IT WAS ALWAYS A FAKE VACCINE

They were never vaccines to begin with. It was always a lie from the beginning.  

Dr. Ryan Cole: 15 Ways the COVID Shots Injure and KiII

According to Dr. Ryan Cole, the COVID shots can cause harm in 15 distinct ways. Researchers have revealed how nanoparticles are being utilized in these shots, and what the effects are of the persistence of synthetic RNA in the body. Additionally, scientists are exposing the circulation of synthetic spike protein and its impact on human health. The spike protein itself is a harmful agent that can have far-reaching consequences. Experts are also examining the brain accumulation and impact of these shots, as well as the potential for peripheral nerve damage and organ damage. Furthermore, the COVID shots have been linked to myocarditis and heart issues, and are also affecting the adrenal glands and elastic fibers. The shots are also causing reproductive harms, weakening immune systems, and leading to vascular damage and clotting. Moreover, abnormal protein accumulation, immune tolerance, and increased cancer risk are all being actively studied as potential consequences of the COVID shots. Dr. Cole’s insights highlight the need for continued research into the effects of these shots on human health and the need to stop them.

Vaccine injections altered human immunity on a global scale

According to epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, vaccine injections have drastically changed human immunity worldwide, and he’s sounding the alarm. By analyzing the electronic medical records of thousands of patients before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, Hulscher has uncovered compelling evidence of vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or VAIDS. The shocking spike in autoimmune diseases, chronic infections, and even cancer cases is prompting Hulscher to call for immediate and thorough scientific scrutiny of the long-term consequences of these vaccines, with the ultimate goal of potentially bringing an end to the mRNA vaccine era. Hulscher’s findings are sparking intense debate and raising critical questions about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, and he’s urging the scientific community to take a closer look at the devastating impact they may be having on human health.

 mRNA tech is NOT a vaccine — it’s an experimental gene-modifying platform

Under oath, Dr. Robert Sullivan confirmed it. mRNA tech is NOT a vaccine — it’s an experimental gene-modifying platform. It forces the body to produce toxic spike proteins, causing lung, heart, and organ damage. It is linked to autoimmune disorders and abnormal cell growth, and they KNEW IT. These are crimes against humanity were committed, the truth was censored to protect Big Pharma and billions were made — at the cost of YOUR health

What is Gene Therapy, and Why the Interest?

Gene therapy involves modifying or introducing genetic material to treat or prevent diseases, often targeting conditions like genetic disorders, cancers, or viral infections. It’s a broad field, encompassing mRNA vaccines (which some call gene therapy due to their use of genetic instructions) and approaches like CRISPR or viral vector therapies. According to dubious researchers and institutions, it offers potential cures for previously untreatable conditions, rapid vaccine development (as seen with COVID-19), and massive commercial opportunities. Biotech giants like Moderna and Pfizer, backed by government contracts, have poured billions into this space, with mRNA platforms alone generating tens of billions in revenue during the pandemic.

mRNA is about Centralized Control and Power

The push for gene therapy is tied to powerful institutions—Big Pharma, governments, and organizations like the World Health Organization or the Gates Foundation—that are centralizing control over health. Globalist entities—think WHO, GAVI, or multinational corporations—are accused of using gene therapy to standardize medical interventions worldwide, bypassing national sovereignty. mRNA vaccines, rolled out globally during COVID-19, were a test case for mandating experimental tech under the guise of public health. gene therapies could be weaponized to alter populations, either through sterilization, genetic selection, or other dystopian outcomes, echoing historical eugenics programs.

Eugenics, as practiced in the early 20th century, involved elites promoting policies to “improve” populations, often targeting marginalized groups. Figures like Bill Gates, whose foundation funds vaccine and gene therapy research, has made comments on population control through health interventions. While Gates frames this as reducing poverty to lower birth rates, its a slippery slope toward eugenics-like goals, especially when gene-editing tools like CRISPR could target specific genetic traits.

mRNA is a Trojan Horse

mRNA vaccines as “gene therapy” because they introduce genetic instructions into cells. They’re a gateway to normalizing genetic manipulation. Kennedy’s recent cancellation of $500 million in mRNA funding cited safety, resonating with those who see mRNA as a tool for globalist agendas rather than public good.

mRNA for Profit and Power Concentration

From a finance angle, gene therapy is a goldmine. The global market is projected to hit $13 billion by 2026, driven by high-cost treatments (some therapies cost $2M+ per dose). This enriches a small elite—pharma CEOs, investors, and their political allies—while tying healthcare to corporate control. The gene therapy’s push isn’t just about health but about creating dependency on proprietary tech, with potential for social engineering if access is gatekept or tailored to certain groups.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

ADHD is a scam

Real Journalists are sounding the alarm, warning that ADHD is a scam that is being perpetuated by the pharmaceutical industry and its cohorts, who are reaping enormous profits from this fabricated epidemic. It’s becoming clear that the driving force behind this madness is not a genuine concern for the well-being of children, but rather a ruthless pursuit of profit, as the pharmaceutical industry and its partners continue to exploit vulnerable families and vastly expand their lucrative market for psychiatric drugs.

The exploitation of ADHD diagnosis and treatment for financial gain

Investigative reports are revealing that the exploitation of ADHD diagnosis and treatment for financial gain is a rampant issue, with pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers, and individuals actively capitalizing on the condition to reap significant profits. This exploitation is manifesting in a multitude of ways, including the over-diagnosis of ADHD, aggressive marketing of medications, and the sale of unproven and often ineffective therapies and services that specifically target individuals with ADHD and their families. Historically, pharmaceutical companies have been at the forefront of promoting ADHD medications, using highly targeted and persuasive marketing campaigns aimed at doctors, educators, and parents, which often emphasize the benefits of medication while downplaying the potential risks and alternative approaches, thereby inflating diagnosis rates beyond what is clinically justified. The ADHD medication market in the United States has ballooned into a multi-billion-dollar industry, with drugs like Adderall and Ritalin becoming household names, and the pursuit of profit has led to a situation where the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD have become driven more by economic motives than by a genuine concern for the well-being of individuals.

The exploitation of children with ADHD diagnosis and treatment

Investigations are revealing that the exploitation of ADHD diagnosis and treatment is running rampant beyond the pharmaceutical industry, with some private clinics capitalizing on lengthy public healthcare waitlists and desperate parents by charging exorbitant fees, sometimes upwards of thousands of dollars, for ADHD assessments. Meanwhile, the online space is being exploited by self-proclaimed “ADHD coaches” and influencers who are peddling expensive courses, supplements, and apps with little to no scientific evidence to back up their claims, preying on the challenges faced by individuals struggling to manage the condition. Researchers are sounding the alarm on the issue of over-diagnosis, with studies suggesting that in some regions, ADHD diagnosis rates are far exceeding expected prevalence, potentially driven by economic incentives or lax diagnostic criteria, which has significant implications for individuals, the healthcare system, and society as a whole, underscoring the need for a more nuanced and evidence-based approach to diagnosing and treating ADHD.

The financial implications of the false ADHD diagnosis on individuals

The financial burden of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) on individuals is staggering, with adults in the United States facing an annual excess cost of between $137 and $4,100 per person, primarily due to the necessity of medication, therapy sessions, and frequent doctor visits. Medication costs, including stimulants like Adderall and Ritalin, are a significant expense, with out-of-pocket costs fluctuating wildly, ranging from $30 to $300 per month for those without adequate insurance coverage. Experts are warning that the financial implications of ADHD are far-reaching, affecting not only individuals but also the broader healthcare system and economy.

Big Pharma is profiteering off ADHD and ADD meds

The global market for ADHD therapeutics is projected to balloon to $15.9 billion by 2025, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.7% from 2023 to 2030, driven in part by the dominance of the US market, which is expected to account for 40-50% of global sales. Revenue in the US is expected to range from $6.4 billion to $7.9 billion annually, making the ADHD drug market a lucrative business for pharmaceutical companies, with profit margins for branded medications often exceeding 70-80% before generic competition enters the market. Takeda, the manufacturer of Vyvanse, one of the top ADHD drugs, is raking in billions, with global sales of over $3 billion in its fiscal year ending March 31, 2023, and potentially earning $1.8 billion in profit from Vyvanse alone in 2024. By 2025, Takeda’s global sales are expected to hover around $2 billion, yielding profits of $1.2 billion if margins hold. Other major players in the ADHD market, including Novartis and Johnson & Johnson, are also generating significant revenue from their ADHD portfolios, with Novartis’s ADHD drugs potentially contributing $500 million to $1 billion annually to its revenue, and Johnson & Johnson’s Concerta generating around $400 million in revenue, translating to $200 million in profit.

The U.S. market drives the majority of profits in the ADHD drug industry

The ADHD drug industry is being driven by the U.S. market, which is generating the majority of profits, with stimulants like Adderall and Vyvanse taking over the market. Around 8.1 million U.S. adults with ADHD are using stimulants, creating a massive revenue pool of $9.7 billion to $29.2 billion every year. The industry is collectively raking in profits from stimulants, ranging from $5 billion to $10 billion, depending on the split between branded and generic drugs.

Globally ADHD is a $15.9+ billion market

Globally, the ADHD market is projected to reach $15.9 billion by 2025, potentially yielding $8 billion to $10 billion in profits for the industry, assuming margins of 50-60% across both branded and generic drugs. Although companies aren’t disclosing their ADHD-specific profits, the market remains extremely profitable, fueled by the rising number of diagnoses and a significant shift towards treating adult patients, who now make up over 50% of U.S. prescriptions. The ADHD drug market is expected to continue to be a goldmine for pharmaceutical companies, with huge revenue and profit potential in the years to come.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

In simple terms, Susan Monarez was hamstringing the mandate given to the Trump administration by voters to Make America Healthy Again, especially in light of the fundamentalist actions deemed necessary to reform institutions and policies that had allowed diabolical and exploitative actors like food and pharmaceutical companies to get away with making the public sicker. Her record and present interests were also contradictory to the mandate given to the Trump administration.

In particular, she works/worked with the US military’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (or DARPA); and wants to expand the use of wearables to see who is vaccinated or unvaccinated; largely working with the Biden-Harris Administration. In addition, Monarez was previously deputy director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (or ARPA-H), which is an agency within the US Department of Health and Human Services; and ARPA-H was created by the Biden-Harris administration to accelerate what they called “high-risk, high reward” biomedical research.

By the way, ARPA-H is also modeled after DARPA, meaning that an alleged health research body is modelled to function as a military body – which is why I’ve often argued that the COVID plandemic policies were a militarised response, and not a health response. Then, Monarez was also a Science and Technology Policy Fellow with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. She also held roles in the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the US National Security Council, where her work included initiatives to combat anti-microbial resistance, expand the use of wearable technology for health monitoring, and improve pandemic preparedness efforts.

This information came to the fore after Susan Monarez was nominated by Trump for CDC Director, many of his voters argued that she is not consistent with the vision for which Americans who voted for Trump expect to see implemented. Furthermore, people who were implicated in the consolidation of the COVID plandemic and the tyrannical pandemic preparedness efforts, are likely incompatible with the ambitions of an administration that is against such an abuse of power. Therefore, Susan Monarez, who also worked in the Biden-Harris administration, was likely going to be against a lot of what the Trump administration stands for anyways. Which is even exemplified by the fact that Susan Monarez was (in part) fired as CDC Director for trying to keep mRNA shots on the recommended childhood vaccine schedule and claiming that “vaccines save lives”.

And so, I think both these points (especially from the point of view of what voters want) (once again), as far as the Trump administration is concerned, Susan Monarez was removed because her works and inclinations are incongruous with what the VOTERS behind the second Trump administration want – and this is the catalyst that led to other CDC leadership like Demetre Daskalakis resigning: it is because they shared in Susan Monarez’s works and inclinations, which were against what voters wanted from the second Trump administration.

So, having covered this recapitulation or contextual background for today’s discussion, we ought then to proceed to analyse the letter that has become a notable feature in the present discourse pertaining to the CDC.

THE ISSUES WITH THE RESIGNATION LETTER FROM DEMETRE DASKALAKIS

So, when Demetre Daskalakis resigned as Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at CDC, his letter to leadership carried a tone of finality and moral conviction . In the letter, he declared “Enough is enough,” explaining that Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s leadership had made it impossible for him to continue. As alluded to earlier, those on the left (and certainly the far left) have praised the letter as being principled, but when read closely it is less a defense of science than a portrait of the very rhetorical habits that drove the public to distrust the CDC in the first place: particularly rhetorical habits that include appeals to authority, catastrophic predictions, ad hominem attacks, and factual distortions.

Consider his charge that he can no longer serve in an environment that (quote) “treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public’s health.” First, this is a false dichotomy; in that it frames the choice as binary: either one accepts the CDC’s so-called “scientific reality,” or one is accused of designing policies to harm. Yet the last five years have shown what most Americans already know: which is that what CDC has called “science” has often been neither transparent nor replicable, but political judgment dressed in a white coat. And this includes associates of the CDC and the plandemic response, when we consider that when asked in a hearing, Fauci conceded that six foot distance during covid was not based on scientific evidence, and was rather a product of this thinking that this was a reasonable idea.

In any case, Demetre Daskalakis further accuses the new HHS of narrative enforcement, when, in reality, the CDC has become infamous for the same on his watch. Lockdowns, school closures, and vaccine mandates were not the inevitable products of neutral science — they were policy choices, frequently contradicted by the very data the CDC refused to release. Kennedy did not cause that collapse of trust. Power overreach and failed policy did.

