We are still looking at the corruption of the UN, especially the Un under Antonio Gueterres. Well, what has emerged thus far is that even before the likes of Antonio Gueterres came to the scene, there already organisations with diabolical aspirations towards a one world government, new world order, and depopulation agenda, who influenced the UN to serve as a conduit of their objectives, thus driving the UN away from its intended purpose of peace. We discussed the influence of the WEF, the Committee of 300 and even the Club of Rome, along with the Tavistock Institute. And so with the contextual background of organisation influencing the UN established, we then ought to proceed to address the corrupt outcomes (seen even in history) that have resulted – and let’s start with how this corruption has manifested in the WHO.
The WHO is the poster child of corruption in a number of global organisations, but in particular, the gross corruption in the arms of the United Nations. However, as jarring as it is, it is also not contextually surprising at all! This organisation, as we’ve discussed previously, was established to serve as a driver of bacteriological warfare, seen by the fact that the first ever director general of the WHO (being Dr Brock Chisolm) was an advocate of bacteriological warfare. More specifically, he served as the DG of the WHO from 1948 to 1953; and as the first DG, he obviously contributed significantly to the philosophy of the WHO. In his advocacy for bacteriological warfare, Dr Brock Chisholm told a meeting of teachers in Toronto in 1947, “that bacteriological warfare promotes any little group of people or any little nation to a degree of proficiency in offensive warfare which makes it a competitor of any of the greater nations.” he added that “It is obsolete now to gauge a nation’s war strength by its capacity to produce aluminium, guns, tanks and so on.” And so, as far as he was concerned, the ability to weaponise biology was the ultimate means of measuring the strength of an entity or nation.
It is important to note that Dr Chisholm made these remarks in 1947, which was before he was appointed as the first DG of the WHO in 1948 – and so clearly, his philosophy was seen as plausible to enshrine into the fabric of an organisation that would be responsible for world health.
But, the corruption we see in the history of the WHO is certainly a concern even now. And so, let’s engage the testimony of an inside employee of the World Health Organization – Dr Astrid Stuckelberger – who exposed the corruption and blackmail that exists in the WHO in order to control scientists, doctors and politicians around the world. She not only addresses how the international health Regulations of the WHO are a tool of infringing on and eroding human rights; but also the financial corruption that in part drove the COVID plandemic.
This testimony from Dr Astrid Stuckelberger is not revealing of corruption that stayed in the past; she is not merely speaking of a checkered history of the WHO. These issues of the control of scientists, doctors and politicians around the world are manifest eve in the status quo. We, as LN24 International, has the opportunity to speak to the Minister of health in South africa regarding the workings of the WHO, including the fact that the present DG – Tedros Ghebreyasus – is a corrupt figure and a known terrorist, and the direction of that discussion reveals two concerning outcomes: (1) either minister of health and others leaders of nations are not aware of the corruption and ills of the WHO, or (2) they are aware and feel compelled to defend what they know because (as revealed by Dr Astrid Stuckelberger) they are part of those who are controlled by the establishment that runs the agenda of the WHO.
To assume there to be sincerity behind the existence of the WHO has never been more dangerous, but also has never been more difficult to do based on what we now know. The WHO is a bureaucracy, and not a body of experts. Even recruitment is based on various factors, including technical competency but also country and other equity-related quotas. These quotas serve a purpose of reducing the power of specific countries to dominate the organisation with their own staff, but in doing so require the recruitment of staff who may have far lower experience or expertise. Recruitment is also heavily influenced by internal WHO personnel, and the usual personal influences that come with working and needing favours within countries. Furthermore, the DG and Regional Directors (or RDs – of which there are six) are elected by member states in a process subject to heavy political and diplomatic manoeuvring – and the result is likely not plausible.
And so, not only is it a mere bureaucratic organisation that is as susceptible to corruption and ruin as the rest of such entities, but it is also dangerously being used for the depopulation agendas that we discussed – especially in light of the Club of Rome’s influence on the UN. So, there is a categorical imperative to ensure that your country is extricated from this organisation.
