Healthcare as one of the 7 areas that globalists seek to manipulate, and we ought to start with some historical context, regarding how the COVID plandemic enabled globalists to test a militarised healthcare system.

Now, in former US president Eisenhower’s farewell speech of January 17, 1961, he stated that “…in the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” Sixty-three years on, many understand what he was referring to. We’ve seen the cycle of undeclared wars and decades-long foreign occupations that are undertaken on nebulous or even outright false pretences. We’ve also seen the ever-hungry mega-industry that produces super-expensive, high-tech killing devices of every imaginable form, as well as the steady stream of traumatised soldiers that it spits out. Evidently, war, to some, has become big business! And as Eisenhower warned, as long as those profiting from it drive the policy and the money stream (in other words – if they can weaponise the laws), the MIC will continue to grow.

In light of this contextualisation of the MIC, one would think that other mega-industries – the medical industry in particular – have generally fared better in public perception than the military-industrial complex; in that this MIC seemed a far more diabolical industry. Well, that was until the covid pandemic, but not forsaking a number of prior controversies. But this is really to say that among its many lessons, the Covid plandemic era has taught us this: if you substitute Pfizer and Moderna for Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, and swap the NIH and CDC for the Pentagon, you essentially get the same result. Meaning that not only is the “medical-industrial complex” every bit as real as its military-industrial counterpart, but, it is also every bit as real a problem, precisely because they are different sides of the same coin since the military industrial complex informed the weaponisation of the healthcare system in the COVID era. So, how did this happen?

Well, during the Covid era, one can infer interesting parallels to military operations. For instance, by early-to-mid 2020, it became obvious to those paying attention that the Covid “response,” while promoted as a medical initiative, was in fact a military operation. Martial law had effectively been declared in March 2020, after the Covid response (and practically speaking, control of the nation) was ceded to the National Security Council. Civil liberties – including the freedoms of assembly, worship, the right to travel, to earn one’s living, to pursue one’s education, or to obtain legal relief – were rendered null and void. In addition, top-down diktats on how to manage Covid patients were handed down to physicians from high above, and these were enforced with a militaristic rigidity unseen in doctors’ professional lifetimes. Meanwhile, the mandated protocols also made no sense: they ignored fundamental tenets of both sound medical practice and medical ethics; they shamelessly lied about well-known interventions, while their mandated protocols killed people.

What was also interesting to note during that time is that those physicians and other professionals who spoke out were effectively court-martialed. State medical boards, specialty certification boards, and large healthcare system employers virtually tripped over each other in the rush to de-license, decertify, and fire dissenters. Genuine, courageous physicians who actually treat patients, such as Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Scott Jensen, Simone Gold, and others, were persecuted, while non-practicing bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci were hailed with false titles like “America’s Top Doctor.” The propaganda was as nauseating as it was blatant. And the subsequent violence was no different.

But, speaking of lies about well-known interventions, you’d recall the ivermectin debate, that president Trump was involved in during that period. Well, as more evidence came out supporting Trump’s claim of the comparative benefit of using ivermectin in comparison to vaccines and all other protocols that were mandated, the FDA in the Biden era, even tried to back-peddle on their dismissal of ivermectin. In particular, the FDA claimed their Ivermectin smear campaign was only related to people self-medicating w/ a veterinary formulation of the drug.

However, in a 2021 interview with the American Medical Association, FDA Director John Farley discouraged physicians from prescribing Ivermectin, calling it a ‘tragic choice’. He stated that (quote): “Making that choice to choose Ivermectin over a vaccine can be a tragic choice that can lead to them getting very sick, getting admitted to the hospital, or even dying from COVID.

This ultimately means that the concerning tenets that have driven the military industrial complex were incorporated into the healthcare system. During covid, globalist debuted this militarised so-called healthcare response, and thus in seeking to manipulate healthcare, want similar control. Why else would there be a WHO pandemic treaty and IHR that try to centralise power to dictate health policy on the Director General, except to great a legal justification for a militarised top down approach to global healthcare?

MEDICINE BECAME BIG BUSINESS: THE COMMERCIALISATION OF SICKNESS AND INFIRMITY 

Now, in light of the parallels between the military and the medical industrial complexes, we alluded to the fact that in light of the operations of the military industrial complex, war has become big business. Well, as far as institutional capture is concerned, the medical establishment has done the same, especially with cancer. You’d recall that we discussed here on ‘The War Room’ how not only is cancer man-made, but it is also big business, a multi-billion dollar industry. It involves getting people to get cancer, to be poisoned with chemotherapy, and large amounts of money spent on continuous research for a cure that apparently does not exist (which is a lie). And the biggest proof of this intentional weaponisation and commercialisation of cancer is that, simply put, cancer did NOT really exist more than 50 years ago but started booming with the introduction of processed food loaded with massive amounts of sugar and chemicals.

So, you’ve just heard the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD. warn about the artificial and genetically modified food that causes cancer. Well, another crucial cause is exposure to carcinogenic systems. Now, a carcinogen is any substance, agent, or process that can induce cancer. They can cause cancer by damaging DNA or interfering with cellular processes (hence cancer is known as an attack on healthy cells by a cancerous cell). Examples of these carcinogens include asbestos, benzene, radon and even tobacco smoke.

This is critical to note because it exposes a detrimental irony when it comes to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is also a carcinogenic system! It is inherently a harmful concoction of chemicals that was initially created as a weapon, and then suddenly became rebranded as a highly profitable health intervention.

There you have it, this same chemical agent that was used to kill people is now being used to allegedly treat cancer. And ironically, despite the modifications on it, chemotherapy can also function as a carcinogen! More specifically, chemotherapy drugs are designed to target and destroy rapidly dividing cells, including cancer cells, but they can also affect healthy cells that divide quickly, like those in the bone marrow, hair follicles, and digestive tract. However, some chemotherapy agents, particularly alkylating agents, have been linked to an increased risk of developing certain types of leukemia or other secondary cancers. And the risk of developing a second cancer after chemotherapy is influenced by factors like the type of chemotherapy drugs used, the dosage, the duration of treatment, and the individual’s overall health. ALL of this is to say that (IRONICALLY) chemotherapy also functions as a carcinogen, meaning that it is a cancer causing agent.

And so this details the institutionalisation of the commercialisation of sickness and infirmity. The medical industrial complex sees sickness as an opportunity to form a market or customer base; and so, this industry interventions that it knows are harmful or not effective in the long run, and merely brands them as an acceptable panacea. What makes this a problem of institutional corruption, as opposed to mere isolated cases of unethical business conduct is that this is standard practice in the medical industry – all while legitimate or just better cures are hidden.

Take Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong, who we recently discussed. So, in an interview with Tucker Carlson he detailed that there actually is a medical breakthrough in fighting cancer. However, because of politics, the Deep State and Big Pharma it’s being suppressed. Meaning that there is an intervention for which he has the data and research to prove has been helpful, yet special interests block it – pointing to systemic institutional corruption in the medical industry. Meanwhile, Dr Mark Hyman also told Tucker Carlson about the keto diet’s ability to fight cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia and more. And so, literally eating certain good organic foods, is a comparatively far better option to chemotherapy.

MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONS: THE MEDICAL CARTEL’S TOOL FOR WEAPONISING LAWS

We then also have to address how the medical industrial complex weaponised laws, through formal legal avenues and also through the establishment of organisations that serve special interests. For instance, we’ve spoken about the audacious incident where the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America have filed a federal lawsuit against Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr for withdrawing COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.

The cartel also demanded a federal judge reinstate the COVID shot recommendations (again for children and pregnant women)—and block the US Department of HHS from enforcing or promoting RFK Jr’s May directive that removed them. Then, they also argued that Kennedy’s directive violates (quote) “norms” by bypassing the CDC and its ACIP panel, and undermines their ability to push the shot to patients and secure insurance coverage. This revealed a jarring display of the audacity of the medical industrial complex to use laws to fight or undermine progress. Because they obviously know that there are serious ramifications from the COVID jabs, but were adamant to use formal legal structures to block the US Department of HHS from enforcing or promoting RFK Jr’s May directive that removed those jabs from the recommendation list.

Similarly, we’ve been told to “listen to scientists” for years, while their credibility was tied to medical societies and associations that vouched for their alleged credibility. BUT… the dark and corrupt history behind the largest group of health professionals in the US, being the American Medical Association, suggests that these organisations are part of the problem of systemic institutional rot and corruption.

Thankfully, the corruption of these medical associations is being exposed on the regular today. For example, files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (also called WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical. The American Medical Association, The Endocrine Society, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and thousands of doctors worldwide rely on WPATH. It is considered the leading global authority on gender medicine.

