Charlotte Scaddan, the UN’s Senior Adviser on Information Integrity, appeared via teleconference as a witness during the hearing, which examined how climate and energy information is managed and communicated. During the session, panel members raised concerns about whether statements that challenge or “undermine” established scientific consensus could be categorised as misinformation.

Critics at the hearing questioned the threshold for such classifications and pressed for clarity on the evidence underpinning UN backed climate claims. When asked to cite specific empirical data during the exchange, Scaddan did not reference particular page numbers or datasets, prompting further debate among panel participants.

The United Nations has consistently maintained that its climate positions are based on assessments from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which compiles peer-reviewed scientific research from around the world. However, the hearing highlighted ongoing tensions over how climate related information is moderated and the balance between combating misinformation and protecting open debate.

The discussion reflects a broader global conversation about free expression, scientific consensus, and the role of international institutions in regulating information in the digital age.