And in light of our reference to Fauci, I found it funny that when his credibility was being ruined by his lies and back-tracking statements (like we just saw), in 2024, Fauci did not hesitate to make it clear that the CDC was the responsible party for the implausible guidelines articulated during the COVID plandemic – thus perhaps, inadvertently proving that the CDC is response for the collapse of trust towards it – not the second Trump administration of Robert F Kennedy.

But still, Daskalakis (in his letter) appeals to institutional sanctity. He states that (quote) “unvetted and conflicted outside organizations seem to be the sources that the Department of HHS uses over the gold standard science of the CDC.” [PAUSE] But, now, the claim that the CDC represents “gold standard science” rings hollow. The agency’s failures are well documented: think of the contaminated Covid tests, the shifting guidance on masks that left the public whiplashed, how the CDC withheld vaccine safety data buried in VAERS and VSD, and the FOIA evasions that stonewalled independent scrutiny. AND SO, to describe this record as “gold standard science” is an appeal to authority wholly unsupported by the evidence!

Then, furthermore, the catastrophism in Daskalakis’s letter is both striking while also ringing hollow. So, he warns that Kennedy’s policies will (quote) “bring us to a pre-vaccine era where only the strong will survive and many if not all will suffer.” (end quote) Now, this is a combined fallacy: being both a false dichotomy and slippery slope. And this is because questioning the safety of excipients, the timing, number, or necessity of vaccines does not condemn the country to Darwinian misery.

In fact, mortality from infectious diseases like measles, pertussis, and diphtheria had already declined long before mass vaccination, thanks to sanitation, nutrition, and reduced exposure to livestock reservoirs. The fact of loss of protection due to waning immunity is not found in his resignation. But, in addition, balanced debate about risks and benefits does not mean “returning to the dark ages.” It means practicing science as it should be — open, skeptical, and transparent and with full accountability on scientific claims.

Then, finally on the catastrophism where Daskalakis claims that Kennedy’s policies will bring people “to a pre-vaccine era where only the strong will survive”, this rhetoric becomes openly and unnecessarily hostile. And this is considering that in this letter, the new Kennedy-appointed and vaccine-critical ACIP members are dismissed as “people of dubious intent and more dubious scientific rigor,” and Kennedy himself is cast as an “authoritarian leader.” These are ad hominem attacks, not arguments. They dismiss individuals rather than engage with data or reasoning. But, in contrast, here is what I think should be highlighted: the actions taken against people like the recently fired CDC Director Susan Monarez are not based on ad hominems from the Trump administration, but careful considerations of their failures and how incompatible they are with the mandate received. This is a crucial contrast, because these actions from the Trump administration reveal efforts towards institutional reform, and not the authoritarianism that people like Kennedy are accused of.

But then, the gravest claim in the letter by Daskalakis states that (quote) “eugenics plays prominently in the rhetoric being generated.” Meanwhile, Daskalakis gives us no quotations, policies, or documents to support this claim. AND YET, Ironically, the accusation is not only unsubstantiated but inverted. Kennedy has consistently warned against coercive health policies and corporate capture, both of which he argues worsen inequality. To portray the Trump administration’s emphasis on transparency and medical freedom as eugenics is a straw man — really, a distortion intended to silence rather than to debate.

But goes further, blaming Kennedy for violence. In particular, he states that (quote) “I am resigning because of the cowardice of a leader that cannot admit that his and his minions’ words over decades created an environment where violence like this can occur.”  So, this refers to a shooting at CDC. Again, no hint of evidence has been offered by Daskalakis or anyone else to connect Kennedy’s words to the crime. It is a post hoc fallacy, in which he is exploiting tragedy to smear a political opponent: it is shameless and ripens the fruit of his letter to rot.

DID THE BIDEN-ERA CDC EMPLOY A SATANIST TO MAKE HEALTH DECISIONS?

Then, finally, regarding the contents of the letter by Daskalakis, well, perhaps most jarring is his claim that Kennedy’s HHS has sought to (quote erase) “erase transgender populations, cease critical domestic and international HIV programming, and terminate key research to support equity.” This rhetoric here is catastrophic, baseless, and false. In reality, under Dr Jay Bhattacharya’s leadership, the NIH has made HIV a top research priority. Far from “ceasing HIV programming,” Kennedy’s administration has pledged to tackle the epidemic with fresh eyes, free from the pharmaceutical capture that distorted earlier approaches. To suggest otherwise is not just hyperbole; it is disinformation.

But, now, if you’re wondering why discussion about the CDC necessitates references to transgender people, well, Dr Demetre Daskalakis was appointed to a senior CDC role as part of Biden’s push to diversify federal health leadership (in pursuit of DEI policies and standards)! He served as the Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the CDC. And, notably, he claimed to have expertise in infectious diseases, especially among the LGBTQ+ community – which is an aggravating thing to publish, because what does he mean “expertise in infectious diseases, especially among the LGBTQ+ community”?! Outside of HIV/AIDS, I do not think that diseases like e-coli, influenza, or chickenpox manifest differently on people based on sexual orientation.

But, of course, DEI appointments were not really meant to be backed by credibility. People just had to be or say things that make them employable under DEI standards. But here’s more about the concerning person that Dr Demetre Daskalakis is, and why it has even led to questions concerning whether the Biden-Harris-era CDC employed a satanist to make health decisions that were affecting Americans?

THE URGENT NEED FOR INSTITUTIONAL REFORM AT THE CDC

But, let’s proceed to discuss the need for institutional reform. First, we’ve spoken about the fact that one of the fatal flaws of the CDC is that it always promotes and protects vaccines (regardless of how egregious the vaccine is), criticizes integrative medical therapies, and promotes disease management strategies that are not very effective (e.g., masking for COVID). It hence should not come as a surprise that the CDC has a longstanding history of corruption, did a variety of unscrupulous things to promote the COVID vaccines and in the present moment, has been the most resistant agency to the MAHA policies that president Trump and RFK Jr have been working to enact.

But, the twist is that the CDC interestingly has enormous credibility among physicians, in no small part because the agency is generally thought to be free of industry bias. In turn, if you browse their website, you will frequently encounter this CME disclaimer, which states that (quote): “CDC, our planners, content experts, and their spouses/partners wish to disclose they have no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services, or commercial supporters. Planners have reviewed content to ensure there is no bias. CDC does not accept commercial support.”

But, in actual fact, the CDC is prone to financial corruption through a legal loophole. One of the primary ways the CDC legally takes bribes is due to a 1983 law where Congress authorized the CDC to accept gifts “made unconditionally…for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service or for the carrying out of any of its functions.” Following this, in 1992, Congress established The National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, allowing the CDC to obtain additional funding for its work. Two years later, it was incorporated to (quote) “mobilize philanthropic and private-sector resources.”

HOWEVER, this problem is not just evident in the CDC Foundation, but also in the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (or the ACIP). In particular, a Congressional report confirmed that the CDC’s ACIP has been compromised since the 1990s! In particular, in the year 2000, a House report revealed that 7 of 10 ACIP rotavirus advisers had direct conflicts; not only this but members voted on vaccines while holding pharma stock or patents; every member received a conflict-of-interest waiver—”freely”; the ACIP also approved Rotashield before FDA licensing—and the pharmaceutical was later pulled for harming infants; and finally, since the year 2020, the ACIP had rubber-stamped mRNA shots despite mass injury and death. But, this issue of jarring rubber stamps for vaccines occurred even in 2018, as you’re about to see in this excerpt from an ACIP meeting.

Evidently, this shows that the CDC (and its ACIP) are implicated in the staggering financial conflict of interest at the heart of America’s vaccine schedule! In fact, Dr Paul Offit, who is a frequent CNN medical analyst and leading voice for vaccines, sat on the very committee (being the ACIP) that voted to add a rotavirus vaccine to the childhood schedule.

While on the committee, Dr Offit had his own rotavirus vaccine in development. By voting to mandate the entire category, he virtually guaranteed a market for his own product—a competitive lock-in. The vaccine the committee approved (which he voted for) was so dangerous it had to be withdrawn from the market within a year, as we have just alluded to. And this was because it was causing intussus-ception in babies—a lethal condition where the intestines telescope, causing agonizing pain.

Then what happened next is that his vaccine, developed with partners Stanley Plotkin and et al., it replaced the failed one; all while he remained on the committee. Then he and his partners sold that vaccine to the pharmaceutical company Merck for $186 million – to which he told Newsweek that he had “won the lottery.” But, in actual fact, Dr Offit did NOT win the lottery; he voted himself rich. Which means that this is NOT just a conflict of interest; it is a catastrophic breach of public trust. And this is because the very experts that were tasked with safeguarding children’s health were making decisions that directly led to a massive personal windfall, after a voted-on product HARMED children. And so, evidently, this is the rot at the core of the system that has necessitated institutional reform in the CDC. It is not just that there is corruption, it is that those who are corrupt are so emboldened that they are even making hundred million dollar deals to profit from this corruption!

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

 So, in the early 1980s, vaccines were so harmful that vaccine manufacturers routinely lost in court. They lobbied the US Congress to pass the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to give themselves liability protection. And they promised to make vaccines safer but there was no legal mechanism in the bill to enforce that promise so they never did.

Pharmaceutical companies proceeded to add as many vaccines as possible to the schedule. Prior to 1986, there were 3 routine vaccines totaling 7 injections. Today the CDC’s Maternal and Child and Adolescent vaccine schedules include 19 vaccines requiring 76 injections with 94 total doses of antigen (I’m actually less worried about the antigens than the other ingredients in the shots).

Meanwhile, no one in a position of authority bothered to measure the impact of the growing vaccine schedule on the health of children. Most regulators were auditioning for a job with Pharma because that’s where the money was said to be. Politicians also depend on Pharma donations for their re-election campaigns. While the mainstream news media get most of their revenue from Pharma advertising so they were never going to bite the hand that feeds them. And so, ultimately, big pharma invested heavily in public relations to lay siege to any remaining pockets of resistance.

Now, during this time, mercury (also known as thimerosal) was grandfathered in as “Generally Recognized As Safe” (or GRAS by the FDA) because it was easier to do that than actual safety testing. Aluminum adjuvants were allowed with only minimal safety testing — which included 1 man, 3 rabbits, and ever-moving goal posts on what constitutes “safe”. And so, the gold rush was on so vaccine manufacturers were free to add whatever they wanted to vaccines and they would all be approved because the regulators and the medical industry were captured by big pharma.

It was against this backdrop and historical context that the autism rate skyrocketed in the 1990s and has continued to increase ever since. At the same time, rates of life-threatening allergies, autoimmune disorders, asthma, childhood cancers, diabetes, and epilepsy soared too and those are probably vaccine injuries as well. But autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is more costly than those other conditions because it’s a lifelong disability with no known effective natural treatment (while some parents have been able to recover their children through holistic and alternative therapies but the percentage who are successful in doing so is still in the single digits). And so, in the US alone, the country went from having autism rates of 1 in 10 000 in the 1970s, to 1 in 31 in 2025. All of this correlates with the amount of vaccines that have been progressively added into the immunisation schedule.

And yet, autism is characterised as merely a mental disorder under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (or DSM-5), which is the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals in the United States – as OPPOSED to a vaccine injury. Here’s why, and what is progressively being done about it.

Now, what Nicole Shanahan just outlined is the problem with autism exclusively being defined as a mental disorder and what is being done to bypass that and establish a link between vaccines and autism. But, at the point when the correlation between vaccines and autism was becoming undeniable, the people who created the autism epidemic had no interest in conceding to wrongful conduct, and instead delayed progress in curbing autism rates by pretending to look for the cause, when they already knew it. But (of course) they also had to make sure never to “find” the actual cause because then the flow of research funding would stop and lots of these doctors and scientists would go to jail for their culpability in vaccine injuries. And so,  an entire industry was created to cover up the autism epidemic!

AN INDUSTRY WAS CREATED TO COVER UP THE AUTISM EPIDEMIC, STARTING WITH BOGUS STUDIES

To begin with, this industry focused on overwhelming academia and society with bogus studies. In fact, Since 2000, more than twenty scientific studies have concluded that there is no association between vaccines and autism. The most widely cited studies are: the Fombonne and Chakrabarti study (from 2001); Madsen et al. (2002; and 2003); Makela, Nuorti, and Peltola (also in 2002); Smeeth et al. (2004); Honda, Shimizu, and Rutter, (2005); Schechter and Grether (2008); and even Tozzi et al (2009) – and this is not even all of them. But the idea is to show that these were supposedly studies from varied authorities, covering a broad scope of research.

BUT… most of these are studies that claim no association between MMR or thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism, which is odd because the CDC’s own internal research shows that both of these types of vaccines do indeed cause autism. You find this in the statement from William Thompson and 2014, and the SafeMinds analysis of FOIA documents that were obtained from former CDC researcher turned GSK executive Thomas Verstraeten.

Doubling down on the blowing the whistle in bogus studies, Pediatrician Dr Joel “Gator” Warsh says the Science is NOT settled on vaccines and autism – despite the so-called research. He adds that when you go look at it, the research is literally just on MMR and thimerosal… but, you cannot make a claim about vaccines and autism when you have NOT studied all the vaccines in the first year together, and you haven’t studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. And before we view the video excerpt, I’d like to kindly ask that you pardon the alcohol analogy, and extrapolate the broader principle in the discussion, about the fallacious nature of how autism studies were conducted.

That said, there have also been studies that com[ared the state of health between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated children, including cases like the McDowell triplets. And so, there is a growing body of empirical evidence that not only disproves bogus studies claiming there is no causal link between autism and vaccines, but studies that also detail the actual causal link.

MEANWHILE, STUDIES ALREADY DISPROVED “GENES” AS THE LIKELY CAUSE FOR AUTISM

Perhaps one of the most aggravating discussions on the cause for autism is that on genetics (as we’ve discussed on previous occasions here on ‘The War Room’). And it is aggravating because in pretending to study the cause, big pharma and its collaborators went as far as to point the blame for autism on genetics – thus implicating parents as the potential originator of a gene that has caused their children a neurological challenge. Conveniently though, what is left out by vaccine manufacturers in this narrative is how the autism causing gene would have gotten to the parent in the first place – seeing that autism was not always part of the infirmities observed in society, in the same way cancer was not always part of the infirmities observed in society.

ANd o, you can imagine my excitement when I found that In 2011, a comprehensive study of twins and autism showed that autism is not primarily a genetic disorder… AND YET, this appears to have made no difference in the trajectory of the industry and perceptions on autism. In more detail, in the early 2000s, as the autism rate soared, political leaders in California wanted to better understand what was happening. So California contracted with sixteen of the best geneticists in the US and gave them access to all birth records in the state. They produced a study titled “Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism” (and this study was conducted by Hallmayer et al., in 2011) and it is the most comprehensive study of twins and autism to date. They found that genetic heritability explains at most 38% of ASD cases; in two places they explain that this is likely an overestimate. So at least 62% of autism cases (and likely significantly more) are caused by something other than genes. HOWEVER, when this study came out, the search for the gene(s) as a cause for autism had already become a large and very profitable industry, and this study showing that autism is NOT primarily genetic was simply brushed aside!

HOW VACCINE MANUFACTURERS TRIED TO DEBUNK THE LINK BETWEEN AUTISM AND VACCINES

Now, flooding academia and society with bogus studies was not the only arrow in the big pharma propaganda quiver; ambitiously, they also corrupted medical literature through going after those researchers and medical practitioners who were frank about the links between autism and vaccines. And in a very famous case, in their efforts to “debunk” the causal link between the vaccines and autism, the pharmaceutical and vaccine enterprise claimed that the only reason people believe vaccines cause autism is because a disgraced British doctor, named Andrew Wakefield, published a fraudulent 1998 study claiming they did and then made everyone start hallucinating that vaccine injuries were occurring, Let’s talk about this.

In essence, whenever the subject of vaccination and autism is raised (particularly within medical circles), you will immediately be told (often in a condescending manner) some variant of a narrative on how Andrew Wakefield was a dishonest doctor who was bribed by lawyers to torture children and publish a fraudulent and deeply flawed study that falsely linked vaccines to autism. You’d also be told that his allegedly abhorrent actions deeply violated the profound trust that people place in scientists, and he even tricked people into believing vaccines cause autism. And so, even though his study has been totally discredited and he lost his medical license for the gross misconduct he committed, his fraudulent study cemented the lie that vaccines cause autism, and despite all the data that is published in modern medical literature, nothing can undo the profound damage that Wakefield did to science, which means the medical and pharmaceutical industries have legitimacy to prevent such an occurrence from being repeated. This is basically the ideal that vaccine manufacturers pedal in an effort to “debunk” the causal link between vaccines and autism.

Now, this narrative on Andrew Wakefeild touches on a key point concerning propaganda. One of the most common ways the corporate propaganda apparatus (known as the PR industry) persuades the public is by sculpting the narrative best suited for swaying public opinion and then blasting it on every media platform while any opposing viewpoint is forbidden from being aired. These lies then become entrenched and everyone starts to independently repeat them as though the idea were their own (we saw this during the COVID plandemic).

In the cause of the vaccine and autism issue, and since Wakefield’s study was published in 1998 (a year after pharmaceutical television advertising became permissible), the study was able to initially gain immense traction in the press (as the media had not yet been bought out). BUT… a few years later, when that pharmaceutical television advertising monopoly had established itself, Andew Wakefeild’s study was suddenly being debunked on every platform. In fact, during that time, Sharyl Attkinson, who was a popular journalist and national news anchor for CBS shared that in the early 2000s, the pharmaceutical industry, feeling the pressure negative coverage of disastrous vaccination programs was creating for them, lobbied to prevent future negative coverage, and after this happened, it became impossible for her to air well produced segments which were critical of any vaccine initiative. Recently she even shared how the CDC was co-opted in this, especially when they went as far as to re-define the word “vaccine” in order to legitimise the COVID jabs.

WHAT THE ANDREW WAKEFIELD SMEAR CAMPAIGN EXPOSES ABOUT PRO-VACCINE PROPAGANDA

Now, there are three critical points to infer from Andrew Wakefield’s experience of being labelled persona non grata after publishing a study that linked vaccines to autism. First, the smear campaign against Andrew Wakefeild was a means through which vaccine manufacturers cemented the lie that no one had ever thought to associate vaccination with brain injuries prior to Wakefield’s study (and hence that all subsequent associations were a product of Wakefield tricking them into seeing a connection that was not there). But, of course,  this is clearly not true because the reason Wakefield did the study was because he was approached by parents who already thought vaccines caused their child’s autism.

Furthermore, in early medical literature (prior to vaccine injuries becoming a taboo subject), many doctors over the decades had actually reported brain damage and characteristic neurological injuries (e.g., cranial nerve palsies) following vaccination that mirror what we see in vaccine-injured children in the present – and so, Andrew Wakefeild was not some petty non-conformist; he rather happened to discuss on autism as neurological injury, while his study made waves because it echoed the experiences of many parents. In fact, you’d recall this excerpt from the documentary titled ‘AUTISM (An orchestrated Crisis)’, which echoes those very concerns even in the present.

So, the second point to infer from the smear campaign against Andrew Wakefeild is that it was conducted to give a very clear warning to every academic journal and researcher to never consider publishing anything that was critical of vaccination (as otherwise they would be raked over the coals for decades by the entire media apparatus like Wakefield was). For a while, this worked as intended (e.g., many scientists have confided to public figures that they know that autism is linked to vaccination but cannot publicly study it) and since Wakefield’s study, virtually no studies have been conducted on vaccine injuries, and of those that were, none could ever be published in a (quote un quote) “reputable” journal.

Then, finally, and equally aggravatingly, the smear campaign against Anndrew Wakefield was also used to cement the lie that the allegedly few incorrect, or fallacious and “doctored” studies that get through are immediately removed, whereas in reality this is not at all true. For example, trial participants and clinical investigators for the HPV and COVID vaccines repeatedly provided proof that fraudulent data was published but the academic journals never even issued a correction of those studies. You’d recall we also discussed, here on ‘The War Room’ how there was fraud detected in Pfizer mRNA vaccine clinical trials studied, and we even looked at a whistleblower’s testimony of how she was fired for exposing this issue to the FDA, while the FDA did nothing to address it. But, here is Dr Andrew Wakefeild discussing how, even in the present and recent history, the CDC covered up evidence and destroyed documents proving that the MMR vaccine caused autism and put millions of children at risk of serious permanent neurological injury.

VACCINE-INDUCED NEUROLOGICAL INJURIES WERE LONG KNOWN TO BE PREVALENT

Now, the claim that Andrew Wakefeild published a fraudulent study that somehow made people start hallucinating that vaccine injuries were occurring ignored that brain injuries were a longstanding problem of vaccination! For example, a 1982 NBC news program revealed that many parents were having children develop “post-pertussis ence-phalo-pathy” after taking the DPT vaccine. But, for some reason, most doctors refused to report this, even though medical knowledge about severe reactions to the whooping cough vaccine went back as far as to the early 1930s, while report after report had been published in medical journals since then. For instance, in 1948, two American doctors reported on case histories of many children who had been brain damaged or died from DPT vaccines in Boston. The following year, another doctor surveyed pediatricians across the country and found still more. Well, those studies have progressively been less discussed, in a world where pharmaceutical companies captured the media, and as a result, this orchestrated a selective amnesia when it comes to the history of vaccines.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

“The protruding war against Statins”, and we ought to begin with some context and recapitulation. You’d recall that we have previously discussed the questionable dichotomy between bad and good cholesterol. Well, part of how big pharma moved the goalpost on cholesterol, in order to create a market for Statins, is that there was a questionable dichotomy created between good and bad cholesterol. More specifically, cholesterol is generally described as a waxy substance essential for building cell membranes and producing hormones. Cholesterol travels through the bloodstream in particles called lipoproteins, primarily as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). LDL, often called “bad cholesterol,” carries cholesterol to cells and arteries, where it can form plaques, narrowing the arteries and increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. For decades, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol has been commonly referred to as “bad cholesterol” due to its association with increased risks of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), such as heart attacks and strokes. Conversely, high-density lipoprotein (or HDL), known as “good cholesterol,” transports cholesterol from the arteries to the liver for elimination.

DEVELOPING: THE RECENT BLOWS TO THE STATINS SCAM

Well, in an interesting development: an article was published on the 25th of June detailing that Heart disease has been the leading cause of death in the United States for more than a century, but overall heart disease deaths fell 66% between 1970 and 2022, and this was according to an analysis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data published also in the month of June. So, that drop was spurned by a nearly 90% decline in heart attack fatalities during that time.

Now, on the one hand,  heart disease has been the leading cause of death in the United States for more than a century, but overall heart disease deaths fell 66% between 1970 and 2022. That drop was spurned by a nearly 90% decline in heart attack fatalities during that time. On the other hand, heart disease has been the leading cause of death in the United States for more than a century, but overall heart disease deaths fell 66% between 1970 and 2022, according to an analysis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data published Wednesday. That drop was spurned by a nearly 90% decline in heart attack fatalities during that time.

It’s important to recognise that these changes take place against the backdrop of a high consumption of statins. In fact, in the article referenced, it states that (quote) “Improved cardiac imaging, the invention of coronary artery bypass grafting, the advent of cholesterol-lowering statins and other medical advances contributed to the decrease in heart disease deaths.” Well, contrary to the intentions of the author of the article in question, the findings reported by the CDC and in the article led many to question what would be behind the decrease in heart attacks, and a parallel increase in heart disease.

THE LINK BETWEEN STATINS, CHOLESTEROL, & HEART DISEASE

First, the status quo reports that the cholesterol myth is crumbling, as many people discover that the “go-to” drugs for cholesterol are linked to over 350 adverse

effects, including declining brain function (including dementia). But, the discussion of Statins is not just about side effects – rather, it is about a profound set of underreported health risks. In fact, a database of 561 studies reveals the alarming truth about statins: they harm the body and mind. For instance, a study discovered that Statins, while they are widely used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease and for the prevention of stroke, they have actually resulted in various adverse effects, most commonly affecting muscle and ranging from myalgia to rhabdo-myolysis. These adverse effects are said to be due to a coenzyme Q(10) deficiency because inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis also inhibits the synthesis of CoQ(10).

In addition, Statins, which are one of history’s most commonly prescribed drugs, have shaped Western society’s approach to treating heart disease. Akira Endo, a Japanese-born biochemist, is said to have discovered statins from mould. His research garnered the attention of pharmaceutical companies, aiming to find a compound that could effectively lower cholesterol—the assumed cause of heart disease. Merck (the pharmaceutical company) ultimately obtained samples of the drug and was “astonished at the potency,” Mr. Endo said in his review, spurring the pharmaceutical company to develop its own statin. Then, in 1987, the FDA approved Merck’s lovastatin, the first commercial statin. But, when you look at the history of statins before big pharma moved the goalpost on what was considered bad cholesterol, you realise that the scientific theory behind statins and even the subsequent studies pointed to significant harm.

Well, for decades, statins have been heralded as reliable heroes in the battle against heart disease, which was said to be the leading cause of death globally. However, a new expert review suggests that long-term use of statins may ACTUALLY be aiding the enemy by accelerating coronary artery calcification instead of providing protection. The review, published in Clinical Pharmacology, suggests that statins may act as “mitochondrial toxins,” impairing muscle function in the heart and blood vessels by depleting coenzyme Q10, which (as we’ve established) is an antioxidant that cells use for growth and maintenance. Multiple studies show that statins inhibit CoQ10 synthesis, leading many patients to supplement. Meanwhile, CoQ10 is vital for producing what is known as ATP, which is the cell’s fundamental energy carrier. Insufficient CoQ10 inhibits ATP production, resulting in an energy deficit that the review authors say “could be a major cause for heart muscle and coronary artery damage.”

Therefore, the crucial question that then arises is: “Who’s behind the studies proving statins’ alleged benefits then? Well, it appears that “virtually all of the major clinical trials of statins were funded by the manufacturers—when the drugs were still on patent”! More specifically, in a 2015 investigative meta-analysis published in The Journal of American Cardiology, researchers reviewed all phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in a decade. They found that nearly 80 percent of the trials had a conflict of interest, and almost 60 percent involved more than half of the authors. Of these studies, 54 had favourable outcomes, and only 12 had unfavourable results.

So, as far as statins are concerned, the manufacturers fabricated the data! The financial ties allowed the manufacturers to design the studies and select patients most likely to benefit from and not be harmed by statin therapy. These ties also allowed the manufacturers to not compare the benefit of statin therapy to the benefit of adopting healthy lifestyle habits and to not ask prospectively about side effects. This truly exposes the deceptive works of pharmakeia (the pharmaceutical industry) shown to us in Revelation 18:23!

DR LEONARD COLDWELL: “STATINS ARE MASS MURDER”

But, the ramifications of taking Statins do not stop there. Dr Leonard Coldwell stated in an interview that Statins are actually “mass murder and always lead to the hardening of the liver.”, while also severely harming the functionality of your brain.

STATINS MARKETING, AND THE NUMBERS GAME IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

So, considering all of these issues, what has propped up Statins as a hero, when there is an abundance of evidence that proves they are anything but a hero? Well, one of the consistent patterns I’ve observed within medicine is that once a drug is identified that can “beneficially” change a number, medical practice guidelines will gradually shift to prioritizing treating that number and before long, rationals will be created that require more and more of the population to be subject to that regimen. In the case of statins, prior to their discovery, it was difficult to reliably lower cholesterol, but once they hit the market, research rapidly emerged stating that cholesterol was more and more dangerous and, hence that more and more people needed to be on statins.

As you would expect, similar increases also occurred within the USA. For example, in 2008-2009, 12% of Americans over 40 reported taking a statin, whereas in 2018-2019, that had increased to 35% of Americans. Given how much these drugs are used, it then raises a simple question—how much benefit do they produce?

As it turns out, this is a remarkably difficult question to answer as the published studies use a variety of confusing metrics to obfuscate their data (which means that the published statin trials almost certainly inflate the benefits of statin therapy), and more importantly, virtually all of the data on statin therapy is kept by a private research collaboration which consistently publishes glowing reviews of statins (and attacks anyone who claims otherwise) but simultaneously refuses to release their data to outside researchers, which has led to those researchers attempting to get this missing data from the drug regulators.

Nonetheless, when independent researchers looked at the published trials (which almost certainly inflated the benefit of statin therapy) they found that taking a statin daily for approximately 5 years resulted in you living, on average, 3-4 days longer. Sadder still, large trials have found this minuscule “benefit” is only seen in men. In short, most of the benefit from statins is from creative ways to rearrange data and causes of death, not any actual benefit.

Here’s what proves that this playing around with numbers is possibly an industry wide issue. What we just discussed is notably very similar to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine trial which professed to be “95% effective” against COVID-19, but in reality only created a 0.8% reduction in minor symptoms of COVID (e.g., a sore throat) and a 0.037% reduction in severe symptoms of COVID (with “severe” never being defined by Pfizer). This in turn meant that you needed to vaccinate 119 people to prevent a minor (inconsequential) case of COVID-19, and 2711 to prevent a “severe” case of COVID-19.

Furthermore, a clinical trial whistleblower later revealed that these figures were greatly inflated as many individuals in the vaccine group who developed COVID-19 like symptoms were never tested for COVID-19. Likewise, these benefits were fleeting as it was shown the “efficacy” of vaccines rapidly waned (disappearing a few months after vaccination). Worse still at six months of follow-up in both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s trials, more vaccinated than unvaccinated individuals died, and similarly a peer-reviewed reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s trial data showed that one was more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from the vaccine than a hospitalization from COVID-19.

FOLLOWING THE MONEY: REGULATORS WERE PUT ON THE STATIN PAYROLL

In circumstances like these where an unsafe and ineffective but highly lucrative drug must be sold, the next step is typically to pay everyone off to promote it. For example, to quote Chapter 7 of Doctoring Data:

“The National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) has been tasked by the National Institutes of Health to develop guidelines [everyone uses] for treating cholesterol levels. Excluding the chair (who was by law prohibited from having financial conflicts of interest), the other 8 members on average were on the payroll of 6 Statin manufacturers.

In 2004, NCEP reviewed 5 large statin trials and recommended: “Aggressive LDL lowering for high-risk patients [primary prevention] with lifestyle changes and statins.”

In 2005 a Canadian division of the Cochrane Collaboration [who were not paid off] reviewed 5 large statin trials (3 were the same as NCEP’s, while the other 2 had also reached a positive conclusion for statin therapy). That assessment instead concluded: “Statins have not been shown to provide an overall health benefit in primary prevention trials.”

Likewise, the American College of Cardiology made a calculator to determine your risk of developing a heart attack or stroke in the next ten years based on your age, blood pressure, cholesterol level, and smoking status. In turn, many doctors punched their patient’s numbers into it and then informed them that they were at high risk of a stroke or heart attack and urgently needed to start a statin. Given that almost everyone ended up being “high risk”, in 2016, Kaiser completed an extensive study which determined this calculator overestimated the rate of these events by 600%! AND YET…sadly, that has not at all deterred the use of this calculator (e.g., medical students are still tested on it for their board examinations). But, here is more about the financial incentives behind the push of statins and the cholesterol lie, from Dr.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES, VACCINES, AND THE TRANS AGENDA

And now onto our main discussion on the agenda on the mutilation of the human species; and we ought to begin with the mutilation of the human species – particularly in light of the intersection between vaccines and the trans agenda. This discussion emanates from a diabolical agenda exposed by the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD., regarding how there is a mutilation of the human species, part of the gender agenda; and which is part of things that people are made to ingest, including contaminated food and drugs. He went on to address how this mutilation agenda even destroys male and female appearances AND has been occurring for many years. Let’s kindly revisit that moment.

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES THROUGH CONTAMINATED FOOD

Let’s first address this human mutilation with respect to food. You’d recall the President of Loveworld Incorporated addressed the issue of corn, and how corn is one of the most genetically modified crops in the present, despite producers who market their corn as organic. At best, the organic mark refers to organic farming practices, as opposed to the natural nature of the product itself. In light of this, you’d recall that we discussed, here on ‘the War Room’ that this genetically modified corn, known as Bt corn, was engineered to produce an insecticide, killing corn borers and other pests, reducing the need for chemical pesticides.  And that, despite it being hailed as a success – especially in killing pests, this corn is a massive liability for human and animal health – especially because the DNA of corn has been altered in such a manner, that is supposed to make it survive being sprayed with toxic chemicals like glyphosate.

As a result, this corn that is contaminated with toxic chemicals has become one of the leading tools in the human mutilation agenda. In particular, the genetically modified corn presents people with numerous health threats, resulting from the toxins – especially when we begin to consider that genetically modified corn is directly tied to something called leaky gut syndrome. Leaky gut syndrome is a condition where increased intestinal permeability allows toxins and undigested food particles to leak into the bloodstream, potentially causing inflammation and various health problems. Here’s what’s notable about this. When the genetically modified Bt corn was made, studies noted that the insects who ate this corn would develop hoes in their stomachs, which would ultimately make their stomachs burst. It appears that the very same genetically modified But corn has a similar mutilating impact on a human stomach, and it is what is being called leaky gut syndrome – as was discussed in a US government hearing.

Now, you’d also recall that the ambitions of mutilating humans through food did not end with corn being tied to leaky gut syndrome. In September 2001, scientists created what they called contraceptive corn, with the pretext or (quote unquote) saving the world from overpopulation. These pregnancy prevention plants were the handiwork of the San Diego-based biotechnology company ‘Epicyte’, where researchers discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack the male reproductive seed, or sperm. By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company essentially created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives, towards a depopulation agenda!

Well, DuPont and Monsanto then purchased the contraceptive epicyte gene to include it in their products and subsequently the corn that they produce – all resulting in decreasing fertility rates in a number of people.

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES THROUGH CONTAMINATED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS

We then ought to talk about the mutilation of the human species through contaminated pharmaceutical products – and frankly, this is where it gets even more twisted and diabolical. In particular, we ought to address this in light of vaccines. And to begin with, I’d like to establish a crucial piece of context, which is that a lot of vaccines that are presented as simple clear solutions ACTUALLY contain fetal tissue that was taken from aborted babies. In fact, kindly have a listen to Stanley Plotkin’s contribution on this. By the way, Stanley Plotkin is widely regarded as a leading author and contributor to vaccinology. He has also been a consultant to Moderna, one of the main manufacturers of the Covid vaccine. And in the following excerpt, he is under oath admitting to the use of fetal tissue from aborted babies in vaccines.

Here’s why this piece of context matters: American author and journalist Dr Naomi Wolf exposed that the COVID jabs are ACTUALLY about “destroying women and babies” AND also “emasculating men.” In Pfizer’s own documents, the pharmaceutical company focused more on researching the effects of the vaccine on sex and reproduction RATHER than on its impact on the lungs. Which is an immediate red flag because COVID was allegedly a virus that affected a person’s respiratory system – so, why would a pharmaceutical company that is allegedly making a vaccine that would protect from this lung harming virus place more emphasis on research the vaccines impact on sex and reproduction?

Well, it is because Pfizer knew of the far greater impact of their vaccine on the reproductive system. American author and journalist Naomi Wolf, along with independent researchers brought a body of work titled the Pfizer Papers, looking at Pfizer’s crimes against humanity. The body of work features reports which are based on Pfizer clinical trial documents released under court order and on related medical literature. They show that Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial was deeply flawed and that the pharmaceutical company knew by November 2020 that its vaccine was neither safe nor effective. THEN, the reports detail vaccine-induced harms throughout the human body, INCLUDING TO THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM; they also show that women suffered vaccine-related adverse events at a 3:1 ratio; expose that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not rare, mild, or transient; and, shockingly, demonstrate that the mRNA vaccines have created a new category of multi-system, multi-organ disease, which is being called “CoVax Disease.”

But, now, in light of the harms to the reproductive system specifically, Dr Naomi Wolf proceeded to detail the diabolical extent that Pfizer targeted the reproductive function of the human body. She states that they knew they were blocking women’s ovaries with lipid nanoparticles, they knew the lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta. Furthermore, Pfizer KNEW there’s something with the biological seed of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or foetuses because Pfizer warned vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women and that if they do, they ought to use 2 reliable forms of contraception. Here’s more fro mDr Noami Wolf.

THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN HUMAN MUTILATION, VACCINES AND THE TRANS AGENDA

Now, I mentioned that it gets even more twisted and diabolical when it comes to the mutilation of the human species through contaminated pharmaceutical products, and we proceeded to look at the contamination of vaccines with the fetal tissue of aborted babies. [PAUSE] Well, this actually explains a concerning intersection between the mutilation agenda, vaccines, and the trans agenda.

More specifically, it appears that the transgender “movement” (so to speak) is the political cover for a larger, long-term directed evolution project being carried out by DARPA, which is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, within the United States Department of Defense. You’d remember DARPA as a notable actor in our discussions on the weaponisation of weather. This project has 3 goals. (2) First, is to sterilise/depopulate 90% of the population covertly over three generations; (2) Second is to trigger/force hyper-accelerated mutations in the general human population in the search for life extension technologies; And (3) to destroy the classical definition of what it means to be human, giving rise to new divergent species.

But, you see the greatest evidence of this project is all that we know about the COVID plandemic and the vaccines themselves. First, it should be no surprise that DARPA – a US Department of Defence Agency – is involved in the creation of a biologically destructive project. It should be no surprise because during the Covid era, one could easily infer interesting facts of military involvement, and even parallels to military operations. For instance, the so-called public health experts were actually not responsible for pandemic response policy in many countries. In the US, for example, the military-intelligence-biodefense leadership was in charge. In fact, government documents have shown how standard tenets of public health pandemic management were abruptly and secretly thrown out during the covid plandemic. The most startling switch was the replacement of the public health agencies by the National Security Council and Department of Homeland Security at the helm of pandemic policy and planning. And as part of the secret switch, all communications – defined in every previous pandemic planning document as the responsibility of the CDC – were taken over by the National Security Council under the auspices of the White House Task Force; the CDC was not even allowed to hold its own press conferences!

And so, when the so-called public health and medical experts blanketed the airwaves and Internet with “recommendations” urging universal masking, mass testing and quarantining of asymptomatic people, vaccine mandates, and other anti-public health policies – or when they promoted obviously flawed studies that supported the quarantine-until-vaccine biodefense agenda – they were not doing so of their own accord, INSTEAD, they were performing the role that the leaders of the national security or biodefense response gave them: which is to be the trusted public face that made people believe quarantine-until-vaccine was a legitimate public health response – all while this was a military operation.

Similarly, it is not a surprise that the mRNA vaccines are a central piece in the mutilation and trans agenda. In particular, you’ll recall that they lied about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, but especially about what the mRNA vaccines do in the human body!

ANTHONY FAUCI AUTHORISED MORE THAN $200 MILLION FOR TRANSGENDER ANIMAL STUDIES

But, just in case the evidence on this intersection between human mutilation, vaccines and transgenderism still sounds circumstantial or less damning for the covid industrial complex, well… Republican Representative Eli Crane exposed critical information concerning Anthony Fauci’s dealings in the COVID era. Anthony Fauci – who was the face of the diabolical covid response, well he also authorised more than $200 million for transgender animal studies.

WHAT THE HUMAN MUTILATION AGENDA MEANS FOR THE VACCINATED

So, what does this mean for the vaccines? Well, for one, we now know that COVID-19 injections are NOT biological, and are rather synthetic nano circuits that communicate with 5G! Now, a Dr Astrid Stuckelberger exposed that Pfizer Covid vial contents “contains graphene oxide, parasites, RFID, metals, and nano-circuitry. And DARPA and Bill Gates developed these non-biological synthetic injections to control the minds and bodies of the population.” She further exposes that “Dr. Charles Morgan formerly with the CIA in a 2018 DARPA meeting talking to the U.S. Military about CRISPR gene editing technology said they can engineer a “unique thing” to kill only one person in the world. In this case, they used this ‘mRNA’ technology to kill millions of innocent people in the world.” This happens because the self-replicating nanobots can be coded to control the mind and body.

written By Lindokuhle Mabaso