And yet WPATH’s internal files, which include written discussions and a video, reveal that its members know they are creating victims and not getting “informed consent.” Victims include a 10-year-old girl, a 13-year-old developmentally delayed adolescent, and individuals suffering from schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses. Meanwhile, WPATH members indicate repeatedly that they know that many children and their parents don’t understand the effects that puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries will have on their bodies. And yet, they continue to perform and advocate for gender medicine. In any case, the WPATH Files prove that gender medicine is comprised of unregulated and pseudoscientific experiments on children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults.

Then there is also the American Heart Association. This association exposes systemic corruption in the medical industry in that it also serves to propagate false and detrimental health directives. You’d recall that we had a discussion of the hoax behind the claim that humans need to consume very little saturated fats and salt, which heavily implicated Ancel Keys, who had the backing of the American Heart Association. Well, even in the status quo the American Heart Association recommends aiming for a dietary pattern that achieves less than 6% of total calories from saturated fat. This is to say, that for example, if you need about 2,000 calories a day, no more than 120 of them should come from saturated fat – the same saturated fat that has now been proven to be essential for your health and to play an essential role in the functionality of your body!

Well, this unaccountable attitude towards accurate nutritional science in the present (as well) is actually less surprising when you consider that the AHA has been operating as a corrupt, anti-health lobby institution for the medical industrial complex, and even food companies. For instance, this year, the American Heart Association sent an employee to TEXAS to fight a bill that would stop food stamps from covering unhealthy items such as candy and soda—part of the MAHA initiatives.

Well, when you follow the money, you understand why the AHA has these inclinations. Not only is it funded by many pharmaceutical corporations, but General Mills and Pepsi Co are both forum members of The American Heart Association.

The question then is, why have these associations averted scrutiny for all these years? Well, for one the people who back them, like the Rockefellers have deep pockets: they not only pay for their operations, but pay to insure they either receive positive coverage (think the mainstream media and vaccines), or pay to ensure they remain under the radar. The second reason is that these organisations play on the liberal inclinations of society, in a world where identity politics are also expected to govern organisational culture. For instance, (and this is not a joke), the American Medical Association declared WEIGHT measurement, through the Body Mass Index (or BMI) to be RACIST, of all things – which obviously fit well in a culture of “body positivity”, and negative reinforcement for unhealthy habits.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Sudan Health Ministry Reports Over 1,300 New Cholera Cases in One Week

the Sudanese Health Ministry reported that from July 12-18, a total of 18 people died across Sudan due to this deadly disease spread via contaminated water. Over 91,000 cases since July 2024, a total of 2,302 deaths and infections recorded in 17 out of 18 states. Interestingly, the report then goes on to say that cholera cases in the Khartoum State are declining following a ten-day vaccination campaign, with 2.24 million people vaccinated (96% coverage). This was the report given by the WHO, stating that new cases dropped from 1,500 to 10-11 per day. Let’s quickly resolve the claims by the WHO.

Zimbabwe door-to-door cholera vaccination campaign

Zimbabwe launched a cholera vaccination campaign to immunize over 2 million people against the waterborne disease, amid an outbreak that has killed hundreds since early 2023. In response to the cholera update, the government implemented an oral cholera vaccination programme, aiming to inoculate over 2.3 million people. The single-shot OCV provides six months of protection against the diarrhoeal illness. So, boosters? But now, they are being used as a poster child for other countries to follow suit.

Mass cholera vaccination carried out in Southern Africa

SADC urged Member States to jointly plan and implement synchronised cross border vaccination campaigns against Cholera, if necessary, and mobilise vaccines for affected and non-affected countries at risk. The organization also devoted to “increase investment in the current cholera emergency response” and “accelerate local and regional manufacturing of cholera vaccines” among other measures. Cholera outbreaks had been reported in several SADC countries, most notably Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania. In Mozambique alone, they rolled out a target to vaccinate over 2 million people against cholera. Kenya has also been running a much-celebrated Vaccine campaign. 72% Increase in Cholera Vaccine Revenues, If I’m talking about it, it means there is money involved.

The cost to immunize against cholera is between US$0.10 and US$4.00 per vaccination. The Vaxchora vaccine can cost more than US$250. Since the beginning of 2023, there have been 24 reactive cholera vaccination campaigns implemented in 12 countries. But, there is a global shortage of cholera vaccines. From January 2023 to January 2024, 76 million oral cholera vaccines (OCV) were requested by 14 countries, while only 38 million doses were available. The World Health Organization (WHO) has three pre-qualified OCVs: Dukoral®, Shanchol, and Euvichol®. One of these OCV manufacturers reported a 72% increase in revenues today. On February 15, 2024, Valneva SE reported its revenue for 2023. Last year, sales of Valneav’s DUKORAL® vaccine amounted to €29.8 million (US32 million), a significant increase from the €17.3 million recorded in 2022. This significant increase can be attributed to the recovery of the private travel markets and price hikes. In a press release, Peter Bühler, Valneva’s Chief Financial Officer, commented, “In 2023, Valneva successfully executed key strategic objectives despite a difficult economic environment…. we are entering 2024 in a good financial position to support our commercial and R&D objectives.” It’s a money-making gimmick for some, fuelled by something deeper and darker. The depopulation agenda.

EuBiologics main supplier of cholera vaccine to global vaccine stockpile

The Oral Cholera Vaccine was developed with the support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through the International Vaccine Institute. This vaccine technology was then transferred to a South Korean Company EuBiologics, which is mass producing the Euvichol oral cholera vaccine. This vaccine was introduced in Haiti and Malawi as well as in other African countries. The WHO then pre-qualified this cholera vaccine and is now the only oral cholera vaccine available for mass vaccination campaigns. Why? Surprisingly, the other prequalified oral cholera vaccine Shanchol was discontinued and production stopped amidst cholera outbreaks. Coincidentally, Sanofi stopped producing the Shanchol vaccine citing less demand for cholera vaccines. Yet as soon as that happens and the Gates invested Euvichol is the only vaccine in the market the demand for cholera vaccines shoots sky high! Currently EuBiologics is the main supplier of the cholera vaccine to the global vaccine stockpile and Euvichol-Plus is the primary product in use.

Revelations about unnecessary and experimental vaccination

Notice the similarities between the vaccines that have been covered. The Oral Cholera Vaccine and the Oral Polio Vaccine have one manufacturer that Gates has invested in, and they become the main or sole supplier of the vaccine globally. In 2022, A European Parliamentary Question asked whether the European Commission had investigated the disturbing revelations about the unnecessary and experimental vaccination of the Haitian people organized by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). What disturbing revelations? World renowned expert on cholera, Professor Renaud Piarroux, exposed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation organized a large-scale trial of the single-dose vaccine using bogus publications and modelling, without clarifying that cholera had disappeared in Haiti two years earlier. The aim of the mass vaccination campaign was to gain support and create a market for the oral cholera vaccine, since Bill Gates owns cholera vaccine factories in South Korea. This vaccine trial in Haiti had been supported as a joint investment between BMGF and with the European Commission (EC) committing close to EUR10 million. Additionally, the European Commission was jointly investing close to EUR100 million in ‘health in Africa’ with the BMGF. The European Parliament questioned why the joint investment (BMGF and EC) was happening despite Microsoft laying off 25,000 European workers, and with the claims that these experimental vaccinations were not necessary.

They always seem to have the money to give people poisonous vaccines but Not Clean Water… Don’t take their poison chemicals. Have you learned nothing? The people who seek to exterminate you … cannot give you healing. How do the African people not know that they have been test subjects for vaccines since Gates and company came along?

The WHO is a criminal racketeering organisation

As explained by Dr. David Martin, the WHO is a “criminal racketeering organisation”—founded by eugenicists—which has been, since 1953, “exclusively a vaccine promoting enterprise, for the benefit of the people who have a commercial interest in vaccines”. The minute the people who have a financial incentive to gain from the decision to declare a pandemic, the minute they’re the ones who are collecting data… they’re going to collect the data that actually justifies their existence. As long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability.

Namibia’s New Surveillance Strategy: A Leap Toward Better Health Security

Namibia has made a significant stride in public health surveillance by launching the Event-Based Surveillance (EBS) Guideline in Windhoek. This move aims to foster early detection and rapid response to health threats such as malaria and cholera, integrating information from diverse sectors for comprehensive monitoring. Supported by the Africa CDC and WHO, Namibia’s approach tailors public health solutions to its unique challenges, bolstering its capacity to manage acute health risks. This initiative comes at a time, coinciding with ongoing outbreaks in the region. With the third edition of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy enhancing information flow from local to national levels, Namibia is reinforcing its ability to protect public health. The adoption of these guidelines aligns with continental efforts to strengthen public health systems and is a step toward improving epidemic intelligence across Africa.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso