Addressing tens of thousands of supporters in central Budapest, Orban emphasised that Brussels’ policies risk dragging Europe into conflict and undermining Hungary’s interests.

“This is why they want to squeeze Ukraine into the EU at any price…to bring war into Europe, and take EU money to Ukraine,” he told the crowd in front of parliament.

Orban, who has consistently opposed sending Hungarian military support to Kyiv, highlighted the economic and social risks of Ukraine joining the EU, including potential threats to agriculture, jobs, and pensions. He reiterated that Ukraine must not be allowed to join the bloc, framing his position as a defence of Hungarian prosperity and security.

Hungary’s commemoration of the 1956 anti-Soviet uprising comes as Orban continues to balance domestic priorities with international pressures. Maintaining constructive relations with Moscow, he has positioned Hungary as a country pursuing stability while other EU nations have sought to isolate Russia.

Orban faces elections likely in April 2026, with the new Tisza party, led by Peter Magyar, positioning itself as a rival. Orban, however, continues to enjoy strong public support, as demonstrated by the large turnout at Thursday’s rally.

Orban, a longtime ally of former U.S. President Donald Trump, had also hoped to host a summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Budapest, reflecting his commitment to diplomacy. Although the meeting was canceled, Orban’s focus remains on safeguarding Hungary’s energy security and national interests amid new U.S. sanctions on Russian oil companies.

Orban’s message of peace, stability, and economic protection resonates with many Hungarians. While opposition parties criticise his governance, his supporters emphasise his dedication to national sovereignty and caution in international conflicts.

During the rally, Orban’s supporters underscored their trust in his leadership, appreciating his efforts to protect Hungary’s economy and ensure that the country remains independent in its foreign policy decisions.

The Polish government has issued a stern warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin, stating that he risks arrest if he attempts to fly through Polish airspace en route to an upcoming summit in Hungary with U.S. President Donald Trump.

The warning came Tuesday, as international attention turned to Budapest, where Trump announced plans last week to meet with Putin in what he described as an effort to “broker peace” in Ukraine.

“Poland is a party to the Rome Statute and therefore bound by the decisions of the International Criminal Court,” said a spokesperson for Poland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “If President Putin enters Polish airspace, we will be compelled to act according to international law.”

ICC Warrant Looms Over Putin’s Travel Plans

In March 2023, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued a warrant for Vladimir Putin’s arrest over alleged war crimes committed during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, including the unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children.

While the warrant has had limited impact within non signatory countries like Russia and China, it technically obligates all 123 ICC member states, including Poland and Hungary, to arrest Putin if he enters their territory.

Hungary, however, has previously signaled reluctance to enforce the warrant, despite being an ICC signatory. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has maintained close ties with both Trump and Putin and is hosting the summit in Budapest, raising tensions among NATO allies.

Trump’s Controversial Diplomacy

Trump’s announcement of the meeting billed as an attempt to end the war in Ukraine has drawn mixed reactions. Supporters say it reflects Trump’s commitment to de-escalation, while critics argue it legitimizes a leader accused of war crimes.

“It’s time for strong diplomacy,” Trump told reporters last week. “The war in Ukraine should never have happened, and I believe it’s possible to bring it to a close fast.”

Airspace as a Pressure Point

Poland’s warning raises the possibility of a diplomatic standoff if Putin chooses to attend the summit. Airspace denial or enforcement of the ICC warrant mid flight could present unprecedented legal and geopolitical challenges.

“It’s not just about law it’s about signaling that war crimes won’t be ignored,” said a European security analyst.

 George Soros who deliberately manipulate economies and societies for their gain. Soros is not just a skilled hedge fund manager who famously challenged the Bank of England in 1992 – he is also the mastermind behind a vast network that has invested billions of dollars in fuelling unrest, protests, and outright destabilization efforts across the globe. Through his Open Society Foundations, he strategically uses philanthropy as a weapon to promote a radical left-wing agenda that actively erodes national sovereignty, fuels division, and creates an environment of chaos that can be exploited. Although his supporters in the mainstream media and fact-checking organizations may dismiss these claims as a conspiracy theory or argue that the funding is indirect, a thorough examination of the financial transactions reveals the truth, and the evidence is available for those who are willing to follow the money trail.

Soros and OSF Funding Division and Disorder in the US

George Soros and his Open Society Foundation (OSF) have been actively funnelling millions of dollars into various groups that ignite protests across the United States, often transforming peaceful demonstrations into violent flashpoints that disrupt the economy. A notable example is the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, which received a staggering $33 million from OSF in 2016 alone, supporting organizations such as the Organization for Black Struggle and Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment that played a significant role in the Ferguson unrest and subsequent chaos. While some critics on the left may view this as merely “supporting civil rights,” it is, in fact, a deliberate attempt to create chaos: BLM protests escalated into riots that destroyed businesses, increased crime rates, and resulted in billions of dollars in damages, all while Soros-backed district attorneys in cities like San Francisco and Philadelphia, funded through OSF-linked networks, adopted lenient policies towards criminals, thereby exacerbating urban decay.

USAID and Soros NGOs worked together to disrupt with paid protestors

Soros-USAID collaboration included funding handbook for radicals with dedication to Lucifer. What stands out about Alinsky’s handbook, aside from its guidance for activists on undermining democratic systems and its connection to Hillary Clinton, who famously based her college thesis on it, is Alinsky’s foreword, which includes a dedication to Lucifer. In 2017, Judicial Watch initiated a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department and USAID, seeking documentation of communications concerning OSF and questioning the rationale behind the financial support given to its Macedonian division. This inquiry followed the Soros-backed 2016 campaign aimed at destabilizing Macedonia’s government, referred to as a “colorful revolution.” Furthermore, Judicial Watch pointed out a similar partnership between Soros and USAID in Albania, where the U.S. government contributed $9 million annually to a judicial reform initiative known as ‘Justice for All,’ which also received $1 million from the Soros Economic Development Fund. Remember what I told you in the previous episode, how USAID and Soros NGOs worked together to disrupt with paid protestors?

Soros and OSF funding of Anti-Trump Movements

Fast-forward to the anti-Trump era, and it becomes clear that Soros’s influence was palpable in the 2017 Women’s March and post-election protests, with OSF grants being awarded to groups like MoveOn.org and the Centre for Popular Democracy, which organized confrontations with lawmakers. The Kavanaugh hearings also saw protesters, backed by OSF-funded entities, including the ACLU, which received a significant $50 million from OSF for anti-incarceration campaigns that dovetailed with broader disruption efforts, storm the Capitol. Furthermore, in 2020, amid the George Floyd protests, OSF pledged an additional $220 million to racial justice groups, including those tied to antifa-like tactics, although OSF denies direct funding of violence, the money flows to networks that enable it.

Soros’ army of ‘progressive prosecutors’ fuelling America’s urban collapse

Many of America’s major cities struggle with a blight that cannot be discussed without mentioning George Soros. He has funded numerous prosecutors nationwide. Through his Open Society Foundations and associated dark money PACs, Soros has invested tens of millions of dollars in the election campaigns of around 100 district attorneys over the last decade. By 2022, district attorneys backed by Soros represented half of the 50 most populous cities in the U.S., impacting about 72 million people. Rather than focusing on crime, many of these prosecutors have acted as Soros’ chosen instruments of political repression. For instance, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, supported by OSF, has charged Trump with 34 felony counts, a move seen as an attempt to undermine his 2024 presidential campaign.

Soros profits from engineered market volatility and crises

More recently, as highlighted by President Trump on August 27, 2025, Soros and his son Alex are accused of bankrolling violent protests against his administration’s crime crackdowns, with $20 million being funnelled to dark-money groups organizing anti-Trump actions in Washington, D.C. The chaos on college campuses is also linked to OSF, which has backed pro-Palestine groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, fueling anti-Israel protests at institutions like Columbia, which are essentially antisemitic dog-whistles designed to divide youth and erode American values. While fact-checkers like PolitiFact argue that these connections are indirect, the reality is that Soros’s money creates the infrastructure for unrest, and the results are undeniable: divided communities, weakened law enforcement, and significant economic losses for small businesses. From a financial perspective, this is not charity; it is a strategic investment in disorder, as Soros profits from market volatility, having previously made lucrative bets against currencies during times of crisis. By funding protests, Soros creates the instability that allows savvy investors to short stocks or currencies, ultimately benefiting from the turmoil.

Soros and OSF Exporting Chaos to Undermine Sovereignty

Open Society Foundation has its operations to over 120 countries, with a staggering $23 billion spent on “open society” initiatives, it’s a push for borderless globalism and regime change. In Europe, the OSF has been accused of deliberately destabilizing nations by pouring $500 million into refugee initiatives in 2016, which many believe encouraged a massive influx of migrants that put a strain on local economies and fueled a populist backlash. The Hungarian government, led by Viktor Orban, took a drastic step in 2018, banning the OSF and labelling it a threat to the country’s sovereignty after it was discovered that the organization was backing NGOs that promoted open borders. Russia had already taken similar action in 2015, designating the OSF as “undesirable” due to its perceived meddling in the country’s politics.

Soros’ abuse of migration as a weapon against nations

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has attributed the intense criticism he faces over his migration policies to the influence of billionaire George Soros. For Soros, it’s a globalist agenda to try to erase countries. Orban describes a direct and ongoing “open conflict” with Soros, specifically centered on the issue of migration. According to Orban, Soros, along with like-minded individuals, is secretly working to undermine his efforts, stating that “Soros and other guys like him try to operate under the radar.”

Orban Declared War on Soros Influence in Brussels

Viktor Orban earlier this year defied Brussels with a list of sweeping demands, seeking to purge the European Commission of agents linked to billionaire George Soros. The Hungarian Prime Minister was taking direct aim at corrupt lobbyists, determined to dismantle their influence over the European Parliament. As the EU teeters on the brink of a crisis, Orban sounded the alarm, warning that Europe must wrest control back from unelected globalist forces that are eroding national sovereignty. According to Orban, these forces are surreptitiously undermining the autonomy of nations, and his actions are exposing a deepening rift within the EU. While some member states are pushing for greater central control, others, like Orban, are fighting to preserve national powers. The debate over who truly governs Europe has reached a boiling point, with the EU’s very sovereignty hanging in the balance. Orban has long been a vocal critic of George Soros and his network of non-governmental organizations, which are being used to undermine Christian values, attack traditional family structures, and compromise national sovereignty – all under the guise of liberal democracy. By taking a firm stance, Orban is forcing the EU to confront the existential question: who will ultimately shape the future of Europe? Additionally, NATO’s expansion has unfolded in tandem with billionaire George Soros making substantial donations to the bloc, particularly in the context of the ongoing Ukraine crisis, with these two developments occurring almost simultaneously.

Colour revolutions” reveal a disturbing pattern with the OSF’s fingerprints

A closer look at the so-called “color revolutions” reveals a disturbing pattern, with the OSF’s fingerprints evident in many of these upheavals. In Ukraine, for instance, the OSF funded NGOs that sparked the chaos that ultimately led to Russia’s intervension in 2014. Similar scenarios have played out in Georgia, where the 2003 Rose Revolution was backed by OSF-funded groups, and in Belarus, where OSF-supported organizations have been instrumental in fomenting anti-government protests. The OSF has also been active in Latin America, where it has backed groups that are critical of conservative governments, such as in Brazil, where Soros-linked ads targeted opponents during the 2022 elections. More recently, Indian authorities raided OSF-linked offices in 2025, alleging that the organization was involved in money laundering aimed at destabilizing the government. While some fact checkers claim that there is no concrete evidence of direct orchestration by Soros, citing the OSF’s denials of funding violence and emphasizing its support for “peaceful advocacy,” a closer examination of the organization’s financial dealings reveals a more complex web of influence. As a seasoned finance expert, I can attest that indirect funding through layers of NGOs, such as the Tides Foundation or Color of Change, is a common tactic used to launder influence without leaving any fingerprints. The OSF’s lack of transparency in its grant-making, which has been rated zero stars for transparency, only serves to hide the full picture, making it difficult to discern the true extent of its involvement in these global upheavals.

Soros and OSF: A Globalist’s Assault on Freedom

Soros, a self-admitted “amoral” trader who collaborated with Nazis as a teen (a claim he downplays as survival), uses OSF to erode borders, economies, and cultures for a one-world order. It’s not philanthropy; it’s power consolidation. As anti-globalists, we see this as the real threat—billionaires buying unrest to remake society in their image. Trump’s call for RICO charges is spot-on; seize their assets and rebuild what they’ve broken.

Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe

Speaking during an interview with local media, Orbán criticized what he called the West’s “illusion” of a Ukrainian victory, urging European and NATO leaders to abandon what he described as a failed strategy rooted in confrontation. According to the Hungarian leader, peace not escalation should be the priority.

“No amount of Western weapons or money will reverse the inevitable outcome,” Orbán said. “This war cannot be won militarily. The only viable path is through negotiations.”

Orbán, one of Europe’s most vocal critics of EU and NATO policy toward the conflict, has frequently positioned Hungary as a dissenting voice. He called on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to “face reality” and pursue immediate peace talks with Moscow.

The Hungarian prime minister’s remarks come amid intensifying calls for a diplomatic resolution from some quarters, even as most Western governments continue to back Ukraine both militarily and financially. Orbán warned that prolonging the war would only deepen human suffering and destabilize Europe further.

“The longer this continues, the more blood is shed. The West should stop chasing illusions,” he added.

Hungary has maintained a complex position throughout the Russia-Ukraine war condemning the invasion in principle, but consistently refusing to send weapons or allow their transit across Hungarian territory. Orbán’s government has also opposed sweeping EU sanctions against Russia, arguing they harm European economies more than they pressure the Kremlin.

While his comments have drawn criticism from Ukrainian and European officials, they reflect Orbán’s broader foreign policy strategy one that seeks balance between East and West, while prioritizing Hungarian national interests.

As the war in Ukraine drags on with no end in sight, voices like Orbán’s are likely to keep stirring controversy within the European Union over how to respond to one of the continent’s most significant military crises in decades.

The Hungarian government reported that the results, published in June 2025, indicated that approximately 95% of surveyed citizens, representing around 29% of the country’s eligible electorate, opposed Ukraine’s accession to the EU.

Similar to the 2023 anti-sanctions referendum, the poll was conducted as a consultation rather than a binding referendum. Prime Minister Orbán stated to reporters at the EU summit in Brussels that, based on these results, he intends to continue vetoing the opening of any additional EU negotiation chapters with Ukraine.

LN International’s Mellisa Sithole, delves more on this special report.

On May 13, 2025, Fidesz tabled this bill to clamp down on foreign-funded organizations—NGOs, media, even private companies—that the government deems a threat to Hungary’s sovereignty. The idea? If you’re getting cash from abroad, especially to meddle in Hungarian politics, you’ve got to register with the Sovereignty Protection Office, get state approval before accepting funds, and have your leaders file public asset declarations. Non-compliance could mean fines up to 25 times the foreign funds received, frozen bank accounts, or even dissolution. Hungarian donors also face scrutiny, needing two witnesses to prove their money isn’t foreign-sourced.

This is about protecting national interests and economic independence

From a conservative finance angle, this is about protecting national interests and economic independence. Orbán’s government argues that foreign money—from USAID, the European Commission, or private donors like George Soros—has been flooding Hungary to sway elections and public opinion. They point to 2022, when millions in foreign funds allegedly backed opposition campaigns. A 98% approval rating in a national consultation shows Hungarians want their democracy free from external puppet strings. Think about it: if foreign entities can bankroll NGOs or media to push migration, gender ideology, or pro-war narratives, that’s not just a political issue—it’s a financial one. It distorts markets, undermines local businesses, and erodes trust in homegrown institutions.

Hungary’s version, though, is tougher, with broader definitions of “influencing public life” that include advocacy, lobbying, or even critical reporting. Critics scream it’s a copy of Russia’s foreign agent law, but let’s be real: the U.S. has been policing foreign influence since 1938. Why shouldn’t Hungary? Sovereignty isn’t just a buzzword—it’s about ensuring Budapest, not Brussels or Washington, controls Hungary’s economic and political destiny.

Now, the other side’s howling that this is “Operation Starve and Strangle,” designed to crush civil society and independent media. Over 320 NGOs, including Transparency International and Human Rights Watch, penned an open letter to the EU, claiming the bill violates free speech, association, and EU laws like the free movement of capital and GDPR. They’re not wrong about the legal risks—Hungary’s 2017 transparency law was struck down by the European Court of Justice in 2020 for similar reasons. The EU’s already threatening infringement proceedings and Article 7 sanctions, which could freeze Hungary’s EU funds. That’s a big deal for a country where EU grants fuel infrastructure and growth.

But let’s zoom out. Orbán’s playing a long game ahead of the 2026 elections. He’s betting that voters, skeptical of foreign meddling, will back Fidesz’s tough stance over EU threats. Polls show he’s got a fight on his hands, with opposition gaining traction. The bill’s delay to autumn suggests internal Fidesz debates about balancing sovereignty with economic stability. For conservative investors, this is a reminder: national pride and control come with risks. Hungary’s defiance might inspire other nations, but it could also isolate Budapest economically if the EU plays hardball. Far from restricting legitimate civic activity, the bill aims to restore transparency and accountability in the political process. Just as political parties are banned from receiving foreign funds under EU rules, non-party actors should be subject to scrutiny when their operations affect public decision-making. In today’s geopolitical climate, defending sovereignty is no longer a theoretical concern—it is a practical necessity. Hungary’s new legislation sets a precedent in protecting democratic institutions from external manipulation and reaffirms the nation’s right to self-governance.

Orban Declares War on Soros Influence in Brussels

Viktor Orban has challenged Brussels with a bold list of demands. The Hungarian Prime Minister wants to remove Soros-linked agents from the European Commission. He seeks to end the influence of corrupt lobbyists in the European Parliament. Orban also demands a stop to Ukraine’s quick path to EU membership. the EU faces a threat and Orban states that Europe must regain control from globalist forces not elected by the people. Orban says these forces undermine national sovereignty. His actions show a growing divide within the EU. Some members want more central control. Others, like Orban, seek to protect national powers. The debate over who governs Europe is now at a critical point because the EU losing its national sovereignty. Viktor Orban has long criticized George Soros and his dubious network of NGOs. The EU hurts national sovereignty, attack family values and undermines Christian heritage, all under liberal democracy’s banner. So Orban posted on X, calling for “a Union, but without Ukraine. Hungary opposes Ukraine joining the EU.

Budapest views Ukraine’s bid as a disaster. They foresee economic, security, and political problems. Brussels wants to spend billions in a “black hole.” They punish members that don’t agree with their ideas. Hungary refuses to conform. They won’t bow to pressure on issues they deem vital. This stance reflects Hungary’s broader resistance. They reject the EU’s perceived overreach. Orban’s government defends its national interests. They resist what they see as harmful policies. Hungary fears a loss of identity. Concerns exist about economic stability. They believe Ukraine’s membership poses too many risks. They insist on protecting their own values and security.

Brussels is in full-blown panic mode. Orban is not just challenging the EU’s policies; he’s attacking the very heart of the globalist power structure that runs the bloc. Soros-backed organizations have operated unchecked in Eastern Europe for decades, infiltrating education, media, and policymaking under the guise of “democracy promotion.” But Orban has refused to kneel. His call to purge Soros’ influence from EU institutions is more than just political posturing, it’s a declaration of war against the foreign-backed NGO industrial complex that thrives on eroding national identities. The EU’s real fear? Hungary’s defiance could inspire others. Slovakia’s Robert Fico and Poland’s nationalist forces are already taking notes. If Orban succeeds in weakening Brussels’ control, the entire EU power structure is at risk of crumbling. The bloc, already struggling with an identity crisis, is now faced with a member state openly advocating for an alternative path, one that prioritizes national sovereignty over the dictates of unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and their billionaire financiers.

The battle lines are drawn. Will Brussels crush Hungary with legal and financial warfare? Or will Orban’s defiance spark a populist revolt against the EU’s imperial overreach? The next few months will determine whether Europe remains shackled to globalist rule or begins its glacial-speed march toward true sovereignty. Now the globalists repeat the same lie. History is turning. The future belongs to patriots and sovereign nations, not to globalist empires.

Written by Tatenda Belle Panashe

Groundbreaking Tax Benefits for Mothers

Under the new family support measures, mothers with one child will be exempt from paying income tax until the age of thirty. Additionally, mothers with two or more children will benefit from a lifetime tax exemption. These unprecedented tax incentives are part of Orbán’s broader strategy to reverse Hungary’s declining birth rate, which has raised concerns about the country’s long-term population growth and economic sustainability.

Orbán, who has long advocated for policies that support families, emphasized that the initiative represents a major shift in Hungary’s approach to economic development and demographic renewal. The goal is to foster an environment where families are encouraged to have more children, thereby bolstering Hungary’s future workforce and ensuring the long-term stability of its social services.

A Comprehensive Strategy to Support Families

The family-centered economy is not just about tax breaks but also includes other measures designed to support families financially and socially. Orbán’s government has also rolled out various initiatives, including subsidies for home purchases and child care, as well as improved access to healthcare for families. These policies are intended to provide comprehensive support for parents, particularly mothers, to help alleviate the financial pressures of raising children.

The measures come at a time when Hungary, like many other European countries, is facing demographic challenges related to an aging population and low birth rates. By prioritizing family support, Orbán’s government hopes to reverse these trends and ensure a thriving future for Hungary.

A Bold Step in Hungary’s Demographic Policy

Orbán’s move to create a family-centered economy is seen as a bold step in addressing the country’s demographic challenges. While some critics have raised concerns about the sustainability of such policies in the long term, supporters argue that the tax breaks and family incentives are crucial in tackling Hungary’s low birth rate and encouraging families to grow.

The new initiative has already drawn international attention, with many seeing it as a model for other countries grappling with similar demographic issues. However, the success of the policy will depend on its ability to produce tangible results, such as higher birth rates and an improved standard of living for Hungarian families.

Conclusion: A Historic Moment for Hungary

Viktor Orbán’s government has taken a historic step by implementing policies that put families at the center of Hungary’s economic strategy. As the country seeks to address its demographic challenges, the bold tax measures and family support initiatives are poised to shape the future of Hungary’s society. While it remains to be seen how effective these measures will be in the long term, they represent a significant shift toward a family-focused economic model that could have a lasting impact on Hungary’s demographic landscape.