This brings us to our main discussion on Ursula Von Der Leyen and the continuing fall of globalist figures. In the first part of our discussion, we ought to address what the legacy of Ursula VDL’s leadership has been  as context for why her implication in corruption is not a surprise at all. So, if there is one individual who, more than anyone else, symbolises the ineptitude of the European Commission then it is surely the Commission’s president, Ursula von der Leyen. And this is something that has been known for some time now. In fact, questions about VDL’s lack of probity first surfaced in 2015 when she was accused of plagiarising her doctoral dissertation. She was eventually cleared of the accusations but, the president of the Hannover Medical School, Christopher Baum, conceded that “Ms von der Leyen’s thesis did contain plagiarised material”, but he added “there had been no intent to deceive”.

Then, VDL’s lack of probity continued while she served as Germany’s Minister of Defence between 2013 and 2019. During her tenure at the ministry, she became embroiled in a scandal regarding payments of €250 million to consultants related to arms contracts. Germany’s Federal Audit Office found that, of the €250 million declared for consultancy fees, only €5.1 million had been spent! However, it did not stop there because one of the consultants was McKinsey & Company, where VDL’s son was an associate, thus raising a possible conflict of interest. It also emerged that messages related to the contracts had been deleted from two of VDL’s mobile phones. Although she was eventually cleared of corruption allegations, questions over her probity during that period remain to this day! Let me state now that text messages disappearing from VDL’s phone is a crucial fact to remember as we follow the thread in her political career.

Then, having evaded accountability, in July 2019 Emmanuel Macron, together with Angela Merkel, bypassed the Spitzen-kadida-ten process and nominated VDL as Jean-Claude Junker’s successor as head of the European Commission. The Spitzenkadidaten process, through which the lead candidate emerges and is then ratified by the European Parliament, is itself somewhat arcane, but here’s more on how it operates in principle.

Well, in VDL’s case, the Spitzenkadidaten process benefited her in that the EU could NOT agree on either of the two lead candidates at the time, being Martin Weber and Frans Timmermans. It was thus left to the consummate fixers to address the matter. And it so happened that the consummate fixers in those elections were both Emmanuel Macron, and VDL’s mentor, Angela Merkel. They came to an agreement on promoting VDL instead using what was essentially a ‘backroom deal’. Then, VDL’s nomination was accepted by the European Council and on the 16th of July the European Parliament voted to accept her appointment.

‘PFIZERGATE’: THE SCANDAL THAT HAS FOLLOWED URSULA VON DER LEYEN

Unfortunately, scandal did not end with the backroom deals in the Spitzenkadidaten process, or missing texts during Ursula VDL’s time in the German cabinet. More specifically, after she was appointed president of the European Commission, VDL again became embroiled in controversy, this time involving the procurement of the Covid-19 vaccine from Pfizer. The scandal, which the media dubbed Pfizergate, related to the purchase of 1.8 billion doses of the Pfizer vaccine for use across the EU. It transpired that: a) the number of doses was far greater than was required, resulting in a significant number having to be either destroyed or donated; b) the excess doses cost the EU €4 billion; c) the total value of the contract, which was reported as being approximately €20 billion, was inflated; and d) the most damaging charge, the contract for the vaccines was negotiated directly between VDL and Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer. The negotiations were conducted using sms messages, which VDL later claimed to have deleted.

The New York Times, which initially carried out the investigation into Pfizergate, brought a lawsuit against the European Commission for failing to provide access to the sms conversations between VDL and Bourla. In Belgium, a lobbyist, Frederic Baldan, filed a criminal complaint citing corruption and the destruction of documents. The Belgian lawsuit was eventually taken over by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, which opened a criminal investigation. During that period, the European commission sheltered Ursula VDL from accountability. You’d recall that German MEP Christine Anderson had her microphone cut off in the EU Parliament for calling out the corruption surrounding Ursula von der Leyen’s multi billion euro Pfizer vaccine contract; while MEP Mislav Kolakusic called out the corruption as well.

THE PROTECTION OF VON DER LEYEN IN PREVIOUS YEARS IS AN INDICTMENT ON THE E.U. COMMISSION

But ultimately, the fact that VDL has evaded accountability does not only speak to her corruption, it also speaks to the corruption in the European Commission in general – thus necessitating a broader discussion on the change in leadership in Europe. But, here is Romanian MEP Cristian Terhes warning that “We Are Witnessing The Biggest Corruption Coverup In EU History.”

One would have thought that VDL would have learned a lesson from all these past controversies, but it seems that scandals are a protruding feature of her leadership. Which brings us to her latest impropriety, being cronyism. In January of this year, VDL had appointed fellow CDU politician, Martin Pieper, to a newly created and lucrative post of special envoy for SMEs. The appointment was reported by La Matinale Europeenne in February but it wasn’t until April that the controversy surrounding the appointment received wide coverage in the English language media.

The appointment was controversial for two reasons: 1) the recruitment process was flawed and 2) the choice of Pieper was seen as politically motivated. On the first issue, it was revealed by an anonymous EU official that there had been two other candidates, one from Sweden and one from the Czech Republic, who had scored better than Pieper in the recruitment process. On the second issue, there was strong suspicion that Pieper had been chosen by VDL in order to curry favour with the CDU and thus win their backing for her reappointment as head of the European Commission.

The appointment sparked a strong response both from other members of the Commission and from MEPs. Four senior Commissioners, including Joseph Borrell and the Internal Market Commissioner, Thiery Breton, wrote to VDL on 27 March expressing their concern about the appointment’s lack of transparency and impartiality. On 11 April, MEPs voted by 382 to 144 to rescind Pieper’s appointment. Although the vote was not binding on the Commission, Pieper’s position became untenable and on 16 April he resigned. Daniel Freund, a German/Greens MEP, said that this scandal was “sad and shameful”; and added that he does not know how they can explain it to the voters” – which really captures the gravity of it all.

So, why did Ursula VDL evade accountability for all of these objectively provable corruption scandals? On the one hand, I think her political ascension was orchestrated (especially when you consider that she was not part of the lead candidates in 2019, but her mentor, Angela Merkel manipulated the Spitzenkadidaten process in a backroom deal to secure her nomination, and eventual vote. It’s the same thing with figures like Kamala Harris , Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton. Then on the other hand, I think Ursula VDL’s evasion of accountability is in part tied to her weaponisation of identity politics – which is the old feminist trick.

In fact, I believe you recall the event that took place in April 2021 where VDL had to sit on a sofa after Charles Michel took one of the only two chairs provided for a meeting with Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in April. This was portrayed as disrespect to Von Der Leyen on the basis that she is a woman. And irrespective of whether that was true, it has meant that criticism of her ought subsequently ought to be viewed in light of her being a woman. In fact, this is essentially what women who weaponise identity politics do: they create an uncommunicated expectation for them to be given the presumption of correctness or to be allowed to claim victimhood. That’s why we saw events like the “believe women”or “me too” movements.

THE TIDES HAVE TURNED: E.U. COURT ORDERS RELEASE OF PFIZER TEXTS

But, now, the tides have turned against Ursula VDL. More specifically, the European Union General Court rejected a European Commission decision not to disclose text messages Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the CEO of Pfizer exchanged during negotiations for COVID-19 vaccines. The Luxembourg-based court said the Commission, which negotiated vaccine contracts on behalf of the 27-nation bloc during the pandemic, did not provide credible reasons for rejecting a New York Times request to hand over the texts. Von der Leyen has said she could not disclose the messages, which the court considered to be official EU documents, because she did not have them. The court, however, said the Commission had failed to plausibly justify why the texts were no longer in her possession. Here’s more.

Well, remember MEP Christine Anderson? Here she is emphasising the significance of this case, especially as someone who has spoken out about this corruption.

WHY IT IS NOTABLE THAT THE PFIZERGATE SCANDAL STUCK

So, clearly, Ursula VDL has been implicated in many scandals, that did not stick or delay her orchestrated ascension on the political ladder, which is why she conveniently championed – as head of the EU – many diabolical politics, including climate change focuses, compulsory vaccines and vaccine passports – to name a few.

So, why is it notable that pfizergate stuck? Firstly, because the Bible is clear on the role of pharmakeia: Revelation 18:23 tells us that merchants (which refers to pharmakeia or the pharmaceutical industry) will deceive the nations. In this case, leaders of nations are not exempt. People like Ursua VDL saw opportunities to profit from a vaccine holocaust but clearly did not imagine that the inspiration behind their cruelty would also be used against them. It happens often: people forget that the devil is cruel and hates all men: he will not hesitate to use them for his evil bidding and ALSO not miss out on an opportunity to not only use them but make a mockery of them as well.

The second reason why it is notable that Pfizergate stuck is because all those who were instrumental in the orchestration satanic and globalist agendas are being relegated to the dustbins of history, especially in the year of completeness where God has placed a moratorium on satanic and globalist agendas. This is thus to say that there is a trickle down effect: Soros. Schwab. And now Ursula Von Der Leyen (which is interesting because they are all European figures). But, it really is unmissable that the tides have shifted, and not only is their leadership questioned, but scandal and disgrace follow them, such that they are esteemed lightly.

VON DER LEYEN’S ROLE IN SATANIC AND GLOBALIST AGENDAS

Applies specifically to VDL – in other words what has been her role in satanic and globalist agendas. Generally VDL is a WEF regular and it is unmissable. In light of this, she has supported the WEF’s censorship industrial complex aspiration through asserting mis and disinformation as a threat that even surpassed the climate change hoax.

As you would have just heard, von der Leyen said 2024 was “the biggest electoral year in history”, and expressed concern that “freedom comes with risks.” She added that (and I quote directly) “There will always be those who try to exploit openness, both from inside and out. There will always be attempts to put us off track. For example, with disinformation and misinformation.” (end quote). Well, she also touted the EU Digital Services Act, which under the guise of preventing ‘hate speech’, establishes controls over all information on social media platforms. And so, she has not only advocated for restrictions on free speech, but she has also supported legislation that has infringed on this inalienable freedom.

Then secondly, not only was VDL closing corrupt contrasts with Pfrizer CEOs, but she was also pushing those vaccines as a necessity, while the EU further demanded vaccine certificates. This was perhaps tasteless captures in a post she made on the 1st of July in the year 2021, when she said (quote): “In time for summer! The EUCOVID Certificate is now up and running. Get yours today” as if she was not casually asking people to forgo the freedom on movement and bodily autonomy in Europe.

Furthermore, Ursula VDL has been culpable in the great replacement agenda through mass migration. This is also tied to the fact that many are saying she is ruining the European  economy with climate insanity and spending billions of tax euros on foreign wars and hostile regimes.

These are all reasons why Ursula Von Der Leyen has been a liability to Europe, but all should be held accountable. Indeed, we have surely prayed, and continue to pray. Therefore, in this glorious Year of Completeness, all satanic and globalist agendas are suspended; they will live in our world, and we will not live in theirs, as we wrap up the Church age. And so, let us keep fighting the good fight of faith, because we have truly already won.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

In a groundbreaking ruling, the European Court of Justice has ordered the European Commission to release the private text messages between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, after four years of secrecy and controversy surrounding a massive €35 billion vaccine deal. The EU Commission is now required to make these texts public, which allegedly contain details of the clandestine negotiations for the lucrative vaccine contract, paid for by European taxpayers. Investigations by Investigate Europe have uncovered that the cost per dose was a staggering 15 times the production cost, potentially resulting in billions of euros being overpaid. Furthermore, it has been revealed that Bourla failed to appear for his scheduled testimony before the EU Parliament in 2022, while von der Leyen’s husband holds a prominent position as Medical Director of Orgenesis, a biotech firm that receives EU funding and has a significant partnership with Pfizer. This complex web of relationships and dealings raises serious concerns about potential corruption at the highest levels of the European Union, with possible conflicts of interest that directly benefit von der Leyen’s family and may have resulted in the misappropriation of billions of euros in public funds through clandestine agreements. The situation appears to be a clear case of alleged fraud on a massive scale, and the European public is eagerly awaiting the release of the incriminating texts, which could shed light on the truth behind this scandal. As the European Union watches with bated breath, the release of these texts is expected to have significant implications for von der Leyen’s tenure and the future of the EU.

MEP Christina Anderson speaks on Pfizer Gate verdict

Ursula Von Der Leyen, we will hold you accountable: Christina Anderson

German MEP Christina Anderson reacted to the stinging rebuke to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who secretly negotiated a massive contract with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla for 1.8 billion doses of the coronavirus vaccine, worth a staggering 35 billion euros. What’s more, these backroom deals were made not through official channels or formal documentation, but rather through casual SMS text messages exchanged between von der Leyen and Bourla. Following a recent ruling by the General Court of the European Union, it has been confirmed that von der Leyen has indeed broken the law, and now the EU Commission is being forced to make her incriminating text messages public, shedding light on the shady dealings that have sparked widespread outrage and calls for greater transparency.

EU Parliament’s shocking display of censorship

Questions have been asked in the EU Parliament but there is always a shocking display of censorship. European Union Parliament member Christine Anderson was once abruptly silenced on the floor after she boldly exposed the corrupt vaccine contracts between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. This outrageous move is a blatant attempt to stifle free speech and transparency, and it’s utterly disgusting. As Anderson’s microphone remained on until she dropped the bombshell that a parliament that covers up such corruption is equally corrupt and is robbing its people, her voice was suddenly and deliberately cut off. The moment she uttered those words, her microphone was swiftly turned off, sparking a wave of outrage. One courageous individual yelled out, demanding to hear the rest of Anderson’s statement, but his request was callously rejected, leaving many to wonder what the EU Parliament is trying to hide. Now we know what the EU Parliament was afraid of, and why they were so desperate to silence Anderson’s truth-telling voice?

€35 billion was secretly funnelled to the pharmaceutical cartel

Investigations have uncovered a complex web of deceit, revealing that a staggering €35 billion of taxpayer money was secretly funnelled into the coffers of a powerful pharmaceutical cartel, with no transparency, oversight, or accountability in place. This is not merely a scandal, but a blatant case of organized crime that has infiltrated the highest echelons of European power. Delving deeper into the heart of the matter, it becomes clear that this was not just a corrupt contract, but a meticulously coordinated operation orchestrated by the Medical Deep State – a shadowy alliance of unelected bureaucrats, pharmaceutical moguls, and globalist technocrats who have hijacked the scientific community, exploited fear, and amassed enormous profits from the masses. Ursula von der Leyen, a key player in this syndicate, has been found to be complicit in this scheme, using her position to push through policies, bypass democratic checks and balances, and channel billions of dollars into the hands of corporate giants like Pfizer, all under the guise of “public health.” A disturbing pattern of events has emerged, in which Pfizer dictated the terms, Bourla evaded testimony, Ursula sent clandestine texts, her husband’s company reaped the benefits, and millions of people were forced into compliance, silenced, coerced, vaccinated, and tracked. Remember when Ursula von der Leyen wanted to impose mandatory vaccination within the EU?

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen joined forces with Bill Gates

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen has joined forces with Bill Gates to “vaccinate 500 million children by 2030”. The organisation aims to vaccinate 500 million children in the next five years, including 50 million children with a malaria vaccine.

This is the very fabric of the Medical Deep State: a parasitic network that infiltrates governments, manipulates institutions, and exploits crises for financial gain. It silences medical professionals, censors dissenting voices, and only funds research that serves its agenda. The COVID operation was the crowning achievement of this syndicate, with Ursula von der Leyen serving as its European queenpin. However, the walls of secrecy are now crumbling, and the incriminating texts are being released, exposing the digital fingerprints of betrayal for all to see. This marks not only the end of a political career but also the beginning of a global reckoning, one that will hold the perpetrators of this massive scandal accountable for their actions. The people demand justice, and it is time for the truth to be revealed.

White House bans U.S. agencies from all work on G-20 in South Africa

The White House National Security Council has ordered U.S. agencies and departments to suspend work with the Group of 20 conference set to be hosted by South Africa this year, according to two people familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a government decision not yet made public. The move follows President Donald Trump’s public threats to boycott the summit over claims that White South Africans are having their land taken away by the government under a new expropriation law. The G-20 is an international forum of the world’s biggest economies and is designed to address the biggest financial issues around the globe. The Johannesburg summit is set to be held in November under the theme “Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability.”

Can the G7 take charge, or is global collaboration falling apart?

The G20’s power seems to be slipping. Can the G7 still steer the world, or is teamwork between countries falling apart? The G20, which includes both rich and developing nations, was designed to tackle big global issues together. But with different countries having different goals, reaching agreements has become harder. For instance, getting everyone to agree on climate change policies is tough. If the G20 can’t lead, the spotlight shifts to the G7. This group of wealthy countries has a track record of setting the agenda. Yet, some wonder if the G7 is truly able to handle today’s complex global challenges alone. Can they get other nations to follow their lead? Or are we entering an era where countries focus more on themselves, making it difficult to solve problems that affect everyone?

The globalist agenda and the G20

The globalist agenda” tied to the G20 often comes up in debates about power, sovereignty, and who really calls the shots in the world. The G20 as a tool for pushing policies that erode borders, prioritize corporate interests, and centralize control under the guise of international cooperation. At its core, the G20 is about coordinating the world’s biggest economies—think US, China, EU, India, and others—to manage global systems like trade, finance, and climate. That mission naturally leans toward interconnectedness: open markets, harmonized regulations, and collective action. For supporters, this is just pragmatic economies don’t exist in a vacuum, and problems like pandemics or recessions don’t respect borders. But in actuality, it’s a stepping stone to something more sinister: a world where national identity and autonomy get swallowed by a borderless, elite-driven system. Let’s look at G20’s economic playbook. Since its post-2008 financial crisis glow-up, it’s championed free trade, deregulation, and global supply chains. Look at the 2016 Hangzhou Summit under China’s watch—it pushed hard for “inclusive globalization,” doubling down on cross-border investment and digital trade. Critics say this just hands more power to multinational corporations and technocrats, who rake in profits while local industries in smaller nations—or even G20 members like Argentina—get hollowed out. The G20’s own data backs this up indirectly: its members account for 80% of world trade, but the benefits skew toward the top dogs, leaving others scrambling for crumbs. Then there’s the climate angle, a favourite target of the globalist-label crowd. The G20’s been loud about “sustainable development”—think the 2021 Rome Summit’s net-zero pledges or the 2023 New Delhi push for green tech. This is a Trojan horse: centralized control over energy and resources, enforced by unelected bodies like the IMF or World Bank, which often tag along in G20 discussions. The counterargument is that climate change is a global mess needing global fixes but look at the fine print—carbon taxes or trade rules that hit poorer nations hardest while letting big emitters like China or the US off the hook with loopholes.

The G20 isn’t about sovereign nations

The inclusion of supranational players like the EU and, since 2023, the African Union, stirs the pot further. This proves the G20 isn’t about sovereign nations but about building a framework for regional blocs—eventually into one-world governance. Add in the guest list—heads of the UN, WTO, OECD and the WEF—and it’s easy to see the makings of a cabal. The G20’s own statements don’t hide this: the 2022 Bali Summit called for “multilateral reform” to “strengthen global governance.” That’s code for chipping away at national control.

The WEF Globalist Agenda drives the G20

The G20’s decisions aren’t binding, but its soft power is real—think peer pressure with trillion-dollar stakes. When it nudges policies like digital currencies (a hot topic in 2025 with India’s pilot and China’s e-yuan) or vaccine passports (post-COVID), you can see the globalist endgame: centralized surveillance and economic dependence. The 2019 Osaka Summit’s focus on “data free flow with trust” got tech giants salivating, but it also sparked fears of a world where citizens answer to algorithms over parliaments. With 19 countries plus a couple of unions calling shots for 8 billion people, the G20’s push for integration—trade, climate, tech—feel like a top-down power grab. That’s the rub: it doesn’t need a shadowy handshake to look like a globalist machine—it just has to keep doing what it’s designed to do.

Is the G20 simply another globalist climate cult group?

One could say the G20 is simply another globalist climate cult group. They push a radical climate agenda. They want to control every aspect of our lives. They demand we give up our freedom. This group has no real authority. It represents an attack on national sovereignty. We should refuse to fund this organization. Every dollar given empowers their destructive plans. They will use our money to push their harmful ideas. We must resist their influence. When you rope in their clandestine meetings under the guise of global welfare are mere facades for their true intentions. The WEF and the G20 weave a web of influence that stretches across continents, manipulating policies and economies to serve their own insidious purposes. Behind closed doors, a sinister plan unfolds, designed to shape the world according to their malevolent vision. But as the shadows of their agenda lengthen, whispers of resistance grow louder, challenging the darkness that threatens to engulf the nations.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe