The Significance of the Resignation of Klaus Schwab

The Significance of the Resignation of Klaus Schwab

Earlier in the month of April, we discussed the announcement from Klaus Schwab communicating his intention to transition from his role as executive chairman of the WEF to a non-executive position by 2027. That announcement had also followed one made in 2024, in which he communicated that he would be stepping back from his role of running the global gathering of weak leaders since he founded it in 1971. Well, now, Klaus Schab has announced his immediate resignation, and we ought to address this further in light of the significance of his resignation.

The Significance of the Resignation of Klaus Schwab

Earlier in the month of April, we discussed the announcement from Klaus Schwab communicating his intention to transition from his role as executive chairman of the WEF to a non-executive position by 2027. That announcement had also followed one made in 2024, in which he communicated that he would be stepping back from his role of running the global gathering of weak leaders since he founded it in 1971. Well, now, Klaus Schab has announced his immediate resignation, and we ought to address this further in light of the significance of his resignation.

PETE HEGSETH BLASTS MAINSTREAM MEDIA FOR PUBLISHING FAKE NEWS

United States Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, has blast mainstream media for publishing fake news. This comes after several media outlets announced made claims that the U.S president is considering firing Pete Hegseth over the signal chat rumors.

MK PARTY ACCUSE KLEINFONTEIN OF TRYING TO CREATE ANOTHER WHITE AFRIKANER ENCLAVE LIKE ORANIA

The Umkhonto Wesizwe (MK) Party visited the illegal white Afrikaans-only settlement of Kleinfontein in a fact-finding mission. The Party believes the community of Kleinfontein is trying to create another white Afrikaner enclave like Orania. Furthermore, in 2024, the Pretoria High Court declared the settlement of Kleinfontein as illegal due to City of Tshwane municipality zoning regulations.

TRIBUTES POUR IN AFTER POPE FRANCIS PASSED ON

Tributes pour after Pope Francis passed on yesterday at the age of 88.  Israeli President Isaac Herzog offered his condolences on the loss of Pope Francis. Herzog called Francis “a man of deep faith and boundless compassion,” and praised his dedication to the poor and to the cause of peace.

And now onto our main discussion, and as we have established, Klaus Schab has announced his immediate resignation, and we ought to address the significance of this development. First and foremost, the significance of this development is rooted in its being an inherent necessity. The WEF, which is the brainchild of Klaus Schwab, had a number of principled and practical errors that made its existence as a platform that served to consolidate Klaus Schwab’s vision intrinsically detrimental; and we can highlight this on numerous fronts.

First, the WED was an elitist cabal structure, lacking a people-centric approach. It was often criticised for being a “club” of global elites, with limited participation for voices outside of big governments, corporations, and civil society actors who often financed lobby initiates. And this lack of representation in approach to global politics meant that the WEF’s decisions did NOT reflect the best interests of the global population. Furthermore, the WEF’s “multi-stakeholder” approach can sideline governments and empower unelected actors, further undermining democratic processes. More specifically, while the multilateral system is rightly accused of being ineffective, too bureaucratic and skewed towards the most powerful nations, it is at least theoretically democratic because it brings together democratically elected leaders of countries to make decisions in the global arena, based on the mandate they receive from their citizens. But, instead of reforming the multilateral system to deepen democracy, the WEF’s vision of multi-stakeholder governance entails further removing democracy by sidelining governments and putting unelected ‘stakeholders’ – mainly corporations – in their place when it comes to global decision-making. ANd so, put bluntly, multi-stakeholder partnerships are public-private partnerships on the global stage. Which should be a concern, because private-public partnerships are a liability to citizens.

The second reason highlighting the significance of Klaus Schwab’s resignation is based on the ‘Great Reset’ agenda he communicated. The WEF’s “Great Reset” agenda, which advocates for a transformation of the global economy, is actually a push for a dystopian future where people own nothing and are happy – as proclaimed by Schwab himself. It is in principle and practically a terrible culmination of socialist and communist doctrines.

More specifically, the plan from which the Great Reset originated was called the Global Redesign Initiative. Drafted by the WEF after the 2008 economic crisis, the initiative contains a 600-page report on transforming global governance. The great reset finds its inspiration from marxism and communist ideals

According to Karl Marx, human rights create an order for granting more privileges to a specific class (specifically the bourgeoisie) to the disadvantage of those who are oppressed (being the proletariat) in the society. Furthermore, rights are contextualised in Marxism by the logic of socialist development rather than capitalism. This attitude towards problematising individual rights in part explains why many communist is not all communist governments – especially in the past – are responsible for gross human rights violations, including the death of many.

And yet, the WEF has adopted this inclination to problematising individual rights like the freedom to speak freely and even to own property, while advocating for a system where people are robbed of private property, while the WEF determined what people need and how it is

Then, thirdly, some argue that the WEF is influenced by corporate interests and may prioritise corporate agendas over the needs of the public and the environment.

There are also concerns about the WEF’s role in promoting institutional whitewashing initiatives, which could shield corporations from accountability and harm. Additionally, there are concerns about the WEF’s lack of financial transparency and the unclear decision processes and membership criteria. Here’s more.

THE WEF’S UNDERMINING OF SOVEREIGNTY THROUGH THE PENETRATION OF CABINETS

In addition to all of this, the WEF has prided itself on the penetration of government cabinets. In fact Klaus Schwab himself is on record for making this statement.

Well, what is also worthwhile to note is that this capturing of government cabinets was not through a mere propagation of the WEF’s ideals. This was often done through the manipulation of election processes in nations as well. For instance, On one of our programmes here on LN24 International, called ‘Starting Point’, we addressed how that in 1996, long before the unelected globalists were vainly predicting a future where people would own nothing and be happy, they were working on ways to get the unpopular then-Russian president Boris Yeltsin re-elected for a second term. This was not an easy feat considering, in the early months of ‘96, Yeltsin’s popularity had plummeted to the extent that he was ranked fifth among Russian presidential candidates, receiving a mere 8 percent of support. Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) leader Gennady Zyuganov was ahead in the race with 21 percent of support.

He was the odds-on favourite to replace Yeltsin. That didn’t sit well with the Davos-dwelling so-called elites. Although Zyuganov promised to eliminate corruption and enhance conditions for foreign investment, the WEF wasn’t convinced. Moreover, at the annual meeting, the Russian delegation – especially the business leaders – expressed growing apprehension regarding Zyuganov’s rising popularity and the potential triumph of the Communist party. In response, the delegation and WEF heavyweights colluded, throwing full support behind Yeltsin’s campaign by leveraging their financial influence. This informal agreement among them became famously known as the “Davos Pact”. Well, Yeltsin was re-elected in July of 1996. This meant that communism was defeated – but at the cost of Russian sovereignty and electoral integrity.

All of this is to say, there were numerous reasons – both on principle and practical considerations – for why the resignation of Klaus Scwab, as the person who birthed the diabolical WEF, is significant. Subsequently, we then ought to look at additional nuances that emphasise the role of prophecy in the demise of the WEF, especially in light of the issues we’ve recently highlighted.

THE WEF’S GATHERINGS WERE NEVER FOR STRONG LEADERS

Firstly, some years ago now, the WEF was proclaimed through prophecy to be a gathering of weak men. God’s prophet to the nations, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD. declared that strong leads do not attend the WEF’s meetings. Let’s kindly revisit that moment.

Well, this prophecy was fulfilled. We saw its fulfilment, first, when critics of the WEF and alternative media went to Davos not to share in their ideologies and focuses, but rather to question, probe and even to undermine the efforts of the WEF at building concessions on its issues of focus. First, we saw this when Argentine president, Javier Milei, challenged the WEF’s socialist inclinations in 2024; and even the ideas of wokeism in 2025.

Another manifestation of the fulfilment of this prophecy was when conservative think tanks were challenging the underlying assumptions and misguided narratives communicated at the WEF, during their panel discussions. For instance, we saw Kenvin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation, when he pushed back of the audacity of members of the Davos elite to attempt to sway what were then upcoming presidential elections in the US.

But, perhaps best of all was when God’s choice for the US presidency and His sign in the end-times, actually DID NOT attend the WEF in person, but delivered a strong message, directly opposing the agenda and focus of the WEF. You’d recall that the same Trump that the WEF had worked hard to prevent from entering into office for a second term spoke to the Davos elite this year.

Why this address was interesting is because of the notable fact that the WEF’s agenda is diametrically opposed to leaders and nations who protect their sovereignty and prioritise the wellbeing of their respective nations. You’d recall that dispossession and disenfranchisement are at the top of their modus operandi, towards the futile and vain plan for a great reset. On the other hand, Trump prioritises making America a strong, wealthy and secure nation through his America first agenda. For instance, president Trump is taking bold action to secure the US border and protect American communities; which includes ending Biden’s catch-and-release policies, reinstating Remain in Mexico, building the wall, ending asylum for illegal border crossers, cracking down on criminal sanctuaries, and enhancing vetting and screening of aliens. In addition, president Trump’s energy policies will end leasing to massive wind farms that degrade our natural landscapes and fail to serve American energy consumers; AND in his direction, the State Department will also have an America-First foreign policy – just to name a few.

Trump knew his victory of the unelected officials over at the WEF as well. You’d recall that he delivered a fiery message directly to the so-called elites at the World Economic Forum. First, he detailed the issues in the US, resulting from the Biden administration which was friendly with the WEF. he then announced an end and utter disregard for the WEF’s favoured endeavours. For instance, he spoke of freezing foreign aid; dismantling climate policies like the “Green New Deal”; withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord; ending the EV mandate; and fast-tracking fossil fuels to put America first. It was really a slap on the face from a man whose influence they thought they could stifle, and hinder from coming into office.

SCHWAB’S INTERIM REPLACEMENT IS FORMER NESTLE CEO, PETER BRABECK-LETMATHE

Well, in light of all of this which contextualises the significance of Klaus Scwab’s resignation, but also the additional nuances on why prophecy made this inevitable, we then ought to discuss what the WEF has announced as the succession plan. And interestingly, former Nestle Chairman and CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe was unanimously selected as interim chairman by the forum’s board at a special meeting on the 20th of April. Meanwhile, a search committee has been set up to choose a permanent successor.

So, who is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe? In short, and much like the president of the WEF, being Børge Brende, he is not very different from Klaus Schwab. More specifically, and especially during his time with Nestle, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe became notorious for his elitist profit over people approach, particularly, when he declared that water was not a human right.

PETER BRABECK-LETMATHE FITS THE WEF’S PLANS ON RESTRICTING WATER ACCESS

But, it should surprise no one that in denouncing water as a human right, which makes Peter the ideal person to champion the WEF and UN Agenda 2030 aspiration on taxing natural resources. In fact, it has been an idea echoes in the WEF that all nature that is easy to quantify should be charged, beginning by adding tax to water”

In previous discussions, we’ve highlighted the role of prophecy in the demise of the WEF, first in consideration of the spiritual truth that 225 is the year of Completeness, bringing with it the suspension of all satanic and globalist agendas; but also in light of the numerous prophecies that have come out throughout the years concerning the demise of the WEF. What we are seeing today is continuous proof that God’s Word does not fall to the ground. And indeed, the prophecies that have gone forth had long announced the demise of the WEF.

Written By Lindokuhle Mabaso

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *