THERE IS A NEED TO MEDICAL FREEDOM AND REFORM IN THE UNITED STATES

And now onto our main discussion, which is a continued analysis and commentary of RFK Jr confirmation hearing, primarily aimed at highlighting what is at stake. We ought to begin with a crucial fact, which is that – more than ever – there is a need for medical freedom and reform in the United States. For years, the US government has curated policies that insist on the submission of patients to the dictates of doctors and the medical industrial complex at large. For instance, we spoke about the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which was signed into law in the United States as part of a larger health bill on November 14, that same year. The purpose of the Act was essentially to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims. And this happened because pharmaceutical companies made the case that they simply would not be able to profit if they were open to liability.

Another issue showing a need for medical freedom and reform concerns vaccine mandates. Through the pharmaceutical lobby and their financed litigations, despite an overwhelming lack of consensus on vaccine efficacy and vaccine mandates, the US has vaccine mandates. You’d recall that by early 2022, government entities at virtually every level in the United States had enacted COVID-19 vaccination requirements. At the federal level, officials in the executive branch imposed vaccination requirements on large employers, health care facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid, federal contractors, federal employees, and military personnel. State and local governments also imposed a diverse array of vaccination mandates, covering groups such as government employees, public-facing employees of private businesses, and health care workers in some states and cities.

And yet (once again) despite widespread public debate about whether vaccination mandates are permissible at all, US courts have decisively rejected the notion that vaccination mandates are not permissible.

This highlights that the US government (and governments in various nations) have long curated policies that insist on the submission of patients to the dictates of doctors and the medical industrial complex at large, because these vaccine mandates are made possible by the pharmaceutical lobby. In fact, a 2005 House of Commons report in the United Kingdom detailed the control and consequences of the pharmaceutical lobby: it stated that “people have been taking ineffective and harmful medicines for centuries… The industry is hugely influential, affecting every aspect of the medical world, including prescribers, patients, academics, the media, and even the institutions designed to regulate it. Its influence in Parliament is extensive… Approximately 90% of clinical drug trials and 70% of trials reported in major medical journals are conducted or commissioned by the pharmaceutical industry.” As the pharmaceutical industry does most of the research, inevitably the industry not only has a major effect on what gets researched, but also how it is researched and how results are interpreted and reported.”Conflicts of interest, financial, political, and legal corruption are commonplace in the pharmaceutical industry.

This lobby is regularly responsible for health scandals, to the point that there is even an epidemic of harmful drug side effects, largely hidden. Meanwhile, these companies could not act without the media intermediary, responsible for spreading and the proselytising of a polluted science. The COVID-19 period has shown a very high level of scientific censorship, causing many people difficulties to access relevant health information. Moreover, the pharmaceutical industries are known for their propaganda in favour of the disease. Pharmaceutical industries are known to provide inaccurate and misleading promotional information about their medicines, but also inaccurate information on diseases and disease risks, which can lead to unnecessary medication and induce side effects caused by these medicines. They pay government officials and even medical practitioners to keep themselves from being exposed.

But, governments around the world then take the research and results interpreted and reported by pharmaceutical companies to make laws based on it. That is why there is an insistence of submission to mandatory vaccine schedules despite the harms that many people have suffered as a result. In any case, all of this is evidence of an urgent need for medical freedom and reform, because there are serious ramifications without this, resulting in a lack of freedom and liberties altogether. For instance, In a court case in 2013 (called Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc., which was litigated in the US, the Supreme Court ruled that “you can not patent Human DNA as if it was “from nature.”

BUT at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court DID RULE that “if you were to change a human’s genome by mRNA vaccines (which are being used) then the GENOME CAN BE PATENTED.” What this means is that everyone who has had the mRNA vaccine, which we’ve discovered has the capacity to alter DNA, well, everyone who’s taken it can technically be “patented”. Not only this, but something that is patented is essentially property that is “owned”, and will thus come under the definition of “trans-human.” And those people that are legally identified as “trans-human” do not have access to Human Rights or any rights provided by the state, because they do not meet the qualification of being a human that is entitled to human rights. [PAUSE] This is the ultimate risk of a lack of medical freedom and reform. The state can coerce submission through avenues like vaccine mandates, that ultimately result in the intake of unnecessary jabs like the hepatitis vaccine for babies, and (ultimately) the lack of freedom and liberties altogether.

But, now, I highlight this need for medical freedom and reform because it is yet another issue that was highlighted during RFK Jr first confirmation hearing, particularly by Senator Rand Paul.

SENATOR RAND PAUL PROBES THE NECESSITY OF HEPATITIS JABS FOR INFANTS 

Senator Rand Paul is absolutely right, especially in his questioning of the logic behind some of the vaccines that are mandated – including the hepatitis vaccine. Central to the vaccine agenda and hoax, as far as it relates to children, is the idea that the many vaccines that parents are being compelled to allow for their children are somehow necessary. However, many are beginning to question this altogether and it is shocking what comes to the surface when necessity becomes central to the discussion on vaccines – especially the hepatitis B jab. In fact, have you stopped and questioned why are newborns given erythro-mycin and Hepatitis B shots?

Within hours or when a child is born, a child is subjected to pharmaceutical intervention: more specifically, a new newborn’s eyes are smeared with Erythromycin Ointment, and a newborn is given the Hepatitis B shot. However, Erythromycin Ointment is to prevent gonorrhoea or chlamydia infections of the eyes; and so, why would a newborn need this if the mother does not have these sexually transmitted illnesses? Furthermore, Hepatitis B is also a sexually transmitted disease, and from IV drug abusers, and so why would a newborn need this if parents are healthy and do not have Hepatitis B? Especially since parents are tested for these illnesses! In essence, the logic behind the alleged necessity of these interventions is really about treating newborns for illnesses they do not have – there is nothing causal and therefore expressly necessary that would warrant these interventions.

And this is not the only intervention. Beyfortus, a synthetic monoclonal antibody to RSV, is part of the approved immunisation schedule for babies and is covered by the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program and many private health insurance plans.  However it has no long-term safety track record and data from France indicates it increases infant mortality. Parents should thus ask about this with obstetricians and not be surprised in the hospital at the time of delivery.

THE DEBATE ON AUTISM AND VACCINES AT THE RFK JR HEARING

Almost inevitably, the debate on autism and whether it is caused by vaccines featured in the RFK Jr hearing. Here’s what I have always found astounding: being aware of the lack of transparency from vaccine manufacturers and the numerous detrimental ingredients that feature in vaccines – like heavy metals – why would vaccine advocates (especially the Senators we heard), defend vaccines on a negative, or perceived benefit? I say this because, in essence, the claim of vaccine efficacy AND SAFETY is not based on proven studies. Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome has asked for those studies. RFK Jr has ALSO asked for those studies, in fact, with the polio vaccine and the DTP vaccine, both Dr Chris Oyakhilome and RFK Jr respectively proved that the safety of vaccines is always alleged, and not based on scientific evidence! For instance, with the DTP vaccine (that is the diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine) Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support the program behind DTP vaccines, and said it saved 30 million lives. The Danish government asked Gates to show them the data. Biut, he interestingly was not able to. So the Danish government came to the African continent and did their own studies, in which they looked at 30 years of DTP data. [PAUSE] What they found shocked them: they found that girls who got the DTP were dying at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated girls. So, did Bill Gates not know this? Where were the 30 million lives saved? Or could it be that he maybe did have studies but studies that only looked at short term effects, below the 30 year mark? Well, irrespective: this proves that the data that Bill Gates tried to use as a selling point to the Danish government was false. The safety of the DTP vaccine was alleged, and therefore, the benefits were perceived at best.

This matters for the vaccine and autism debate because if the issue with vaccines is the lack of transparency from manufacturers and harmful ingredients like heavy metals – then how can vaccine supporters make an absolute argument that vaccines do not cause autism? But, when listening to Senator Maggie Hassan, there is a notable nuance that we ought to address.

What Senator Maggie Hassan’s contribution reflects is the distress of parents who have not only wondered if there is something wrong that they did to result in the harms suffered by their children (as she stated), but I think to a degree (also) parents who have been so conditioned by the government to submit to the alleged wisdom of the medical industrial complex, that it becomes inconceivable for them to think that they might have been wrong in ignorantly trusting the government’s mandated health directives, and in their ignorance, led to the harm of their children. Let me state emphatically, that no parent deserves to experience this.

However, it is the refusal to grapple with this uncomfortable reality that actually leads to a lack of progress in finding causes of autism – not the people who keep probing this matter. In fact, there are countless testimonies of parents that not only show a direct link between the deterioration of the health of their children and vaccines, but also a culture of medical doctors who merely shrug when these concerns are brought to their attention.

FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF SENATORS EXPOSED DURING RFK JR’S CONFIRMATION HEARING

Well, coming to terms with these critical issues is a challenge enough. But what is perhaps another alarming realisation, is that the defence of vaccines and vaccine manufacturers is not just about ignorance to the impact of vaccines, rather it is about financial incentive. In our previous discussion on RFK Jr’s hearing I highlighted that it was a case of a simple dichotomy: either the Senators are for placing the best interests of Americans first, or they have alternative motives that coerce them to defend the unthinkable. Well, this makes that even clearer.

For instance, it came up in the hearing that people like Democrat Senator Bernie Sanders received financial contributions for the pharmaceutical industry. Of course Senator Sanders tried to spin this for a socialist win by saying the contributions came from the workers, and not executives, although this of course, does not change the source of the money, and the capacity is has to influence his inclinations – much like was seen during Mr Kennedy’s hearing.

A similar critique arose for Democrat Senator Patty Murray, who was calling to block the confirmation of Robert F Kennedy Jr as Secretary of HHS, saying he’s a “anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist”. Well, it is worth noting that Senator Murray received campaign amounts amounting to $513,635 from pharmaceuticals; over $666,970 from health professionals; $311,844 from insurance companies, and $198,376 from Health Maintenance Organizations (or HMOs).

And so, it is becoming clearer and clearer what motivates Democrat Senators opposed to RFK – it is the source of their finances. Not that RFK  jr is some tin-hat wearing conspiracy theorist, or that he has exceptional ideas to fundamentally work alongside president Trump in improving the health of Americas, no; it is simply greed. In fact, is not ironic that liberals will claim to detest big pharma and the lack of medical freedom in the US (in fact some even diabolically cheered when the head of an insurance company was murdered), and yet will oppose RFK Jr who wants to challenge the medical industrial complex.

In any case, they have imagined a vain thing! We have surely prayed, and continue to pray – especially considering how central pharmakeia is to the deception of nations, as revealed to us in the Scriptures, we thus have a categorical imperative to watch and pray concerning RFK Jr’s confirmation hearing. Ultimately, in this glorious Year of Completeness, all satanic and globalist agendas are suspended; they will live in our world, and we will not live in theirs, as we wrap up the Church age. And so, let us keep fighting the good fight of faith, because we have truly already won.

RECAPITULATION: WHAT RFK JR AND ‘MAHA’ REPRESENT FOR AMERICANS

And now onto our main discussion, looking at RFK Jr’s Confirmation Hearing, and the war against pharmakeia and the WHO. And we ought to address first the confirmation hearing of Robert F. Kennedy Jr – starting with a recapitulation of what RFK Jr and the ‘MAHA’ project represent for Americans. First and foremost, the start of an ambitious anti-chronic disease campaign, being the “Make America Healthy Again” project that has become central to president Trump’s health agenda. In fact, in his victory speech, shortly after the electoral college results made it clear that he had surpassed the 270 votes mark, president Donald Trump vowed to “make America healthy again,” setting the stage for the Republican Party to reset its health agenda, finding new policy goals alongside a broader critique of the federal health bureaucracy.

Now, as I have said a number of times before: this approach is said to have the potential to forebode conflict with the traditional GOP preference for market-based solutions and scepticism of government ones. But, here is why the MAHA project matters: First, MAHA is a shift from the traditional reactionary health policy approach that was taken by Republicans. As far as healthcare was concerned, Republicans traditionally wanted to add risk pools to Obamacare to cut rates for healthy, young people; allow small businesses to team up to buy insurance; and add work requirements to Medicaid, which is the state-federal insurance program for low-income people. These approaches have at best been reactionary to the status quo.

However, through the MAHA project, the Trump administration would be taking an approach that challenges and even shapes the fundamental nature of how healthcare is conceptualised in the US, with spillover effects on the world. This is because Robert F. Kennedy Jr., wants to primarily accomplish two things: first, he wants expose and destroy what the Trump team sees as a corrupt alliance between the food and pharmaceutical industries and the agencies that regulate them, which has resulted in these industries pushing unhealthy products for profit — and secondly he is arguing for strong, independent government controls.

Furthermore, MAHA adherents also emphasise policy goals out of step with the traditional Republicans, because MAHA also incorporates places aimed at eliminating food additives in service of reversing the “chronic disease epidemic, and also reducing pollution (and not the zero carbon emission focus of the proponents of the climate change hoax).

ELIZABETH WARREN’S MISGUIDED ADVOCACY FOR PROTECTING BIG PHARMA FROM LITIGATION

Let’s proceed to interesting developments from Robert Keneddy Jr’s confirmation hearing, and we ought to start with what is perhaps one of the most jarring interactions, which was with Senator Elizabeth (Pocahontas) Warren.

So, let me make sure we are all on the same page. Senator Elizabeth Warren is concerned that Robert F. Kennedy Jr will receive (and take) financial incentives on court cases AGAINST the pharmaceutical industry, that he will cut the amount of vaccines taken and therefore the amount of vaccines produced – essentially reduce access to vaccines while making money from it. [PAUSE] Well, my question is: from who?! Who has a corrupt motive to finance an agenda against pharmakeia in a mafia like fashion?! There honestly are not many people who stand to make money from waring against Big Pharma – we know this because pharmaceutical companies have capitalised on this; they know that most of the people who launch cases against them do not have the finances to sustain long litigations, and typically opt for settlements (this is in part why there was delayed accountability for the opioid crisis).

INSTEAD, all that Senator Elizabeth Warren is accusing RFK Jr of is precisely what has been the modus operandi of pharmaceutical companies – using financial incentive to manipulate laws. For instance, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, was signed into law in the United States as part of a larger health bill on November 14, 1986. This Act’s purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims. And this happened because pharmaceutical companies made the case that they simply would not be able to profit if they were open to liability.

Secondly, while I can understand Senator Warren’s concern with corruption, I do, however, think she is mistaking the status quo and what the Trump administration seeks to implement as change. The status quo, in an America that has been under Democratic leadership far longer than it has been under Republican leadership, has seen massive corruption in the health and regulator industries. For instance, the FDA which is supposed to be a regulator of the food and pharmaceutical industries – is either getting a serious makeover, including changing how it receives funding, or it is going to be replaced with a more accountable and rigorous institution. Meanwhile, RFK Jr has problematised the fact that the FDA is in Big Pharma’s back pocket. Approximately 65% of the FDA’s drug review budget comes directly from the pharmaceutical industry. Yes, you heard that right—more than half of the funding for the agency responsible for regulating pharmaceutical drugs in the US comes from the very companies it’s supposed to keep in check!

The corruption was so obvious and unchecked that people who worked in the FDA would also go on to work for the pharmaceutical companies that they were supposed to be regulating. People like Scott Gottlied: he served as the 23rd commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from May 2017 until April 2019. But, he is presently a member of the board of directors at Pfizer! There’s also Sephen Hahn. He served as the US commissioner of food and drugs (which is essentially the head of the FDA) from 2019 to 2021. Then, in 2021 after stepping down from this role, he became chief medical officer at Flagship Pioneering, which is the venture capital firm that launched Moderna.

But here’s what must not be missed: the corruption or collusion between big pharma and regulators is primarily because regulators are in the pocket of big pharma, and not because they seek to reduce the unchecked availability that big pharma has enjoyed. This means that the Trump administration (and therefore RFK Jr) are diametrically opposed to big pharma).

But, during this interaction between Senator Warren and RFK Jr, re-emerged something that I’ve always found curious about RFK jr’s stance on vaccines.

RFK JR’S HEARING EXPOSES THE DEMOCRATS’ PROPENSITY TOWARDS CENSORSHIP AND OSTRACISM

I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again: I do find it curious that RFK Jr says he is not anti-vaccines and rather advocates that they also go through rigorous testing. I don’t believe him; I think he is IN FACT anti-vaccines because it is difficult to be neutral about vaccines when a large portion of your work is aimed at proving their factually observable harms they cause and the fact that their benefits have no scientific evidence – like his work does. So, I think his claimed lack of opposition towards vaccines is due to the fact that pharmaceutical companies have made a point of weaponising language that enables them to dismiss and OSTRASISE people who challenge vaccines as simple-minded conspiracy theories who wear tinhats and think the earth is flat – and RFK Jr is clearly aware of that. And I say this to say that if at any point RFK Jr says, “You know what? I AM an anti-vaxxer”. I would certainly appreciate it, because it would then place the burden of proof on those who claim he is wrong. It is about time, we hear them argue for why exactly they think that vaccines have any efficacy. And RFK Jr is certainly ready to have that debate with them.

In addition to the anti-vaxxer label being a favoured tool of ostracism by Democrats, this hearing further exposed their propensity towards censorship and malinformation, while decrying “misinformation”. RFK’s hearing largely consisted of him having to answer about statements associated with him that are not even accurate. And he correctly points out that these statements feature at the frequency they did in this hearing because they are designed to misinform people about the substance of his message, so that the actual facts he presents never quite become a discussion point.

But, this will always be an ill-conceived plan to challenge ideas you do not agree with. For instance, in this discussion, I have detailed that I do not agree with RFK Jr when he says he is anti-vaxx and made an argument for why I think he (correctly) is; or at the very least should be. However, I articulated this disagreement while fundamentally conceding to the fact that his work is aimed at exposing the harms resulting from vaccines and their lack of efficacy, as well as calling for transparency from vaccine manufacturers, in order to help people (especially parents) make a more informed decision on whether to vaccinate their children. All to say that it is possible to disagree with another person’s argument without reducing your contributions to false accusations and ad hominems.

RFK JR ADDRESS THE QUESTION ON WHETHER HE IS A CONSPIRACY THEORIST

But, despite the censorship and ostracism, RFK Jr does provide an interesting and necessary response to the question on whether he is, therefore, a conspiracy theorist. And I should state emphatically that in today’s world, where deception is the harbinger of the end, and it is a liability to assume absolute ethical and moral conduct from one’s government, it is, therefore, dangerous, not to be a conspiracy theorist (or – more accurately – realist). And what a conspiracy realist is is someone who questions the status quo, practices critical thinking, and does not simply ingest the narrative presented by mainstream media. THIS IS TO SAY, that RFK Jr is not a conspiracy theorist – he is an educated personality, who has learnt to separate truth from fake science.

HOW RFK JR AND THE ‘MAHA’ PROJECT CHALLENGE THE WAR ON HEALTH

Now, it does not stop here. In focusing on a fundamental approach to healthcare, and in being driven by a person who is informed about big governments collusion with big pharma and big food, the MAHA project challenges and (really) responds to the globalists’ war on human and even environmental health. This also means a number of things, and let’s address two. First, it means pharmaceutical and food production companies are no longer afforded a presumption of good corporate conduct; it means they are about to be under significant scrutiny over their products, their manufacturing processes and even the ingredients and chemicals they add to their final products! This includes ingredients like genetically modified corn and chemicals like fluoride, and tartrazine.

Secondly, having legal expertise, and being informed about the scientific concerns behind certain foods and vaccines, means RFK Jr is a strategic actor in the Trump team, who has the capacity to play a significant role in ensuring accountability and justice against the actors that that have been driving the war on health, like Fauci and Gates. This is critical because people like Gates and Fauci have long enjoyed an unqualified presumption of credibility. And so, having people armed with the requisite wisdom and knowledge is key in the agenda of thwarting their diabolical and murderous empires. And well, RFK Jr has certainly spent a fair deal of time gathering a wide scope of intel about these diabolical actors and the poisonous vaccines they try to push on society.

ADDRESSING WHY CERTAIN POLITICIANS FUNDAMENTALLY OPPOSED TO RFK JR AND MAHA

So, considering that RFK Jr is no stranger to warring against the erosion of health that is orchestrated by globalist entities, we then ought to address this question: why are certain politicians (especially Democrats) fundamentally opposed to him? Well, it is because of what he knows and what the MAHA project represents. Under his leadership, the MAHA project could grow well beyond environmental and agricultural rules to include new conservative health ideas broadly, with an emphasis on personal responsibility and individual choice in health care – essentially a world where doctors and government bureaucrats do not coerce people to conform to certain health policies (like vaccine mandates), and people are rather given access to information to make an informed decision.

And this is where it gets even more interesting because Robert Kennedy Jr has been outspoken in his critiques of vaccines and the collaboration among industry elites and government institutions to harm Americans, while also questioning what big food and big pharma and their paid so-called scientists claim to be settled science across a number of issues. This reveals a critical intersection between draining the swamp, like Trump has always advocated for, and making America great again. This is important to note because it becomes the yardstick with which to measure the priorities of politicians in the Senate as this hearing unfolds. Either they are for placing the best interests of America’s health first, or they have alternative motives that coerce them to defend the unthinkable – such as pharmakei.

But, we have surely prayed, and continue to pray. In fact, we are still praying for nations and leaders, and considering how central pharmakeia is to the deception of nations, as revealed to us in the Scriptures, we thus have a categorical imperative to watch and pray concerning RFK Jr’s confirmation hearing. Ultimately, in this glorious Year of Completeness, all satanic and globalist agendas are suspended; they will live in our world, and we will not live in theirs, as we wrap up the Church age. And so, let us keep fighting the good fight of faith, because we have truly already won.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso