIST DWELLS ALL THE FULLNESS OF THE GODHEAD BODILY

The Apostle Paul even added to this revelation by telling us that in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead, bodily. This means that when you see Jesus, you wouldn’t need to look out for the Holy Spirit or the Father; because He is the complete embodiment of Deity.

Once again, as we study the Bible, we’ll be enthused to discover who Jesus truly is. And that is why I am excited that Joe Rogan is a member of a Bible studying Church, because it means he will inevitably come to the conclusion that Jesus is Adonai, the Son of God, the incarnate Word, in Whom dwells the fullness of the Godhead bodily. Also, thank God for the ability given us to rebroadcast the HSLHS, because it means we can take this message to people around the world, including personalities like Joe Rogan and Konstantin Kisin, because God is not a secret to be kept, as we are taught in Matthew 5:14-16 (in the MSG translation).

THE HEALING STREAMS LIVE HEALING SERVICES: PROOF OF DIVINE HEALING

Now, you’d also recall that we’ve highlighted the reality of divine healing as taught to us by the Man of God and the president of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD, when he taught on sound codes. In light of the many miracles that took place during the HSLHS, it’s important to revisit the reality of divine healing. So, in the just referenced teaching, the man of God Pastor Chris reveals that speech creates sound waves, and the original source material for creation is sound! This is because sound is the energy produced by words. Furthermore, when God spoke, creation came into being. This shows us that His words possessed the energy that formed and caused everything He said to materialise. And when we consider the question on why God had to speak? Or why He simply did not make everything without speaking? We learn that, it is because God was giving us a precedent and, more importantly, showing us the importance of sound coding. And in this case, Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome explains that sound coding is the assignment of meaning, interpretation, and communication of sound or the cognitive process for the creation of sound.

Well, there are actually scientists who have performed experiments that echo what the Scriptures teach about sound codes. Take Japanese scientist Dr Masaru Emoto. He claimed human consciousness has an effect on the molecular structure of water. One of the experiments he did was to place different written words on water and to note the effect it had on water crystals. From his experiment, it can be seen that different words and their intention have different effect on the structure of water crystals, with words such as, Thank You, Love, Compassion, Truth, Peace, Love & Gratitude, Humility etc creating beautiful crystal structures and unkind words creating distorted, non-symmetrical dysfunctional crystal structures.

As incredible as this revelation is, it also provides an explanation for the undeniable reality of divine healing. Think about it: Pastor Chris was ministering in Nigeria to people all over the world, and when he would speak worlds declaring healing or commanding devils to leave a person, wherever the person is, there would be a response. Well, in light of sound codes and how water responds to words, we ought to consider that approximately 55% to 78% of the human body is water. And so, that water surely can also respond to words!

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Minneapolis Catholic School Shooting, and we ought to begin with the official details released this far. The two people killed in the attack were children aged eight and 10. Their parents have been notified, although their identities have not yet been released. Of the 17 people injured, 14 are children and three are adults. Two of the children are in critical condition, but all of the remaining victims are expected to survive. Minneapolis police chief Brian O’Hara also added that there is, however, a wide range of injuries.

The shooting took place just before 08h30 AM local time, during a worship service marking the first week of school. The assailant approached the outside of the building and began firing a rifle into the windows toward the children sitting in the pews. Law enforcement said that a rifle, a shotgun and a pistol all had been lawfully purchased by the shooter, adding that they believe the shooter acted alone; and also fatally shot themself behind the church. The shooter has been named as Robin Westman, aged 23, by local news outlets. Westman reportedly grew up in Richfield, Minnesota, and his mother worked at Annunciation School.

Then, FBI director Kash Patel has announced that the FBI is now investigating the shooting as an act of domestic terrorism and a hate crime targeting Catholics. Local police refused to be drawn on a motive for the attack. Officials further stated that the shooter had scheduled a manifesto to be released on YouTube. The police said it “appeared to show him at the scene and included some disturbing writings”. The content was then taken down with the assistance of the FBI. Then, finally, in light of the occurrence, US president Donald Trump has ordered American flags to be flown at half-mast following the mass shooting until the 31st of August. Here’s the statement that was given by the school principal, Principal Matthew DuBois.

WHY IT IS VALUABLE THAT THE FBI IS INVESTIGATING THE SHOOTING AS A HATE CRIME

I’ll be honest, while I am grateful that there is intent not to overlook the fact that the shooting occurred at a Catholic school, and thus recognising that there was intent to harm Christians, I am, however, upset at some of the ways that this case is being handled. However, let’s begin with why it is valuable that the FBI is investigating the shooting as domestic terrorism and a hate crime against Catholics. In essence, this reflects and implements a necessary shift away from bias against Christians in the FBI.

For some context, in February 2023 (which was during the Biden-Harris administration) an FBI intelligence document, referencing a January intelligence product from the Richmond Field office, was leaked that revealed FBI targeting of Catholics who adhere to traditional beliefs on abortion and other cultural issues. This led to an April 2023 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch along with CatholicVote Civic Action against the FBI and the Department of Justice after their failure to respond to a March 2023 requests for records about the FBI’s intelligence memo targeting what they called “radical traditionalist” Catholics.

Now, on July 22nd this year, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) released a new interim staff report on former President Joe Biden’s Catholic spy ring. Thanks to FBI Director Kash Patel, some of the information is new. And when pieced together with what we already knew, the picture that emerges is one of an FBI that went off the rails, while Christopher Wray, who led the FBI under Biden, bears much of the blame.

What the report indicates is that this targeting of Catholics by the Biden-Harris administration was not a mistake; rather, it was a well-planned effort to intimidate and harass practicing Catholics. [PAUSE] Once again, the FBI was apparently focused on “radical-traditionalist Catholics”, and concerning details emerged when the question was posed on: Who (exactly) are these radical-traditionalist Catholics, by FBI standards? First, according to the FBI’s own internal review of this matter, “investigators found that many FBI employees could NOT even define the meaning of ‘radical-traditionalist Catholic’ when preparing, editing, or reviewing” the Richmond Field Office memorandum that authorized the probe.

In other words, the FBI decided that Catholics were a problem, even though agents were unable to explain who they are. FBI agents were convinced that the so-called radical-traditionalist Catholics were “linked” to “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists.” What made them think this way is still a mystery, even though reports indicate that they found nothing. That’s because there is no record of very conservative Catholics linking up with violent persons. And so, indeed, on this basis alone there was no reason to investigate them. But, of course, this did NOT stop some FBI operatives from categorising “certain Catholic Americans as potential domestic terrorists.” They came to this absurd conclusion based on articles employees read. In fact, one titled (quote) “How Extremist Gun Culture Is Trying to Co-opt the Rosary” is one of the articles they named as evidence of the nefarious agenda of “radical-traditionalist” Catholics.

Then secondly, this latest report shows that the FBI proposed a probe of “mainline parishes.” It says that “FBI employees believed without evidence that mainstream Catholic churches could serve as a pipeline to violent extremist behavior.” And this was all without evidence! Also, “The FBI seems to have considered Catholic churches as a potential hot spot for radicalization and viewed investigating Catholic churches as an ‘opportunity.’” As an example of this mad search for wrongdoing, the FBI even investigated Catholics who evinced “hostility toward abortion-rights advocates.” In other words, Catholic activists who exercised fidelity to Church teachings on abortion — meaning they are called pro-life Catholics — they were considered a domestic threat by the FBI. Similarly, those who espoused “Conservative family values/roles” were labeled “radical.”

And so, this tells us all we need to know about the politicisation of the FBI under the Biden-Harris administration. In particular, it tells us of institutional rot that had very anti-Christain inclination, especially because it was not even dissident Catholics who expressed a desire to weaponise violence that the FBI was concerned about. It was simply Catholics who expressed views consistent with what they were taught about abortion and family values. But, before we proceed, kindly have a listen as Representative Jim Jordan challenged the controversial investigation into what the FBI called “Radical Catholics” – signalling a war on Christian values in the Biden-Harris FBI.

So, all of this is to say, that in investigating the Minneapolis Catholic School Shooting as domestic terrorism and a hate crime against Catholics, the FBI in this second Trump administration is necessitating and making practical a shift away from bias against Catholics in the FBI. In other words, this time around, the FBI has to help and see as a target for violence the same people that it was propped up to antagonise and vilify. And this shift should absolutely be celebrated in a society that was being moulded to wage a war on Christians and our values.

THERE IS A FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PATTERN OF TRANSGENDER SHOOTERS

This then brings us to the less satisfactory elements of the response to the Minneapolis Catholic School Shooting, and it is that the transgender (and possibly even the SSRI) discussion is less prevalent in official reports. For some context, the shooter has been identified as a transgender woman (meaning he is a biological male) who went by the name Robin Westman, but was initially known as Robert Westman before his so-called transgender transition. According to court documents, Westman had applied to change his birth name from Robert to Robin in Dakota County, Minn., when he was 17 years old, That name change was granted in January 2020; and the petition for the name change added that Westman (quote) “identifies as a female and wants her name to reflect that identification.” But, five years later, he seemed to have backed away from that identity.

So, why does this seemingly personal detail matter? Well, it matters because it proves a pattern that law enforcement has been casually skipping over for years now. In particular, in recent years in the US, both the Denver shooters, being Devon Erickson and Maya ‘Alec’ Mckinney identified as transgender. The Aberdeen shooter, Snochia Moseley, identified as transgender. The Nashville shooter, Audrey Hale, identified as transgender. The Georgia shooter, Colt Gray, identified as transgender. The Philadelphia Shooter, Kimbrady Carriker also identified as transgender. And perhaps to mix things up, the lowa shooter, Dylan Butler, identified as gender fluid.  But then the Uvalde shooter, named Salvador Ramos, identified as transgender, while the Colorado Shooter also identified as transgender. So, it would seem like there is a pattern, but also a parallel failure to recognise, or openly acknowledge this pattern.

And so, this is the latest in a string of mass killings carried out by members of the trans community, and the second against a Christian school. Rather than focusing on the victims, Minnesota authorities have chosen instead to prioritise exonerating the transgender people as a whole, with no mention of the hugely disproportionate number of mass killings that have been carried out by trans people over the last few years.

WHY IS THERE A PATTERN OF TRANSGENDER SHOOTERS IN SCHOOLS & BROADER SOCIETY?

So, let’s contribute to the discourse and actually ask the question on: Why is there a pattern of transgender shooters in schools and broader society? I think it comes down to two things, the first is that cross sex hormones and puberty blockers combined with mental illness is a seriously deadly combination.

For instance, a 2011 study originally claimed there were no mental health issues after puberty blockers. But, now, a re-examination of the data found that puberty blockers actually “reliably deteriorated” the mental health of more children than it helped.

But, that is one study among many that are rife with misrepresentations. In fact, a particularly egregious misrepresentation, which is repeated multiple times, is the contention that puberty blockers are completely reversible and generally helpful to the youth. Many so-called medical practitioners have stated and continue to state the same fraudulent claim in their private practices as well as their public appearances and in the media. BUT, this is an entirely false and extremely dangerous misrepresentation to make and advocate to the public, particularly since the affected audience are children and adolescents (and their families).

In truth, puberty blockers are KNOWN to impact children’s bone density and can lead to early onset osteoporosis and decreased bone density. AND… they can also impact a child’s mental illness. In fact, on the package insert for Lupron, which is one of the most commonly prescribed puberty blockers, it lists ‘emotional instability’ as a side effect and warns to “[m]onitor for development or worsening of psychiatric symptoms during treatment” – which is a massive red flag, that should serve as a pre-warning against prescribing puberty blockers! In addition, Lupron has also been associated with and may be the cause of mood disorders, seizures, cognitive impairment, and sterility if the patient proceeds to take cross-sex hormones.

But, it does not stop there, because a leading expert on the subject noted in relation to a recent experimental trial of puberty blockers, stated that (quote) “There was no statistically significant difference in psychosocial functioning between the group given blockers and the group given only psychological support – thus proving that puberty blockers have NO positive impact on mental health related issues. In addition, there is unpublished evidence that after a year on [puberty blockers] children reported greater self-harm, and the girls also experienced more behavioral and emotional problems and expressed greater dissatisfaction with their body; THEREFORE, puberty blockers actually exacerbated so-called gender dysphoria, which is evidently a mental illness.”

But, there is actually a simple reason for this, which is that when you give puberty blockers to a developing child, you do not merely prevent the development of their reproductive organs, you fundamentally infringe on how that child’s brain also functions by trying to manipulate the child’s body from undergoing a natural physiological development, and thus also create a lot of detrimental hormonal dysregulation as well. And many people actually take for granted how interrelated the human body’s systems are. For instance, in research years ago, I discovered that a number of female body builders (in the course of training) become significantly thin, especially due to a restrictive diet and excessive exercise, and it can lead to a hormonal imbalance that causes menstruation to stop, which is a condition known as amenorrhea. And this happens because a restrictive diet and excessive exercise cause a mental stress trigger, where the body interprets a lack of energy and low body fat as a stressor, and thus enters what is called “survival mode”, where the body then lowers the production of essential reproductive hormones like estrogen. This can result in health risks such as bone loss and infertility. And so, similarly, if you suppress certain bodily functions, there are going to be ripple effects on the body, including how a child’s brian develops.

So, the impact of puberty blockers on the brain, are one of the reasons I think we see this pattern of transgender shooters. And when you watch the videos of Robert, the Minneapolis Catholic School shooter, he does not present as sane AT ALL. His manifesto videos included drawings where he was looking into the mirror but saw himself as the devil – he obviously was not sane.

Then, the second reason I think we see this pattern of transgender shooters is social contagion – and this matters in the event that Robert and other transgender shooters were not on puberty blockers. In light of social contagion, trangender persons are often of the far left or ultra-liberal end of the political spectrum. For instance, the Minneapolis Catholic School shooter had writings (including on his gun) that included “kill Donald Trump” and “Israel must fall”; and “Jew gas”.

Evidently, Robert sounds like the product of ultra-left thinking and violence mongering – much like that which celebrated Luigi Mangione, who shot the UnitedHealthcare CEO, Brian Thompson. He is the product of Democrat leaders and notable figures openly talking about killing Donald Trump or locking up his supporters in concentration camps. And so, really, social contagion coupled with mental illness is also as deadly as puberty blockers coupled with mental illness.

The fact of the matter is that there are organisations and groups of people who wish to parent children, in the absence of objections from their parents, and socio-political indoctrination is one of the avenues they wish to accomplish this. For instance, while parents are being gaslit and told that their children will allegedly commit suicide if they are not allowed to socially or medically transition, not only awoke schools teaching children that they can identify as trees more that they are concerned about their grasp of alegra. Similarly, Democrats and other liberal actors are trying to convince children of their superior understand (even to the extent of challenging their parents), even trying to codify this into law by allowing schools to socially transition children without informing their parents – ALL WHILE the transgender and puberty blocker industry has become a multi-billion dollar industry!

“CONFIRMING A KID’S CONFUSION IS NOT COMPASSION, THAT’S CRUELTY”

But now, I genuinely believe that no sane parent ever does anything with the hope of potentially raising a child who will become a school scooter. And so, here is what I believe is crucial to note: whether with puberty blockers or as a product of social contagion, confirming a child’s confusion is not compassion – rather it is cruelty. And this is something that Vivek Ramaswamy has become famous for stating – and it is true. Parents have a categorical imperative to protect their children from socio-political nuances that have nothing to do with a godly, happy and optimistic upbringing. Children should not have to try to grapple with ideas of gender, or whether Donald Trump is a dictator who must be killed, or even whatever drag story hour is. And the absence of this protection of the socio-political innocence of children is to allow their grooming, especially to function as children of the state – something that the President of Loveworld incorporated has warned about. And so, ultimately, it is cruel to confirm a child’s confusion.

Finally, one of the details that were reported in light of the shooting features a boy aged 10 and his friend Victor. The boy aged 10 survived the attack and he told reporters that his friend saved him from bullets by lying on top of him. He said (and this is a direct quote) “I was like two seats away from the stained glass window,… My friend, Victor, saved me though, because he laid on top of me, but he got hit… My friend got hit in the back, he went to the hospital… I was super scared for him but I think now he’s okay.” It is always these stories that get me. First, because this reminds us of the Words of the Master Jesus in John 15:13, when he said “Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends.”; and it is inspiring to see this mindset appropriated by children, afterall the Master Jesus also said that “…the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these”.

The second reason why these stories get to me is that they highlight a painful reality where children have a better understanding of a protective duty than adults who are supposed to be responsible. As admirable as Victor’s actions were in laying on his friend to protect him, and taking the hit himself, the truth of the matter is that it should not have been Victor’s responsibility to take bullets at all! He is a child who is entitled to protection as well. And in failing to adequately recognise patterns that could improve how society and government as a whole respond to issues that lead to school shootings, Victor has had to grow up rather quickly in a space of minutes – robbing him of the innocence, sense of wonder and incurable optimism that all children should enjoy – which I certainly pray he never loses.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Mayer Amschel Rothschild also had five sons, being: Amschel Mayer, who succeeded his father as the head of the Frankfurt establishment; Salomon Mayer, who founded a branch in Vienna, in Austria. There was also Nathan Mayer, who founded a branch in London; also Karl Mayer, who founded a branch in Naples, in Italy; and James or Jakob, who founded a branch in Paris. As a family, the Rothschild’s were a dominant power in European investment banking and brokerage in the nineteenth century. Family members held seats in Parliament and in the House of Lords; they became Barons in London; and they founded the Rothschild Natural History Museum (in 1892).

By 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild controlled the Bank of England and boldly declared, “I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.” This became the Rothschild family’s mantra — control the world by controlling the world’s money supply. And by the 19th century, the Rothchilds had indeed amassed control on half of the world’s money supply.

THE 1818 PRUSSIA LOAN FROM THE ROTHSCHILD BANKING CARTEL

This then brings us to the second question of focus, being: What was the significance of the 1818 Prussia loan? So, in 1818, the Rothschild bank arranged a £5 million loan to the Prussian government and the issuing of bonds for government loans. The providing of other innovative and complex financing for government projects formed a mainstay of the bank’s business for the better part of the century. This loan, issued by Nathan Rothschild for Prussia, is considered by many to be the precursor of the public borrowing system which transformed the international capital market in the nineteenth century. And subsequently, as a result of this loan, the financial strength of N. M. Rothschild & Sons in the City of London became such that by 1825–26, the bank was even able to supply enough coin to the Bank of England to enable it to avert a liquidity crisis.

HOW THE ROTHSCHILD FAMILY GAINED CONTROL OVER AMERICA’S MONEY SUPPLY

And now onto the final question of focus, being: How did the Rothschild family gain control over America’s money supply? And the idea with this question is that to appreciate how the Rothchild’s amassed influence or control on half of the world’s money supply, we ought to consider the United States as a case study. So, In 1791, the Rothschild family gained control of America’s money supply through Alexander Hamilton (who was said to be the family’s agent in George Washington’s cabinet) when the family established a central bank in the US named the First Bank of the United States, which received a 20-year charter from Congress in 1791.

When Congress refused to renew the charter in 1812, the Rothschilds threatened the US with a “most disastrous war” with Britain. However, the US stood firm. And following through on their threat, a second war broke out between the US and Britain. The British war effort was financed by the Rothschilds. When the war ended in 1815, US finances were in shambles. By 1816, Congress passed a bill authorizing a second Rothschild-dominated central bank with a 20-year charter. Named the Second Bank of America, this bank gave the Rothschilds control of the American money supply again.

Then, in 1832, President Andrew Jackson led a successful effort by Congress to retake control of America’s money supply from the Rothschilds by refusing to renew the charter for the Second Bank of America. Not until 1913 would the Rothschilds be able to set up their third central bank in America. But, in the meantime, beginning in 1875, the Rothschilds (acting through their New York banking partner, Jacob Schiff, at the banking house of “Kuhn, Loeb, and Co.”) had financed John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, Edward H. Harriman’s railroad empire, and Andrew Carnegie’s steel empire using Rothschild money. In addition, the Rothschilds also helped New York financier J.P. Morgan and the Drexels and Biddles of Philadelphia establish European branches of their respective banks in exchange for allowing the Rothschilds to control the banking industry in New York and, therefore, America.

This then brings us to a development that I think you might have seen coming in the course of this discussion. And this is the fact that, in 1913, the Rothschilds established their last and current central bank in America – the Federal Reserve Bank. This so-called independent bank regulates and controls America’s money supply and monetary policies. Even though the Federal Reserve is overseen by a board of governors appointed by the President of the United States, the bank’s real control still resides with the Rothschild family!

Here’s why this part of the discussion should especially be notable: There was a time when the President of Loveworld Incorporated warned that the US dollar is going to crash (which it will), and in that prophetic warning, he also discusses that the US dollar is not backed by anything except propaganda (given its nature as fiat currency), but he also referenced the fact that the US government does not even own the dollar – which might seem like an exaggerated claim. However, when you consider the Rothchild’s historical influence over US reserve banks (including the current one), and when you consider that reserve banks regulate and control monetary policy and money supply (which includes the literal printing of the country’s currency), then you realise that (once again), the President of Loveworld Incorporated, being the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD. , was always right.

But, once again, America is one case study, in a model that the Rothschild family has imported in varying degrees to other parts of the world. For instance, and as we have established in the earlier parts of our discussion, the Rothschild family’s banking businesses pioneered international high finance during the industrialization of Europe and America. Rothschild banks financed railway systems around the world. They also financed the construction of the Suez Canal in Egypt. Additionally, Rothschild family capital founded DeBeers in 1888, which is the largest diamond mining company in the world.

In 1987, Edmond de Rothschild also created the World Conservation Bank to gain control of land in third world countries, which represent 30% of the land surface of the Earth. The bank assumes the debts of these countries in exchange for real estate that is conveyed to the bank. The Rothchild’s even financed conflicts including the Boer war.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

THE U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES REFUTES THE CLAIM OF GENDER AFFIRMING CARE

And now onto our main discussion on the recent war against gender affirming care. To begin with, children diagnosed with gender dysphoria a condition defined by distress related to one’s biological sex or associated gender roles—are increasingly being offered powerful medical interventions. These include puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and, in some cases, irreversible surgeries such as mastectomy, vaginoplasty, or phalloplasty.

Recently, an umbrella review from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) states that “thousands of American children and adolescents have received these interventions,” despite a lack of solid scientific footing. In addition, while advocates often claim the treatments are “medically necessary” and “lifesaving,” the report concludes “the overall quality of evidence concerning the effects of any intervention on psychological outcomes, quality of life, regret, or long-term health, is very low.” It also cautions that evidence of harm is sparse—but not necessarily because harms are rare, but due to limited long-term data, weak tracking, and publication bias. But, ultimately, the review amounts to a scathing review of the assumptions, ethics, and clinical practices driving gender-affirming care in the US.

“GENDER AFFIRMING CARE” IS BASED ON A DIGRESSION FROM MEDICAL ETHICS

First, at the heart of the HHS critique is a reversal of medical norms. To appreciate this, we would have to consider that in many areas of medicine, treatments are first established as safe and effective in adults before being extended to paediatric populations. However, in the case of gender affirming care, the opposite occurred!

This is to say that despite inconclusive outcomes in adults, these interventions were rolled out for children without rigorous data, and with little regard for long-term, often irreversible consequences. This includes irreversible consequences such as infertility, sexual dysfunction, impaired bone development, elevated cardiovascular risk, and psychiatric complications.

For example, puberty blockers, frequently marketed as a reversible ‘pause,’ actually interrupt bone mineralisation at a critical growth stage—raising the risk of stunted skeletal growth and early-onset osteoporosis. When followed by cross-sex hormones, as is common, the harms multiply. Known risks include metabolic disruption, blood clots, sterility, and permanent loss of sexual function. And yet, many clinics operate under a “child-led care” model, where a minor’s self-declared “embodiment goals” dictate treatment.

However, another issue with the child led model used in gender affirming care (in addition to its existence as a model), is the fact it is not based on any credible science – because children do not have a valid and objectively factual reason to claim gender dysphoria, without influence from environmental factors (i.e. social contagion, or the impact that contaminated food and pharmaceutical interventions have on hormones and biological development). This cannot be stressed enough, there is no such thing as organic gender dysphoria – there literally is no scientific basis for it AT ALL! RATHER, where its normalisation comes from is the intercession of medical science and social politics, meaning that it is the product of medical science being heavily influenced by pressure from those lobbying to make sectors of society bend towards political correctness and the LGBT agenda – thus leading to social contagion!

ARE CHILDREN CAPABLE OF CONSENTING TO LIFE-ALTERING MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS?

This brings us to one of the most critical issues to consider in the discussion on so-called gender affirming care – being child consent. More specifically, we ought to ask: Are children capable of consenting to life-altering medical interventions? Generally, we understand informed consent as meaning more than simple agreement informed consent requires a deep understanding of risks, alternatives, and long-term impact (meaning consequences of a choice or action).

This means that, by definition, children often lack full legal and developmental capacity for medical decision-making – because they do not possess sufficient maturity and mental reasoning or processing capacities to understand the gravity of irreversible decisions, beyond a temporary fixation of an assumed benefit. Therefore, when medical interventions pose unnecessary, disproportionate risks of harm, healthcare providers should refuse to offer them even when they are preferred, requested, or demanded by an under-age patient!

THE DECEPTIVELY CONSTRUCTED “MATURE MINOR DOCTRINE

But, the medical industrial complex that benefits from these procedures created a loophole to this issue on minor consent, through collaborating with lawmakers to form the mature minor or minor consent doctrine in a number of states – starting with vaccination and thus creating precedent for gender transitions. In essence, “Minor consent” – which refers to a child being legally able to consent to vaccinations or other treatments without parental consent – exists in multiple US states. For example, in California, minor consent is legal for some vaccines beginning at age 12, while in New York, there is no set lower age limit for a child to consent to Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination. Washington State is among the most extreme. The pro-vaccine organisation Vaxteen describes Washington’s “mature minor doctrine” as follows. They state that: In Washington, minors of any age do not need their parent’s consent to receive all healthcare services, including vaccinations. This is called a “mature minor doctrine” and essentially means that if you talk to your doctor/healthcare provider and they decide you are “mature enough” to make your own health care decisions, you can.

Of course, it is still vague what mature enough would mean, and based on how proponents of child mutilation surgeries have run away from directly addressing the argument that children are not mature enough to make decisions on permanent or temporary health decisions, you can probably deduce that there is no objective metric to measure the maturity of a child.

Well, in an interesting shift in events, even members of the alphabet community are recognizing that there is no basis for informed consent in so-called gender affirming care. For instance, Jamie Reed testified on the 9th of May in Maine in support of bill LD380, which would require parental consent to medicalise a minor. She correctly differentiates between consent and assent, detailing that in medical procedures driven by minors, at best all those children can provide is assent, meaning agreement to allowing the procedure to take place. However, this does not amount to informed consent, because often the children do not know the extent of the changes and harm they are agreeing to. The pendulum is swinging towards common sense.

Based on this concession from even the alphabet people, it further emphasises that supportive parents cannot shield clinicians from ethical responsibility. Especially considering that any children who present for transition also have autism, trauma histories, depression, or anxiety all of which can impair decision-making. Yet clinicians frequently misread a child’s desire to transition as evidence of capacity.

But, once again, there is no such thing as organic gender dysphoria (meaning gender dysphoria that is not influenced by environmental factors). And not only is there no organic gender dysphoria, but the actual mental illnesses that children are struggling with are being ignored, in order to justify the claim of gender dysphoria. There was even a trend (especially among medical professionals) of not questioning the unstable nature of gender dysphoria claims, and rather affirming the so-called transgender children, in the name of compassion. But, Vivek Ramaswamy correctly stated that that trend was based on a false dichotomy, that resulted in the assumption that compassion can only come with affirming gender dysphoria claims.

Ultimately, there is a general consensus that children are not regarded as fully mature beings who are capable of complete expression or legal consent. The reason for this is that children, in all that they progressively learn, do not always fully appreciate the complex concepts (which is why complex concepts are simplified and taught at their level of understanding), and they are also not fully able to appreciate the consequences of actions, even when they are taught those actions are wrong or right: as I’ve said before, this is part of the reason why five year olds do not drive, or why children do not have legal standing to represent themselves in court, or even why it is considered negligent for an adult to leave a child alone near a large body of water. And so, what is claimed to be intuitive knowledge from a child when they claim to be “mis-gendered” can not be regarded as an objective fact. Furthermore, it is to fail the parental or medical duty to care when children are allowed to transition, while making permanent decisions based on temporary feelings.

“GENDER AFFIRMING CARE” REPRESENTS A MORAL PROBLEM IN MODERN MEDICINE AND LAW

Considering that the medical industrial complex has manufactured a doctrine of minor consent to perform mutilation procedures on children despite the irreversible harms, it becomes evident that the problem is not only medical it’s moral. In light of this, in the aforementioned HSS report, the HHS accuses the medical establishment of abandoning its core duty: which is to protect vulnerable patients. The HHS argues that ideology and activism have taken precedence over evidence and caution.

This is to say that the evidence of the benefit of paediatric medical transition is very uncertain, while the evidence for harm is less uncertain. And among the most disturbing trends highlighted in the report is the sidelining of mental health support. Research suggests that most cases of claimed paediatric gender dysphoria resolve without intervention. Yet clinicians continue to proceed with irreversible treatments. Meanwhile, medical professionals have no way to know which patients may continue to experience the claimed gender dysphoria and which will come to terms with their bodies. This means that they perform treatments that aren’t based on a genuinely conceived mandate to care for the patient, but based on a careless disregard for their duty to care! A detransitioner adds to this account..

Well, you’d recall that in light of this, the Supreme Court in the US heard arguments of gender affirming care in December 2024, and indicated that the majority was leaning toward upholding a Tennessee law that restricts so-called gender transition treatments for minors. Now, this case (in essence) decides whether, under the US constitution, states are allowed to outlaw child mutilation in the name of gender ideology. But, now, a few years or even months back, this case would have been inconceivable because it was considered inherently wrong to allow children to consent to irreversible harm, which would be inclusive of the almost irreversible procedures that are conducted of so-called transgender children. Of course, what then happened is that trans activists intimidated people who opposed gender ideology (especially through the incorporation of cancel culture). What also happened is that there were a number of woke activist judges who were co-opted into the court system.

For instance, while the Supreme Court was hearing a case on whether banning the medical transitioning of minors violates the Constitution’s equal protection clause, Justice Sotomayor argued that children denied “gender affirming care” may kill themselves or become drug addicts.

Let’s (once again) address this alleged threat of suicide, where children are denied so-called gender affirming care, as also articulated by Justice Sotomayor. I believe that this threat only has an impact because it is not actually analysed. And I do not necessarily blame parents for this: when a parent is told that their child is at risk of ending their life, that easily seems like the worst case scenario and thus has the potential to dilute their concerns about child mutilation, if they do not understand the full extent of the harms that child mutilation also brings. And so, compassion will likely move parents to want to save their children (at least as they are coerced to) – especially if they do not fully understand what the transition would mean for their children.

And so, to address this claim of suicide, let’s look at children (or former children) who are now speaking out against allowing minors to make choices that have an irreversable impact on them. SPOILER ALERT: these children and young adults are advocating hard against allowing minors to make such decisions because they are now dealing with the consequences of having been allowed to make decisions with permanent ramifications on the basis of temporary feelings. This is an excerpt from a documentary titled ‘THE GENDER AGENDA’, produced by the President of Loveworld Incorporated, and available on the Ceflix platform. He documentary zoomed in on cases of minors who were reflecting on having been allowed to make the decision to mutilate themselves.

What is interesting to note, is that children who opted for child mutilation, were actually coerced into it because even they were told they would end their lives if they did not transition! So, it appears that the threat of suicide originated from the medical practitioners who perform these surgeries of distribute the puberty blockers! SECONDLY, if children are not being told that THEY will end their lives if they do not opt for mutilation, they are often already struggling with mental health issues, like depression. Therefore, even in this instance, parents are not risking the lives of their children by refusing to opt for child mutilation – because the depression and mental health issue would exist independent of the option for mutilation or “transitioning”.

Finally, in refuting the suicide claim tha tis used to coerce parents, it is worth noting, especially from the young lady towards the end of the excerpt we just watched from the documentary, that a massive contributor to mental illness or depression is the regret that comes from having undergone the child mutilation processes and then realise that even when you detransition, you may never gain back your biological experiences and privileges, like starying a family. We all watched her weep and lament the sense that she does not think anyone can love her anymore, which I genuinely hope she knows is not true, because even if she was the only person on earth, Christ would have still died for her in his unwavering love for her.

THE GENDER ARE GENDER AS A WEAPON OF POLITICAL MANOEUVRING

But, seeing how gender affirming care has been systematically pushed, we also have to not miss that it has been organised as a political weapon – that is even being wielded by activist judges. And the idea that the gender agenda is a tool of political manoeuvring is not a mere statement or semantics – it really has become utilised in this manner. For instance, those who are proponents of the agenda use it to gain certain privileges or to institute changes in society that are to their favour – no matter how ridiculous. For instance, LA City in June 2024 took down a couple “no U-turn” traffic signs in Silver Lake, California because the signs are anti-LGBTQ. Really, it is almost disturbing how much this is a group that so desperately wants to be “oppressed” or “marginalised”, because that somehow validates their existence.

But, the use of the gender agenda as a political manoeuvering tool is not exclusive to privileges of the change to social standards and law; the gender agenda is now also mechanism for targeting those who dissent to it. In fact, we recently discussed the story of the DOJ’s charge against Dr Ethain Haim in Texas. More specifically, the DOJ unsealed an indictment against Dr Eithan Haim, who last year leaked evidence of cross-sex hormone procedures being performed at a Texas hospital despite the facility claiming to have halted them, with the surgeon facing four felony counts for alleged violations of a medical-records law that could land him in prison for up to 10 years. The DOJ announced on June 17 that it had charged Dr Haim for obtaining protected individual health information for patients who were not under his care, allegedly acting without authorisation and with intent to cause malicious harm to Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH).

We also discussed the fact that, in this case, the controversy actually centers on the fact that the TCH, which the largest children’s hospital in the country, publicly declared in March 2022 that it was halting “hormone-related prescription therapies for gender-affirming services” for minors, citing potential legal and criminal liability after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton declared that prescription of puberty blockers was “child abuse” under Texas law. And that, however, the documents leaked by Dr. Haim purportedly showed that the hospital continued to perform some “gender-affirming” therapies after the announcement, including one procedure on an 11-year-old three days after it made the declaration. And so, he was actually functioning as a whistleblower against an institution that was breaking the law in this case.

Written y Lindokuhle Mabaso