It’s easy to dismiss a number of protest actions, movements and coups that take place in various countries as organic developments of responses to a government that people are frustrated with. But, when we begin to investigate the nuances in a number of developments around the world, it quickly becomes obvious that there are diabolical actors behind the scene who are driving those respective developments. And so, having observed the recent protests in the US, the coup in various governments, and even the failed effort at what was supposed to be nation-wide destruction in nations such as Nigeria and Zimbabwe, we then ought to address further the diabolical entities behind protests, so-called movements and coups.
THE CIA HAS A DOCUMENTED HISTORY OF SPONSORING REGIME CHANGE
And now onto our main discussion regarding the diabolical entities behind protests, so-called movements and coups; and while I believe that not many have fully appreciated how many protests, movements and coups were either sponsored or hijacked by diabolical actors, I do, however, believe that many of us are now aware of the how involved the CIA (in particular) has been in regime change and political disruption in various nations, especially through USAID. And so, it’s only right that we first address the most obvious actor behind a number of the protest actions, movements and coups – being the CIA.
And in essence, the CIA has a long and concerning history of regime change through orchestrated protest and coups. You’d recall our discussion on Nicaragua. A USAID document laid out a blueprint for regime change in Nicaragua. The document detailed information on the 2018 protests in Nicaragua as well as similar operations in other countries targeted by the US, such as Venezuela.
In particular, a report by the Council on Hemispheric Affairs revealed a guide to regime change in Nicaragua by USAID. The document, which dates to March-April of 2020, describes in frank terms how the agency, which maintains close ties with the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), could create or exploit a variety of scenarios to remove then democratically-elected Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega and his FSLN party from power in or around the 2021 elections, which were upcoming at the time. It is said that many of the tactics outlined in the USAID document can be observed in the demonstrations that rocked Nicaragua in the summer of 2018.
But on the document itself, and how it inspired the coup, it was, essentially, a contract hiring coup plotters – a ‘coup-plotters for hire’-type contract. And it’s really astounding how the whole document is based on the premise that Americans can impose a better version of democracy for the Nicaraguan people. It talks about a crisis and a transition, and all of that is code-speak for basically bringing about a coup. [PAUSE] All of this is evidence to the fact that USAID is a CIA front, a tool of regime change – typically for the CIA and the State Department.
THE CIA WAS ALSO BEHIND THE COUP IN IRAN
Of course, it did not end or begin with Nicaragua – the CIA was also heavily involved in a coup in Iran. The 1953 coup in Iran, known as Operation Ajax, was a pivotal event in the history of Iran and its relationship with the Western world. This covert operation, orchestrated by the United States and the United Kingdom, successfully overthrew the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and reinstated Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi as Iran’s leader. The operation was also driven by the strategic interests of the US and UK, particularly due to Iran’s vast oil reserves and its geopolitical importance during the Cold War.
Before the coup, Mosaddegh was a popular figure in Iran, known for his nationalist policies and his decision to nationalize the country’s oil industry, which had been under British control through the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Expectedly, this move was seen as a threat to Western interests, prompting the CIA and MI6 to plan and execute the coup. The operation was complex, involving CIA-funded agents, propaganda, and the harassment of political and religious leaders.
But, despite challenges, including the shah’s hesitation to sign the royal decrees prepared by the CIA, the coup took place and even had far-reaching consequences for Iran and its relationship with the West. The shah’s return to power marked the beginning of increased Western influence in Iran, but it also sowed the seeds for what is called the Islamic Revolution of 1979, which ultimately overthrew the shah and established the Islamic Republic. Today, the 1953 coup is seen as a significant event that influences Iran’s political landscape and its relations with the West.
THE CIA IS CRIMINAL ORGANISATION – BOTH INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY
Well, Iran was perhaps a tip of the CIA meddling iceberg. This is especially because at the time that the coup was executed, the CIA’s hand in the coup was regarded as a success of Cold War espionage. Furthermore, this also led the CIA into a series of further coups in other countries, including Guatemala, where American clandestine action in 1954 installed a military dictator and sparked a 40-year civil war that likely killed some 245,000 people.
The problem that must be highlighted in these examples is not only the fact that the CIA committed these disruptive actions, but also how fundamentally undemocratic they are, in the sense that they undermined the will of the people in those respective nations, while superimposing the interest of the US where it otherwise has no legitimate jurisdiction. No matter its intentions, the CIA does not have sanction to lord it over the domestic politics of any nation – especially to the extent that it makes the people of those nations a casualty of its pursued interests. But, literally, from its inception the CIA operated to undermine the will of the people in a respective nation, OR to superimpose the interests of the US on other sovereign nations.
Meanwhile, (and this is the other problem with the CIA’s involvement in regime change)… the actions taken by the CIA did not always reflect US policy! The CIA has often operated as a rogue organisation, with a history of corruption, engaging in illegal activities, secret projects and operations that are without a doubt crimes against humanity, and even acts of terrorism against the people it claims to protect. And it did not start with MKUltra. The CIA is culpable in coups and regime change even in the US! Tucker Carlson explained how the FBI and CIA conducted a coup to take out President Richard Nixon with help from journalist Bob Woodward.
Ultimately, this is why DOGE exposing USAID as a CIA terrorism-sponsoring front has been such a crucial discussion point for many! But, perhaps an apt case study that depicts the workings of the CIA as a criminal organisation is the proxy war in Ukraine.
GEORGE SOROS-FUNDED ‘INDIVISIBLE’ CONCEDES TO SPONSORING PROTESTS AGAINST TRUMP
Now, another person with CIA-like ambitions of disrupting nations is George Soros. George Soros is behind a lot of socio-political instability and moral rot through the organisations he funds. For instance, we recently saw an organised wave of protests against president Trump in the US. Considering that they were organised, there was certainly nothing organic about these protests. However, when following the money, it becomes even more but even more revealing that this was bought-and-paid for domestic terrorism, funded by oligarchs. In fact, the Soros-funded organisation called ‘Indivisible’ is openly admitting they are behind the 1300 paid protests that took place in all 50 states. And it’s not just them, there is also MoveOn, Third Act and others, here’s more.
Now, people are certainly welcome to protest what they do not agree with in their government. However, with everyone who dares to make a public contribution to political discourse – be it through protest or even media, there is a categorical imperative to be well informed about the issues you are making a contribution in. For instance, Rachel Maddow and the gentleman from Indivisible referenced the tariffs from president Trump as among the issues that fueled the protests.
The tariffs were reciprocal tariffs that were imposed on nations that ALREADY had tariffs on US products. This, therefore, means that US producers were already at a disadvantage because their products were being sold in foreign markets at a higher price, while exports were cheap when they entered the American market. And so, this was clearly a measure aimed at putting AMerican producers and businesses first – it was a means of encouraging American trade partners to consider removing the tariffs that they already had on American goods.
The disapproval from other leaders and the gifts in the stock market were merely a consequence of the dissatisfaction of foreign leaders (which is inevitable), but nevertheless did put American producers and businesses first. And so, it seems ridiculous to use the tariffs as a means of justifying the protests, considering that they are doing to American trade partners what those trade partners have been doing to American producers and businesses – all with the intent to eventually encourage discussions on eventually removing or decreasing the tariffs, like we’re seeing number of countries and trade blocs plan to do. In any case, the sponsorship of these protests ironically proves they were not organic.
HEZBOLLAH ALSO FUNDED STUDENT PROTESTS IN THE U.S. AND THE E.U.
Actually, when we look at seemingly inorganic, ill-conceived and misguided protests – all these seem to be indicators of a sponsored protest. In fact, the same can be said about the anti-Israel and pro-Hamas protest by students. There is very little reasoning that can justify supporting a terrorist organisation that brutally murders people as a part of its modus operandi, while terrorising its own people. And yet, we saw students chanting from the river to the sea, without even understanding what that meant, while simultaneously rallying behind a terrorist organisation. Here’s a Hezbollah official admitting that the terror group is funding student protests in the US and EU.
GEORGE SOROS BUILT HIS PROFITS ON DESTABILISING NATIONS
In fact, people like Soros, who fund these inorganic protests, are notorious for such actions. Soros in particular has long been engaged in destabilising nations through his funds – in fact, this is how he built his profits. Notable in his track record is his role in the 1992 currency crisis that forced the British government to withdraw from the European exchange rate mechanism (ERM) and devalue its currency, the pound sterling. This event, which occurred on Sept. 16, 1992, is known as Black Wednesday, and it earned Soros the nickname of “the man who broke the Bank of England.”
The European exchange rate mechanism, or ERM, was a monetary system established in 1979 to stabilise the exchange rates of the European currencies and prepare them for the eventual adoption of a common currency, the euro. The European Commission. The ERM also fixed the exchange rates of the participating currencies to the German mark, which was the strongest and most stable currency in Europe at the time. Now, the ERM allowed for some fluctuations within a certain range, but if a currency reached its upper or lower limit, the central bank of that country had to intervene in the market to keep it within the band. Now, Britain initially declined to join the ERM when it was created, preferring to keep its monetary policy independent and flexible. However, in 1990, under the leadership of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, the U.K. decided to join the ERM as part of its commitment to the European integration process. Britain hoped that by joining the ERM, it would benefit from lower interest rates, lower inflation, and a stronger currency.
BUT, Soros bet against the pound in 1992 because he believed that Britain’s position in the ERM was unsustainable and that it would eventually have to devalue its currency or leave the system. He used his Quantum Fund to sell billions of pounds and buy other currencies, creating a huge demand for other currencies and a sizable supply of pounds, which lowered the value of the pound in the market. George Soros became very wealthy, but also infamous for his role on Black Wednesday. He was also criticised as a greedy and ruthless speculator who exploited the weaknesses of the system and caused harm to millions of people. He also was accused of having a political agenda behind his actions, as he was a vocal supporter of European integration and a critic of Britain’s reluctance to join the euro.
THE LGBT “MOVEMENT” IS ANOTHER SOROS-BACKED MAFIA
But, it is not only coups and protests that are used by the CIA and the likes of George Soros – so-called movements, which are often presented as being based on a plausible collective rallying point, are often coordinated mafias, who infiltrate various aspects of government and society. A notable example in the status quo is how a number of LGBT organisations are funded by George Soros entities, as we have previously discussed. He is among people who essentially have a vested interest in the gentital mutilation of (especially) the younger demographic and the promulgation of ideals that contradict the family structure that allows for the proliferation of humans of the earth.
Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso
