Rev. Dr. Chris Oyakhilome Archives - LN24

Global Prayer And Fasting With Pastor Chris Oyakhilome Begins Today

LN24 — Thu, 30 Oct 2025 07:15:32 +0000

Believers Worldwide Unite in Two Days of Fervent Intercession for the Nations

The Global Prayer and Fasting with the man of God, Rev. Dr. Chris Oyakhilome, DSc, DSc, DD, begins today at 6 p.m. GMT+1, marking another historic moment of spiritual unity for Christians across the world. The program continues through Friday, October 31, and will be broadcast live on LN24 International and all LoveWorld Networks.

Millions of believers from every continent are expected to join Pastor Chris in this sacred time of intercession, as hearts and voices are lifted together in prayer for peace among nations, revival in the Church, and the advancement of the Gospel in these crucial times. Pastor has emphasized the significance of this global call to prayer not just as a time of fasting, but as a divine assignment to shape the course of nations through the power of the Holy Spirit.

The Global Prayer and Fasting comes just weeks after the Global Day of Prayer earlier this month, where billions connected from around the world under the same divine instruction. During that program, Pastor Chris led believers in deep prophetic declarations, inspiring a renewed sense of purpose and spiritual awakening.

As the world tunes in once more, participants are encouraged to prepare their hearts and set aside dedicated time for fasting, worship, and intercession. Viewers can connect live via www.ln24international.com or any LoveWorld Network station worldwide.

Now, as this new session of the Global Prayer and Fasting begins, believers and the body of Christ everywhere are ready to align with God’s Spirit and see His glory revealed among the nations.

The Healing Streams Live Healing Services: Teaching the Deity of Jesus Christ

LN24 — Tue, 28 Oct 2025 20:34:31 +0000

We have just come from the recently concluded October 2025 edition of the Healing Streams Live Healing Services – and not only did we experience a surge of the grace and power of God, we further saw the love and mercy of the Master Jesus on display, AND ALSO received key insights from the Scriptures that build our understanding on what the Christian faith and confession of the Lordship of Jesus Christ is ultimately about. Now, in addition to sharing the beautiful and absolutely faith-stirring testimonies that were shared at the Healing Streams and even those that formed after the divine encounter that many had (which you can surely look forward to, with the festival of miracles beginning), I believe it also essential to zoom in on the teaching of the deity of Jesus Christ, and why it is such a powerful and transformative message for the world in this time, and especially as we progress towards concluding the Year of Completeness, in which we are surely completing the full preaching of the Gospel to ends of the earth.

THE HEALING STREAMS LIVE HEALING SERVICES: TEACHING THE DEITY OF JESUS CHRIST

The thing that came to mind as I watched this excerpt is how God, through the Man of God Pastor Chris, was sent to answer these question and bring many to the full knowledge of Christ – because in deed, DAY 1 of the October Edition of the HSLHS answered the questions that were articulated by Joe Rogan, and perhaps even harboured by many others.

And so, we ought to revisit the crucial teaching from the Man of God and President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD, in which he teaches that Jesus is Adonai. Pastor Chris, first began by bringing our attention to Mathew 22 from verse 41, looking at the question that Jesus asked the Pharisees. Let;s kindly revisit that moment.

This is easily one of the most crucial interactions that Jesus had, which showed the limited understanding of those who accused him of blasphemy when he said he was the Son of God. But, here is what is crucial to note about the questions that the Master Jesus asked the Pharisees.

As you study the Bible, you’ll be enthused to discover who Jesus truly is. For instance, John 1:1-4 teaches us that “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men”. Verse 14 of the same book then states that “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth”. This first means that Jesus is the Word of God made flesh or encapsulated in a human body; and secondly it means that when Jesus walked the earth, He looked as ordinary as everybody else, yet He was Himself God – because He was the word of God become flesh; and you do not separate a person from His words. And with this understanding, it bears mentioning that Jesus was, therefore, the God that spoke to Moses in the burning bush. He was the One that called Abraham out of Haran and said, “Walk before me, and be thou perfect; I am the Almighty God” (in Genesis 17:1). He was the One that stood before Moses and said, “Take your shoes off your feet for where you are standing is holy” (in Exodus 3:5).

Similarly, After Jesus rose from the dead, He appeared to His disciples. But one of them, Thomas, wasn’t there; so he doubted the resurrection of Jesus. Then, Jesus appeared to the disciples on another occasion; this time, Thomas was present, and Jesus engaged him in a dialogue. He said to Thomas, “…Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing” (in John 20:27).

Thomas reached out his hand, and felt the holes in the Master’s hands and the hole in His side. Awed at this, Thomas exclaimed, “…My Lord and my God” (John 20:28)! When Thomas addressed Jesus as God, Jesus didn’t say, “No, Thomas, don’t call me God; you’re going too far.” He accepted it because Thomas spoke reality. Jesus is Himself God: He is God in a human body. He is Adonai, the Lord, God!

JESUS IS ADONAI AND THE SON OF GOD

Now, one might then ask, “Why is He called the Son of God if He’s Himself, God?” Many ask that question because they don’t understand the true meaning of the expression, “Son of God.” “Son of God” doesn’t mean one that’s born of God; rather, it means God in a human body. Jesus is Adonai; the Lord, God. He was the One that said to Moses, “Your fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob knew me as El Shaddai, but I’m Jehovah” (Exodus 6:3). Jehovah is Yahweh. This is why the Jewish people had difficulty accepting Jesus Christ ordinarily, because everything written about Jesus in the Scriptures and the things He said of Himself, show that He is Adonai. Now you can understand why His Name has all power.

Think about it: that seemingly ordinary man of Galilee was actually God Almighty, walking the streets of Israel, but they didn’t know it, to the point they even killed Him. John says, “He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own; and his own received him not” (John 1:10-11). Here, John was talking about Jesus, the incarnate Word!

IN JESUS CHRIST DWELLS ALL THE FULLNESS OF THE GODHEAD BODILY

The Apostle Paul even added to this revelation by telling us that in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead, bodily. This means that when you see Jesus, you wouldn’t need to look out for the Holy Spirit or the Father; because He is the complete embodiment of Deity.

Once again, as we study the Bible, we’ll be enthused to discover who Jesus truly is. And that is why I am excited that Joe Rogan is a member of a Bible studying Church, because it means he will inevitably come to the conclusion that Jesus is Adonai, the Son of God, the incarnate Word, in Whom dwells the fullness of the Godhead bodily. Also, thank God for the ability given us to rebroadcast the HSLHS, because it means we can take this message to people around the world, including personalities like Joe Rogan and Konstantin Kisin, because God is not a secret to be kept, as we are taught in Matthew 5:14-16 (in the MSG translation).

THE HEALING STREAMS LIVE HEALING SERVICES: PROOF OF DIVINE HEALING

Now, you’d also recall that we’ve highlighted the reality of divine healing as taught to us by the Man of God and the president of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD, when he taught on sound codes. In light of the many miracles that took place during the HSLHS, it’s important to revisit the reality of divine healing. So, in the just referenced teaching, the man of God Pastor Chris reveals that speech creates sound waves, and the original source material for creation is sound! This is because sound is the energy produced by words. Furthermore, when God spoke, creation came into being. This shows us that His words possessed the energy that formed and caused everything He said to materialise. And when we consider the question on why God had to speak? Or why He simply did not make everything without speaking? We learn that, it is because God was giving us a precedent and, more importantly, showing us the importance of sound coding. And in this case, Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome explains that sound coding is the assignment of meaning, interpretation, and communication of sound or the cognitive process for the creation of sound.

Well, there are actually scientists who have performed experiments that echo what the Scriptures teach about sound codes. Take Japanese scientist Dr Masaru Emoto. He claimed human consciousness has an effect on the molecular structure of water. One of the experiments he did was to place different written words on water and to note the effect it had on water crystals. From his experiment, it can be seen that different words and their intention have different effect on the structure of water crystals, with words such as, Thank You, Love, Compassion, Truth, Peace, Love & Gratitude, Humility etc creating beautiful crystal structures and unkind words creating distorted, non-symmetrical dysfunctional crystal structures.

As incredible as this revelation is, it also provides an explanation for the undeniable reality of divine healing. Think about it: Pastor Chris was ministering in Nigeria to people all over the world, and when he would speak worlds declaring healing or commanding devils to leave a person, wherever the person is, there would be a response. Well, in light of sound codes and how water responds to words, we ought to consider that approximately 55% to 78% of the human body is water. And so, that water surely can also respond to words!

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Peter Marks, & the Revolving Door Corruption in the FDA

LN24 — Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:07:11 +0000

In addition to understanding that the COVID plandemic was a product of satanic influence, many individuals also believe that Peter Marks is the government official most directly responsible for the entire COVID catastrophe. And understandably so, because when you look at Peter Mark’s contributions to the COVID plandemic (alone), you get to see that he reflects the systemic issues within the American and global healthcare bureaucracy that urgently need to be fixed, especially so as to disincentivise other health officials from following in similar footsteps. However, recent developments reveal that Peter Marks (as a former FDA official) does not only reflect what is wrong with healthcare bureaucracy, but also the problem with the revolving door corruption that occurs between regulators and the corporations they are supposed to hold accountable – which is precisely what we will address today.

PETER MARKS & THE FDA’S COVER-UP OF THE HARMS OF COVID JABS

Now, proceeding to look further into Peter Marks’ works at the FDA, many have been horrified to learn that the FDA and CDC systematically ignored every possible sign the COVID vaccines were dangerous as they pushed it on more and more people. One of the ways people were made aware of this was through the recently leaked recordings showing how stubbornly the head of FDA’s vaccine division, being Peter Marks at the time, refused to acknowledge any of the evidence brought forward by a group of permanently injured vaccine recipients, and even medical practitioners who were treating vaccine injured patients.

Here’s why this is important to note: generally, in looking through what transpired with the COVID-19 response, Anthony Fauci is commonly blamed for all that went amiss – and correctly so. However, we must not also miss the people who were also directly involved, while hidden within the FDA bureaucracy; and one such person is Peter Marks. Peter Marks is the primary person who covered up the reports of COVID vaccine injuries (and instead repeatedly told the world they were (quote unquote) “safe and effective”).

He was also the person who kept on pushing the FDA’s chief vaccine scientists (who were very pro-vaccine) to accelerate and condense the approval timelines for the COVID jabs (as those approvals were needed to legally implement Biden’s vaccine and booster mandates). The parties involved in this process, which included, Marion Gruber and Philip Krause (who were the Director and Deputy Director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines Research and Review, respectively); they reported that there were (at that point) no more corners they could cut to further accelerate the COVID vaccine approvals, at which point they were removed from the COVID vaccine approval process and Peter Marks took it over (at which point the unjustifiable approvals and mandates quickly followed).

BUT, despite all of this, the media lied about Peter Marks. They stated that Marks was pressured to be anti-vax by RFK Jr. Yet, no single specific action is cited. Some articles even call Marks a hero, and he is praised by past FDA officials who now consult for drug companies or serve on their board. And funny enough, Peter Marks has now joined their ranks as one among those who embody the problem with the revolving- door corruption between the FDA and the corporations it is supposed to regulate – especially pharmaceutical companies.

FROM FDA REGULATOR TO ELI LILLY EXECUTIVE — THE REVOLVING DOOR OF CORRUPTION EXPANDS

More specifically, six months after his removal from the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Peter Marks has officially joined Eli Lilly — the same company that has become notorious for particularly employing former FDA officials. In any case, Marks will serve as Senior VP for Molecule Discovery and Head of Infectious Diseases, working alongside Rachael Anatol, who is another recently ousted regulator. Meanwhile, his former FDA counterpart Patrizia Cavazzoni also quietly landed at Pfizer as Chief Medical Officer earlier this year.

IN FACT, nine of the last ten FDA commissioners have actually gone on to work for major pharmaceutical companies shortly after leaving public office. Within the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, officials routinely rotate between government agencies, global NGOs, and Big Pharma — advancing personal careers while deepening institutional entanglements across the syndicate. And to paint a picture of both this corrupt revolving door relationship and also just how global this syndicate is.

Dr Elizabeth Nabel, who is the former Director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at the NIH — Joined Moderna’s Board of Directors. Dr Scott Gottlieb, who is the former FDA Commissioner — Joined the Board of Pfizer to promote vaccines on TV during pandemic. Dr Stephen Hahn, the former FDA Commissioner — Became Chief Medical Officer at Flagship Pioneering, which is the venture capital firm that launched Moderna. Sir Jonathan Van-Tam, who is the United Kingdom’s former Deputy Chief Medical Officer and member of the Vaccine Task Force — he was appointed as Senior Medical Consultant at Moderna. Then, Dr Jeremy Farrar, the former Director of the Wellcome Trust — he was appointed as Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO).

In addition, Dr Soren Brostrom, the Director General of the Danish Health Authority — he was also elected to the Executive Board of the World Health Organization. Then, Dr Moncef Slaoui, who is the former Chief Scientist of Operation Warp Speed — he previously served as an executive at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and as a Board member at Moderna. Dr Julie Gerberding, who is the former CDC Director — became President of Merck Vaccines, later serving as CEO of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (the NIH). There is also Dr Luciana Borio, the former FDA Acting Chief Scientist and member of the Biden COVID-19 Advisory Board — she became a Partner at ARCH Venture Partners, which is a firm heavily invested in biotech, while (as we just alluded) Dr Patrizia Cavazzoni, the former Director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) — Appointed as Chief Medical Officer at Pfizer, and Dr Peter Marks, the former Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) — has recently been appointed Senior Vice President for Molecule Discovery and Head of Infectious Diseases at Eli Lilly.

It is jarring how repetitive and global this revolving door corruption is; it is factually a syndicate that has gotten so bold in its endeavours, that it has become a network that erases the line between public health stewardship and corporate profiteering — which is a deeply embedded conflict of interest that undermines both trust and safety.

THE REVOLVING DOOR CORRUPTION IS INDICATIVE OF A BROADER ISSUE OF DIABOLICAL CORPORATIONS

Now here is why this revolving door issue matters beyond the specific individuals who are involved in it. A frequent criticism of corporations (which I believe also applies to governmental bureaucracies) is that their organisational structure encourages sociopathic behaviour – in fact, you would have heard me quote the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD, when he warned that “Capitalism has metamorphosed”, in that while we used to have corporations that sought to make profit through contributing products and services that added a net positive to society, that has since changed for a handful of them, and now they seek to make profit at the expense of the best interest of society.

Well, this typically occurs because MEMBERS of these entities are shielded from legal or personal accountability for their actions, with any wrongdoings being attributed to the corporation as a whole. In contrast, the main form of accountability most members face is the pressure to advance the institution’s mission (e.g., to make more money), leading to the proliferation of increasingly unethical methods to achieve that goal. To illustrate this, consider this quote from Peter Rost, who is a former executive at Pfizer and one of the few pharmaceutical leaders to speak out against the industry: He stated that (quote):

“It is scary how many similarities there are between this industry [speaking about the pharmaceutical industry] and the mob. The mob makes obscene amounts of money, as does this industry. The side effects of organised crime are killings and deaths, and the side effects are the same in this industry. The mob bribes politicians and others, and so does the drug industry … The difference is, all these people in the drug industry look upon themselves – well, I’d say 99 percent, anyway – look upon themselves as law-abiding citizens, not as citizens who would ever rob a bank … However, when they get together as a group and manage these corporations, something seems to happen … to otherwise good citizens when they are part of a corporation. It’s almost like when you have war atrocities; people do things they don’t think they’re capable of. When you’re in a group, people can do things they otherwise wouldn’t, because the group can validate what you’re doing as okay.”

Now, this genuinely sounds like a cry for help, from someone who fell into the pharmaceutical rabbit hole, only to discover later that they had become everything that they found morally reprehensible. Which clarifies, in part, how many of the people in this industry overlook what they know and are asked to do. But, on the other hand, we also know that there are those who are driven by their gain: be it power brockering or money. For instance, during the COVID plandemic, there was essentially zero daylight between Anthony Fauci’s agencies and the pharmaceutical industry; and this incestuous relationship was a significant part of the problem. But, here’s more on the propensity of pharmaceutical companies to function like the mafia or mob.

Furthermore, why this revolving door issue matters beyond the specific individuals who are involved in it is that it also points to a culture of disregard for morally acceptable or ethical conduct. In other words, pharmaceutical companies had a streak where they just did not fear consequences as much as they should, because they often got away with very heinous conduct – either through out-of-court settlements, or because of the work done through the pharmaceutical lobby. As such, this created a culture of outright corruption.

For instance, you’d recall that in May this year, the FDA Commissioner in this second Trump administration, being Dr Martin Makary, he publicly exposed a longstanding practice where agency inspectors accepted luxury limousine rides from the very pharmaceutical corporations they were tasked with overseeing. This underscores deep-seated conflicts of interest that have undermined the integrity of drug safety inspections, especially at overseas manufacturing facilities.

Now, the issue centers on foreign inspections, where the FDA’s oversight of drug production has historically relied on “scheduled” visits—essentially announced in advance. These setups, Makary argues, are “no inspections at all. They’re a joke.” Companies get ample time to polish their operations, hide violations, and even roll out the red carpet. Enter the limos: lavish rides provided by inspected firms, blurring the line between regulator and regulatee. While not outright bribes, such perks create an aura of favoritism, potentially softening enforcement. Makary’s exposure highlights how these rides were routine, eroding public trust in the FDA’s gold-standard claims. And this is not hyperbole; especially as the numbers paint a grim picture.

In particular, the FDA inspects thousands of foreign facilities annually, many in countries like India and China, which produce up to 80% of active pharmaceutical ingredients for U.S. drugs. A 2023 Government Accountability Office report flagged delays and weaknesses in these checks, exacerbated by COVID-19 travel bans. But post-pandemic, the return to fieldwork revealed these ethical lapses. In response, the FDA announced an expansion of unannounced inspections in May 2025, aiming to catch bad actors off-guard—those falsifying records or concealing contamination risks. The policy also explicitly bans inspectors from accepting industry-provided transport, including taxis, limos, or for-hire vehicles, alongside lodging perks. “This is a key step… to ensure that the FDA is the gold standard for regulatory oversight,

WORLD’S FIRST INTERNATIONAL GOVERNING BODY DECLARES mRNA INJECTIONS BIOLOGICAL & TECHNOLOGICAL WMDS

But, while all of this happens, there are strong efforts that are pushing against the works of pharmaceutical companies, and the vaccine holocaust. Notable among them is that in a stunning and historic move, the Alliance of Indigenous Nations (or A.I.N.) International Tribunal has issued an ORDER and DECLARATION stating that “mRNA nanoparticle injections are in fact biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.” And, of course, this marks the first formal judicial declaration by any recognized international authority categorizing the COVID-19 mRNA products as biological weapons.

Now, also important to note is that, in December 2024, Canada’s Ministry of Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC) formally acknowledged the Alliance of Indigenous Nations, its Treaty, and its International Tribunal—a judicial body composed of judges from every continent. In its official letter dated December 13, 2024, Canada affirmed that its relationship with the A.I.N. exists on a Nation-to-Nation basis, thereby recognizing the Tribunal as a sovereign legal authority under Indigenous and international law.

Also important to note is that the declaration by the Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal that the COVID vaccine is a biological and technological weapons of mass destruction aligns with our recent study by Zywiec et al, which demonstrated that the COVID-19 mRNA injections violate the Biological Weapons Convention, the Nuremberg Code, the Helsinki Declaration, and the US Constitution. It also aligns with Minnesota Bill HF3219, which classifies mRNA injections and related products as weapons of mass destruction under Section 609.712, prohibiting their possession or distribution within the state.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Navigating the Gaza Narrative: Facts, Aid, and the Cost of Misinformation

LN24 — Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:32:17 +0000

First and foremost, Israel’s right to secure borders. The chaos in Gaza isn’t just a humanitarian tragedy—it’s a squandered opportunity for prosperity, exacerbated by Hamas’s terrorist governance and amplified by relentless propaganda. Far from the one-sided narratives peddled by biased media and international bodies, the reality underscores Israel’s responsible stewardship amid existential threats, while exposing the self-serving tactics of Hamas—a designated terrorist organization that has repeatedly undermined its own people’s welfare. With the recent ceasefire agreement signed on October 13, 2025, brokered by leaders from Qatar, Egypt, and Türkiye, there’s a window to reset. Let’s cut through the noise, highlighting the true situation on the ground, Israel’s tangible contributions to Palestinian lives, and the deceptive narratives that shield a regime that terrorizes its own people.

The Truth on the Current Situation in Gaza

Two years after Hamas’s barbaric October 7, 2023, attack that claimed 1,139 Israeli lives and triggered the war, Gaza stands at a crossroads. The Gaza Ministry of Health reports over 67,000 Palestinian deaths and 170,000 injuries since then, figures that underscore the war’s toll. Yet, as of October 14, 2025, the ceasefire has ushered in cautious optimism: humanitarian teams are accessing previously isolated areas, and aid distributions are scaling up rapidly. Economically, Gaza’s pre-ceasefire GDP per capita had plummeted amid widespread poverty and unemployment rates exceeding 50%, a direct fallout from Hamas’s prioritization of rockets over reconstruction. Infrastructure—hospitals, schools, and water systems—lies in ruins. While the ceasefire halts active hostilities, the real challenge remains governance: without dismantling Hamas’s stranglehold, Gaza risks perpetual stagnation.

Unmasking the Propaganda: How Myths Sustain a Terrorist Regime

Hamas, designated a terrorist organization by the U.S., EU, and others, thrives on a web of disinformation that vilifies Israel while concealing its own abuses against Palestinians. This propaganda isn’t organic; it’s a calculated campaign amplified by social media and biased outlets, peddling myths that equate self-defense with aggression and whitewash Hamas’s atrocities. Take the enduring falsehood that Israel deliberately starves Gaza: In reality, restrictions stem from security checks to prevent weapons smuggling, yet Israel has consistently allowed aid far exceeding UN minimums—debunking claims of a “genocide” engineered through blockade. Another trope: Hamas doesn’t target civilians. Fact-checkers have exposed how the group embedded fighters in population centers, using schools and hospitals as shields, resulting in tragic but avoidable casualties. Viral videos falsely depicting “caged Israeli children” as hostages? Fabricated to inflame global outrage. Worse, this narrative ignores Hamas’s internal failures: Billions in Qatari and Iranian funds diverted to tunnels and missiles, leaving Gaza’s economy in tatters with 80% youth unemployment and crumbling services. Propaganda portrays Hamas as “resistance,” but it’s a regime that executes dissenters and hoards aid, perpetuating poverty to fuel endless conflict. Supporting such lies doesn’t liberate Palestinians—it entrenches their suffering under a terrorist yoke.

Exposing Hamas’s Propaganda Machine – A Terrorist Group Betraying Its Own

Hamas, enshrined on the U.S. State Department’s terrorist list since 1997, has weaponized misinformation to shield its military agenda at the expense of Gazan civilians. The group’s propaganda apparatus, including figures like the eliminated spokesman Abu Obeida, has fabricated crises to vilify Israel, from staging hospital “bombings” to exploiting images of ill children for viral outrage.

On the second anniversary of the October 7, 2023, atrocities, U.S.-based activists echoed Hamas’s blame-shifting, ignoring how the group’s tunnel network—spanning over 500 kilometers—diverts cement and fuel from civilian infrastructure. This isn’t mere rhetoric; it’s a pattern of self-sabotage. Hamas’s governance has siphoned aid for rocket production and elite enrichment, leaving Gazans to bear the brunt. Senator Tom Cotton aptly summarized in July 2025: “Hamas wants the world to believe that Israel has undertaken a campaign of deliberate starvation,” when evidence shows the opposite—Hamas hoarding supplies amid its own failures. This internal predation stifles growth: Gaza’s unemployment hovers at 45%, not due to external pressures, but because Hamas prioritizes jihad over jobs. The ceasefire’s hostage releases—over 100 Palestinians freed from Israeli custody—further reveal Hamas’s duplicity, as reunited families report abuse not from Israel, but from their captors.

Gaza: The Current Humanitarian Landscape – Challenges from Within

There is food in Gaza. Its just not being distributed by the UN

Contrary to alarmist headlines, Gaza is not in the throes of deliberate starvation orchestrated by Israel. As of mid-October 2025, following the ceasefire, humanitarian aid has surged into the territory, with the United Nations reporting preparations to deliver over 170,000 metric tons of food, medicine, and supplies—enough to sustain 2.1 million residents for the initial phase. Israel’s coordination has facilitated this influx, including the safe return of displaced Palestinians to their homes and the dismantling of temporary aid sites like those operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), now obsolete due to normalized deliveries. Claims of a “famine” or Israeli-imposed starvation policy are not only unsubstantiated but represent a calculated distortion. An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) investigation in August 2025 categorically rejected assertions of widespread malnutrition deaths attributable to policy, noting that isolated cases were exacerbated by Hamas’s diversion of resources rather than any blockade.

Independent analyses, including those from the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, have labelled these narratives a “fraud,” pointing to inflated data from Hamas-controlled health authorities that the UN has uncritically amplified. Cam Higby was in Gaza and like many other exposed the lie. All food would pass every level of IDF inspection and cross the Karem Shalom border. It would now be the responsibility of the U.N. to distribute it, they didn’t.

According to the U.N. Only 7% of its distribution trucks inside of the strip have reached the population. More often than not, they’re raided by armed marauders or Hamas. The U.N. Has cited safety concerns as a reason for not distributing effectively but has also turned down offers to have IDF escorts. In economic terms, this propaganda has real costs: it deters investment and prolongs instability, keeping Gaza’s GDP per capita stagnant at around $1,000—levels that could double with secure aid channels and demilitarization.

The UN’s Complicity in Perpetuating the Crisis

While Israel facilitates aid, the United Nations—particularly The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East —has deliberately exacerbated Gaza’s woes through biased reporting and operational inefficiencies. UN-backed famine assessments in August 2025, which claimed over 500,000 in “catastrophic hunger,” relied on unverifiable Hamas data, later debunked as “fabricated” by watchdogs like UN Watch. The Institute for National Security Studies highlighted how these reports ignore Hamas’s aid looting, instead framing Israel as the sole villain—a narrative that delays real solutions. Financially, this dysfunction is glaring: UNRWA’s $1.6 billion annual budget yields fragmented relief, with audits revealing up to 10% lost to corruption—funds that could fund Gaza’s desalination upgrades. By amplifying propaganda, the UN discourages donor confidence, trapping aid in bureaucratic silos.

Israel’s Enduring Support in Palestinian Stability and Growth

Contrary to the one-sided portrayals, Israel has been a steadfast partner in Palestinian welfare, channelling billions in aid and infrastructure that foster long-term economic resilience. Since the war’s outset, Israel has facilitated the delivery of over 1.3 million tons of humanitarian supplies—food, medicine, fuel, and shelter materials—into Gaza, often in coordination with international allies. The Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) meticulously tracks these efforts, ensuring safe passage through crossings like Kerem Shalom and Erez, even under the duress of ongoing threats. Beyond immediate relief, Israel’s contributions extend to foundational services that underpin prosperity. For decades, Israel has supplied Gaza with 80-90% of its electricity, desalinated over 20 million cubic meters of water annually (meeting 10-15% of needs), and enabled tens of thousands of Palestinians to work in Israel, injecting $500 million yearly into Gaza’s economy pre-war. Medical evacuations are another hallmark: since 2000, Israel has treated over 200,000 Palestinians in its hospitals, including complex cases from Gaza, free of charge. In 2024-2025 alone, amid the conflict, Israel approved aid convoys carrying 500,000 tons of flour and 300,000 tons of rice, countering famine risks despite Hamas’s diversion of supplies for military use.

Israel’s Enduring Positive Contributions to Palestinian Prosperity

Israel’s track record of goodwill toward Palestinians is a testament to its democratic ethos and strategic foresight—actions that foster long-term economic interdependence. Even amid conflict, Israel has enabled over 20,000 Gazans to access medical treatment in Israeli hospitals annually, a lifeline that saved thousands of lives pre-2023 escalation. Post-ceasefire, Israel has greenlit reconstruction phases under the Arab League’s March 2025 plan, committing to six months of unfettered aid and infrastructure rebuilding in Gaza City and Khan Yunis. Economically, Israel’s innovations have indirectly benefited Gaza: desalination plants supply 20% of the Strip’s water, while joint agricultural tech transfers have boosted Palestinian yields by 30% in the West Bank—initiatives ripe for Gaza replication. The January 2025 ceasefire phase allowed “sufficient” humanitarian flows, paving the way for private sector revival, including tech hubs that could employ 50,000 youth. These aren’t concessions; they’re investments in stability, aligning with values of self-reliance and mutual benefit. As President Trump’s involvement in the October deal demonstrates, strong U.S.-Israel ties yield dividends for all parties.

Written By tatenda Belle Panashe

The Chronic Fallibility of Climate Alarmists

LN24 — Tue, 14 Oct 2025 08:52:02 +0000

The President of Loveworld Incorporated, being the highly esteemed Rev Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD, once remarked that “Deception is the harbinger of the end”; and I think this remark perfectly captures why a cohort of individuals whose propensity to fallibility has become a trademark of their work and contributions, are still being published and publicised. Because otherwise, in the absence of the deception factor, it is difficult to explain why climate alarmism is highly regarded by others – so much so, that a few hours ago, Time Magazine published an article titled “The World’s First Climate Tipping Point Has Been Crossed, Scientists Say”. And this is yet another piece that decries an impending doom (because, for some reason, despite all the restrictive policies and carbon taxes imposed by governments, there is seldom a positive shift in their calculations). And so, in addition to the work we’ve done here at LN24 International disproving the claims behold the climate change hoax, let’s push the envelope and have a frank discussion about the chronic fallibility of climate alarmists.

TIME MAGAZINE: “THE WORLD’S FIRST CLIMATE TIPPING POINT HAS BEEN CROSSED, SCIENTISTS SAY”

We ought to start with the Times Magazine article and its recent contributions to the climate alarmism discourse. So, as referenced earlier, Time Magazine published an article titled “The World’s First Climate Tipping Point Has Been Crossed, Scientists Say”. Then, Simmone Shah, who is the author of the article remarks that (quote) “The exact moment when Earth will reach its tipping points—moments at which human-induced climate change will trigger irreversible planetary changes—has long been a source of debate for scientists. But they might be closer than we think. A report published today says that the Earth has passed its first climate tipping point.”

She continues to state that “The second “Global Tipping Points” report published by the University of Exeter found that warm-water coral reefs are passing their tipping point. Rising ocean temperatures, acidification, overfishing, and pollution are combining to cause coral bleaching and mortality, meaning that a large number of coral reefs will be lost unless the global temperature returns towards 1°C warming or below. “ Furthermore, Tim Lenton, who is the founding director at the Global Systems Institute at the University of Exeter (who led the report that Simmone Shah is wrote bout in this Times articles), he is quoted stating that “We’re in a new climate reality,”… and that “We’ve crossed a tipping point in the climate system, and we’re now sure we’re going to carry on through 1.5°C of global warming above the prior industrial level, and that’s going to put us in the danger zone for crossing more climate tipping points.”

And for clarity, the authors define a tipping point as “occurring when changes in a system become self-perpetuating and difficult to reverse beyond a threshold, leading to substantial, widespread impacts.” Scientists are said to have found as many as 25 major tipping points, including the Amazon rain forest transforming from a lush forest that stores carbon emissions to a dry savannah, and the permanent melting of polar sea ice whereby the dark open water absorbs more heat compared to white snow, encouraging further melting. Now, let’s directly respond to these claims.

First, Simone Shah does not do much to clarify who exactly are the scientists behind the claim that the “World’s First Climate Tipping Point Has Been Crossed”, which I think we can at least deduce that they are people working with Tim Lenton, who is the founding director at the Global Systems Institute at the University of Exeter, as quoted by Simone Shah herself. But this question matters, because knowing who are these individuals that are shoved under the collective title of “scientist” helps us to investigate their credibility; because otherwise, their credibility appears only to be that they agree with climate alarmist claims – which is not on its own a testament of critical thought and scientific integrity.

Secondly, it is worth noting that merely stating that scientists have made a certain claim about climate change does not carry the weight it does, because scientists do not have an overwhelming consensus on issues pertaining to climate change – UNLESS the money funding their research comes from organisations that expect them to arrive at that conclusion – hence climate alarmism grew parallel to research funding for this area becoming a billion dollar industry – which is also not testament of scientific integrity or genuine consensus among scientists. In fact, regarding scientific consensus on climate change, you’d recall that we’ve discussed here on The War Room that almost NO ONE who refers to the claim of there being about 97% consensus among scientists concerning a climate emergency has any idea of whether this claim was proved. And in our previous discussions we’ve discussed that among the studies that were used to justify the lie behind the 97% consensus claim, was a weirdly popular paper authored by a John Cook, who runs the website SkepticalScience.com, which is a virtual encyclopedia of arguments trying to defend predictions of catastrophic climate change from all challenges. And yet, in the weirdly popular paper, Cook was able to demonstrate only that a relative handful of scientists endorse “the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause.” Cook calls this “explicit endorsement with quantification” (quantification meaning 50 percent or more). But, really what those findings meant is that there is no quantifiable 97% consensus among climate scientists.

To drive this further, Dr Judith Curry, who is a renowned climatologist and Georgia Tech professor emeritus, she describes how climate research has been overtaken by politics, funding incentives, and academic pressure to conform. She adds that honest debate is discouraged, climate models are treated as infallible and students are trained to find disasters, not question assumptions.

THERE IS 0.04% CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE; AND HUMANS ONLY CONTRIBUTE 3% OF THAT

This brings us to the third point of rebuttal to the claims made in the Times article by Simone Shah, and this has to do with the association between the so-called tipping points, with what is regarded as human-induced climate change that will trigger irreversible planetary changes. Now for clarity, human-induced climate change (also referred to as anthropogenic factors of climate change), usually has to do with carbon emission from humans. Well, the point of rebuttal is this: climate alarmists need to stop for a moment and ask how much carbon dioxide is in the earth’s atmosphere and how much of it humans contribute to because they will discover how ridiculous their approach is.

Simply, CO2 (that is carbon dioxide) is 0.04% of the atmosphere. Humans create only 3% of that 0.04%. This means that if carbon dioxide is inherently bad (which it is not, considering its organic existence and role in the flourishment of life), there is nevertheless an incredibly low amount of it in the earth’s atmosphere already. Secondly, assuming the amounts of carbon dioxide need to be kept at a minimum, restrictions on humans who collectively contribute only 3 percent of carbon emissions is a ridiculous approach with less than marginal gains. And the proof of this is that carbon emissions have actually been on a sharp decrease for YEARS!

Today, CO2 levels are at about 400ppm; and yet, CO2 at 4,000 parts per million means abundant life. The historic average for CO2 in the atmosphere is also 1,600 ppm. Meanwhile, CO2 is considered completely safe in naval submarines at 8,000 ppm, which is notable as the oceans are the storehouse of 93% of all CO2 on earth, where up to 70% of all photosynthesis takes place, via phyto-plankton.

CHANGE IN THE CLIMATE DOES NOT NECESSARY REFLECT AN IRREVERSIBLE AND IMPENDING DOOM

Then the fourth and final piece of rebuttal to the Time magazine article by Simone Shah has to do with the definition of tipping point itself (that is beyond its association with human CO2 emissions). Just to remind you, the authors quoted in the study define a tipping point as “occurring when changes in a system become self-perpetuating and difficult to reverse beyond a threshold, leading to substantial, widespread impacts.” The so-called scientists are thus said to have found as many as 25 major climate-related tipping points, including the Amazon rain forest transforming from a lush forest that stores carbon emissions to a dry savannah, and the permanent melting of polar sea ice whereby the dark open water absorbs more heat compared to white snow, encouraging further melting.

Now, the question I’d like to ask (part of refuting these remarks) is this: Have they differentiated between a tipping point and a natural occurrence, that either requires no alarmist response or the earth is equally capable of correcting organically? I ask this because when climate alarmists make statements that are supposed to communicate an impending emergency, it is often relative to how they have manipulated the data and chosen to frame the message they wish to communicate. For instance, they can say “today is the hottest day ever recorded” – and that sounds somewhat serious to the unsuspecting mind. But, how consequential it is that today is the hottest day ever recorded changes the moment you ask “since when”. Because, for example, the hottest day recorded in the last 50 years, is not equal to or above the hottest day that was recorded in the days of Jesus on earth. And yet, ironically, the communication from climate alarmists is that we are progressively experiencing harsher climates due to increasing CO2 emissions, and not that the present state is even better than previous years, when there were lesser CO2 emissions.

And so, the tipping points sound well defined, until you realise that the definition is hinged on a relative consideration of irreversible harm. The earth was made by a very wise Creator who understood how to ensure harmonious co-existence of all elements and life. That is why the sun knows when to shine, and oceans have boundaries; or why there are habitable (and thus likely non-habilitable places of the earth) – so much so, that the earth is even able to self regulate and correct. For instance, after something as destructive as a volcano eruption, plants grow incredibly well after because volcanic ash creates incredibly fertile soil that is rich in essential nutrients like potassium, phosphorus, and calcium. God knew what He was doing; and change in the climate is an organic event and does not necessarily reflect an emergence or irreversible doom.

CLIMATE ALARMISTS ARE ALSO WRONG ABOUT ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS

But, let’s also zoom in on the claim of anthropogenic factors fueling climate change. So, climate alarmism is built upon the four part theory that: (1) Firstly, CO2 levels were in equilibrium (at around 280-300 ppm); (2) secondly the use of fossil fuels (and steel, cement & aluminium production) increases CO2 levels; (3) thirdly, increases in global CO2 concentrations increases average global temperature; and (4) finally, that an increase in average global temperatures is bad, and causes more bad weather.

Well, this theory has been destroyed by a paper which demonstrates that CO2 levels (using an analysis of 979 technical papers reporting from 1,901 air samples) have actually not been in equilibrium and in fact rose to 383 ppm in the early 1940’s (thus corresponding with temperature increases at that time) and then fell.

CO2 levels have been measured at Mauna Loa in Hawaii since 1960 – but prior to that, CO2 measurements relied upon proxy data from Antarctic ice samples which have been found to be highly questionable given a great deal of selection bias that was uncovered.

In more detail, the late Dr Ernst-Georg Beck spent years compiling an exhaustive chemical database of the CO2 levels measured in air samples from across the globe. Analyzing 979 technical papers reporting from 1,901 air sample measurement stations, Beck’s CO2 measurement data was published in a scientific paper entitled “Reconstruction of Atmospheric CO2 Background Levels since 1826 from Direct Measurements near Ground” after his death in 2022.

The 60,000 global-scale chemical measurements compiled between 1930 and 1950 using data from 25 authors and locations assessed that between 1939 and 1943 global atmospheric CO2 rose to 383 ppm – the same concentration again achieved in 2007. After the early 1940s, the chemical measurements indicate CO2 plummeted to 310 ppm by the late 1940s.

Well, these fluctuations are consistent with variations in sea surface temperatures and temperature-dependent soil respiration processes, thus suggesting that temperature is the driver, and CO2 variations are the effect. But, ultimately, this proves that the major driver of CO2 levels are natural temperature variations, and not human activity.

Furthermore, the analysis reveals that of the 90 ppm rise in CO2 since1958 (the Mauna Loa era), not more than 12 ppm could be said to have derived from fossil fuel emissions. And when the CO2 rose to 383 ppm in the early 1940s, the impact from anthropogenic emissions “can be largely excluded.” This means that climate alarmism is once again exposed to be a scam. Simply, CO2 variations happen outside of anthropogenic factors, thus meaning that schemes to reduce fossil fuel use are also a vain and diabolical effort.

So, given that this theory on anthropogenic factors is so obviously wrong, why was it pushed? The answer is control. Former US government insider, Marc Morano, summarises how unelected globalists are using the “human-induced climate change” hoax as a pretext to deliberately collapse the food supply, so people will have no choice but to eat insects and lab-grown “meat”. And this is further evidenced by the fact that Climate grifter extraordinaire, John Kerry, announces the need for a war-like effort to collapse the global farming industry, under the pretext of tackling the “human-induced climate change” hoax.

THE REAL “INCONVENIENT TRUTH” IS THAT CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISTS ARE ALWAYS WRONG

You’d recall that Al Gore presented a film titled “An Inconvenient Truth”, and it portrayed sea level rises as such that they’re going to be 20 feet in a few decades. Well, it appears that the real so-called inconvenient truth is that climate alarmists are often wrong; especially considering that this was nowhere in any science at all, even the most extreme, far-fetched projections.”

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

The War Against the “Brain Dead” Scam

LN24 — Wed, 27 Aug 2025 07:11:19 +0000

Now, the concept of brain death was formulated in 1968 in the landmark report published by a Harvard Ad Hoc Committee; and the report was titled ‘A Definition of Irreversible Coma’. And in introducing the concept of brain death, it marked a shift from a fundamental focus on the heart to the brain, because in the past, the irreversible loss of heart and lung functions had signaled death; while (in contrast) the new definition of what signalled death was then based on the irreversible loss of brain functions. This transition from heart to brain grew out of several parallel developments that converged in 1968. It began in 1947 when Claude Beck performed the first successful defibrillation of a human heart, and thus suddenly, death was perceived as being reversible, as far as the heart was concerned.

Well, this redefinition of irreversible coma by the Harvard Committee as a new standard for the determination of death represented a major paradigm shift since, according to medical dictionaries and encyclopedias prior to the Harvard Committee report in 1968: the medical definitions of death revolved around one central theme: and this was the cessation of ALL vital functions of the human body. In formulating the criteria for determining death, these traditional medical definitions did not isolate the function of any one organ; rather, they emphasise the total stoppage of all vital bodily functions, as evidenced by the absence of heartbeat and respiration, beyond the possibility of resuscitation. These classical medical definitions of death thus gave no special significance to the vital function of the brain; RATHER, they placed the definition of death on an integrated basis, stressing the idea of total stoppage of bodily functions.

In other words, that the traditional medical definition of death was not centered on any organ (or organ system) necessarily indicates that it was drawn from a holistic vision of human beings in which no organ, however “noble” an organ it might be, holds supreme control over other organs or organ systems. Therefore, in proposing a primary focus on the brain when in determining death, this approach introduced a paradigm shift where the Harvard report then set forth a new 5-fold diagnostic criteria of brain death, which was articulated as: (1) first “unreceptivity and unresponsivity, that is, complete unresponsiveness even to the most painful stimuli”; (2) second is “no spontaneous breathing as documented by the apnea test”; (3) third is “no spontaneous muscular movements”; (4) fourth is “no reflex, meaning that not only are brainstem reflexes absent, but also “as a rule the stretch tendon reflexes cannot be elicited”; and finally (5) is a flat ence-phalogram (or EEG).

Then, following the Harvard Committee’ report, their criteria of brain death were endorsed by the President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research in 1981. The Commission advanced a philosophical justification for brain death by adopting Bernat’s thesis of the brain as the supreme master and central integrator of the body and promulgated the Uniform Determination of Death Act which states that (quote): “An individual who has sustained either (1) irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions, or (2) irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem, is dead.” Here’s more regarding the historical context behind the concept of brain death.

Now, here’s an interesting piece of historical context: this report by the Harvard Ad Hoc committee obviously had a big impact in the introduction of brain death. BUT… there was a reason this Harvard Committee embarked on this project of redefining death from the heart and lung-centric view; and it all began with a highly illegal heart transplant that took place in Brooklyn, New York – which was the second ever to take place after the first by Dr Christiaan Barnard in South Africa, in 1967. So, with the illegal second transplant in New York, it was between 2 infants, which resulted in both of them dying. That action was highly illegal, and so to make it legal, the Harvard ad hoc committee was then set up to formulate a legal basis for moving the focus away from the heart to the brain. And these findings from the Harvard Committee that we have just discussed, were not even based on scientific studies.

THE BRAIN DEATH DEFINITION EVOLVED, BUT IT STILL OVERLOOK IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS

Following the promulgation of the Uniform Determination of Death Act, there followed an evolution of the criteria of brain death, and this took place parallel to the rise in critiques offered to the definition. For instance, subsequent to the 1981 publication of the President’s Commission report, it came to light that many patients, who met all the clinical test criteria of brain death, still demonstrated persistent brain functions or even spontaneous movements and elicitable reflexes.

As mentioned earlier, given that brain death was said to define death, there should be complete unresponsivity, that is, complete silence of the whole central nervous system, such that there should be no reflex of any sort and no spontaneous movements. However, there have been reports of reflex-reactions in brain-dead organ donors who, in response to surgical incision and sternotomy at the time of surgery for organ removal, manifested “dramatic increases in blood pressure and heart rate”, “sweating and lacrimation” as well as contraction of abdominal muscles upon incision of the parietal peritoneum, such that neuromuscular blocking agents or anesthesia had to be administered.

In addition, there have been many reports of a wide range of stretch tendon reflexes and spontaneous movements including twitching of facial muscles, periodic leg movements similar to those occurring during sleep, respiratory-like movements, plantar withdrawal reflex, triple flexion reflex (in which tactile or noxious plantar stimuli trigger the flexion of the thigh, leg, and foot), among others. Most dramatic is what is called the classic Lazarus sign, which is “a complex sequence of movements characterized by bilateral arm flexion, shoulder adduction, and hand raising to the chest or neck”, which can be spontaneous or triggered by noxious stimuli such as the removal of the ventilator during apnea testing. According to the published literature, reflexes and spontaneous movements “are present in approximately 80% of patients up to 200 hours from brain death diagnosis”.

In light of this, brain death proponents have repeatedly asserted that the myriad of reflexes (both autonomic and motor) and spontaneous movements in said-to-be brain-dead patients are of spinal cord origin. As such, they are deemed insignificant; and can be accepted without invalidating the brain death diagnosis and, therefore, justifying organ procurement for transplantation. Hand-in-hand with this assertion is the claim that the integrative functions of the spinal cord are not critical! Such arguments raise difficulty, however, especially since the patho-physiological basis to account for movements in brain death has remained speculative, and there has been “no definitive empirical evidence to prove that the spinal cord is the sole source of sensori-motor reflexes and complex movements in ‘brain death’. Moreover, not a few of these alleged spinal reflex movements “are very similar to some stereotyped movements mediated by the brain stem,” which implies that some areas of the brain stem may actually still be viable and functioning.

BUT, even if reflexes and spontaneous movements in brain death were to be entirely from the spinal cord, the question still remains: on which basis can it be claimed that the integrative function of the spinal cord is noncritical? And this is considering that anatomically, the spinal cord is an integral part of the central nervous system, in full continuity with the brain as there are neural tracts running in both directions. Therefore, if no dividing line exists (whether macro or microscopically) then why do the reflexes above the foramen magnum (or brainstem reflexes) qualify as critical and clinical functions, while those below it (being the spinal reflexes) are dismissed as irrelevant? And, evidently, it is rather difficult to assert that “brain stem reflexes are more integrative of bodily functions,” when several of the spinal reflexes involve movements that are more complex than those of brainstem reflexes.

Nevertheless, the definition of brain death evolved since the mid-20th century, and this was driven by two things. First was technological advances in critical care and second was also the need for organ transplantation, thus moving from a cardiopulmonary-centric view of death (which is one that focuses on the heart and lungs) to one based on the irreversible cessation of the entire brain’s function, as first formally proposed in the 1968 Harvard criteria and later codified in the US Uniform Determination of Death Act in 1981. This evolving standard was premised on the idea that the brain, not just the heart and lungs, was vital for life and that its total and irreversible loss constituted death, allowing for a legal basis to declare death even when artificial support systems maintained cardiopulmonary function.

But, here’s more from Dr Paul Byrne concerning the manipulation of the understanding of body flexes, consciousness and pain in the brain death definition. In particular, he makes a very interesting point on how consciousness is subjectively understood in the world of medicine and so just because a person lacks observable consciousness does not mean that they are dead. And regarding pain, he adds that lacking the ability to experience pain is also not indicative of death, especially since those whom organs are harvested from are also given paralysing agents.

UNPACKING DR PAUL BYRNE’S REMARKS ON CONSCIOUSNESS AND PAIN

Here’s why I think Dr Paul Byrne’s notes on consciousness and pain are crucial, and even complement certain things we’ve observed and learned in the status quo. First, I think there is credence to the fact that consciousness is not something that can be objectively observed with physical instruments or senses; and I say this because scientists and medical practitioners generally struggle with separating the brain from the mind in discussions on consciousness. For example, the American Heritage Stedman’s Medical dictionary gives a definition of the brain that includes the statement that (quote) “the brain is also the seat of consciousness, thought, memory, and emotion.”

However, if you read the book ‘The Power of Your Mind’ by Rev Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD., in the second chapter, titled, “Understanding the Human Mind”, he gives a crucial explanation. He states that the seat of consciousness, thought, and emotion cannot reside in the brain. In addition, even memory cannot be said to reside in the brain because true memory goes beyond recording information to processing it; and such processing of information – usually for interpretation, meaning, language, and expression – is not in the power of the brain but the power of the mind. Not only this, but Rev Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD. emphasises that the brain is neither the mind nor the soul; and is rather a physical organ of the body, while the soul and mind are intangible. THEREFORE, this means that doctors cannot use the physical brain or physical instruments that measure the brain’s activity to measure an intangible mind and the intangible functions of the mind. Hence, I agree that doctors (at best) have been measuring consciousness subjectively, or at worst INCORRECTLY, especially if their measurements are based on brain activity.

Which then brings us to the second point raised by Dr Paul Byrne concerning pain. Once again, regarding this, he states that lacking the ability to experience pain is also not indicative of death, especially since those whom organs are harvested from are also given paralysing agents. Well, here’s what we’ve learned about paralysing agents. These agents are used in euthanasia and death row cases, and have actually been found to amount to a practice of prolonged torture!

This is to say that most people actually have no idea how agonising these lethal injection or drug-induced deaths are because (once again) the victim is paralysed. And yet research has proven, however, that DESPITE BEING PARALYSED, the person who has been given the lethal injection or drug concoction suffers great pain, all while being aware of everything that’s happening – so much so that death by lethal injection is deemed highly tortuous and violating of the most basic human rights of an individual.

THE UNDERLYING REASON BEHIND THE USE OF A PARALYTIC IN ORGAN HARVESTING

So, I think that what we’ve come to learn about euthanasia and the death penalty and the drugs administered especially as a paralytic is that people are experiencing pain, they are just paralysed and cannot show it. Therefore, just because we cannot see the pain does not mean it is not being experienced by a person who is categorically and biologically alive – all it proves is that the paralytic substance is effective. And we’ve come to learn this in painful cases, such as a death row case in Arkansas, which was also influenced by a death row case in Oklahoma. In essence, in the state of Arkansas in the US, the lethal injection comprises three chemicals: midazolam, to sedate; vecuro-nium bromide, to paralyse the muscles; and potassium chloride, to stop the heart.

Each of these is delivered at a dose that could theoretically kill the inmate; however, each drug has drawbacks. A cocktail of all three is apparently used to mitigate the other drugs’ disadvantages. At the time of execution, the inmate is strapped to a gurney, and IV tubes are inserted into both arms. Notable is that the Arkansas procedure uses two IV sites. This is allegedly partly to protect against ‘vein failure’. Vein failure was cited as the reason behind the ‘botched’ execution of Clayton Lockett in Oklahoma in 2014, which reportedly took 43 minutes as Lockett ‘thrashed on the gurney, writhing and groaning in pain’. And so, that case enabled the world to see the physical manifestation of pain that otherwise would have not been visible if the paralytic substance had worked. And so, once again, this gives credence to what Dr Paul Byrne said – which is that just because we do not see pain does not mean it is not being experienced – especially where a paralytic has been administered to a patient.

But, even the administering of a paralytic comes with a concerning concession. In essence, the need for a paralytic is because the person keeps moving, meaning that their spinal reflexes are functioning (which should show life since the spine is connected to the brain and central nervous system)! And so, administering a paralytic is how hospitals bypass having to deal with the reality that the person they are about to cut into is actually alive. In fact, one of the most notable cases concerning this pertained to nurses having reported organ donors squirming or grimacing when the first incision was made. In addition, the US Department of Health and Human Services reported that hospitals have been allowed to begin the organ procurement process while the so-called organ donors were still showing signs of life! And so, that is why they need to administer a paralytic – it is because the person they are trying to take organs from is alive.

THE HHS EXPOSES CONCERNS IN AMERICA’S ORGAN PROCUREMENT SYSTEM

Here are the additional details on what was uncovered by the US Department of HHS. So, the Department’s investigation has exposed systemic, life-threatening failures in America’s organ procurement system in general (beyond hospitals themselves), and this includes cases where patients were NOT even dead when doctors began harvesting their organs, like we;ve just heard.

Well, in addition, the Department of HHS’s independent review found 29% of 351 cases had “concerning features,” including 73 patients with neurological activity and at least 28 who may have still been alive when organ procurement began. And the cause of all of this is shoddy death certifications, pressure to secure organs, and misclassification of overdose cases as “brain death.”

Meanwhile, all of this had been covered up for a long time because the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, which is the self-regulating body overseeing transplants, ignored red flags and dismissed concerns as “misinformation.” And when the Department of HHS ordered an investigation, an industry trade group (being the Association of Organ Procurement Organisations) publicly attacked the probe as a “conspiracy campaign” – which tells you where their priorities lie, considering the findings of the investigation.

Now, we alluded to the fact that the definition of brain death evolved in the mid-20th century due to technological advances in critical care and the need for organ transplantation – and we actually ought to look further into this intersection between brain death and organ donation and transplantation. So, organ donation and transplantation is a weirdly propagandised phenomenon. How it is spoken about in mainstream platforms is often with respect to its alleged inherent plausibility. You often hear or read the same old report that seeks to emphasise how the selfless deed of one person saved many more others – it is a very consequentialist “one life for many argument”, which is meant to emphasise some sort of utilitarian appreciation for organ donation.

But, beneath the propaganda lies a very dark fact, which is that organ donation or procurement relies on the donor’s organs being viable, which means they must still be oxygenated and functioning at the time of removal. Therefore, this requires the donor to be biologically alive—despite being labeled “brain dead.” And so, organ donation seems less like a self-less consequentialist deed, but a trojan horse that introduces an incentive to kill people who are otherwise alive. As a result, the term “brain death” is highly controversial, as it literally allows organ removal from patients whose hearts are still beating. In effect, the act of organ removal becomes the cause of true biological death, because the person would otherwise be alive if their organs were left intact. And so, in light of this controversy, many are calling organ harvesting a ritual: a ceremonial determination of death preceding a sacrificial extraction, all under the guise of medical necessity.

HOW BRIAN DEATH INFLUENCED THE COMMODIFICATION OF ORGANS

So, let’s also follow the money. In essence, given how limited viable donor organs are, transplants rapidly became an incredibly valuable commodity (e.g., the cost of a transplant ranges from over $400,000 to just under $2 million, depending on the organ—and with the heart being the most expensive). As such, given how desperate many are for the organs, and how much money is at stake, it seems reasonable to deduce that some degree of illegal organ harvesting would occur given that people are routinely killed in other contexts for profit (for example, in overseas wars, or with a pharmaceutical company pushing a lucrative drug they know can kill). And unfortunately, this is the case – which is to say that the brain death phenomenon, coupled with a need for viable organs, has fueled a commodification of organs that has in turn created human rights abuses – and all for money.

For instance, individuals being tricked into selling a kidney. For example, in 2011, a viral story discussed a Chinese teenager who did so for an iPhone 4 – which is approximately 0.0125% of the black market rate for a kidney, after which he became septic and his other kidney failed leaving him permanently bedridden

Similarly, a 2009 and 2024 Newsweek investigation and a 2025 paper highlighted the extensive illegal organ trade, estimating that 5% of global organ transplants involve black market purchases (totaling $600 million to $1.7 billion annually), with kidneys comprising 75% of these due to high demand for kidney failure treatments. As such, approximately 10-20% of kidney transplants from living donors are illegal, with British buyers paying $50,000–$60,000, while desperate impoverished donors (e.g., from refugee camps or countries like Pakistan, India, China and Africa), receive minimal payment and are abandoned when medical complications arise, despite promises of care.

So, these are clearly all concerning cases that show the propensity for abuse that is built on the foundation of the brain death definition. But, here is what I think this subject also exposes, and what I hope many to be increasingly curious about. The subject of brain death is demonstrating that humans are first and foremost spiritual beings, and that the spiritual transcends the physical – because now, when having discussions about consciousness and life vs death, many are realising that the brain is neither the mind nor the soul; and is rather a physical organ while the mind and soul are intangible, thus bringing them closer to the revelation that life is (in fact spiritual) and that man is ultimately created in God’s image and likeness, God who is Himself Spirit. And the following excerpt, I believe, exemplifies this progression in discourse around the world.

Written by Lindokuhle Mabaso

The War Against the Influence of Witchcraft

LN24 — Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:25:52 +0000

THE POLARISATION EFFECT ORCHESTRATED THROUGH WITCHCRAFT

The influence of witchcraft, and as we alluded to at the beginning of our discussion, the influence of witchcraft, when understood from the Scriptures, is notable in various dynamics and settings: from families and homes to even global politics. Now, during the July Edition of the monthly Global Fasting and Prayer with the President of Loveworld Inc., the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc DSc DD. exposes the polarisation effect that is orchestrated through witchcraft, and how this has application beyond what many people have actually observed.

THE INFLUENCE OF WITCHCRAFT IN THE POLARISATION OF NATIONS

We ought to zoom into this polarisation effect further, against the backdrop of two notable conflicts in the world – namely the proxy war between Russia and NATO being fought in Ukraine, and the conflict between Israel and Hamas. With the proxy war between Russia and NATO, it is notable that the war in Ukraine has significantly polarised nations globally, particularly in Europe, with a divide emerging between those aligned with Western liberal democracies and those perceived to be more aligned with Russia and China. This polarisation is further fueled by three factors; namely: (1) varying degrees of support for Ukraine, (2) differing perspectives on the conflict’s causes and implications, and (3) the role of the NATO alliance.

Here’s what is troubling, and ultimately revealing of the spiritual influence behind the polarisation driven through this proxy war; and we’ll start with the varying degrees of support for Ukraine… Despite the fact that Ukraine is comparatively magnitudes behind Russia in population numbers and military strength, there is no consensus on its victimhood in this conflict – and this is not for lack of trying. In fact, most of the world has been exposed to efforts of the liberal and mainstream media at portraying Ukraine as a victim of Russian aggression and invasion, while propping it up as a beacon of democratic excellence. However, despite all of this work, there is no overwhelming support for Ukraine’s presence in this conflict, because there is discernment and a protruding awakening to the fact that it is a war based on deceptive and nefarious agendas.

For one, there was an agreement between NATO and Russia that NATO will no longer expand closer towards Russia; particularly that NATO will not expand eastward of Germany to draw near the Russian border – BUT NATO did not uphold its end of this agreement. Secondly, the Ukrainian government under Zelenskyy became an oppressor to the people it claimed it was protecting from Russian aggression – especially when you look at the persecution of the Orthodox Church and forced conscription of men. Then, thirdly, there was also a propaganda effort, where the media spewed lies about Russia in a parallel information war, which not only contradicted facts that we already knew (such as the information about referendums from Crimea and the Donbas region; but also the conflict between Ukraine and the Donbas since 2014). And so, it became suspicious for many to hear a narrative that claimed Russian invasion, when recent history showed there were longstanding discussions on session in Ukraine.

And so, clearly, there was no just war effort from Ukraine and its backers. Clearly, this war became a polarisation effort through deceiving nations and (in particular) their leaders, into propping up this proxy war with resources that should have otherwise been spent on their people. And I would say the greatest proof of this is the extent to which the so-called liberal democracies and the Ukrainian government undermined diplomatic and peaceful options for resolving the conflict. You’d recall that they hosted gatherings and peace summits ALL while excluding Russia, which is one of the fighting parties. Moreover, this proxy war was a pre-meditated effort, when you consider that in the course of 2014, Putin called repeatedly for a negotiated peace, which led to the Minsk II Agreement in February 2015 based on autonomy of the Donbas and an end to violence by both sides. Russia did not claim the Donbas as Russian territory, but instead called for autonomy and the protection of ethnic Russians within Ukraine. Then, years later, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel blurted out the truth, which is that the Western side treated the agreement not as a solemn treaty (meaning a disingenuous diplomatic engagement on their part), that was only entertained to give Ukraine time to build its military strength, because NATO members told Zelenskyy that it was important that he defeat Putin on the battle field.

Well, the Bible says to test the spirits whether they are of God. And if God is a God of peace, then those who are working to start or prolong a war are influenced by a contrary and polarising spirit – ergo, exposing the influence of witchcraft in the polarisation of nations!

SIMILARLY, THERE IS A NOTABLE INFLUENCE OF WITCHCRAFT IN CIVIL STRIFE

Similarly, this polarisation of nations is seen even in the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Think about it: for the most part, many in the world would agree that if a violent insurgent group murders innocent civilians, that group committed a condemnable act of terror. And yet, there has been a jarring display of moral rotation through the outright support of Hamas, disguised as support for suffering Palestinians from a number of deceived people around the world. Similarly, Iran is a KNOWN state sponsor of terrorism – and not just from the perspective of Israel or the US, but even a number of middle-eastern nations share this issue with Iran: from Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates. But, they suddenly had fans rooting for them in ignorance during the Operation Midnight Hammer period.

However, it does not end with interstate conflicts, even domestically, we can observe the polarisation effect of witchcraft through civil strife. For instance, when you genuinely consider the history of the apartheid system in South Africa and Namibia, you cannot refute that it was an evil invention! It was a system built on the inherent dehumanisation of people on a superficial basis (being race), so much so that officials were tasked with coming up with innovative ways to oppress and kill others. Well, the Bible says it is the devil who came to steal, kill and destroy. Additionally, the phrase “inventors of evil things” appears in the Bible, specifically in Romans 1:30; and it is part of a larger description of people who have turned away from God and embraced sinful behavior (in other words, people who are rebellious, which the Bible says is equivalent to witchcraft) – again, ergo the polarisation effect of witchcraft.

But, what is particularly interesting about Romans 1:30 is that the verse refers to individuals who are not only engaging in evil actions but are also actively devising new and creative ways to do evil. When you consider the rise of the AIDS epidemic in South Africa and Africa at large, you can discern the influence of witchcraft further.

In essence, it has since come out in the open that Africans were intentionally inoculated with the AIDS virus, with the intention to kill them – a confession that came from one of the intelligence officers who worked for the South African Apartheid regime, through a unit of the South African Institute for Maritime Research (SAMIR) which was actually an intelligence and mercenary group.

But, the officer in question, a Mr Alexander Jones, doesn’t say that this operation was exclusive to South Africa, thus making it implausible to say that this was an exclusive pursuit by the Apartheid regime. In fact, he instead says this was an undertaking that was directed towards Africans in general. Here’s why this matters: it shows that when a group of people are villainised, problematised or even regarded as less than deserving of equal moral concern, they are treated and even killed in the most heinous ways. And while this is discussed in the context of the apartheid regime that discriminated against black South Africans, this problem actually transcends racial politics! At its core is a fundamental disregard for human life, once the people committing the atrocities have convinced themselves that those they are fighting are an enemy.

This influence of witchcraft in civil strife is not just retrospective. We see it in those labouring to fuel unrest in modern day society. For instance, it should not be lost on anyone that George Soros is behind a lot of socio-political instability and moral rot through the organisations he funds. For one, we recently saw an organised wave of protests against president Trump in the US, also in light of the tariffs. Considering that they were organised, there was certainly nothing organic about these protests. However, when following the money, it becomes even more but even more revealing that this was bought-and-paid for domestic terrorism, funded by oligarchs. In fact, the Soros-funded organisation called ‘Indivisible’ is openly admitting they are behind the 1300 paid protests that took place in all 50 states. And it’s not just them, there is also MoveOn, Third Act and others.

Additionally, President Trump made a post that remarked, “Paid Insurrectionists” in light of the LA riots. And he was not wrong, because there are people fueling these riots behind the scenes. For one, Leftwing nonprofit groups are openly helping to fuel anti-ICE riots here by handing out “F–k ICE” packs with protective equipment — as protesters continue to take over downtown every night and engage in rolling battles with cops, federal agents and National Guard troops. Chilling footage even revealed one unidentified group handing out a truckload of face shields and other riot gear to protesters in downtown Los Angeles. The “F–k ICE” packages — which include goggles, facemasks, gloves and a phone number for “jail support” — are being assembled and distributed by a nonprofit called Operation Healthy Hearts.

It’s just one of several organizations that started as grassroots community aid agencies, but have been wading into politics and throwing their weight behind left-wing street protests. LA Poverty Department (which is another organisation) was handing out PPE in the midst of that with the help of another community group, Mutual Aid/Social Therapy (MAST), which describes itself as “a decentralized project that uses the principles of mutual aid to put the tools of the psychological disciplines in the hands of the people.” But rather than focusing on spreading therapy practices, the group has been passing out goggles and gear to help protesters evade tear gas and rubber bullets, while stoking anti-law enforcement sentiment on social media.

And like the other groups, Operation Healthy Hearts (which we mentioned earlier) generally organises community service like food drives for the homeless on LA’s Skid Row, but in addition to creating the “F–k ICE PPE” packs, has a long history of pumping out left-wing rhetoric on its social media — and has been denouncing law enforcement since protests started. So, clearly, there is nothing organic about these protests, and there is an influence of witchcraft driving people to sponsor the unrests

PHARMAKEIA: WHY THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IS EVIDENTLY PRACTICING WITCHCRAFT

This then brings us to pharmakeia. We’ve highlighted here on ‘The War Room’ that the UK terminally Ill Adults or End of Life Bill represents a digression from Godly Wisdom. When significant changes take place as a consequence of sinister influence, it is often a gradual process. A catalyst takes place, the slow burn begins, and then a threshold is crossed, and suddenly the narrative changes. For instance, Europe was pivotal in taking the Sopel to other continents, and yet, today, the Christian faith and doctrine in Europe is not as valued as it was; in fact, in a number of places, people have great reverence for their government and secular law instead.

This highlights the significant shift in social narrative in Europe, and the gist of the spiritual war in today’s discussion; which is that when laws are made in the UK, it is not the Wisdom of God and Scriptures that are at the fore of the discussion, rather it is diabolical activities of witches in the UK, and something must be done. And considering that the End of life bill has influence from the diabolical activities of witches in the UK, and that the medical industry is being used as a conduit of these diabolical activities, this exposes another crucial fact about witchcraft, which is its association with pharmakeia, which the Bible reveals is also sorcery.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Global Prayer and Fasting with Pastor Chris Set for July 24–25, 2025

LN24 — Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:21:01 +0000

Pastor Chris: “The church of Jesus Christ will never allow the destruction of the nations again.”

The highly anticipated July 2025 Global Prayer and Fasting with Rev. Dr. Chris Oyakhilome, DSC, DSC, D.D, is set to take place from Thursday, July 24th to Friday, July 25th, beginning at 6 PM (GMT+1) each day.

This special 2-day prayer and fasting will unite believers from around the world in focused, fervent prayer and fasting, as they join their faith with the man of God to effect lasting change across nations, institutions, and individual lives.

Pastor Chris declared, “The church of Jesus Christ will never allow the destruction of the nations again.” This bold and prophetic statement sets the tone for what promises to be two extraordinary days of intercession, prophecy, and divine direction. In a world grappling with instability, conflict, and moral decay, the church is taking its place to restrain evil and release God’s will on earth through prayer.

This global gathering will be broadcast live across all Loveworld platforms, including television, radio, and digital streaming services. Participants from every continent will have the opportunity to pray alongside Pastor Chris and other anointed ministers, aligning with God’s agenda for the second half of the year.

The program will feature powerful sessions of worship, strategic prayers for governments, institutions, families, and individuals, and prophetic utterances that will shape the destinies of nations.

All believers, churches, prayer groups, and ministries are invited to prepare and participate wholeheartedly. As history has shown through past global prayer programs, lives are changed, situations are reversed, and nations are transformed when the body of Christ unites in prayer.

Your Loveworld Specials with Pastor Chris Oyakhilome: Season 11, Phase 2

LN24 — Wed, 05 Feb 2025 09:14:12 +0000

Get ready for an extraordinary spiritual experience as Your Loveworld Specials, Season 11, Phase 2 with Rev. Dr. Chris Oyakhilome, DSC, D.D. kicks off from February 5–7, 2025. This highly anticipated event promises to be a time of deep revelation, spiritual empowerment, and divine wisdom as Pastor Chris shares insights from the Word of God, providing guidance on global events and life’s events from a Biblical perspective.

Over the course of these three days, viewers will be blessed with transformative teachings that touch on everything from personal growth to community development, offering divine solutions to today’s issues. Pastor Chris’s ministry is well-known for its ability to bring clarity and purpose to believers, encouraging them to embrace their divine destiny with confidence and faith.

As always, the Loveworld Specials continue to provide a platform for believers around the world to experience powerful moments of spiritual growth. Whether through live broadcasts, online streaming platforms, or television networks, Your Loveworld Specials is reaching millions globally, allowing believers to unite in purpose, faith, and action.

What makes Your Loveworld Specials so unique is its ability to bring people together in one global community of faith. Throughout this phase, millions are being empowered to live out God’s purpose for their lives, with countless testimonies of transformation emerging as a result of these teachings.

Join us from February 5–7, 2025, and be part of this life-changing series as we experience the presence of the Holy Spirit, prophetic utterances, and practical teaching focused on building a generation passionate about spreading the love and message of Jesus Christ to the world.

Don’t miss out on this powerful time of fellowship, teaching, and prophetic insight with Pastor Chris Oyakhilome!