IT WAS ALWAYS A FAKE VACCINE

They were never vaccines to begin with. It was always a lie from the beginning.  

Dr. Ryan Cole: 15 Ways the COVID Shots Injure and KiII

According to Dr. Ryan Cole, the COVID shots can cause harm in 15 distinct ways. Researchers have revealed how nanoparticles are being utilized in these shots, and what the effects are of the persistence of synthetic RNA in the body. Additionally, scientists are exposing the circulation of synthetic spike protein and its impact on human health. The spike protein itself is a harmful agent that can have far-reaching consequences. Experts are also examining the brain accumulation and impact of these shots, as well as the potential for peripheral nerve damage and organ damage. Furthermore, the COVID shots have been linked to myocarditis and heart issues, and are also affecting the adrenal glands and elastic fibers. The shots are also causing reproductive harms, weakening immune systems, and leading to vascular damage and clotting. Moreover, abnormal protein accumulation, immune tolerance, and increased cancer risk are all being actively studied as potential consequences of the COVID shots. Dr. Cole’s insights highlight the need for continued research into the effects of these shots on human health and the need to stop them.

Vaccine injections altered human immunity on a global scale

According to epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, vaccine injections have drastically changed human immunity worldwide, and he’s sounding the alarm. By analyzing the electronic medical records of thousands of patients before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, Hulscher has uncovered compelling evidence of vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or VAIDS. The shocking spike in autoimmune diseases, chronic infections, and even cancer cases is prompting Hulscher to call for immediate and thorough scientific scrutiny of the long-term consequences of these vaccines, with the ultimate goal of potentially bringing an end to the mRNA vaccine era. Hulscher’s findings are sparking intense debate and raising critical questions about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, and he’s urging the scientific community to take a closer look at the devastating impact they may be having on human health.

 mRNA tech is NOT a vaccine — it’s an experimental gene-modifying platform

Under oath, Dr. Robert Sullivan confirmed it. mRNA tech is NOT a vaccine — it’s an experimental gene-modifying platform. It forces the body to produce toxic spike proteins, causing lung, heart, and organ damage. It is linked to autoimmune disorders and abnormal cell growth, and they KNEW IT. These are crimes against humanity were committed, the truth was censored to protect Big Pharma and billions were made — at the cost of YOUR health

What is Gene Therapy, and Why the Interest?

Gene therapy involves modifying or introducing genetic material to treat or prevent diseases, often targeting conditions like genetic disorders, cancers, or viral infections. It’s a broad field, encompassing mRNA vaccines (which some call gene therapy due to their use of genetic instructions) and approaches like CRISPR or viral vector therapies. According to dubious researchers and institutions, it offers potential cures for previously untreatable conditions, rapid vaccine development (as seen with COVID-19), and massive commercial opportunities. Biotech giants like Moderna and Pfizer, backed by government contracts, have poured billions into this space, with mRNA platforms alone generating tens of billions in revenue during the pandemic.

mRNA is about Centralized Control and Power

The push for gene therapy is tied to powerful institutions—Big Pharma, governments, and organizations like the World Health Organization or the Gates Foundation—that are centralizing control over health. Globalist entities—think WHO, GAVI, or multinational corporations—are accused of using gene therapy to standardize medical interventions worldwide, bypassing national sovereignty. mRNA vaccines, rolled out globally during COVID-19, were a test case for mandating experimental tech under the guise of public health. gene therapies could be weaponized to alter populations, either through sterilization, genetic selection, or other dystopian outcomes, echoing historical eugenics programs.

Eugenics, as practiced in the early 20th century, involved elites promoting policies to “improve” populations, often targeting marginalized groups. Figures like Bill Gates, whose foundation funds vaccine and gene therapy research, has made comments on population control through health interventions. While Gates frames this as reducing poverty to lower birth rates, its a slippery slope toward eugenics-like goals, especially when gene-editing tools like CRISPR could target specific genetic traits.

mRNA is a Trojan Horse

mRNA vaccines as “gene therapy” because they introduce genetic instructions into cells. They’re a gateway to normalizing genetic manipulation. Kennedy’s recent cancellation of $500 million in mRNA funding cited safety, resonating with those who see mRNA as a tool for globalist agendas rather than public good.

mRNA for Profit and Power Concentration

From a finance angle, gene therapy is a goldmine. The global market is projected to hit $13 billion by 2026, driven by high-cost treatments (some therapies cost $2M+ per dose). This enriches a small elite—pharma CEOs, investors, and their political allies—while tying healthcare to corporate control. The gene therapy’s push isn’t just about health but about creating dependency on proprietary tech, with potential for social engineering if access is gatekept or tailored to certain groups.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

Peel back the glossy press releases, and a darker narrative emerges—one echoed in financial circles wary of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Great Reset” rhetoric. Independent researchers and African policymakers have revealed that GMO mosquitoes aren’t just about disease suppression; they’re a Trojan horse for depopulation and coerced medical interventions. The Gates Foundation, with its $50 billion endowment and deep ties to pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Moderna, has long been exposed of prioritizing population management over genuine aid. In a 2010 TED Talk, Bill Gates himself mused on reducing global population growth through vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive services. Fast-forward to today: Oxitec’s malaria-focused strains, developed with Gates funding, will deliberately target human fertility in high-birth-rate regions.

Bill Gates’ GMO Mosquitoes

Flying Syringes for Forced Vaccination and Global Control

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation invested a staggering $41 million in Oxitec, a British biotech firm, to develop these genetically modified mosquitoes that purportedly aim to eradicate malaria. However, numerous health experts have dubbed these creatures “flying syringes,” because their true purpose is to covertly vaccinate the general population with potentially hazardous vaccines that induce sterility in both men and women, without their knowledge or consent. This could lead to a significant increase in infertility, with women becoming barren and men becoming impotent on a massive scale, highlighting just one of the many risks associated with this technology.

Consider the “flying syringe” concept, a Gates-backed idea to engineer mosquitoes that deliver vaccines via bites. A 2008 Grand Challenges grant explored transgenic mosquitoes secreting malaria antigens into human saliva during feeding, turning insects into inoculators. This blurs the line between consent and compulsion. This tech could enforce compliance under the guise of public health emergencies. Financially, the payoff is staggering: The global vaccine market, projected to hit $100 billion by 2030, thrives on perpetual crises. Gates’ investments in mRNA platforms during COVID-19 yielded billions; GMO mosquitoes could similarly prime markets for next-gen shots, funnelling profits to elite stakeholders.

Back in 2008, Gates’ foundation doled out $100,000 to a Japanese scientist, Hiroyuki Matsuoka, to engineer mosquitoes that secrete malaria vaccine proteins in their saliva. Bite you? Boom – you’re “vaccinated.” No needle, no doctor, no choice. They called it a “flying syringe,” and it wasn’t some fringe fantasy; it was funded under Gates’ Grand Challenges Explorations, where he threw millions at 104 “bold ideas” for global health domination. Fast-forward, and outfits like Oxitec – backed by Gates cash – are releasing billions of GM bugs in places like Florida and Brazil, supposedly to fight diseases. But whispers from the lab? These could be tweaked to deliver anything: vaccines, gene therapies, or worse. These genetically engineered mosquitoes are not only being touted as a means to control population growth, but also as a way to inoculate people with vaccines without their explicit consent. As a seasoned finance analyst who has tracked the ways in which globalist billionaires transform “philanthropy” into lucrative business ventures, this initiative reeks of a depopulation agenda masquerading as a benevolent endeavor. Rather than saving lives, Gates is essentially attempting to playing god with people’s bodies, and the backlash from Africa is only the beginning. In essence, the hazardous and potentially deadly vaccines that people have been wary of and rejected can now be administered without their knowledge or consent, courtesy of these genetically modified mosquitoes. All it takes is a mosquito bite, and the vaccine is injected into the bloodstream, complete with untested and questionable substances, all without the individual’s permission. Why should any nation, proud of its heritage, allow Bill Gates and his associates to continue perpetrating their mass depopulation agenda on their soil? The very idea of allowing these “flying syringes” to infiltrate their ecosystems is a stark reminder of the need for vigilance and resistance against such insidious plans.

Bill Gates is Waging a High-Tech War on Mosquitoes

At What Cost to Humanity and the Environment?

Bill Gates’ ambitious plan to eradicate malaria is a complex combination of artificial intelligence, experimental vaccines, and genetic modification, known as gene drives, which are essentially “kill switches” for mosquitoes.

 At first glance, his plan appears to be a selfless act, aiming to save the lives of over 600,000 children under the age of five who die from malaria every year. However, beneath the surface of this seemingly altruistic endeavor lies a more sinister reality: Gates’ desire to control nature reflects the arrogance of the global elite, who view humanity and ecosystems as mere test subjects for their experiments. Gates portrays mosquitoes as malicious, but is he and his allies truly any different? Unlike mosquitoes, they have monopolized farmland, disrupted food supplies, and profited from crises under the guise of “charity” – actions that have had far more devastating consequences for human societies. The use of gene drives, the cornerstone of Gates’ mosquito eradication plan, poses significant risks to the environment and ecosystems. These irreversible genetic modifications have the potential to disrupt the delicate balance of nature in unpredictable ways. While mosquitoes can be a nuisance, they also play a crucial role in pollinating plants and supporting biodiversity. However, Gates’ solution to the malaria crisis disregards these essential roles, prioritizing short-term human intervention over long-term ecological stability. This reckless approach to genetic engineering is reminiscent of the same hubris that has plagued globalist experiments in agriculture, healthcare, and energy, which have often had disastrous consequences for the environment and human societies. The narrative surrounding the “war on malaria” also conceals a more insidious agenda: control.

Gates acknowledges that malaria research has been underfunded because its victims are “too poor to attract attention”, but who is responsible for perpetuating this imbalance if not the billionaires who profit from inequality? Gates’ projects are not about saving lives, but about consolidating power and using diseases as leverage to reengineer society and nature in the image of the global elite. The exploitation of the Global South by Western philanthropists and corporations has become a familiar pattern, with the beneficiaries of these “humanitarian” efforts often being the same biotech firms, AI companies, and elites who profit from controlling life at the molecular level. The use of gene drives as a tool for population control is a chilling possibility that cannot be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Given Gates’ history of using the Global South as a testing ground for his experiments, it is not far-fetched to imagine the use of gene drives for more sinister purposes. The same individual who has treated people as lab rats now seeks to play god with the natural world, ignoring the catastrophic consequences that his actions could have for the environment and human societies. The growing resistance to Western “philanthropy” in the Global South is a testament to the fact that people are no longer willing to be treated as test subjects for the experiments of the global elite. Ultimately, if Bill Gates truly wants to eliminate parasites, perhaps he should start by targeting the ones that are monopolizing resources and exploiting humanity. Mosquitoes may carry malaria, but Gates and his allies are carrying the far more malignant disease of hubris, which has already had devastating consequences for the environment and human societies. The cure for this disease is not found in a lab, but in the growing resistance of people who are rejecting the control of the global elite and demanding a more equitable and sustainable future for all. Financially, this is a goldmine for the elite. Gates invests in biotech firms like Oxitec and big pharma players, then “donates” to projects that create demand for their patents. It’s vertical integration on steroids – fund the “problem” (engineered bugs), sell the “solution” (vaccines via bite), and watch royalties flood in while populations dwindle. Remember his TED talk where he released mosquitoes on the audience to make a point about malaria? That wasn’t a stunt; it was foreshadowing. And don’t buy the fact-check spin that his current projects aren’t for vaccination – the tech’s the same gene-editing toolkit, and history shows he’s funded the syringe concept directly.

Bill Gates is actively utilizing insects as carriers for hazardous pathogens and recklessly dumping untested mRNA technology on impoverished communities, flagrantly disregarding fundamental conservative values such as informed consent, secure national borders, and unrestricted free markets. The Nuremberg Code, established to protect human rights, is being blatantly disregarded, while national sovereignty is being deliberately compromised. The potential consequences of these actions are alarming, ranging from ecological devastation and unforeseen genetic mutations to deliberately engineered pandemics designed to justify further authoritarian control. The state of Florida has already been transformed into a testing ground for these experiments, with billions of dollars being invested under the supervision of Governor DeSantis, despite the absence of comprehensive long-term studies to assess the safety and efficacy of these measures. We must reject this blatant attempt at technocratic domination and instead support courageous leaders like Traoré, who are taking a firm stance against these dangerous experiments. It is imperative that we invest in genuinely effective solutions, such as locally driven agricultural initiatives and traditional medicine, rather than relying on patented, potentially lethal products promoted by Gates. If we fail to take immediate action to halt these egregious practices, we risk being subjected to an unending barrage of experimental technologies concocted by globalist elites, as this sinister agenda is driven by an insatiable pursuit of wealth, power, and the systematic erosion of national sovereignty.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

The War Against the Planned Parenthood Organisation’; and we ought to begin with some historical context, in contrast with modern perceptions. So, today, a notable proportion of women in the country begin utilising a form of contraception at a young age. However, in the 1800s and early 1900s, usage of contraceptives was far less common due to laws prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives or simply information about contraceptives via mail or in other non-approved settings. Margaret Sanger sought to change this. Margaret Sanger is largely known for her work as an ambitious feminist leading the birth control revolution in America and, largely, around the world. However, Sanger’s motivations behind this work had dark roots in racism and eugenics.

Specifically, Sanger’s writings shed light on underlying motives of Sanger in her movement toward family planning: eugenics and racism. Sanger strongly backed the field of eugenics and saw birth control as an innovative and safe way to medically allow for limiting the abilities of certain populations to reproduce. Her eugenic beliefs also found themselves rooted in race, greatly affecting African American populations in America and furthering beliefs that people of color were lesser than or appropriate for being used as test subjects for medical advancements. Both of these belief systems drove Sanger’s fight for widespread, easy access to birth control in America.

For one, Sanger was a strong proponent of eugenics, and many of her writings demonstrated the clear link she saw between controlling reproduction of certain groups and birth control. Sanger believed that the country was suffering greatly due to uncontrolled reproduction, specifically the unstable majority of the so-called “feeble-minded” ─ which were primarily people of other races, and those living in impoverished conditions. And at the time, it was thought that feeble-mindedness was associated with “abnormally high rate[s] of fertility” ─ which was described as a “biological menace” ─ and many eugenicists believed that reproduction of feeble-minded people would only result in pauperism or insanity in the following generation.

Well, in light of this, Margaret Sanger argued so-called feeble-minded people should not be granted the  personal liberty to reproduce as much as “normal people”. Rather, she proposed the segregation and sterilization of feeble-minded groups. Specifically, she argued that every feeble-minded girl in her childbearing age needed to be segregated in order to prevent her from bearing “imbecile children”. Sanger also argued that “the male defectives are no less dangerous”, claiming that segregation of women would only handle part of the problem, and therefore, the immediate sterilization of men was needed in order to ensure that “parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded”. Therefore, Sanger demonstrated clear objections to free abilities to reproduce in “lesser than” groups of society, and she recognised the way in which birth control could help prevent population growth in the so-called feeble-minded groups.

Moreover, Sanger was particularly an important figure establishing the link between birth control and eugenics, as she saw it as a means toward backing the ideas of then-prominent eugenicists. She noted that eugenicists had been given “proof that reckless spawning carries with it the seeds of destruction” and saw birth control as the solution for eugenicists to aid in reducing the population of feeble-minded citizens. Sanger claimed “Birth control… is really the greatest and most truly eugenic method, and its adoption as part of the program of Eugenics would immediately give a concrete and realistic power to that science”. It is therefore clear that Sanger was a prominent figure in connecting a eugenics “problem” to the “solution” of birth control. All of this is to say that birth control, including abortion, had their beginnings in eugenics.

These eugenicist influences are also historically evidenced in Margaret Sanger’s writings and speeches. Years before the atrocities of Hitler upon the Jewish people during World War II, Sanger exposed herself as a racist and eugenicist. In her piece Morality and Birth Control, Sanger said that birth control “must lead to a higher individuality and ultimately to a cleaner race” and that “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class.”

Also, on the topic of birth control, Sanger said in her book titled ‘Woman and the New Race’ that birth control “is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.” Then, on eugenics and selective breeding, Sanger wrote in her autobiography, (quote) “The eugenists wanted to shift the birth control emphasis from less children for the poor to more children for the rich. We went back to that and sought to first stop the multiplication of the unfit. This appeared the most important and greatest step towards race betterment.” (end quote). And so, evidently, her (own) words leave little question about Sanger’s views on race, the poor, and the disabled. Because of remarks like these, Planned Parenthood has struggled to remove the stain that Sanger herself left on her organisation.

But, it is not without trying: initially, Planned Parenthood and its cohort of allies tried to brand Sanger as a radical feminist of her time (not that that is inherently plausible). For instance, there have been many an article or glorification piece written about Margaret Sengar, on publications such as Time Magazine. And this branding of Margaret Sengar as a feminist has been a deliberate propaganda campaign. But, again, when you listen to Margaret Sengar’s own words, you realise it is hard to deduce genuine interest in women’ suffering, and what tends to stand out more is what I would call the feminist classics: namely, a misconception of society fuelled by a wrong ideology and worldview (in her case eugenics), bitterness from personal frustration, and the antagonisation of Christians and traditional values, such as the Church as a whole, as well as family and marriage.

LIBERALS HAVE LONG PRETENDED NOT TO KNOW MARGARET SANGER’S EUGENICIST HISTORY

Again, what is ironic about all of this is that many ultra-liberal and so-called politically correct people have long tried to maintain the pretence that Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood are models of what advocacy for women’s rights and liberty ought to look like. From the leadership at Planned Parenthood, to democrat politicians and executives in similarly aligned organisations – all of these parties tried to sell society on the lie that an organisation that sought to destroy some of them was somehow their liberator and ally in modern considerations of civil rights.

Well, that was until people began to ask the right questions, and looked beneath the feminist veil that cloaked Margaret Sanger’s reputation; and quickly it became difficult to pretend that Magaret Sanger was a feminist icon to be celebrated. And this was perhaps exemplified when, in April of 2021, The New York Times published an article titled “I’m the Head of Planned Parenthood. We’re Done Making Excuses for Our Founder”. In the piece, Alexis Johnson, the president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood, tried to put some distance between the founder and the organisation. Her words are damning; stating that (quote) “Up until now, Planned Parenthood has failed to own the impact of our founder’s actions. We have defended Sanger as a protector of bodily autonomy and self-determination, while excusing her association with white supremacist groups and eugenics as an unfortunate ‘product of her time.’” Johnson continues to state that, “…[Sanger] endorsed the Supreme Court’s 1927 decision in Buck vs Bell, which allowed states to sterilize people deemed ‘unfit’ without their consent and sometimes without their knowledge…” and, that “Sanger remains an influential part of our history and will not be but that Planned Parenthood must fully take responsibility for the harm that Sanger caused to generations of people with disabilities and Black, Latino, Asian-American, and Indigenous people.”

But, this article must still be viewed in light of the context it was published. It was published in 2021 – which is the politically correct, post-George Floyd riots era – where organisations with a tainted past had to pacify black people in a disingenuous effort to show some resemblance of comradery, while actually trying to maintain their customer loyalty.  But, before we proceed, here are democrats and liberals pretending that planned parenthood is the most important thing to ever happen to liberal democracies and civil rights discourse – you know, while pretending to be oblivious to its eugenicist aims.

THE MODERN EUGENICIST IMPACT OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ON AFRICAN AMERICANS

Now, someone could say: well, that was the past: Margaret Sanger is no longer at the helm of Planned Parenthood, and recent leadership has a new and non-eugenicist focus. To which I’d like to then propose that we evaluate the present-day contraceptive usage among African Americans. In essence, when we examine the rate of abortion in the United States, the words of Planned Parenthood‘s current leader fall flat. Her implication that the racially motivated quest of their founder was true but part of the past is questionable.

African Americans, in particular, have been disproportionately harmed by the evils of Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger. In 2020, the Centers for Disease Control reported that the abortion rate among Black women was 24.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44, while White women had a much lower rate of 6.2 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. Moreover, although only 12.4% of the total U.S. population is Black, 39.2% of all abortions were performed on Black women.

Since 1973, more than 64 million babies have been aborted in the United States. Of this number, more than 20 million of them were Black babies. But the disparity doesn’t stop there. Not only are babies who are a racial minority aborted at significantly higher rates, but so are babies who are diagnosed with a disability. A 1995-2011 study estimates that among babies with a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome in the U.S., anywhere from 60%-93% were aborted. Unfortunately, prenatal testing has a high rate of false positives. Dr. Tara Sander Lee of the Charlotte Lozier Institute writes that, “Flipping a coin would be just as accurate,” as the Natera screening for Down syndrome in low-risk pregnancies. Thankfully, North Carolina passed a law in 2023 that prohibits abortions due to an unborn child’s race, sex, or Down syndrome diagnosis.

While Planned Parenthood denounces Margaret Sanger’s discrimination against racial minorities and people with disabilities, the national statistics do not back up their claims. And, while they do not speak of “weeding out the unfit,” there is no question that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the country, continues to follow eugenic practices that are more damaging to racial minorities and disabled individuals. And so, one of the actual big “inequities” facing black Americans is that they make up only 13 percent of the US population, yet account for about 40 percent of all abortions. Thankfully, many – especially in the Body of Christ have been fighting against this anomaly for years. For instance, 6 years ago when PP sought to open a new branch in Charlotte, North Carolina, Church leaders protested the effort, also raising awareness about the number of abortions being conducted in African American neighbourhoods.

Now, here is another reason we are discussing all of this today: The Biggest Planned Parenthood in the US Is Closing! When Planned Parenthood Prevention Park opened in Houston in May 2010, more than a dozen protesters demonstrated outside the 78,000-square-foot edifice, picketing, singing, and even weeping. This location gained widespread attention in 2015 when the Center for Medical Progress published clandestine videos from the clinic.

Many of the city’s pro-life organizations sprouted within a 15-mile radius of Prevention Park. Demand for their services was reported to have been on the rise since the Texas abortion ban took effect in 2022, BUT, this all culminated in a closure!

So, in October, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast’s operations will be taken over by Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas, per local media reports. With the consolidation comes the closures of Prevention Park and a clinic in southwest Houston, leaving four remaining facilities on the outskirts of the city. In neighboring Louisiana, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast announced it will cease operations entirely, shuttering both the Baton Rouge and New Orleans clinics. Planned Parenthood also confirmed the closures but did not respond to requests for further comment.

In any case, pressure on Planned Parenthood has been intensifying for years, with Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin stripping away state dollars, mostly by removing Planned Parenthood’s eligibility for programs like Medicaid or Title X. This followed controversies surrounding how planned parenthood was utilising its allocated resources. In particular, with the $792 million Planned Parenthood receives in taxpayer funds annually, they performed approximately 1,100 abortions per day; administered synthetic hormones to minors and promoted trans ideology; and also supported the Democratic party politically in an effort to defeat Republicans in elections.

In addition to all of this, the ironically named Planned Parenthood has been notorious for predominantly pushing women towards abortion through their advocacy efforts and public campaigns. For example, in 2022, PPFA and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund launched a $16 million media campaign to raise awareness about abortion access amid threats to Roe v. Wade, emphasizing the right to abortion and targeting voters in key states. This included ads like “Our Bodies, Our Futures, Our Abortions” and relaunching sites like BansOffOurBodies.org. In 2024, they spent $40 million to support Democratic candidates who backed abortion rights, framing abortion as a critical electoral issue. These efforts aggressively promoted abortion, especially since Planned Parenthood’s political arm, called the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, engages in so-called voter education and lobbying to protect and expand abortion access. Here’s more on how they concealed information from state-sponsored booklets from a former worker.

However, thankfully, the tide is continuously shifting, in addition to the closure we see developing in Texas. In fact, with respect to formal legal recourse, the Supreme Court in the US has ruled in a 6-3 decision in the Medina v. Planned Parenthood case that state Medicaid programs can DEFUND Planned Parenthood. This is a huge breakthrough for the cause of life. Planned Parenthood should absolutely NOT receive a dime of taxpayer money. SIMILARLY, In June this year, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene launches investigation into Planned Parenthood’s use of taxpayer funds. And also incredibly, especially from a youth focus, in a groundbreaking lawsuit, detransitioner Cristina Hineman is taking on Planned Parenthood for its role in handing out opposite-sex hormone prescriptions like candy.

In addition to these measures of formal legal recourse, you’d recall the judge ruling, from a lawsuit filed by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey accusing Planned Parenthood of transporting minors out of state for abortions will move forward. The lawsuit is based on conversations between Planned Parenthood staff and a man from a conservative activist group who secretly filmed the staff while inquiring about an abortion for his fake 13-year-old niece. The video, which was captured in December, was posted on social media by the conservative activist group and self-proclaimed right wing news organisation that often conducts undercover stings.

Planned Parenthood Great Plains, which runs the Kansas City area clinic where the video was taken, asked that the judge dismiss the lawsuit shortly after it was filed. Furthermore, at a hearing in early June, John Andrew Hirth, an attorney for Planned Parenthood, said there was no proof the Kansas City area clinic broke the law. However, the Boone County Judge, Brouck Jacobs, found merit for moving forward with the case. This is an excerpt of the video in question.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Weaponising the law in pursuit of trying to use these 7 areas for their agenda; and what it means that at the centre of the projects being pursued by the globalist is Bill Gates, through his philantro-capitalism. Let’s begin with the weaponisation of laws.

Once again, God’s Prophet to the Nations and the President of Loveworld Inc, being the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD., re-echoed the warning against the satanic plans of globalists, in which they intend to use various other methods to try to control nations, looking at 7 areas that these respective globalist figures intend to manipulate. A key medium for their manipulative efforts is the weaponisation of the law, and there are important reasons why this is the case.

The first is that laws are a socialisation agent; and one that is often ignored. When we talk about socialisation agents, the tendency is to think about the most social aspects of society and thus restrict the definition of socialisation agents to entities like one’s family, school, social group, and similar considerations. But laws are actually a massive socialisation agent – when you consider the relationship that society and government has with the law.

For our collective clarity, when we speak of socialisation agents, we speak of those individuals, groups, or institutions that influence how a person learns and even internalises what are presented as the values, norms, and acceptable behaviours of their society. As a result, these socialisation agents play a crucial role in shaping an individual’s social development and (more broadly) their understanding of the world.

Here’s how laws are socialisation agents: the values, norms and behaviours of a society do not exist in a vacuum, and are thus often susceptible to some influence and change – positive or otherwise. Driving this change are the interests of certain groups, or at times even the government. And how the government influences or changes these societal values, norms and behaviours is by systematically nudging people to begin to think and act a certain way through legislating a new set of values, norms and behaviours.

So, this is quite significant because when a law is implemented, there are usually subtle or overt propaganda efforts that purport the legitimacy of that law. For example, the UK government keeps claiming that the Online Safety Act is about protecting children, and so when they say that enough about the Online Safety Act, that begins to be what people associate with it. This measure is also significant because it preys on the more liberal inclinations of certain sects of society and the impressionable minds of a younger generation without pre-existing ideals. Again, in the UK, the end of life Bill failed to pass years ago with an older more conservative society, but it passed in newer more liberally inclined one, where even younger members of society claimed they wanted so-called merciful deaths for their aging relatives.

Now, as stated earlier, we see this socialisation capacity of the law play out positively and negatively: on the one hand, we saw people in liberal democracies where the freedom of movement was supposed to be guaranteed, be systematically nudged to suddenly accept being imprisoned in their homes in the name of “flattening the curve”, because the law dictated that it was illegal to move at will. On the other hand, we see governments enact laws against the gender mutilation of children to systematically nudge society away from assuming the inherent correctness of sex changes. And so, the point is not that all laws are bad and manipulative, but it is to highlight that law is very much a socialisation agent, and that governments use it as such. And knowing this, globalists also want to use laws to try to enforce a new set of values, norms and behaviours in society – which paints a picture of how systemic their vain ambitions are. And here’s the President of Loveworld Incorporated warning about the weaponisation of laws, and emphasising our role as the Church in this time.

The second reason globalists have this diabolical ambition to weaponise laws is because – in addition to laws being socialisation agents – they often come with the expectation of general application. This is because laws typically demand compliance, and in order to enforce that compliance, it should be expected of all if not the majority of people. Therefore, weaponising laws for globalists is about trying to use the law to guarantee a massive impact of their pursuits – ensuring that their diabolical efforts are of general applications, with few exceptions.

Here’s an example, if you regularly watch ‘The War Room’, you would know I do not regard international law and actual law because it has no enforcement capacity. For the most part, all it tends to be is a bunch of agreements that nations may choose to organise resources and enforcement capacity to achieve, usually through incorporating some aspects of the international agreement into an act from the legislative body – otherwise, international law is inconsequential. At best they could either sanction nations to try to disincentive certain conduct, or offer trade benefits to encourage it – but, again, otherwise, international law is inconsequential.

Now, I think the globalists caught on to this reality, because they then weaponised domestic law, capacity and enforcement towards a diabolical, international law-related agenda, which is the pandemic accord and the international health regulations. More specifically, the amendments to the IHR made a diabolical adjustment to make the WHO decrees enforceable. How they did this is that the IHR requires every country to appoint a National IHR Authority. This is a local enforcement body that takes orders from the WHO. It won’t answer to your vote, your courts, or your constitution. It will coordinate “compliance” with global health law. In other words, the WHO is by-passing constitutional sovereignty, meaning that the constitution in your country (as far as health and related policies are concerned) will no longer be the highest law of the land; but also that they capture domestic enforcement mechanisms to enact their agenda. And so, this desire to make laws of general application, while also capturing domestic enforcement capacity is another reason why globalists want to weaponise the law for their 7 fold agendas.

Then the final consideration on why globalists want to weaponise the law, is that they wish to evade accountability, and so they want to make governments legislate things in their favour. There are two key examples that attest to this. First is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which was signed into law in the United States as part of a larger health bill on November 14, 1986. This Act’s purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims. And this happened because pharmaceutical companies made the case that they simply would not be able to profit if they were open to liability.

Second is Agrochemical companies are taking a page from big pharma’s playbook, in that they are seeking a TOTAL liability shield against claims against them! This is to say that while the pesticides that agrochemical companies like Bayer and Monsanto utilize have been “linked to cancer, to learning disabilities, to infertility, to hormone disruption … and they impact children more than the rest of us..” they are, nevertheless, fighting for a liability shield to prevent people from taking legal action against them for injury and death.

And so, just like vaccine manufacturers have zero liability for the harms their vaccines cause, agrochemical companies, like Bayer are seeking similar protections. While Congress has allocated a special fund for those who have been injured by vaccines, the chemical companies are proposing no such plans.

BILL GATES: AT THE CENTRE OF GLOBALIST PROJECTS THROUGH PHILANTRO-CAPITALISM

This then brings us to the second part of our discussion, in which we address the fact of bill Gates being at the centre of the  globalist plans exposed by the President of Loveworld Inc., and this being done through his modus operandi of philantro-capitalism. In essence, through his philantro-capitalism, Bill Gates transformed himself from a tech villain into one of the most seemingly admired people on the planet. Even as allegations of misconduct have recently tarnished his public image, the beneficence of the Gates Foundation, celebrated for spending billions to save lives around the globe, is taken as a given. But as investigations have revealed, Gates is still exactly who he was at Microsoft: a bully and monopolist, convinced of his own righteousness and intent on imposing his ideas, his solutions, and his leadership on everyone else. At the core, he is not a selfless philanthropist but a power broker, a clever engineer who has innovated a way to turn extreme wealth into immense political influence—and who has made some people believe that they should applaud his acquisition of power, and not challenge it – something that the president of Loveworld Inc. and God’s Prophet to the Nations has exposed.

But, like the media, Gates also uses gaslighting inorder to sanitise and justify his diabolical philatro–capitalism dealings. For instance, Gates once exclaimed in an interview that he has been taken aback by the volume of (what he calls) “crazy” and “evil” conspiracy theories about him and Dr. Anthony Fauci spread on social media during the COVID-19 plandemic – which is an interesting attitude towards people demanding accountability from people like him, who had imposed a tyrannical order, during the pandemic.

THE COST OF BILL GATES’ PHILANTRO-CAPITALISM ON RECEPIENT NATIONS

Now, there is a notable reason why Bill Gates has pursued philantro-capitalism, which answers the question of what is the cost of being a recipient nation of his schemes, falsely presented as philanthropic works. In particular, Gates’s billions have purchased a stunning level of control over public policy, private markets, scientific research, and the news media. Whether he is pushing new educational standards in America, health reforms in India, global vaccine policy during the pandemic, or Western industrialised agriculture throughout Africa, Gates’s heady social experimentation has shown itself to be not only undemocratic, but also ineffective. In many places, Bill Gates is hurting the very people he claims to help.

Now, you’d also recall that Bill Gates has openly articulated his belief the world needs billions less people. Everything he does, supports, and funds, actively promotes achieving his psychotic death wish for those he considers useless eaters. Gates funded Event 201 in October 2019, laying out the master plan for the Covid plandemic, while at the same time funding the vaccines for a disease that supposedly didn’t exist yet. Of course, he was also front and centre in pushing billions across the globe to be injected with this untested toxic DNA altering concoction. It is now unequivocally provable these vaccines killed millions immediately, millions more slowly and methodically, and stopped millions more from ever being born by drastically altering the fertility of young people who had ZERO risk from covid, but were forced to be injected by the authorities and their bought off lackeys.

Let’s zoom into Gates’ claims that his involvement in the health affairs of nations is about a rational and humane decrease in human population. He claims that they are merely making information and products for better health available, which in turn encourages families to decide to have fewer children. This is a weird argument and it’s sad that not a lot of people have said this to Bill Gates and his team at the Gates Foundation. First, this claim by Bill Gates presupposes that parents who choose to have more children typically lack knowledge and products that promote their health and wellbeing, which also sounds like the people Gates is supposedly talking about have a perpetual inclination to making bad decisions that leave them in worse conditions – no! Being fruitful and multiplying is not a consequence of poor health education and products.

Secondly, one would expect that when health becomes better, parents would want to have more children because the health facilities required for adequate care are more available. And so, this tells us something about the Gates’ Foundation proposed solutions for health – they likely contribute to population decline, especially when we look at vaccines and how they have destroyed the reproductive capacity of many around the world, if not killed the vaccine recipients completely.

Well, we have surely prayed, and continue to pray. Therefore, in this glorious Year of Completeness, all satanic and globalist agendas are suspended; they will live in our world, and we will not live in theirs, as we wrap up the Church age. And so, let us keep fighting the good fight of faith, because we have truly already won.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

The 2025 Bilderberg Meeting: Depopulation and Migration on the Agenda

The term “Depopulation and Migration” has raised alarms, as it is evidence of a globalist agenda tied to population control and replacement migration. However, the Bilderberg Group operates under Chatham House Rules, meaning no detailed minutes or attributable statements are released, leaving the exact context of discussions unclear.

If you think the reference to “depopulation” may refer to declining birth rates and aging populations in developed nations, potentially linked to migration policies like the UN’s Replacement Migration concept, rather than a conspiratorial plot, you couldn’t be further from the truth.

Bilderberg attendes list, the who’s-who of the anti-freedom crowd

First of all, who was in the Room? The so-called “official” attendee list on bilderbergmeetings.org reads like a who’s-who of the anti-freedom crowd: NATO’s Mark Rutte, Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, Pfizer’s Albert Bourla, and Palantir’s Alex Karp rubbing elbows with Goldman Sachs suits and the King of the Netherlands. Swedish PM Ulf Kristersson was there too, conveniently left off the public list—because why be honest with the people? You’ve got Big Tech (Google, Anthropic), the military industrial complex (Saab, Anduril), big pharma and the banking cartel (Citigroup) plotting alongside left-wing democrats like Stacey Abrams.

The 2025 Bilderberg Meeting: Depopulation and Migration on the Agenda

Red flags are waving on the issue of depopulation and migration, and rightly so. The crux of the matter goes beyond merely declining birth rates – it appears to be a deliberate and calculated effort to reshape the very fabric of Western nations through the implementation of open border policies and stringent population control measures. The United Nations’ Replacement Migration plan is a notable example that comes to mind, where the ruling elite seek to supplant our native culture with a more controllable and malleable entity. Although the secretive nature of organizations like the Bilderberg Group has limited our access to concrete evidence, the available information hints at a more sinister plot. It’s essential to acknowledge that when globalist leaders discuss depopulation, their primary concern is not the preservation of our planet, but rather the consolidation of their power and control over the masses. Meanwhile check out this video of Club of Rome member Dennis Meadows.

The 2025 Bilderberg Meeting: War and AI on the Agenda

Here’s what’s also on their agenda: they’re actively targeting the US economy, meddling in Ukraine, pushing the boundaries of artificial intelligence, bolstering defense, and manipulating energy markets. In essence, they’re deliberately interfering with our financial systems, fueling endless wars, and aggressively investing in AI surveillance and militarized technology. With the Trump administration’s tariffs and “America First” policies significantly disrupting their globalist agenda, it’s no surprise that they’re now desperately trying to salvage their vision of a free-trade, open-border world. Their focus on energy and critical minerals is a clear attempt to counter China’s dominance over rare earths. Meanwhile, their involvement in Ukraine and the Middle East is leaving a trail of NATO’s fingerprints, dragging the US deeper into costly conflicts that are rapidly depleting our financial resources.

The Bildrberg meeting is epitome of the globalist establishment

It’s important to sound the alarm on the secretive Bilderberg gathering, which embodies the epitome of the globalist establishment, shrouded in secrecy and devoid of accountability. This elite clique, convinced of their intellectual superiority, has a notorious history of concocting disastrous policies, such as the Euro, and is now setting its sights on dismantling our borders, manipulating demographics, and eroding our freedom. The euphemistic term “depopulation” is being used as a thinly veiled code for implementing policies that systematically undermine our core values and national sovereignty. The fact that this year’s meeting is being held in close proximity to Sweden’s Grand Lodge only serves to further fuel speculation, with its unmistakable Masonic undertones seeming to mock the demands for transparency.

Make no mistake, this is not a baseless conspiracy theory, but a stark reality, given the organization’s steadfast refusal to allow even a glimmer of sunlight into their proceedings, leaving the public to wonder what exactly is being orchestrated behind closed doors. Contrary to this, private-public partnerships have been taking a more aggressive approach, driving the globalist agenda and depopulation efforts under the guise of promoting global health and pandemic preparedness. In reality, these funders and partners are spearheading the charge, deliberately crafting and manufacturing pandemics, rather than genuinely working towards preparedness. The term “pandemic preparedness” has become a euphemism, as it is now synonymous with the intentional creation, development, and construction of these global health crises, ultimately serving the interests of these powerful partnerships.

Proponents of Depopulation

For decades, powerful elites have openly discussed and promoted depopulation as a means to reshape society in their favor. From billionaires to policymakers, their words and actions reveal a disturbing agenda. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, during one of the World Economic Forum, stated that depopulation ACTUALLY GOOD as it makes it easier to replace humans with AI and automation.

US billionaire Bill Gates has grown an obsession over his vaccines. However, his vaccination programs in India have been linked to paralysis in at least 490,000 children. In a 2010 TED Talk, he controversially stated that vaccines could help reduce the global population by 10-15%.

Notably, Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla is there, alongside top brass from the World Economic Forum and the chair of DSM-Firmenich, the company behind Bovaer, a technology eerily linked to “climate cow control”. Remember, the meeting took place under a strict media blackout, with no press coverage allowed. However, in a stunning contradiction, prominent corporate media figures are actually inside the meeting, but not as reporters – they’re participants. Specifically, journalists from esteemed outlets like The New York Times, Bloomberg, and The Economist are rubbing shoulders with the elites, raising serious questions about the blurring of lines between journalism and cronyism.

Flashback from 2012: In a very telling and bizarre reaction, executive editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson, literally ran away from a question about the Bilderberg Group by Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange.

Writteb By Tatenda Belle Panashe

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES, VACCINES, AND THE TRANS AGENDA

And now onto our main discussion on the agenda on the mutilation of the human species; and we ought to begin with the mutilation of the human species – particularly in light of the intersection between vaccines and the trans agenda. This discussion emanates from a diabolical agenda exposed by the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD., regarding how there is a mutilation of the human species, part of the gender agenda; and which is part of things that people are made to ingest, including contaminated food and drugs. He went on to address how this mutilation agenda even destroys male and female appearances AND has been occurring for many years. Let’s kindly revisit that moment.

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES THROUGH CONTAMINATED FOOD

Let’s first address this human mutilation with respect to food. You’d recall the President of Loveworld Incorporated addressed the issue of corn, and how corn is one of the most genetically modified crops in the present, despite producers who market their corn as organic. At best, the organic mark refers to organic farming practices, as opposed to the natural nature of the product itself. In light of this, you’d recall that we discussed, here on ‘the War Room’ that this genetically modified corn, known as Bt corn, was engineered to produce an insecticide, killing corn borers and other pests, reducing the need for chemical pesticides.  And that, despite it being hailed as a success – especially in killing pests, this corn is a massive liability for human and animal health – especially because the DNA of corn has been altered in such a manner, that is supposed to make it survive being sprayed with toxic chemicals like glyphosate.

As a result, this corn that is contaminated with toxic chemicals has become one of the leading tools in the human mutilation agenda. In particular, the genetically modified corn presents people with numerous health threats, resulting from the toxins – especially when we begin to consider that genetically modified corn is directly tied to something called leaky gut syndrome. Leaky gut syndrome is a condition where increased intestinal permeability allows toxins and undigested food particles to leak into the bloodstream, potentially causing inflammation and various health problems. Here’s what’s notable about this. When the genetically modified Bt corn was made, studies noted that the insects who ate this corn would develop hoes in their stomachs, which would ultimately make their stomachs burst. It appears that the very same genetically modified But corn has a similar mutilating impact on a human stomach, and it is what is being called leaky gut syndrome – as was discussed in a US government hearing.

Now, you’d also recall that the ambitions of mutilating humans through food did not end with corn being tied to leaky gut syndrome. In September 2001, scientists created what they called contraceptive corn, with the pretext or (quote unquote) saving the world from overpopulation. These pregnancy prevention plants were the handiwork of the San Diego-based biotechnology company ‘Epicyte’, where researchers discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack the male reproductive seed, or sperm. By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company essentially created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives, towards a depopulation agenda!

Well, DuPont and Monsanto then purchased the contraceptive epicyte gene to include it in their products and subsequently the corn that they produce – all resulting in decreasing fertility rates in a number of people.

THE MUTILATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES THROUGH CONTAMINATED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS

We then ought to talk about the mutilation of the human species through contaminated pharmaceutical products – and frankly, this is where it gets even more twisted and diabolical. In particular, we ought to address this in light of vaccines. And to begin with, I’d like to establish a crucial piece of context, which is that a lot of vaccines that are presented as simple clear solutions ACTUALLY contain fetal tissue that was taken from aborted babies. In fact, kindly have a listen to Stanley Plotkin’s contribution on this. By the way, Stanley Plotkin is widely regarded as a leading author and contributor to vaccinology. He has also been a consultant to Moderna, one of the main manufacturers of the Covid vaccine. And in the following excerpt, he is under oath admitting to the use of fetal tissue from aborted babies in vaccines.

Here’s why this piece of context matters: American author and journalist Dr Naomi Wolf exposed that the COVID jabs are ACTUALLY about “destroying women and babies” AND also “emasculating men.” In Pfizer’s own documents, the pharmaceutical company focused more on researching the effects of the vaccine on sex and reproduction RATHER than on its impact on the lungs. Which is an immediate red flag because COVID was allegedly a virus that affected a person’s respiratory system – so, why would a pharmaceutical company that is allegedly making a vaccine that would protect from this lung harming virus place more emphasis on research the vaccines impact on sex and reproduction?

Well, it is because Pfizer knew of the far greater impact of their vaccine on the reproductive system. American author and journalist Naomi Wolf, along with independent researchers brought a body of work titled the Pfizer Papers, looking at Pfizer’s crimes against humanity. The body of work features reports which are based on Pfizer clinical trial documents released under court order and on related medical literature. They show that Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial was deeply flawed and that the pharmaceutical company knew by November 2020 that its vaccine was neither safe nor effective. THEN, the reports detail vaccine-induced harms throughout the human body, INCLUDING TO THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM; they also show that women suffered vaccine-related adverse events at a 3:1 ratio; expose that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not rare, mild, or transient; and, shockingly, demonstrate that the mRNA vaccines have created a new category of multi-system, multi-organ disease, which is being called “CoVax Disease.”

But, now, in light of the harms to the reproductive system specifically, Dr Naomi Wolf proceeded to detail the diabolical extent that Pfizer targeted the reproductive function of the human body. She states that they knew they were blocking women’s ovaries with lipid nanoparticles, they knew the lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta. Furthermore, Pfizer KNEW there’s something with the biological seed of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or foetuses because Pfizer warned vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women and that if they do, they ought to use 2 reliable forms of contraception. Here’s more fro mDr Noami Wolf.

THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN HUMAN MUTILATION, VACCINES AND THE TRANS AGENDA

Now, I mentioned that it gets even more twisted and diabolical when it comes to the mutilation of the human species through contaminated pharmaceutical products, and we proceeded to look at the contamination of vaccines with the fetal tissue of aborted babies. [PAUSE] Well, this actually explains a concerning intersection between the mutilation agenda, vaccines, and the trans agenda.

More specifically, it appears that the transgender “movement” (so to speak) is the political cover for a larger, long-term directed evolution project being carried out by DARPA, which is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, within the United States Department of Defense. You’d remember DARPA as a notable actor in our discussions on the weaponisation of weather. This project has 3 goals. (2) First, is to sterilise/depopulate 90% of the population covertly over three generations; (2) Second is to trigger/force hyper-accelerated mutations in the general human population in the search for life extension technologies; And (3) to destroy the classical definition of what it means to be human, giving rise to new divergent species.

But, you see the greatest evidence of this project is all that we know about the COVID plandemic and the vaccines themselves. First, it should be no surprise that DARPA – a US Department of Defence Agency – is involved in the creation of a biologically destructive project. It should be no surprise because during the Covid era, one could easily infer interesting facts of military involvement, and even parallels to military operations. For instance, the so-called public health experts were actually not responsible for pandemic response policy in many countries. In the US, for example, the military-intelligence-biodefense leadership was in charge. In fact, government documents have shown how standard tenets of public health pandemic management were abruptly and secretly thrown out during the covid plandemic. The most startling switch was the replacement of the public health agencies by the National Security Council and Department of Homeland Security at the helm of pandemic policy and planning. And as part of the secret switch, all communications – defined in every previous pandemic planning document as the responsibility of the CDC – were taken over by the National Security Council under the auspices of the White House Task Force; the CDC was not even allowed to hold its own press conferences!

And so, when the so-called public health and medical experts blanketed the airwaves and Internet with “recommendations” urging universal masking, mass testing and quarantining of asymptomatic people, vaccine mandates, and other anti-public health policies – or when they promoted obviously flawed studies that supported the quarantine-until-vaccine biodefense agenda – they were not doing so of their own accord, INSTEAD, they were performing the role that the leaders of the national security or biodefense response gave them: which is to be the trusted public face that made people believe quarantine-until-vaccine was a legitimate public health response – all while this was a military operation.

Similarly, it is not a surprise that the mRNA vaccines are a central piece in the mutilation and trans agenda. In particular, you’ll recall that they lied about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, but especially about what the mRNA vaccines do in the human body!

ANTHONY FAUCI AUTHORISED MORE THAN $200 MILLION FOR TRANSGENDER ANIMAL STUDIES

But, just in case the evidence on this intersection between human mutilation, vaccines and transgenderism still sounds circumstantial or less damning for the covid industrial complex, well… Republican Representative Eli Crane exposed critical information concerning Anthony Fauci’s dealings in the COVID era. Anthony Fauci – who was the face of the diabolical covid response, well he also authorised more than $200 million for transgender animal studies.

WHAT THE HUMAN MUTILATION AGENDA MEANS FOR THE VACCINATED

So, what does this mean for the vaccines? Well, for one, we now know that COVID-19 injections are NOT biological, and are rather synthetic nano circuits that communicate with 5G! Now, a Dr Astrid Stuckelberger exposed that Pfizer Covid vial contents “contains graphene oxide, parasites, RFID, metals, and nano-circuitry. And DARPA and Bill Gates developed these non-biological synthetic injections to control the minds and bodies of the population.” She further exposes that “Dr. Charles Morgan formerly with the CIA in a 2018 DARPA meeting talking to the U.S. Military about CRISPR gene editing technology said they can engineer a “unique thing” to kill only one person in the world. In this case, they used this ‘mRNA’ technology to kill millions of innocent people in the world.” This happens because the self-replicating nanobots can be coded to control the mind and body.

written By Lindokuhle Mabaso