The war against vaccine religion, and since 2021, critics of the new generation of mRNA so-called “vaccines” have been bewildered by the immunity of this enterprise to empirical data showing that the products are neither safe nor effective. And many of the critics did not seem to realise that they are challenging beliefs that are not rooted in scientific evaluation, but in claims from the vaccine enterprise and scientific religion. This is why the plausibility of vaccines rests on claims of their claimed almost miraculous emergence with the smallpox vaccine, while also being sustained by unqualified heroic deeds about how vaccines got rid of some of the worst diseases in human history. Well none of this is true (as we have discussed previously) and yet, to say this is regarded as heresy! And the reason lies with how the vaccine enterprise and the medical industrial complex have leveraged religion.

In actual fact, when we look back at the 2020 – 2022 period, we can observe the workings of this scientific religion. For instance, after being locked down and systematically terrorised by the mass media for most of 2020, most of humanity anxiously awaited the vaccine that was heralded as their savior and liberator. As vaccine investor, enthusiast and self-proclaimed philanto-capitalist Bill Gates repeatedly stated in the spring, the world would only be able to go back to normal (quote) “when almost every person on the planet has been vaccinated against coronavirus.” Now, this was an uncanny thing for anyone to say, considering that the freedom of people does not rest on the proclamations of mere man. But, the proclamation that “almost every person on the planet” needed to be injected with a novel substance (about which they knew nothing) seemed like something out of a dystopian science fiction novel. And yet, that was the script: that entire playbook (from predictive programming through Event 201 – to the utter erosion of human rights, the destruction of economies, closure of businesses, learning institutions and closure of Churches) all of this was part of their script, and what can be called their claimed sacred document.

Well, when the emergency-authorised mRNA vaccines were rolled out in December 2020, most of humanity was apparently unaware that they were not vaccines in the traditional sense of inactivated or attenuated pathogens that would induce an immune response (which, as we’ve previously discussed, is not sound or scientific logic). In any case, the new injections were the genetic code for instructing the body to create a foreign, toxic protein. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg understood this, and he starkly contrasted with the public when, during an internal meeting with com- pany executives on July 16, 2020, he stated that (quote): “I do just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modify- ing people’s DNA and RNA to directly code in a person’s DNA and RNA. Basically, the ability to produce those antibodies and whether that causes other mutations or other risks downstream. So, there’s work on both paths of vaccine development.” Well, Zuckerberg clearly violated what was the Facebook code of conduct on talking about vaccines during that period in saying this.

Because most of humanity did not understand what they were being injected with, the creators of this injection apparently perceived it necessary to erect something akin to a religion that deified the vaccines. This came naturally to them because many perceived that, with their new messenger RNA vaccines, they were using God’s language to direct the cellular machinery of the human body to do their bidding. And I’d like to just highlight here that (in saying this), it is not my creative interpretation or articulation of the events that transpired. In actual fact, proof of this god-complex can be found in that: in his 2006 book, titled The Language of God, former NIH director Francis Collins begins by quoting former US president Bill Clinton when he announced in early 2000 that the human genome had been sequenced. In fact, about 88 percent had been sequenced at that time, but as the leader of the Human Genome Project, Dr Collins was apparently keen to make the big announcement sooner rather than later. And so, at a press conference in the East Room of the White House, with Dr Collins standing next to him, president Clinton announced, (quote): “Today we are learning the language in which God created life. We are gaining ever more awe for the complexity, the beauty, and the wonder of God’s most divine and sacred gift.” (end quote). Evidently, when president Clinton said they were “gaining ever more awe” as they were learning the language in which God created life, clearly he meant they were learning to modify and alter people’s DNA. And I say this because the “modified” mRNA produced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna has been chemically altered to have this effect – as Zuckerberg was caught on camera warning. But, here is Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan explaining the signs of DNA integration seen in the COVID jabs..

THE SELF-PROCCLAIMED INFALLIBILITY OF THE ORCHESTRATORS OF THE SCIENTISTIC CULT

Then there is the self-procclaimed importance and infallibility of those who were persons orchestrating the scientific religion. In essence, from the outset of the pandemic, those who were said to be working “at the speed of science” to create a new vaccine were presented as high priests of molecular biology and vaccinology. They used lots of Latin and Greek words that lay people couldn’t understand. Anthony Fauci was presented by the adoring media as the Pope of the COVID-19 vaccine program. He frequently stated the mantra “follow the science,” which consisted of his edicts, issued like papal bulls, that no one was allowed to question. On June 9, 2021, Dr. Fauci implicitly invoked the doctrine of papal infallibility when he proclaimed, “Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science.”

Then, those who did question Fauci in public forums and on the internet quickly ran afoul of an army of censors who worked for various internet policing organisations. Doctors who advocated treating COVID-19 with repurposed drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were branded as heretics and excommunicated from the college of physicians and from the rest of society. The medicines they recommended were banned as anathema that could not, under any circumstances, be dispensed, even to a patient dying in hospital to whom nothing else was being offered.

Well, this informs us of the religious cult leader-like inclinations of those who were at the helm of the COVID response. They played on the ignorance of many,allocated power over others to themselves, while making any dissent to their proclamations appear as an act of heresy. But, interestingly, Carl Sagan spoke about this potential danger years before we saw it at the scale with which it was displayed during the COVID era; while Dr Judy Mikovits ties the developments during the COVID era directly to the cult of scientism.

Now, this is a good time to state categorically that science itself is not inherently bad. In fact, scientism (as was referenced by Dr Judy Mikovits) is far different from science. Scientism is about declaring falsehoods to be true under the guise of science. Therefore, telling someone to (quote)  “trust the science” is the hallmark of a religious cult, and actually flies in the face of the scientific method which requires you to test the science.

This differentiation should even make it clear what other phenomena fall within the scope of scientism and not science – such as the climate change hoax, which has also produced a cult, as was articulated by Australian Senator, Malcolm Roberts, in 2023.

GOD ALLOWS QUESTIONS, AND YET THE VACCINE ENTERPRISE DOES NOT

Tied to the claimed infallibility of the persons behind the vaccine enterprise and scientific religion is the contempt for questions and the freedom of choice. Now, to underline the gravity of this audacious position, I’d like to highlight when we observe the Scriptures, like the moment when Abraham interceded for Lot and his family in Genesis 18, and when Moses interceded for the children of Israel in Exodus 32, God Almighty allows people to ask questions! In fact, God also respects the freedom of choice, because He is love and love connotes choice – so much so, that in the first Chapter of the Gospel of St John, he lets us know (in verse 11) that the Lord Jesus came to His own, but was rejected by them; and then in the successive verse St John proceeds to say that to those who received Him, Hesus gave them power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name. In other words, He came to His own people, they chose to reject Him, and He subsequently focused on those who received Him. In fact, even today, salvation is not by compensation: there are people we may preach to, who will reject the message.

Well, despite this, the members of the scientific religion saw themselves as far more infallible and omnipotent, thus completely negating men’s free will and option to question or dissent to the status quo. So much so, that a massive censorship industrial complex extending from federal agencies to every major digital tech platform was constructed over the last nine years, and went into full effect in 2020. This largely happened out of the public eye. Even five years ago, it was barely known. The cases of banned accounts and throttled postings seemed isolated and often just an unfortunate exercise of editorial zeal.

BUT, the FOIAs and court discovery have unearthed tens of thousands of pages of evidence, proving that the problem is neither isolated nor random but rather gargantuan and systematic. It involves dozens of federal agencies, non-government organisations working as contractors, universities on contract either directly or indirectly, and even embedded employees at social media companies. The censorship network is so elaborate at this point that it is truly an industry—and an illegal one, at that! And, at the very core of its existence is both the government’s desire for control, and the reality that the scientific cult has, for the longest time, presumed people to be too stupid to think for themselves. And we saw the Biden-Harris  administration leverage this form of thinking, in building a censorship industrial complex that serviced the vaccine enterprise and scientific religion.

THE SCIENTISTIC RELIGION ALSO REQUIRES BLOOD SACRIFICE

In case the discussion thus far seemed like a stretched analogy, let’s make the parallels between religion and scientism (as well as the vaccine enterprise) even more explicit. Now, as you’d already know, any religion and cult notably requires blood sacrifice. Well, it certainly is no different for the scientific religion that has tried to sensationalise vaccines as an irrefutable good intervention.

In fact, this parallel of blood sacrifice can be traced to the use of aborted foetus tissue in the development of vaccines. A lot of vaccines that are presented as simple clear solutions ACTUALLY contain fetal tissue that was taken from aborted babies – so much so, that human fetal cell lines are used to culture a number of vaccines today. They are listed on the CDCs Vaccine Excipient list as WI-38, MRC-5, HEK293, PERC.6. In more detail, WI-38 is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of an aborted female fetus. And MRC-5 (also called Medical Research Council cell strain 5) is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted male fetus.

In addition, Human Embryonic Kidney cells 293, also often referred to as HEK 293, are a specific cell line originally derived from human embryonic kidney cells grown in a tissue culture. And the PERC-6 cell line was derived from human embryonic retinal cells taken from an elective abortion. Now, the newest cell line created in 2015 for vaccines: WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3-month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.

Then you might ask, which vaccines utilised aborted fetal materials? There is a long list of them; and it includes: the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine/MMR. There is also the diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliomyelitis vaccine (the DTaP/TdP). There is the varicella (or chickenpox) vaccine and the shingles (zoster) vaccine. The hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines; the rabies vaccine; and even some coronavirus vaccines! And so, this is clearly a long established practice in the vaccine industry.

And you’d recall that this was highlighted from the testimony of Stanley Plotkin, under oath. This is the same Stanley Plotkin who is widely regarded as a leading author and contributor to vaccinology; and has been a consultant to Moderna, one of the main manufacturers of the Covid vaccine.

THE SCIENTISTIC RELIGION IS AIMED AT SELLING A DEFECTIVE AND DETRIMENTAL PRODUCT

Of course, the sacrifice of lives does not end with the foetuses used in the development of vaccines. It is also the lives harmed and destroyed in the rollout of various vaccines – which has been happening for years, since the very first vaccine, which is the smallpox vaccine. In 1798, the smallpox vaccine hit the market. Once it hit the market, it was observed to frequently cause smallpox outbreaks (rather than prevent them) and to cause a wide range of debilitating and complex injuries that many of the doctors had never seen before (and many of which I believe were examples of “blood stasis”). Curiously, rather than recognising this was a mistake, most of the medical profession endorsed the smallpox vaccine, and governments around the world mandated it as cases kept on increasing, leading to a downward spiral that was eventually broken by mass public protest against those mandates.

In the 1800s and early 1900s, a variety of early vaccines (e.g., rabies, typhoid, diphtheria, tuberculosis) and horse-generated antiserums (for most of the common infections at the time) entered the market. Since many of these vaccines were produced in small independent labs, there were a variety of quality control issues with these products, which frequently led to hot lots being released that severely injured or killed a group of people. Additionally, many of those vaccines had a high degree of toxicity. Because of this, a variety of new and severe medical conditions emerged, many of which were deemed to be due to brain inflammation (ence-phalitis) or brain damage (ence-phalopathy) and observed to occur in conjunction with cranial nerve damage. Most of these conditions in turn mirrored the myriad of injuries we now too see from modern vaccinations!

But, now, in addition to the injuries, two major issues stood out during this period: First, in addition to sometimes being directly contaminated with the disease causing organism (e.g., yellow fever or tuberculosis) and causing the illness, vaccines would often cause a temporary immune suppression which lead to disease outbreaks in those vaccinated (discussed here). However, each time this happened, rather than it being seen as a sign we needed to dial back vaccination, it was interpreted as not enough people being vaccinated and harsher and harsher vaccine mandates being instituted to enact that policy or new vaccines being created to address the existing damage of vaccination (we note this when observing the example of how the DPT vaccine frequently caused polio outbreaks).

Then the second issue that stood out is that public health officials and vaccine designers were well aware of the injuries vaccines were causing, but since it was said that no other treatments existed for the disease, regrettably deemed this to be a necessary sacrifice for the greater good and hence covered the injuries up so the public would continue to vaccinate. However, this medical doctrine rested on a faulty premise because effective treatments did IN FACT exist for the illnesses (e.g., in 1920 it was known IV hydrogen peroxide could treat severe infections and in 1928 it was known that ultraviolet blood irradiation could treat many otherwise incurable infections). And so, the scientific religion and vaccine enterprise has always operated with a willingness to sacrifice lives, while covering it up as acts of necessity, which is why aborted foetuses are used even today for the development of vaccines.

Written by Lindokuhle Mabaso

Following their work, Pfizer also took advantage of the growing needs during the American Civil war. Demand for painkillers, preservatives and disinfectants soared during the US Civil War (which took place in 1861-65), thus leading to one of Pfizer’s first big profit making ventures. The company expanded production to help meet the needs of the Union Army. Soldiers carried tartaric acid, developed by Pfizer, in their battlefield kits, and used it to treat wounds. And the drugs manufactured included iodine, morphine and chloroform, which, in addition to medicinal applications, were also used in the emerging field of photography. Pfizer’s revenues doubled by 1868.

Shortly afterward, the company saw its fortunes climb further with the production of citric acid, which had numerous industrial uses. More specifically, in the late 1800s, Pfizer began manufacturing citric acid just as drinks such as Coca-Cola, Dr Pepper and Pepsi-Cola – which all used citric acid as an ingredient – started to become popular. Citric acid soon became Pfizer’s main product and the launch pad for its growth in the decades to follow. During this time, Charles Erhart died in 1891, and the eponymous Pfizer gained full control of the burgeoning firm, which would remain privately held until 1942 – when 240,000 shares were offered to the public. Nevertheless, the company continued to grow, and in 1881 transferred its administrative headquarters to Manhattan, followed by additional expansion into other regions of the United States. By 1906, Pfizer’s annual sales topped $3 million.

Subsequently, when World War I resulted in a global shortage of calcium citrate—necessary for the production of citric acid—Pfizer was forced to seek an alternative. The solution was found in a fungus that created citric acid through the fermentation of sugar, and Pfizer began production of citric acid through this process in 1919. During World War II, the technology developed for the production of citric acid through sugar fermentation would also be used in the mass production of the antibiotic drug penicillin. In fact, Pfizer was the first company to discover a way to mass-produce the antibiotic drug penicillin – following its discovery by British scientist Alexander Fleming in 1928. And then heeding a plea from the US government, Pfizer began supplying penicillin to Allied forces in World War Two.

Then, in the 1900s and early 2000s, Pfizer launched anti-erectile dysfunction drug Viagra in 1998. Hailed as a “miracle drug”, Viagra has been a reliable source of income for 15 years, with sales in the US alone in 2012 of $2bn. In the 21st Century, Pfizer acquired many other pharmaceutical companies, including Warner-Lambert in 2000 for $110bn, followed by Pharmacia in 2003 and Wyeth in 2009, external. However, while these developments were taking place, Pfizer developed a propensity towards corrupt dealings – especially in undermining the regulatory functions of the FDA, all while harming lives and attempting to conceal the information.

FELDENE: PFIZER’S BEST-SELLING DEADLY DRUG

And now onto our second question, being: How does the feldene drug uniquely expose Pfizer’s propensity to place profit over people? So, Feldene is the most widely sold nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug in the world. It is marketed in 106 countries to more than 20 million people. It is the most lucrative product sold by the Pfizer Corporation. And, according to critics, it also kills people. Since Feldene was introduced in the U.S. in 1982, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received a total of 2,621 non-fatal and 182. fatal adverse reaction reports associated with the drug’s use.

These figures, based on a November 1985 FDA printout, may greatly underestimate the total number of adverse reactions to Feldene. Dr Sidney Wolfe, director of the Public Citizen Health Research Group in Washington, said “At least 1.75 million elderly. American people now receiving this drug are at risk of developing life-threatening gastrointestinal reactions.” He has petitioned the FDA to ban “as an imminent hazard to the public health” the use of Feldene in patients aged 60 and over. The National Council of Senior Citizens has urged the FDA to take the drug completely off the market.

Feldene can cause stomach and intestinal bleeding, ulcers, intestinal perforation, hematemesis (vomiting of blood), and melena (blood in stools). It also can cause congestive heart failure and reactions such as burning, itching, redness, and small swellings on the skin after brief exposure to light.

This is important to note because Feldene is part of a series of drug scandals in which giant pharmaceutical companies, as a matter of corporate policy, place profits before human life. But Feldene also represents a case study in how the FDA fails to perform its regulatory function. First the FDA bent the rules to allow Pfizer to market its product and then it took no action after the company repeatedly violated the law. Meanwhile, Pfizer originally submitted a new-drug application for Feldene to the FDA in March 1978 and again in May 1980. Both times the applications were rejected because Pfizer had not conducted the necessary tests. In September 1981, Pfizer resubmitted its application but it did not perform any new tests; it simply reanalyzed old data.

Then, while the FDA was still considering the application, Pfizer sponsored a reception at the meeting of the American Rheumatism Association in Boston and showed a film promoting Feldene which the FDA said was illegal. Nevertheless, on April 6, 1982, the FDA approved Feldene for use in the U.S. And even while the FDA was deliberating on Pfizer’s application, Feldene users were already dying in Europe. The FDA did not learn of Feldene’s record in Europe until after it was approved. About six months after approval, Pfizer submitted 26 adverse drug reports from Britain; the reports showed that Pfizer may have held onto them as long as two and a half years. And between July and November 1983, Pfizer reported almost two dozen patient deaths in Europe. Aware of the potential impact of adverse publicity, Pfizer attempted to censor articles considered for publication in medical journals in Europe. But, here’s more on feldene – and you would note the various challenges it poses where the side effects are detailed.

HAS PFIZER LEARNT  FROM ITS HISTORY OF CORRUPTION AND MISLEADING STUDIES?

In our final question, we then ought to address the question of whether Pfizer learnt from its history of corruption and misleading studies? And here we must consider all that we detailed about Pfizer diabolical dealings and what we see in the status quo, and even recent history. Well, it should surprise no one that Pfizer did NOT gain constructive lessons from this history.

Well, in a now famous case study, it emerged that in the development of the poisonous COVID-19 vaccine, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. More specifically, a regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has exposed the fact that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems that they were finding.

Then, after repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, named Brook Jackson, proceeded to email a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The outcome, unfortunately, was the protection of Pfizer and a backlash against her – for doing the right thing.

We began this discussion by stating that we are proceeding to take a deep dive into learning how pharmaceutical companies ended up in a position of influence in health policy, despite the harms their products have caused. Evidently, it is because the pharmaceutical companies falsified or concealed information, while corrupting the very institutions that are supposed to hold them accountable – something that we see in the history of the Pfizer company.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso