sanctity of life Archives - LN24

Rothschilds’ Media Arm Cheers ‘Right to Die’ Movement’s Spread Across the US

LN24 — Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:16:22 +0000

The rapid expansion of euthanasia and assisted suicide laws across the globe should never be viewed as progress, but as a deeply alarming trend that threatens the sanctity of human life and echoes the chilling ideologies of past eugenics movements. Far from being acts of compassion, these policies expose vulnerable populations—the sick, the elderly, those battling mental illness or poverty—to state-sanctioned death, often under the guise of “choice” or “dignity.” The normalisation of legalised killing, now celebrated in influential media and supported by powerful interests, risks eroding the ethical boundaries that have long protected society’s most defenceless members. As history has shown, when the value of human life is subordinated to utilitarian logic or population control agendas, the door opens to dark and dangerous abuses. It is imperative that we resist this slide towards a culture that deems some lives less worth living than others, and reaffirm our commitment to genuine care, support, and respect for every human being.

According to Rothschilds’ media arm, The Economist—long a mouthpiece for elite interests—states encompassing a third of America’s population are on the brink of legalising assisted dying. The magazine lists 13 states along with Washington, DC, where doctor-assisted suicide is now either permitted or poised to be approved, painting this expansion as some kind of historic achievement.

The Economist claims that lawmakers are “catching up with public opinion,” referencing a Gallup poll stating just over half of Americans support assisted suicide in general, while two-thirds would approve if the patient is suffering and has no hope of recovery—a framing that conveniently serves the agenda of normalising state-sanctioned death. The magazine attempts to placate concerns that America might follow Canada’s deeply controversial path, where so-called “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAID) has ballooned to include vulnerable groups such as those with chronic pain, mental health struggles, or even the homeless, fuelling debates over organ harvesting and a chilling disregard for human life. With more than 42,000 MAID deaths reported in Canada since 2021—over 5% of all deaths in 2024—The Economist assures its readers that the US will enforce “stricter safeguards.” These supposed protections require a prognosis of six months or less to live, confirmation by two doctors, and the patient’s ability to self-administer the lethal drugs. Yet, the steady erosion of ethical boundaries and the growing influence of globalist eugenics ideology remain deeply troubling. Whitney Webb has characterized the spread of doctor-assisted suicide as a dark reboot of the fascistic eugenics programs of the 20s and 30s.

Canada’s Fast Track to Death: Euthanasia Approved Years in Advance

Organ harvesting & child murder

Canada’s euthanasia nightmare spirals

Canada has tragically become a global frontrunner in state-sanctioned euthanasia, with more than 15,000 lives ended through assisted suicide in 2023 alone—a staggering 15% rise from the previous year. This explosion in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) followed the passing of Bill C-7 in March 2021, which eliminated the “reasonably foreseeable natural death” requirement and drastically loosened restrictions. As a result, MAiD deaths have surged by a third annually. What was falsely presented as a supposedly compassionate, last-resort measure for terminally ill patients now extends to those suffering from chronic pain, autoimmune conditions, and even depression—ailments that can easily be alleviated with proper care and support. Instead, vulnerable Canadians are being pushed toward death rather than offered help, reflecting a chilling disregard for human dignity and echoing the dark legacy of eugenics policies.

Many so-called “assisted deaths” in Canada are immediately followed by rapid organ harvesting. Physicians prepare patients for organ donation mere hours after administering euthanasia drugs, turning the suffering and desperate into commodities. Let’s point out the bitter irony of this practice: instead of preserving life, the system transforms the vulnerable into sources of organs and money. Homeless and struggling Canadians are now routinely approved for euthanasia—not because of terminal illness, but due to the failure of social services. Canadian doctors, who once dedicated themselves to saving lives, now increasingly serve as facilitators of death, describing their euthanasia cases as “delivery of life out.” Over 99.9% of assisted suicides in Canada are carried out by physicians. The nation’s euthanasia crisis is descending even further, as discussions now broach the prospect of extending these deadly practices to infants with disabilities. In 2022, proposals surfaced to legalise euthanasia for babies under one year old, a horrifying step that raises serious moral questions and signals the relentless advance of a eugenics-driven ideology.

Countries that allow euthanasia

In 2002, the Netherlands and Belgium became the first countries in the world to legalize euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, followed by Luxembourg, Colombia, Canada, Spain, New Zealand, most of Australia’s states, Austria, and most recently, Portugal and Ecuador. Switzerland has allowed passive assisted suicide since the 1940s, although active, doctor-assisted euthanasia is illegal. Assisted dying is not to be confused with passive euthanasia (i.e. refusal of treatment or withdrawal from life support), which is legal in most of Europe, North and South America, and a sprinkling of countries in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

How euthanasia laws become more liberal

Belgium’s 2002 Euthanasia Act originally allowed assisted suicide for adults facing “unbearable suffering.” In 2013, it was extended to terminally ill children with parental consent. In Colombia, the decriminalization of euthanasia for adults in 2014 led to the practice being approved for children as young as six – and without parental consent after age 14, in 2018. In 2022, Colombia decriminalized assisted suicide for non-terminally ill people suffering from “severe health conditions.” In Canada, Justin Trudeau’s Liberals passed doctor-assisted suicide legislation in 2016 for terminally ill mentally competent adults. It was expanded in 2021 to include incurable illnesses, and in 2023, plans to include mental illness were delayed until 2027.

In 2021, a story in New Zealand revealed that COVID-19 patients deemed terminally ill qualified for euthanasia under the 2019 End of Life Choice Act. Local anti-euthanasia campaigners said the story highlighted “the lax nature of the already existing qualifying criteria” for assisted suicide procedures.

Euthanasia is Lucrative business

In Switzerland and Belgium, assisted dying has apparently become a lucrative business, with foreigners traveling to the countries in droves. In 2020 alone, Dignitas, a non-profit Swiss clinic, counted 3,248 assisted suicide cases, most of them foreigners. Belgium, where assisted dying can only be performed by doctors, was dubbed the world’s “euthanasia capital” by Forbes in 2019, and allows qualified applicants to be euthanized for about $3,500.

In Canada, lobbying promoting assisted dying has taken an ugly turn, with a 2017 Canadian Medical Association Journal report touting how up to $136.8 million CAD could be saved annually on health care costs through euthanasia. The passage of the ‘Medical Assistance in Dying’ (MAiD) program has also resulted in a dramatic surge in assisted suicide deaths, from 1,018 in 2016 to 13,241 in 2022 – accounting for over 4% of all deaths in Canada that year. A year ago, Health Minister Mark Holland announced the government needed more time before it could expand “medical assistance in dying” to include people who are suffering from mental illnesses, but it’s still in the works. The government was originally planning to expand the euthanasia project on March 17, 2024.

In 2009 British psychotherapist and author Colin Feltham penned a shocking op-ed in The Guardian where he argued that “there are good reasons for arguing that a stabilization or gradual reduction in population would be the best way to address the carbon emissions problem,” and that assisted dying programs were one possible way to do so.

Who’s funding pro-euthanasia propaganda?

In 1998, George Soros’ Open Society Foundations published a ‘Project on Death in America’ report, detailing hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants to Dartmouth College, Stanford, Staten Island University Hospital and other academic, medical and cultural institutions for research, education and public policy discussions about death, including physician-assisted suicide, which Soros hoped might “influence the culture of dying” in America. After shelling out $45 million in grants, the project closed in 2003 after being deemed to have “completed all grantmaking.” In March 2024, US lawmakers grilled Pfizer after discovering links between the pharmaceuticals giant and Dying with Dignity Canada, the lobbying group “owning the conversation around assisted deaths” in Canada, with media discovering that Pfizer makes three of the lethal drugs recommended by the MAiD program for assisted deaths. Other donors included Google, United Way, and the San Diego chapter of the Hemlock Society – a right-to-die advocacy group that George Soros’ mother Elizabeth was a member of. In the UK, the pro-euthanasia lobby has reportedly received a sympathetic ear from the publicly-funded BBC, and consists of a series of partisan nonprofits funded by little-known groups like the AB Charitable Trust – created in 1990 by former hedge fund manager Yves Bonavero and his wife, which seems to be involved in backing an array of assisted dying lobbying groups, including the Citizens Jury, Humanists UK and the Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

Their goal is depopulation

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink explained how the real goal of depopulation (Covid19, Midazolam, Remdesivir, “vaccines”, euthanasia, abortion, Ukraine war, Gaza genocide, assisted dying) is to make it easier to substitute humans with machines.

Who promotes euthanasia and why?

The origins of the modern right-to-die movement can be traced back to the Club of Rome’s liberal humanist agenda and concerns about overpopulation and climate change began presenting assisted dying as a humane way to end suffering. More recently, the World Economic Forum has taken up the euthanasia agenda, actively discussing it since at least 2009.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

Opinion: Canada’s Euthanasia Expansion, Slouching Toward a Death Ethic

LN24 — Sun, 17 Aug 2025 19:02:48 +0000

We’ve arrived at a troubling crossroads. Canada is advancing euthanasia, or Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), into morally dark territory targeting more than just the terminally ill. With over 90% of unborn babies with Down syndrome being aborted, and now the government looking to expand euthanasia even to those with vaccine injuries, we must ask: Are we devaluing lives that do not fit society’s idea of “productive”?

We live in a society where it’s becoming easier to access death than to receive proper care especially for the most vulnerable.

Ethical and Human Rights Alarm Bells

External scrutiny is mounting. An investigation revealed that Canada’s euthanasia laws are among the most permissive in the world, now available not just to the terminally ill but to individuals with unmanageable suffering even when their pain might be mitigated through better social assistance, housing, or mental health support .

Alarmingly, Canada’s euthanasia program may inadvertently be pushing non-terminal, often disabled, individuals toward choosing death due to systemic neglect. Ontario data shows that many euthanized persons, particularly those not near death, came from disadvantaged backgrounds.

In one stark case, a man with a COVID vaccine injury a disability caused by a medical intervention was approved for assisted death, revealing how easily suffering can be pathologized when it’s rooted in a healthcare system failure.

This isn’t abstract speculation. The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has condemned Canada’s system for being structurally ableist providing death rather than life-supporting remedies and strongly opposing its planned 2027 expansion, which includes mental illness as a sole condition for euthanasia.

Slippery Slope: When Death Outpaces Care

The broader narrative is disturbing. As our society grows older and health systems strain, MAiD becomes a costly shortcut financially and existentially for governments that would rather see an end than invest in care.

Add to this the delay of just a few years to 2027 for allowing euthanasia solely on grounds of mental illness, and we’re watching a regulated decline of life’s value. Critics including MPs like Tamara Jansen are pushing back, introducing bills to halt this expansion, warning that from March 27, 2027, people suffering from common conditions like depression could walk into a doctor’s office and die with minimal oversight..

Only God Gives and Sustains Life

From a biblical standpoint, life is a sacred gift from God. Our Lord is described in Acts 17:28 as giving not only life but being its very “in Him we live and move and have our being.” To circumvent that design and justice is not just medical it’s spiritual rebellion.

When society begins telling struggling individuals that “you’re better off dead,” we echo the cries of ancient civilizations that worship death over deliverance. We run the risk of echoing false idols that cheapen life.

Let’s Uphold Life, Not Expedite Death

We must urgently redirect resources toward:

Affordable housing and robust palliative care
Accessible mental health services
Inclusive policies centered on inherent human dignity not convenience

A Christian ethic says: Let’s heal, not kill; let’s support, not abandon; let’s love especially those whom society deems unworthy.

Let’s ensure that the most vulnerable don’t become the easiest exit.

China Unveils Development of World’s First ‘Pregnancy Robot,’ Stirring Global Ethical Debate

LN24 — Sun, 17 Aug 2025 18:54:46 +0000

News that Chinese scientists are developing the world’s first “pregnancy robot” a machine designed to grow human life outside the human body has raised serious alarms, not only for ethical and medical reasons, but for deeply spiritual ones as well.

Let’s be clear: this is not progress it’s rebellion.

The womb is a sacred vessel, created by God Himself, for the miracle of life. It was never meant to be replicated by machines or manipulated in labs. Scripture tells us in Psalm 139:13, “For You formed my inward parts; You knitted me together in my mother’s womb.” That is the natural, divine design and no amount of technological advancement can improve on what God has perfectly created.

A Man-Made Substitute for the Miracle of Life

These artificial wombs what some call “pregnancy robots” seek to take the role of God and woman in bringing forth life. It removes the intimacy, the bond, the divinely ordained process of pregnancy and attempts to hand it over to machines. Life, they say, will now begin in steel chambers, monitored by AI, not formed by the breath of God.

This is not about science solving problems. This is about science overstepping boundaries. When we try to take creation into our own hands, we mimic the mistake of the Tower of Babel thinking we can build our way up to God, rather than humbly following His design.

Where Does It Stop?

Today it’s artificial wombs. Tomorrow it’s genetic editing, designer babies, and human life customized like a product on a shelf. The slippery slope is already in motion. Once we allow life to begin in a lab, what value does it hold in the eyes of those who see it as an experiment?

We’re not just risking ethics we’re risking souls.

“There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death.” Proverbs 14:12

Only God Gives Life

As believers, we must stand firm in the truth: only God is the giver and sustainer of life. No robot, no laboratory, no scientist can replace Him. The more we try to “improve” on His creation, the further we drift from His presence.

Technology should serve life, not seek to create it apart from God’s will. We must ask ourselves if life does not begin in the womb God made, is it still life as He intended?

I say this not to condemn, but to warn: we cannot play God without facing the consequences.

Let us return to God’s design, trust in His wisdom, and protect the sanctity of life as He created it.